Touching and spreading open her sister’s vagina is more than just ‘looking at it to see what it looked like’. She could have done that to herself, and didn’t have to make her sister part of her ‘games’…
“One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked.
My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”
My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just got on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success.”
 May 22, 2015 at 2:30am
Of course when Lena Dunham wrote about feeling up her sister, many on the left came to her defense, basically treating gher as a feminist/lesbian goddess… Double standard much?
Of course to be fair, there were critics on right and left both who called her out on it. One has to give them credit for speaking out against her childhood depravity.
May 16, 2015 at 4:33am
Those violations would be thrown out in court, thanks to 1st Amendment. See Texas vs. Johnson, and US vs Eichmann.
Flag protocol is a product of the Progressives…. Long before the progressivs came along, people wore flag and patriotic clothing all the time. During elections, Indepence day, etc.
It is part of Progressive way to restrict people’s free speech.
Part of the Berne Convention makes copyright automatic. One doesn’t have to file as long as they are the original designer, it is automatically copyrighted. They just have to prove they are the original designers.
May 16, 2015 at 4:17am
It’s part of the Berne Convention, that copyrights are automatic. It protects the ‘little guy’.
May 16, 2015 at 4:16am
Actually copyright is automatic under the Berne Convention, look it up.
May 16, 2015 at 4:15am
Actually copyright is automatic under the Berne Convention.
May 16, 2015 at 4:13am
Grima Wormtongue, actually ever since the Berne Convention, copyright is ‘automatic’.
 May 16, 2015 at 4:12am
Actually ever since the Berne Convention, copyright is automatic.
May 5, 2015 at 7:41am
It may not be pharmaceuticals, not everyone uses a lot of pharmaceuticals. We are exposed to a lot of sources of electronic and other forms of radiation in our technologically enhanced world… that simply wasn’t an issue twenty to 50 years ago. Who knows how much are minds are microwaved in a given day.
But I’m not one for endorsing eco-fascist Luddite/population control methods like the liberals are, and I happen to like my technology.
BTW, for any idiots who think Tin Foil hat will help you, unless you actually have a Farraday Cage, Tin Foil can actually enhance the effects of electromagnetic radiation we are exposed to…
 May 5, 2015 at 5:04am
RRF Flyer I agree with you until you got to the flag… If you don’t understand 1st Amendment right to desecrate the flag you don’t understand the Bill of Rights at all. Instead you want a more collectivist fascist society. Our free speech is not to protect speech we agree with but even the most provocative forms of speech.
Which applies to actors/reinactors portraying members of the armed forces in a play/theatre/reinactment.
 May 4, 2015 at 4:07pm
“What violence? I didn’t see any violence in that video. All he did was tear a piece of cloth that was being used to deceive people by a man impersonating a military officer. Pretending to be somebody from the military, law enforcement, or government is a federal crime.”
Technically just touching someone else, if they don’t want to be touched can be viewed as ‘assault’. Someone got into the space of another individual. It can refer to any unwanted touching.
In fact if someone was a police officer they might be trained to take action against anyone who ‘touches’ them. It might even be lethal in some situations.
Cavallo not sure what the current situation is and rules with regards to military uniforms exactly, but it might still be illegal by federal law to wear an ‘accurate’ military uniform. Seen as ‘impersonation’.
Although Military re-inactors or actors portraying soldiers (for movies or tv) are protected IIRC.
Although, the guy should have just reported the other guy if he was breaking the law, rather than directly accosting him. He might get in trouble for that if the other guy presses charges.