Skin color must be irrelevant. Do the crime- do the time. Suppression of anyone due to a “victim” identity, is self-suppression. Free expression should never be tolerated if someone is harmed either physically or financially. This country is founded on the rule of law. Those laws must be enforced. Skin color doesn’t matter. Break the law, suffer the consequence. Not following an officers instructions is violating the law (resisting arrest, interfering with an investigation). Law officers have the right to protect themselves. Don’t make them do it.
June 28, 2016 at 2:51pm
Typical Democrat response- sleazy, hypocritical lies! There is no truth in them.
 June 13, 2016 at 11:51am
She wouldn’t know common sense if it slapped her in the face.
saw: This horrible, incompetent, vicious, law breaking old hag has no business being POTUS. NADA!
This could never happen. Common sense is waiting in line behind the ugly stick that is still beating on Hillary.
 June 13, 2016 at 11:46am
Hillary is spouting the feckless argument that gun control will stop these attacks. Anybody with a half a brain knows that is not the case. Regardless of the motive, these are evil people committed to kill or maim as many people as they can. Taking the AR off the market only means they will find an AK or other semi-automatic, find it on the black market, use an explosive vest or car bomb, fire or any other means of accomplishing their goal. We must stop THEM not the tools they use.
 June 3, 2016 at 11:54am
If they don’t have to respect the law coming into this country they won’t respect after they’re here.
 May 5, 2016 at 10:40am
They were seated and served not denied service. It doesn’t matter how many empty tables there were, was anybody else allowed to stay longer than 45 minutes. The fact that these points are not referenced leads me to believe they are typical wealthy, entitled people wanting special treatment. No discrimination here.
 May 4, 2016 at 11:19am
How can an article on Trump and Clinton even use the word “trust”. Both have proven themselves completely untrustworthy. A sad day for America!
Okay, sawhite, I could not give you a thumbs up, or down, as you included the positive - Trump, and the negative - Clinton, but, tell us more!
You can’t trust anybody who runs for president. Nobody is a purist and Clinton is the worst kind of criminal.
 April 26, 2016 at 4:53pm
Although I may not agree with the language, I absolutely agree with the anger expressed by Mr. Crowder. These loser lefties constantly come into an event with a half dozen cronies and do everything they can to disrupt that event. These are the same people that claim to need a “safe place” which means no one that disagrees with them is allowed. They are simply rude, ignorant “little minds” who can’t have an honest discussion. They are a waste of time and waste of flesh.
 April 26, 2016 at 11:11am
Who’s the idiot? Trump has admitted he is putting on a show for you. Is that who you trust? The guy that tells you what you want to hear not what he actually believes?
 April 13, 2016 at 1:37pm
The kids these days spend tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for a college education and can’t spell, speak intelligently, formulate an hypothesis, speak in front of an audience except in a safe zone, do simple math without a computer or calculator, treat others with respect, or answer the simplest questions about our country’s history or government. However, they can recite the latest rap song, tell you the current price of marijuana, spell privilege, tell you where the closest Planned Parenthood clinic is, and beat you at the latest video games. What a waste!
 March 31, 2016 at 11:44am
Rules for Radicals in action. This is right out of the Alinsky playbook. We need to stop this NOW!
So true. That's why the Trump candidacy has to have been conceived and hatched by the left. It's the only thing that makes sense.
 March 29, 2016 at 6:43pm
So the person who couldn’t be trusted to protect her staff, protect classified information and protect this country is saying who can’t be trusted?
 March 29, 2016 at 6:35pm
From the moment of conception, the 46 chromosomes define the cell as human. Left alone, a birth will occur in most circumstances. the only way, other than physical abnormality, that won’t happen is if that process is terminated intentionally. Terminating human life intentionally is murder. Any attempt to define when life begins using the circumstances of death (breathing, brain waves, heart beat, etc) ignores the intent factor. If that adult life is terminated intentionally, it is murder. If it occurs because the body cannot sustain itself, that is natural. Women, it is your body and you should control it. That is your responsibility. That control need to occur before conception, not after. If you choose to engage in sex and become pregnant, that is the consequence you chose when you made the decision to have sex. What abortion provides you (and the man) is the ability to be irresponsible and not endure the consequence of your bad decision at the expense of a human life.
"...is the ability to be irresponsible and not endure the consequence of your bad decision at the expense of a human life."
Isn't that the text-book definition of liberalism?
