User Profile: UnGreen


Member Since: April 17, 2011


  • May 6, 2014 at 11:00am

    Pete, I think you have this all wrong.
    You wrote: “White House actively tried to downplay intelligence showing that terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, and that it was not a response to an anti-Muslim video.”
    That is not what the Select Committee will be investigating. They will be investigating a cover-up, perjury, contempt of congress, i.e. Not providing requesting documents and gun running and providing aid and assistance to our known enemies, the Terrorist: al-Qaeda and Ansar al-Sharia.
    This article seems to miss the big picture and instead makes everything look political.

  • April 21, 2014 at 11:35am

    I’m confused; Pictures one and three show his injury on the right side, However, picture two shows the injury on the left side.

  • April 17, 2014 at 10:05pm

    Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. would have invited the criminals in, according to Becks non-violent view. To put this in perspective, Armed Rebellion. Without it, we would not be the United States of America. I think Glen’s response is that this is nothing compared to the British and violence is not called for. I believe it is going to happen in spite of Glen’s view.
    Let the criminals In Glen!

  • October 1, 2013 at 12:15pm

    Fellow Americans doing what true American’s do. “Don’t Tread on Me”.

  • April 18, 2013 at 12:06am

    I just can’t tell, is this guy a dark skin or white guy?

  • April 17, 2013 at 9:09pm

    Actually MDLWOODS is correct. There is a common understanding of the term “arms”, and if you look up the word bear, you can see what MDLWOODS is proposing. I would like to see you bear a tank. His point is well taken. What is it about “MAY NOT INFRINGE” that you and those like you don’t understand? I’m retired Riverside County Deputy Sheriff. What is presented by this police department is “tyranny” . There was no threat as the officer had more than sufficient back-up. Grabbing the gun was a mistake. If the officers were smart they would have backed off and apologized. Ego and an attitude of misplaced authority won out. Shameful and rare conduct. Also, what took place prior to the video is moot in my opinion. There is sufficient cause to support what I have said. I suspect this attitude is inherent in this department based on the presence of a supervisor (Sargent) and the response to the Blaze when asked about this incident.

  • February 4, 2013 at 10:06am

    I have to wonder where you would have stood during the American Revolution. Our government is no less tyrannical than the British. I believe the tipping point will come when Obama takes it on himself, via presidential decree (Executive Order), to violate the 2nd Amendment.

  • November 26, 2012 at 9:16am

    How many kids go to the ER for bicycle accidents, running, hockey, foot ball, base ball, playing hide and go seek, climbing trees, wrestling, horsing around, sword fighting with Star Wars light sabers, shooting with slingshots, BB guns (you will shoot your eye out), pellet guns, blow guns, bow and arrows, potatoe guns, slip an slides, roller skating, ice skating, skate boarding, any type of hunting and/or camping…… You get my point. The government is striving to control anything and everything!


    Responses (1) +
  • November 24, 2012 at 5:00pm

    “We need to kick Puerto Rico out of America. They have chronic poverty, failing schools and soaring violent crime rates. They’re a 3rd world country. ”

    Sounds like you are talking about Obama’s America.
    Chicago – NYC – Detroit – LA – Cleveland – Atlanta. In the next four years, I’m sure this list will grow.

  • November 24, 2012 at 4:54pm

    Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.

  • November 1, 2012 at 3:59pm

    Maybe ambassadorship to Benghazi!

  • November 1, 2012 at 3:55pm

    I disagree! I think Romney should offer this dork an ambassadorship in Benghazi.

  • October 21, 2012 at 11:49pm

    Exactly what is it about 15 minutes does she not understand?

  • October 9, 2012 at 5:14pm

    Big Bird? What is with the Blaze? Drudge doesn’t run it so the Blaze follows the leader? I’m referring to the foreign donations.

  • October 9, 2012 at 11:35am

    Big Bird? I really think Obama’s accepting foreign donations is a little more important than a bird!

  • October 5, 2012 at 6:01pm

    The premise of this article is that “AGW” exist. AGW is an unproven “Theory” that has been the subject of numerous incidents of scientific fraud. With regards to EV’s and those of you driving the Prius; I would suggest you look up the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 4, 2012 at 7:28pm

    I wonder if all these dead voters are from different states or what? Another question that comes to mind, can a dead voter be registered in two different states? I mean, if he is dead, can he be in violation of voting laws? Boy these union guys really know how to stump you! Tricky, very tricky!

  • October 4, 2012 at 4:52pm

    Gold Chloride is a salt of gold. The bacteria is simply digesting the chloride. This is not world shaking. There have been microbes that consume ferric chloride.

    Responses (3) +
  • October 4, 2012 at 2:36pm

    Florida Defamation Law

    Note: This page covers information specific to Florida. For general information concerning defamation, see the Defamation Law section of this guide.

    Elements of Defamation

    Under Florida law, the elements of a defamation claim are:

    the defendant published a false statement;
    about the plaintiff;
    to a third party; and
    the falsity of the statement caused injury to the plaintiff.
    Border Collie Rescue v. Ryan, 418 F.Supp.2d 1330, 1348 (M.D.Fla. 2006). A plaintiff must also prove that the defendant’s fault in publishing the statement amounted to at least negligence. The elements of a defamation claim in Florida are similar to the elements discussed in the general Defamation Law section, with the following exceptions:

    Defamation Per Se
    In Mid-Florida Television Co. v. Boyles, 467 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1985), the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the state no longer recognizes presumed damages for defamation per se in lawsuits against media defendants. (Defamation “per se” refers to a legal doctrine which holds that some statements of fact are so egregious that a court will presume that they harmed the plaintiff’s reputation.) The CMLP is not aware of any Florida cases deciding whether a blogger or non-traditional journalist is a “media defendant” for purposes of applying this rule. In cases involving matters of purely private concern, a Florida court could still presume damages based on defamation per se. In Florida, a statement amounts to

  • August 22, 2012 at 11:40am

    I can’t figure out who you are referring to; Ferguson, Krugman, Fallows or DeLong?