Give her a break- she's preoccupied with birth control, gay marriage, and the war on anything other than white males.
She cant be bothered with genocide, WW3, or nuclear proliferation. You know, cause, pay equality and working wages ,man.
Sorry but that's NOT a Lady. It's a Harry Hey NAMBLA type of broad.
Rep Pelosi knows condescension as well as anyone, having used it daily through her whole sad political career. In truth I doubt anyone could honestly "underestimated the ability of the Obama administration to negotiate an agreement that keeps nuclear weapons away from Iran." Over estimate, yes, but it would be difficult to underestimate our president's negotiation abilities.
 February 27, 2015 at 5:17pm
Cavallo, the alien probe is still on it’s way. The time disruption would not have affected the extinction of the whales thus earth is still in trouble. That’s a major thing that I hope the reboot will tackle, even if it’s simply mentioned in a passing conversation. For instance, “hey, remember when we had to go get those whales?” It just can’t be overlooked.
 February 20, 2015 at 3:19pm
Wait, so don’t trust the police if you’re a black criminal and get away with looting and harming cops (re: pigs). However, if you’re a white Christian conservative you’re marked as possibly being a terrorist and a greater risk to this country than actual terrorists. Thus they are no longer cops but law enforcement officers.
The mental hoops I’ve been having to go through for the past 7 years, courtesy of left leaning folks, is making my head spin so fast I don’t even know where I am anymore.
 February 20, 2015 at 1:50pm
If you can explain to me how a cake, floral arrangements, or wedding photos are protected rights in this country then you might have a point. Last I checked, a person does not need these things to survive. They are wants, not needs.
 February 19, 2015 at 5:02pm
Usually people don’t come in asking for a cake to celebrate cheating on their spouse or to congratulate Jr. on stealing his first car. If they did I’m certain the Christian baker would turn them away. In this case the sin was purposely revealed and as such a Christian’s conscious would be defiled if they continued to help the person celebrating said sin.
 February 19, 2015 at 4:44pm
creation mythos- Freedom to express both sides
reproductive rights and sexual morality- Nobody is denying these things, just take responsibility for your own actions and don’t force the government to take care of your problem
dress code- while I have no clue what you mean by this, what’s wrong with modesty? Nobody wants to see your rear end hanging out your britches.
[-1] February 16, 2015 at 9:50pm
Because some people believe in misconceptions and continue to teach them without fact checking from the source. For example many believe Lucifer is Satan. If they read Isaiah 14 in it’s entirety and looked at key phrases they’d see the truth. Isaiah 14:4 that you will take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say…16“Those who see you will gaze at you,
And consider you, saying: ‘Is this the man who made the earth tremble, Who shook kingdoms (Satan isn’t a man) 19-21 But you are cast out of your grave Like an abominable branch, Like the garment of those who are slain, Thrust through with a sword, Who go down to the stones of the pit, Like a corpse trodden underfoot. 20 You will not be joined with them in burial,
Because you have destroyed your land And slain your people. The brood of evildoers shall never be named. 21 Prepare slaughter for his children Because of the iniquity of their fathers, Lest they rise up and possess the land, And fill the face of the world with cities…. Satan can’t die nor is he able to procreate. Besides the prophecies before and after this are about the people and lands thereof. Why in the middle of it would Isaiah go off and talk about Satan then back to the kingdoms? Therefore verse 4 is the key verse. People would benefit by studying more and accepting false doctrine less. Always check with God’s word to get the truth.
February 13, 2015 at 4:27pm
Idiocracy or Minority Report. Which one will come true first? My guess is on Idiocracy maybe with a smidge of Minority Report and a dash of 1984.
 February 13, 2015 at 3:48pm
Obama, your bias is showing. The Fort Hood shooter was workplace violence because he was Muslim and now the tables have turned it’s religious bigotry? Make up your mind, man.
Evidence shows that this man was an atheist/progressive so his bigotry towards ANY religion turned violent. This is the same crowd that sues over having someone say "God Bless America" over a school intercom. I think the President is right. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I do agree with your sentiment, I just like to use a little different reasoning about it. No argument here.
He will make up his mind when the wind stops blowing. He will change it again when the wind starts back up though.
Here we go!
President - attorney general - fbi
All involved where they do not belong to press a radical agenda!
February 12, 2015 at 3:08am
Actually God called the light and the darkness a day. Why would He deceive us if that’s not what He meant? “Oh, sorry guys, I meant to tell you that the first day was actually a couple billion years. Sorry for the deception there.” If that were the case then God would be untrustworthy in all He said.
