I don’t like Obama, I never voted for him and I can’t even stand the sound of his voice. Why would I quote him and what does he have to do with this conversation about Steven Crowder’s integrity?
[-7] January 28, 2016 at 11:23am
Not at all , but you obviously missed the entire point of my post. I’ll try to explain it to you in simpler terms:
No matter how good a person is, they only have to lie/deceive once to make every thing they say or do suspect and questionable. Here’s an example for you;
George Bush said, “Read my lips, NO NEW TAXES” . Everything he said or did after that had to be taken with a grain of salt and scrutinized.
Do you get it now?
 January 28, 2016 at 10:54am
I couldn’t give a rat’s @ss who Bill sleeps with or that Hillary acquiesces and stays with him for her own career advancement. That’s their business and their problem.
I DO care that the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States looked in to the camera, waved his finger at me and LIED UNDER OATH.
I DO care that Hillary made a concerted effort to silence his victims through threats and intimidation.
[-12] January 28, 2016 at 10:46am
Steven Crowder? I’m surprised he didn’t use the same M.O. he employed for his mockumentry trying to obtain a ‘gay’ wedding cake from Muslim Bakeries: Did he try to buy a gun at a Bait and Tackle shop so he can say they refused to serve him? After all, he used a Bakery which only made bread and rolls as an example of a bakery denying him a cake.
Don’t get me wrong, I like Crowder. He did an excellent job with his collapse of Detroit and Canadian Health Care videos. But keep in mind, he’s still a comedian and it seems lately that getting a laugh and making a parody is his first goal.
Sure did ....but, but, but that was different, LOL!
Yes and he lost Iowa but won the general election for President!
and he fired his campaign manager.. for it..
Yes, and he was REAGAN, not trump.
 January 27, 2016 at 8:48pm
Trump’s strategy is brilliant. He has nothing to gain from going to the debate and the rest of the politicians could take a page from his book on how to handle the media. The children at Make America Awesome would have done themselves a service if only they had foregone the tennis balls and bought themselves some brains instead. At least that way they wouldn’t be standing around with their mouths agape, looking like they’re missing a chromosome, when Donald wins big. They wouldn’t be asking themselves, “How did this happen?” because they might have been able to see his inevitable win coming.
Do you actually believe that the majority of supporters for the other Republican candidates would actually gravitate to vote Democrat or would just not vote at all and allow Hillary to win rather than vote for Trump? Don’t be so naive.
January 26, 2016 at 10:37pm
Would you mind clarifying what you mean by, “Cracker”?
[-1] January 26, 2016 at 10:30pm
You are really missing it. This is a game being played by FOX looking to increase their ratings. They could very easily have used Jeanine Shapiro or any of a dozen other equally or more qualified individuals to moderate. Kelly was just as biased in that last debate as Candy Crawley was in the Obama/Romney debate. There’s no denying it. Kudos to Donald for not playing in to it. But no worries, there will be plenty of cheap shots made at Trump on Monday night anyway.
 January 26, 2016 at 10:24pm
Trump commands a 41% lead in the latest polls to Cruz’s 19%.
Trump supporters are 70% ‘locked-in’ compared to 40% (of that 19%) for Cruz.
What does Trump have to gain by accepting this schoolyard challenge? Trump has it locked up, he doesn’t need to play FOX’s rating game and he doesn’t need to debate Cruz. He’s already done both and he’s bested them both. This man wrote, ‘The Art Of The Deal’ and he’s closing that deal right now. FOX and Cruz never saw it coming.
How about some respect that he is actually qualified at being a PRESIDENT not just some school yard BULLY.
I listened to a rally that Cracker provided all of it was bluster/EMOTION not any POLICY what so ever. LISTEN carefully to find any POLICY next time you see one. And PLEASE point it out.
There's not one single poll which shows Mr Trump winning against Kankles or Bernie the Socialist!
 January 26, 2016 at 7:55pm
I have to laugh at the foolish premise that Trump is ‘scared’ of Kelly or Cruz.’ Kelly’s last performance was absolutely biased and rife with ‘gotcha’ type, non-substantive questioning. Trump has every right to demand a different moderator, and with just cause. It may have been a tough decision for FOX not to ask Rosie O’Donnell to moderate alongside Kelly. Fox is pushing her simply for ratings, no other reason. They employ dozens of other people who are better qualified for the job of moderator.
As far as Cruz is concerned, Trump is beating him, he’s got a 16 point lead over Cruz in NH and a 14 point lead in Iowa. Why bother debating him? I see the logic in Trump’s refusal to participate.
What was it that Kelly asked Trump that was so unfair, and beyond what anyone can expect at debates? Asking him to address his own actions?
I agree, Fox's insane reply was the last straw. If I was Trump I would boycott Fox News. Roger Ailes is in over his head on this. It's a win win for Trump. He's sticking it to the turncoat Fox News, & helping the Vets. Now Cruz will have to scramble to come up with a new strategy. I guess kelly will get another vacation for this, maybe Ailes too.
 January 26, 2016 at 6:54pm
That ‘empty podium’ would still garner more attention and support than the remaining candidates on the stage.