User Profile: Sawdy19


Member Since: August 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] April 25, 2015 at 2:06pm

    I wrote the above to show that gross ignorance, bigotry and intolerance are not just a characteristic of the far left. I wasn’t asking for anyone to provide an example but, thank you Sojourner for volunteering to provide us with one.

    I won’t endeavor to educate you on the difference between sexual persuasion and sex acts, nor will I attempt to enlighten you about that ‘demon cult’ ( as you so eloquently waxed) of which you obviously know nothing. I suspect the effort would be akin to trying to teach a pig to whistle. It would only result in frustrating myself and annoying the Hell out of the pig.

  • [16] April 25, 2015 at 6:38am

    Actually, it seems it’s always been like that.

    I’m a gay, conservative Catholic:

    The left has a problem with me being conservative because I’m gay (I’m a self-hater to them).
    The right assumes I’m a liberal Democrat (I was a registered Republican for nearly 40 years and never voted for a Democrat in my life)
    Christians insist I can’t possibly believe in God because I’m gay. (just read some of the posts to me on this site).

    For the record, I left the Republican Party (or should I say they left me) and became an Independant when I came to the conclusion that they were the same self-serving liars as the Democrats. Republicans and Democrats are nothing more that two heads on the same monster.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-1] April 24, 2015 at 11:54am

    I wonder if that was the same ‘Christian’ family that attacked the police and assaulted a Walmart employee trying to use the bathroom.

    And before you trolls get started, NO.. this is not an ‘attack on Christians’. It’s an attack on the Blaze’s slanted reporting and incendiary headlines.

  • [31] April 24, 2015 at 10:49am

    B. Hussein Obama wrote:

    “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” The quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of “The Audacity of Hope.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] April 23, 2015 at 11:55pm

    Oddly enough, Bill and Hillary went out and bought a block of stock in Uranium One shortly before the sale was announced.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 23, 2015 at 2:36pm

    dreich –

    Do you not understand the difference between sexuality and sex acts?

    I’ve read Romans 1 and 2 (KJV). The Apostle Paul wrote it roughly about 56-57 A.D. He wrote it to give the believers in Rome a concrete theological foundation on which to construct their faith and to live for and serve God effectively. Never once did he mention human sexuality. You obviously have ‘special’ knowledge which Paul withheld from the rest of us. I have searched for the epistle of Paul to Dreich ( the Book of Dreich?) but have failed to find any such recording.

  • [1] April 21, 2015 at 10:36pm


    Responses (1) +
  • April 21, 2015 at 10:15pm

    It’s right there next to the part that says being Gay is a sin. Neither exist but both lefty’s and homosexuals have been singled out by the clergy, persecuted and threatened with damnation if they didn’t conform to “God’s way”. The abuse of left-handed children by the Catholic church only ended in the 1960′s. God willing, the same will be said about the Church’s abuse of homosexuals within my lifetime.

  • [1] April 21, 2015 at 4:23pm


    you ask, “Has there been any case of a church being sued for not marrying a gay couple?”

    The only case I know of was a couple who sued the Church of England. The difference there is that the CoE is a state sanctioned religious sect and the head of the church is the Queen of England. So in effect, the couple was suing their government for equal rights.

  • [-1] April 21, 2015 at 4:12pm

    It wasn’t that long ago that the Nuns were cracking my knuckles for writing with my left hand. Left handedness was considered a sign of the Devil (the word for ‘left’ in Latin is, ‘sinister’). There is no left-handed gene..

    You can not show me the DNA marker that makes one left handed however, I can parade a line of people before you who have been chastised and physically abused by the clergy for it, and having done so in the name of God.

    Responses (5) +
  • [2] April 21, 2015 at 4:04pm

    Clearly you don’t understand the difference between ‘sexual orientation’ and acts of violence. They are two entirely different things that have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

    Ad Absurdum – taking an argument to the point of absurdity.
    ie: Since marriage is a sacrament, the prisons should be opened and all men who murdered their wives should be set free. All women who poisoned their husbands should be exonerated. One should look away when parents kill their children. After all, they followed the word of God to marry and reproduce.

