User Profile: scarebear83


Member Since: February 12, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [3] October 9, 2015 at 12:08pm

    You know what? There are atheist churches springing up all over the place… Does that mean FFRF doesn’t have a leg to stand on to promote secularism since atheists now have their own religion via church services on Sunday mornings?

  • [9] October 8, 2015 at 1:45pm

    “I think this MAY be illegal.
    Is it not illegal to discriminate on race, RELIGION, other?”

    So correct me if I’m wrong but don’t some clubs and bars have ladie’s nights where women get in free or get some sort of discount? Isn’t that sexist? Should it also be considered illegal since men don’t get the same discount? How about places that give discounts to senior citizens? Isn’t that being discriminatory?
    It’s illegal to discriminate based on certain criteria and circumstances. For example it’s illegal to discriminate against say a disabled person when considering hiring or to turn them away from an eating establishment. Getting discounts doesn’t fall into that category because places all around the US give discounts for various reasons, some of which do not apply to everyone. I have not heard of people getting upset over those, just only when it comes to discounts for Christians.

  • [175] October 7, 2015 at 5:16pm

    Hypnosis is a dangerous thing for the weak and impressionable minds. I personally know someone who got heavily into it and I believe that it ruined them far worse than it helped. Find a trained psychiatrist to deal with your issues if you need it. Or better yet, find God and ask Him to help you through.

    Responses (10) +
  • [2] October 7, 2015 at 2:52pm

    This dude is a minor, therefore the question should be asked… Where are his parents?! Instead of gun control, how about parents start using a bit of child control? Granted it won’t stop all shootings but if parents would step up and be parents then maybe the thuggish behavior we’re seeing so much of just might start to drop in numbers. Hey, it worked for that lady and her son when she caught him at the Baltimore riots.

  • [86] October 6, 2015 at 4:56pm

    No matter what you call poo, it will always stink. ABC “Family” doesn’t need to change the name, it needs to change it’s programming. With the addition of shows with promiscuity and cursing and trans issues, it definitely wasn’t a family friendly channel after all that.

    Responses (2) +
  • October 2, 2015 at 4:27pm

    The idea is to bombard them with “stricter gun free zone control” talk. If they’re going to bring up gun control in situations like these then point out to them that stricter gun free zones would have prevented this. Use the same questions and rhetoric they use on us and see if they trip up. It’s just a theory anyway.

  • [2] October 2, 2015 at 4:00pm

    Luke’s account in chapter 21 settles the matter if people would read and think. We know in other accounts that Jesus is talking to the inner four. Now read Luke 21:12: But before all these things, they will lay their hands on you and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons. You will be brought before kings and rulers for My name’s sake…. If this were about future events in our lifetime then ask yourself, will Jews round up Christians and bring them to the synagogues? That’s kinda silly isn’t it? So reading the other accounts we know Jesus is telling the inner four that *they* will be the one’s persecuted, not future generations (although any Christian can and will suffer some sort of persecution in their lifetime but context is key here).

    Also when Jesus comes a second time no one will be able to escape by fleeing into the mountains (verse 21). In fact the previous verse tells what will happen to Jerusalem and we know this was fulfilled in 70 AD. It is really important to look at all accounts and piece them together logically instead of taking a few passages and trying to string together an incoherent mess. Don’t take my word for it though, read it in God’s word for yourself.

  • [58] October 1, 2015 at 11:35pm

    I came up with an ingenious dialogue to have with leftists. When they start in with more gun control, ask them if they’ve considered stricter gun free zone control. I mean obviously putting up signs aren’t helping. So should we put metal detectors at every entrance and hire a few qualified personnel that have had weapons training? Harsher punishments for violaters? We need to start taking over the conversation when things like this happen and ask what they and congress plan to do to enforce gun free zones. If they say the idea is preposterous then say, so is putting restrictions on legal gun owners.

    Responses (4) +
  • [23] October 1, 2015 at 4:01pm

    RHG- You do realize Ben was being facetious, right?

