Tens of millions of Americans will die after Obama completes this “deal” with Iran. They’ll create nukes, and then they’ll use them! Obama will go down in history as one of the most destructive and foolish humans to ever walk the face of the earth!
 April 21, 2015 at 11:50am
And in other news, Hoda Mothana is no longer a virgin! She’s now as oft-used as a urinal! And has every known STD known to humanity!
That would be poetic justice!
I think it's sort of sweet. Go out and watch the cows. Sort of like little house on the prairie. Only Danish style - I'll bet they go home and have a good drink after all that milk.
 April 21, 2015 at 11:35am
I think they misspelled her name here. It think her last name starts with a “B”.
Barf! Because that’s what I do every time I hear her speak!
 April 20, 2015 at 8:20pm
I agree 100%!
But I would suggest we change the verbiage slightly! They’re GOVERNMENT schools!
A few years ago, I went to a townhall meeting and referred to the schools as “government” schools. A man came up to me afterward and took umbrage to my using the term “government schools”. He insisted they were “public” schools.
Once he walked away, someone else came up to me and asked if I knew who that person was. I said no. They then told me that he was the County DNC Chairman and a school teacher!
I told that story to my State rep. He told me that they ARE government schools, because they have their own taxing authority! They can raise taxes, even without a vote by the citizens, so they are GOVERNMENT schools! Let’s call a spade, a spade! They are GOVERNMENT schools!
I'm willing to call a spade as it really is, but these aren't government SCHOOLS, they're government INDOCTRINATION CENTERS! I've seen plenty of attempts to re-write history such as listing Abraham Lincoln as a democrat and claiming that the KKK were/are nothing but a bunch of religious conservatives.
Vouchers are the only answer. Government schools must die. They truly believe they own you child.
Yeah, the indoctrination and re-writing of history is insane in government "schools". I remember my cousins telling me how their history book posited that Abraham Lincoln was the first gay president, because the Democrats had printed up political mudslinging flyers claiming Abraham Lincoln was a homosexual (in an attempt to defeat him in the elections).
But rather than seeing the mudslinging for what it truly was, some liberal history book writer ignored the historical context and assumed that the Democrats of the 1800s were all pro-LGBT and were in support of Lincoln's homosexuality.
The lengths that people will go to are astonishing.
 April 20, 2015 at 8:12pm
I will NOT support whoever the candidate is! I vote for principle, not a party label!
If Bush is the nominee, I and about 5-10 million other conservatives will take our votes and go elsewhere, and the GOP will lose another election! There is no way we will put fresh Constitutional wine, into old party bottles! We only doom ourselves by doing that! That’s why we’re on the brink of tyranny, because we’ve held our noses for too long and voted for the same downward path, but just at a slower pace than the Democrats! Voting for the same destination, at a slower pace, only gets us the same end — destruction!
Wow I could not agree with you more!! You said it on the nail. I know damn well if Jeb is the nominee I am staying home. Although, I will spend the day crying, praying and stocking my survival staples. I guess I am a weirdo...and I am ok with that. I just don't see honesty in Walkers eyes. I want Cruz over all. I feel like I can trust him.
I believe the #'s will be at least 10 million and maybe more. The elitists don't have a clue what is going on in America today with true constitutional conservatives. If they think we are a wacko fringe group-they better wake up. No more hold our noses and vote for another mccain type. The likes of bush, christie, no,no,no!!! The news media is trying to drive public opinion for bush because they think he will be the most beatable--Wake up America!!!!! Don't be fooled bush like mccain is at the bottom of the REAL POLLS--
Ted Cruz is the top of my list, he is a true conservative unlike the Koch Brothers who are social liberals, they don’t deserve the headline of this article. Walker isn’t a bad 3rd choice, he has taken on the big leftist machine and won, yet my 2nd choice is open to others who might get in the race. Otherwise if the Republicans is a RINO, I’ll write-in my choice.
I agree 100%... Bush is another globalist and I am equally convinced he would be a slower death to our way of life than Obama but equally as dangerous to true liberty.
Better yet, if 10 million conservatives gave $5 to each of the real conservative candidates directly then they could outspend all the RINOs in the primaries and if one of them got the nomination the others could shift their funds to the conservative nominee and have more than enough to outspend Hagatha.
 April 20, 2015 at 7:56pm
The question itself is irrelevant! ALL behavior is a choice! Therefore, all practice of homosexual sex is a choice, just as heterosexual sex is! To imply that because it might be in-born, it is therefore permissible, is a non sequitur! It’s the same as saying that because the American Indian has a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, therefore it’s OK for all American Indians to become alcoholics and to be perfectly justified in being alcoholics. That premise of the question is absurd!
Whether attraction toward the same gender is in-born or a product of other factors, God has forbidden it! God has also forbidden all sexual behavior outside of a marriage between a man and a woman.