  • [7] April 20, 2015 at 11:53pm

    No genetic marker has ever been found for people who are left-handed yet, they too are “born that way”.
    The answer to your question however is inevitably, Yes. Of course the left would condone aborting a baby with a “gay gene”. The left is not about supporting any group (as they would lead you to believe). The tenet of the left is: to divide, categorize and put labels on people and individuals. Once that is done they pit these groups against each other and promote themselves as the “defender” of the poor disadvantaged. Create the problem and then arrive on the scene as the “savior”.
    Secondly the left is all for abortion under any circumstance. Don’t forget that Hillary idolizes Margaret Sanger and refers to her as her “personal hero”. Sanger’s mission in creating Planned Parenthood was to keep the Black, Jewish, handicapped and the population of other dirty masses in check through eugenics.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] April 20, 2015 at 7:28pm

    The Heaven you describe sounds like a very lonely place.

    No Jews
    No Muslims
    No Shinto
    No Baha’is
    No Buddhists
    No Sikhs
    No Hindus
    No Atheists
    No Homosexuals

    It is estimated that only 31.5% of the world population identifies themselves as Christian.
    Within that 31.5% there exists (estimated) 41,000 denominations most of which disagree with each other as to what “God says”. So clearly, a great deal of Christians won’t make it into your version of Heaven either.
    Is it your contention that God lied to all the other Christian denominations and other religions or, did 85% of mankind just get it wrong’ and thus have doomed themselves to Hell?

  • [5] April 20, 2015 at 12:34pm

    @Web -

    What difference does the legal status of my relationship with my partner make to you or to anyone else? How exactly does the legal status of my relationship affect your life?

  • [10] April 20, 2015 at 10:51am

    Because your commitment to your wife is destroying the institution of marriage.

    No… that’s not it, hmm …. wait, wait… Ok, I got it. God says our marriage is… uhh… well.

    Ooooo, I know! You’re forcing your interracial sex down our throats, right? That must be it.

    Wishing you and your wife more love and happiness together than you could possibly imagine for yourselves.

  • [10] April 20, 2015 at 10:40am

    No one is forcing or even asking any church to change any of their sacraments. That is a false argument based on a fallacy.
    Atheists, some of whom actively attack organized religions and try to eradicate any mention of God from the public forum are allowed to marry. Have any of them tried to force any Church (the Catholic Church to use your example and, I am a Catholic myself) in to changing their sacraments and performing those marriages? Yet those marriages are not only accepted, they are celebrated and honored. No one has ever demanded that Atheists should not be allowed to marry as it is a religious rite sanctioned by God. No one has ever argued that Atheists should only be allowed civil unions and they should be happy with that.

    What is the difference? The difference is that those opposed to gay marriage would sleep with an Atheist woman but not with someone of the same sex who believes in the existence of God. That is all.

  • [21] April 20, 2015 at 9:55am

    I’m gay and have been in a monogamous relationship with my partner for nearly 40 years (which begs the question: how well have some of the hetro posters here done in their relationships/multiple marriages?).

    Would you please explain to me what exactly my ‘lifestyle’ is that is so objectionable?
    Is it that I am monogamous?
    Is it that I pay my taxes?
    Is it that I own my home outright and maintain my property?
    Is it that I have no debt?
    Is it that I attend church regularly?
    Is it that I pray?

    I never understood this ‘lifestyle’ bit that is so vilified. Could someone please enlighten me to what it is? Or is the entire problem that some people just wouldn’t ‘choose’ to spend their lives committed to the person I fell in love with just like I have no desire for their spouses/girlfriends?

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] April 20, 2015 at 9:42am

    @ since -
    The answer to your question is the same as the answer to this question:
    If a person is born ‘heterosexual’, can they also be born ‘pedophile’?

  • [-1] April 19, 2015 at 9:43am

    from Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals:

    * RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

    argumentum ad hominem
    (also known as: personal abuse, personal attacks, abusive fallacy, damning the source, name calling, needling [form of], refutation by character)

    Description: Attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself, when the attack on the person is completely irrelevant to the argument the person is making.

    You ARE the sore spot! You’re a pain in everyone’s ass! Get and education …
    …you smart ass remarks just pissed me off…
    … the wise ass comments…
    … you’re nothing but a troll, and not a very good one.

    This will be my last reply to you as I’m not inclined to participate in your insipid repartee.
    Good luck to you and have a nice day.

  • April 18, 2015 at 11:19pm

    When you can’t debate the facts, resort to personal attacks. Your ad hominem remarks say a great deal more about your own education level than you infer about mine.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love