 March 29, 2016 at 1:59pm
As a Christian, I believe it is not my responsibility to judge you. That belongs to God alone. It is my responsibility to judge my own actions and if I find I have sinned to confess that to God and repent (turn away from that behavior). That is the commitment I made to him when I chose him to be my Lord. God gave us all free will so we can choose him or reject him. If we choose to reject him, we will be judged after we die. So if you wish to reject god and his law, that is your choice and consequence. I am here to be available to you if you want to learn about that choice. My life should be an example of that choice. You won’t see a lack of struggle or perfection in my life but will see an honest care and concern for others, a peace about my circumstances, and a commitment to follow Christ’s teachings. But please understand, you cannot force me to believe that your sinful, Godless lifestyle is correct. The founding fathers understood that everyone should have the liberty to choose upon what they will base their life. They wanted to be sure the government did not mandate any religion or denomination for the citizens of this country- including atheism. We must tolerate each others choice. Requiring me to bake a cake, provide a venue or perform the ceremony when there are plenty of options elsewhere to obtain such things is someone trying to force me to violate my religious principles. Just because you disagree with me doesn’t mean you should be offended. That’s just a cover.
Sawhite, Very well said. You speak for the typical Christian. Most of us are simply working our way through life trying to live according to what our conscience tells us is right. Most of us have great respect for the religious searching of others. We know how to keep it appropriate at work and in the public square, not proselytizing and cramming our way down others’ throats. Without being lukewarm, we simply try to live a Christian witness. Our doors are open and we are willing to welcome anyone who enters with a sincere desire. We also realize we need our church; that it is a hospital for the soul needed by all of us who are sinners.
Sawhite, such wisdom. I couldn't have said any better.
Gay taxpayers help you run your business
with the services they help support = roads, communications fire and police
That the issue. Period
You CANNOT pick and choose WHICH tax payers you will serve - for any reason.
You and your ilk are on another planet.
Give it a rest already, You sound like 5 year olds
This issue HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A FREAKING CAKE, OR FLOWERS.
March 25, 2016 at 3:03pm
Irrational fear often leads to irrational response. Many people freak out at the sight of a spider even though most spiders won’t hurt you. We should not base our laws on irrational fear. Guns can provide protection from the very end result they fear. How bad will they feel if the loose a child because there was no one there to protect him/her. Unfortunately, conquering irrational fear requires a lot of time and effort.
 February 26, 2016 at 2:57pm
And you hate it when my religion is promoted. The difference is in the attitude. It is your God-given right to reject Him. I cannot make you believe in anything. That is your responsibility and yours alone. But I won’t mock you for your decision even though I don’t agree.
Too bad the first amendment says that govs cannot promote a religion
 February 16, 2016 at 6:06pm
Dr. Carson is speaking the truth. Listen to the truth. Check it out if you think he is wrong. If you are a devout Muslim (and there cannot be any other kind based on the Quran), then you must abide by Sharia. The tenets of Sharia are in direct opposition to the Constitution, Laws, and philosophy of America. Do the research.
He is alos correct about Trump. Who is Trump. He is a business leader and a narcissist. Many business leaders do what is best for the company and themselves often at the expense of their employees and the country. Their job is to make those decisions. Trump wants to win. He will do what it takes to win saying what is necessary to earn the favor of the voters. Look at what he is saying now vs. what he has supported in the past. Sure, we like what he says but what will he do. Ex: has said he thinks his sister would make a good Supreme Court Justice. The sister that is vehemently pro partial-birth abortion? He knows we need to close the border but thinks he can stick Mexico with the bill? I think his foreign policy acumen is pretty thin. Again, do the research.
 January 8, 2016 at 5:07pm
So he says it was in the name of Islam but it really wasn’t? Did they check him for a Black Lives Matter poster? Maybe that’s the reason. (Sarc never off)
 January 1, 2016 at 6:56pm
If they needed prayer breaks they should have checked that before you accepted the job. This was not something denied them.
 December 10, 2015 at 2:31pm
The article states all the guns used in San Bernardino were purchased legally. I believe that proxy purchasing are not legal and both rifles were not purchased by the perpetrators.
Don't forget that hey were illegally modified as well.
Straw man purchases are illegal if the recipient is not legally authorized to possess the weapon.
Good point, I'd still like to know who funded them. There is a lot we are not being told. For instance the US has funded and trained ISIS, Obama has even publically admitted it.
This implicates this administration in over 300,000 murders and opens the door to the possibility that US money could have been behind this shooting, the Paris attacks and many others. What kind of a world do we live in when the president can actually cop to such a thing and receive barely any public reaction at all? Why isn't anyone reporting on this? I'd love to be spouting off about some conspiracy theory here but this is cold hard reality and it is as unbelievable as it is terrifying.