Since the Creator has declared that the practice is a sin, we know one thing for certain — that the behavior of homosexual sex is bad for the eternal destiny of humanity. Of that there is no “question”.
Schieffer’s question itself is irrelevant and based upon a false premise! He should know better! Clearly, he isn’t nearly as smart as he thinks he is. Therefore, he’s manifesting HUBRIS, not smarts!
 April 19, 2015 at 10:11pm
Yes, all the legions of leeching lemmings will still vote for her! They care only how much they can use their votes to covet and steal, not about the preservation of liberty!
 April 19, 2015 at 6:01pm
In a population of about 500 million, Europe has imported 44 million Muslims!
When you play with fire, you’re going to get burned. Europe is going to go up in flames!
April 18, 2015 at 7:25pm
And we think we’re “civilized”! Wrong! We’re just celebrating violence by calling it a “sport”!
April 18, 2015 at 7:14pm
“I would vote for Hillary because I love tyranny!” I would mock them by saying this!
 April 18, 2015 at 7:01pm
On another website, there was an article about Krugman’s constant use of name-calling, derision and ridicule toward those who disagree with him. The article was by one of those often targeted by Krugman and his condescension, Niall Ferguson. Krugman placed a comment at the bottom of the article as a reader, just was we’re doing here. He used name-calling and derision of the author, who was economic historian from Harvard, Niall Ferguson.
I replied to Krugman and pointed out that Krugman’s own comment just PROVED the point Ferguson was making. These elitist intellectuals like Krugman are blind to their own proud arrogance. That’s HUBRIS — arrogance to the point of weakness!
April 18, 2015 at 6:54pm
Both are just as necessary, Sen Grahamnesty! Both are indispensable!
 April 16, 2015 at 11:10am
Silverman is the same slimeball that went into an abortion clinic and took photos of herself before and after she took the innocent life that she and her boyfriend had created, with a smile on her face, boasting about it, and laughing throughout!. She thought it was CUTE and a PR photo op to kill the baby in her womb! She has no conscience, so why should we be surprised that she would lie about what she purports is a “wage gap”! Deception is her game, and lying is just her method!
Yup, Full Dirtbag. Defending Abortion with Bill Maher:
How about this... heard of The Young Turks? Get ready to shake your head in disgust:
[-1] April 14, 2015 at 9:53pm
Repeal the 16th Amendment. Then all of this would be moot!
 April 14, 2015 at 9:47pm
Those who are perpetually “offended for a word”!
April 14, 2015 at 9:46pm
Our Pablum-speaking President!
 April 14, 2015 at 8:56pm
The term “pro-choice” is a misnomer!
It’s NOT pro-choice! It’s pro-ABORTION!
Nope. Not the same at all. I wonder if there are any statistics to show the number of women who CHOSE to carry their children when abortion was an uncontested option. I guess one way would be to compare the number of abortions in a year to the number of births. I have a feeling that the births will be in greater number. And every one of those children were born because someone chose to see their pregnancy through. This whole issue about abortion is so skewed. Any data related to births vs. abortions zeroes in on demographics like teenagers, minorities, etc. But overall, still, births greatly outnumber abortions. How about let's create a nation where it is more feasible to bring children into the world so more people can make the choice you so badly want. Or, we could just shun them as trash. So far that doesn't seem to do much good...
It should be called pro-killing.
New Speak, something the democrats excel at.
Precisely! The issue is not about choice, it's about whether or not someone is in favor of abortion. Babies do not get to choose.
What in the world do you mean by “uncontested option” ?
Every woman who becomes pregnant in this day and age of over 40+ BC options why would they have to “choose” killing their and their spouse,sperm donor child ?
Most PPL who “choose” to not use protection,or don’t use it properly as directed,get knocked up because they “choose” to either not use any BC,or used it improperly,And just as if you drove your car improperly or not according to Law will face some kind of repercussion,every action has a reaction,even children know this and because a VERY large portion of abortions are done on women who already have at least one child,they know this,and how to prevent it from happening again,A condom and spermicide are nearly 100% or use BC pills or any of the other 40+ BC on the market and your NOT going to have to “choose” to kill your child.
OR they could close their legs..
Adoption is another “Choice”
 April 14, 2015 at 8:55pm
This is perfect proof of how deceitful and evil this woman is. She knows that the overwhelming majority of the 60 million abortions performed since Roe v. Wade were abortions of convenience, not threat to the life of the woman. Her argument is a straw man, purposefully intended to mislead.
If she were truly pro-CHOICE, she would tell women to CHOOSE their consequences BEFORE they CHOOSE have sex, not after! Once they have CHOSEN their behavior, there are at least two other lives affected — the baby and the father! THey have rights, too! But the feminazi tyrants like Schultz think that only the women should have rights. Sorry, Schultz, but we have a “no nobility” clause in the Constitution that precludes special classes of rights only for certain people!