  • [8] September 9, 2015 at 5:44pm

    Since when did, “I’ll be praying for you” turn into teaching or indoctrination? People need to learn to accept that people have religious beliefs and being in a school does not dictate that you are to stop being religious.

  • [6] September 7, 2015 at 10:29pm

    Ah, yes, because denying a couple a wedding cake or a marriage license is like beating, raping, burning, and beheading people for not converting to Islam or not being Muslim enough. I can totally see the comparison.

  • [9] September 3, 2015 at 5:21pm

    New research from Vanderbilt University suggests that the mass extinction, which occurred 540 million years ago, might have been initiated by the life on Earth itself.

    Did anyone else get the feeling that this theory is just a means to get people to believe in “climate change?” As in, “Hey, look! Animals caused this mass extinction so humans are capable of it too!”

    Responses (1) +
  • September 3, 2015 at 3:31am

    But how does one explain someone who continues to live in a sinful relationship after they’ve “accepted Jesus?” Can a homosexual continue to live with their partner even though they’ve been forgiven? The Bible is clear, Jesus said that if anyone marries her who is put away commits adultery. You don’t commit it once and then you’re forgiven so keep living that way. It wouldn’t make sense to tell a homosexual they’re ok because they’re a Christian now so they can continue to live with their partner. You wouldn’t tell them that so why excuse an adulterer for basically the same thing, living in an unrighteous situation?

  • September 3, 2015 at 3:03am

    I’m sorry I was not aware the FFRF are the 1st Amendment enforcers and we are to thank them when they save the day from those evil Christians who want to bless everyone and pray for them. How dare those kids and teachers have religious rights at school. What was I thinking?

  • September 2, 2015 at 4:49pm

    Think, you’re right on par with what the Bible teaches. Unfortunately a lot of Christians only believe what their denominations or even “pastors” tell them (even then not knowing the Biblical definition of the word pastor). But if the innocent party wants to remarry then they have that right. The guilty party can only be reconciled to their first spouse or as a consequence of their action, remain single. You can sort of see a correlation between Israel and God. Israel “cheated” as it were on God with idols throughout the old testament. Therefore Jesus, who was innocent, died and now all are made one under Christ. Romans 7 explains it a bit better. But yes, unless she’s reconciled to her first husband (unless he cheated on her) then she should remain single. However, that’s only guessing as I don’t have the full details of the relationships. It’s possible all of the marriages ended up with the husband cheating (I have a friend who was divorced twice and both times the spouse cheated on him). But you’re on the right track, Twice. I hope you keep searching for the truth.

  • [2] September 2, 2015 at 4:13pm

    “Please reply detailing the steps being taken to bring Carroll County Schools into compliance with the First Amendment.”

    I don’t know what these people are smoking but these kid’s first amendment rights aren’t dependant on the FFRF’s permission.

    Responses (4) +
  • [18] August 27, 2015 at 11:12am

    So basically she had the right to her religious beliefs before this ruling. Since the ruling was handed down her same held beliefs are now against the law for her to have and keep in this position. Got it. If you can’t get rid of religion, just make rulings that make religious practice illegal.

    Responses (4) +
  • [80] August 14, 2015 at 12:40pm

    Absolute. Savages. Please, please, please tell me how this is the religion of peace again? And tell me how Christianity is so brutally oppressive? Tell me one more time cause I’d love to hear it…

    Responses (2) +
  • [-3] August 11, 2015 at 1:53am

    Freunlaven, by the time that was written the word of God had been preached in those areas, so much so that they had elders set up and they were taught the correct way to worship etc. They didn’t intuitively know. Yes, the Bible was not completed by then but the Holy Spirit was guiding them into all truth. Now that we have the Bible it is where we learn of the truth, it is God’s word, the only place we will find His truth and not from someone who has a “new revelation” or from men’s traditions.

  • [8] August 9, 2015 at 10:27pm

    @ thejamescat: Matthew 4:4 Jesus states that man lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. Well, how else do we receive God’s word today? Also 2 Timothy 3:16-17 all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, correction, instruction that the man of God may be perfect, equipped for good works. So, yeah, all we need are God’s words which are in the Bible.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love