User Profile: Sawdy19


Member Since: August 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [1] January 28, 2016 at 3:32pm

    I don’t like Obama, I never voted for him and I can’t even stand the sound of his voice. Why would I quote him and what does he have to do with this conversation about Steven Crowder’s integrity?

  • [-7] January 28, 2016 at 11:23am

    Not at all , but you obviously missed the entire point of my post. I’ll try to explain it to you in simpler terms:

    No matter how good a person is, they only have to lie/deceive once to make every thing they say or do suspect and questionable. Here’s an example for you;

    George Bush said, “Read my lips, NO NEW TAXES” . Everything he said or did after that had to be taken with a grain of salt and scrutinized.

    Do you get it now?

  • [7] January 28, 2016 at 10:54am

    I couldn’t give a rat’s @ss who Bill sleeps with or that Hillary acquiesces and stays with him for her own career advancement. That’s their business and their problem.

    I DO care that the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States looked in to the camera, waved his finger at me and LIED UNDER OATH.

    I DO care that Hillary made a concerted effort to silence his victims through threats and intimidation.

  • [-12] January 28, 2016 at 10:46am

    Steven Crowder? I’m surprised he didn’t use the same M.O. he employed for his mockumentry trying to obtain a ‘gay’ wedding cake from Muslim Bakeries: Did he try to buy a gun at a Bait and Tackle shop so he can say they refused to serve him? After all, he used a Bakery which only made bread and rolls as an example of a bakery denying him a cake.

    Don’t get me wrong, I like Crowder. He did an excellent job with his collapse of Detroit and Canadian Health Care videos. But keep in mind, he’s still a comedian and it seems lately that getting a laugh and making a parody is his first goal.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] January 28, 2016 at 2:18am

    So did Winston Churchill. Conclusion: Winston Churchill was Hitler.
    Same can be said of Ronald Reagan. Reagan = Hitler

    Hitler killed 40 million people. Donald Trump built hotels.
    Hitler never put little chocolates on everyone’s pillow.

  • [1] January 27, 2016 at 10:37pm

    “Well, even though you and I had an agreement that you wouldn’t ask me that, which we did, I will therefore forget that you asked me that,” Trump said.

    O’Reilly (the ‘Flagship’) conceded he had made a prior agreement not to ask Trump to reconsider attending the debate.

    Proving once again that FOX breaks it’s agreements and can’t be trusted to be fair or balanced.

  • [19] January 27, 2016 at 9:05pm


    You folks do realize that Ronald Reagan skipped the last debate before the Iowa caucus, right?

    Responses (4) +
  • [7] January 27, 2016 at 8:48pm

    Trump’s strategy is brilliant. He has nothing to gain from going to the debate and the rest of the politicians could take a page from his book on how to handle the media. The children at Make America Awesome would have done themselves a service if only they had foregone the tennis balls and bought themselves some brains instead. At least that way they wouldn’t be standing around with their mouths agape, looking like they’re missing a chromosome, when Donald wins big. They wouldn’t be asking themselves, “How did this happen?” because they might have been able to see his inevitable win coming.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] January 27, 2016 at 4:39pm

    Psssst…. Glenn…. ‘Cuban’ is not a race.

  • [5] January 27, 2016 at 2:11pm


  • [5] January 27, 2016 at 1:19pm

    This is newsworthy why?

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] January 27, 2016 at 11:13am

    “… it’s going to be interesting to see where the real power is…”

    The real power lies with the people, not FOX News, not some slovenly progressive film maker. Trump knows this and that is who he is appealing to.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] January 27, 2016 at 9:43am

    Ahh yes, and Kelly is exactly the same person she was 5 years ago, How dare Trump change his opinion of her!

  • [-1] January 27, 2016 at 9:38am

    Roger Ailes and FOX need Trump. Trump doesn’t need them. This just shows what poor losers Ailes and FOX are. Very telling indeed.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 26, 2016 at 11:44pm

    Do you actually believe that the majority of supporters for the other Republican candidates would actually gravitate to vote Democrat or would just not vote at all and allow Hillary to win rather than vote for Trump? Don’t be so naive.

  • January 26, 2016 at 10:37pm

    Would you mind clarifying what you mean by, “Cracker”?

  • [-1] January 26, 2016 at 10:30pm

    You are really missing it. This is a game being played by FOX looking to increase their ratings. They could very easily have used Jeanine Shapiro or any of a dozen other equally or more qualified individuals to moderate. Kelly was just as biased in that last debate as Candy Crawley was in the Obama/Romney debate. There’s no denying it. Kudos to Donald for not playing in to it. But no worries, there will be plenty of cheap shots made at Trump on Monday night anyway.

  • [1] January 26, 2016 at 10:24pm

    Trump commands a 41% lead in the latest polls to Cruz’s 19%.
    Trump supporters are 70% ‘locked-in’ compared to 40% (of that 19%) for Cruz.

    What does Trump have to gain by accepting this schoolyard challenge? Trump has it locked up, he doesn’t need to play FOX’s rating game and he doesn’t need to debate Cruz. He’s already done both and he’s bested them both. This man wrote, ‘The Art Of The Deal’ and he’s closing that deal right now. FOX and Cruz never saw it coming.

    Responses (2) +
  • [6] January 26, 2016 at 7:55pm

    I have to laugh at the foolish premise that Trump is ‘scared’ of Kelly or Cruz.’ Kelly’s last performance was absolutely biased and rife with ‘gotcha’ type, non-substantive questioning. Trump has every right to demand a different moderator, and with just cause. It may have been a tough decision for FOX not to ask Rosie O’Donnell to moderate alongside Kelly. Fox is pushing her simply for ratings, no other reason. They employ dozens of other people who are better qualified for the job of moderator.

    As far as Cruz is concerned, Trump is beating him, he’s got a 16 point lead over Cruz in NH and a 14 point lead in Iowa. Why bother debating him? I see the logic in Trump’s refusal to participate.

    Responses (2) +
  • [11] January 26, 2016 at 6:54pm

    That ‘empty podium’ would still garner more attention and support than the remaining candidates on the stage.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go