Btw off topic, ENFP here. ;)
 February 11, 2015 at 5:59am
No matter your views on the current situation in the Middle East, this should be highly looked down upon. Thoughts and prayers to the family mourning over the loss of their loved ones.
I don't know any details. So it's on with my life.
I'm sure more than three people who were American were killed in Chicago last night, but let's make these people special because they're muslim.
And cue all the stupid comments from the paid posters.
 February 10, 2015 at 12:40am
Actually it was, ” I like this guy.” The other sentence was a different thought stating, “I do, however…. whatever I said.” Anyway, I like him because of his disagreement with what Obama said. Besides, he’s still a human and is worthy of salvation from the only true and living God. Christians should love and care for their neighbors (physical and spiritual needs) no matter what religion they follow.
Going to miss you Bernie.....NOT1
 February 9, 2015 at 11:17am
I like this guy. I do, however, get sick of this, when things get ugly blame the Christians of the past to make Christianity seem invalid thing. Every culture and religion has had an ugly side but I don’t understand why people bring up the past and think that we who are alive today have any control over what happened. Stop arguing over what’s happened centuries ago and let’s be focused on what’s going on now. The present is what we can alter.
Obama smuggled arms to Libya and Syria, so who would be stupid enough to buy his Crusades tales besides LoInfo and his walking dead base Democrats?
this ties in very well.
If living Christians are guilty by association because of "possible" persecutions in the past....an analogy would be that Democrats started the KKK and fought FOR slavery so current demoRATs are bigots and the enemy of black people.......oh, wait.....they ARE BIGOTS and the enemy of black people....they just pretend to take care of them and keep them on the 'plantation'.
Anyone care to comment.
The West better wake up.
Very interesting, makes for a good dinner discussion.
Well it is important to see the roots of certain things. Nothing founded in violence and hatred can grow into something good.
Islam has always and will always be violent because of the specific doctrine found in the koran. Christianity has never been violent because of specific doctrine found in the Bible.
This guy failed to mention that the inquisition was never a christian event. It was a gross misuse of power by the Catholic church that has never had any basis in scripture and will never be condoned by actual christians.
So they can refer back as many centuries as they want. Nothing in christianity has ever or will ever be comparable to islam.
scarebear, you questioned why people bring up the past, etc., in your comment. When you have nothing else, then you have to go back and sometimes way, way back as Obama did to try to deflect attention from a real and current problem. Obama does it very well for the low information people and the Obamatons who buy anything he vomits out! What an embarrassment Obama is, and even more so his followers who do not question the obvious but simply jump on the progressive bandwagon.
I’m going to be the bad guy here, so everyone get your fingers ready to punch me a few keys straight to the head…..Before Christianity there were Pagans. The Pagans fought tooth and nail to retain their beliefs. But, the Christians defeated the Pagans and forced them to become Christian or die. That is the truth. Now us Christians, which I am one, are fighting for our own lives to defeat another religion we do not believe in, Islam. This current fight is no different then the Pagans vs Christians, back in the day. The pagans lost due to the overwhelming numbers of Christians and the Pagan’s leaders wanting to appease those who seemed stronger (the leaders didn’t want to lose their power) and so were defeated. So what I see here in America and other Christian countries, is leaders bowing down in fear of loosing their own power. They don’t care about us Serfs. They just want to keep their power and are being promised just that if they lay down. Histories show the Pagans became extinct because of this. Will Christianity also become extinct, because of our so call leaders need for power?
And of course if you can't blame the Christians, blame George Bush.
Islamic scholar is a contradiction in terms. there is no such thing as an Islamic scholar, because if all you study is islam then you are jihadist freaking fool and danger to free people everywhere.
I am only as invalid as this govt makes me to a point but islam is a total different subject my govt I will set straight Islam I lead to the road to defeat but they share the same outcome NOTHING and defeated as king Tut found out his face was removed from all buildings and text as will obama's aka his entire family will hide in shame ,, no fig leaf to help them
It doesn't matter to Obama; his goal is to "fundamentally America," and if that means rewriting or history, so be it.
The Crusades were completely justified, they were in response to Muslim aggression. The only problem is that the crusaders didn't finish the job, and as a consequence we have to deal with it today. Otherwise Islam would have been an historical footnote interesting to only historians.
"I DO LIKE THIS GUY"...
Please, pray tell. WHY?????
Hes not much of a Biblical scholar, or historian concerning American history. If he was he would understand that the Civil War had more to do with the struggle between states rights and an overbearing federal government. He would also understand that the institution of servitude is NOT identified as an unspeakable evil by Christ or the Apostles. In the book of Philemon Paul, a chief Apostle, instructs a runaway slave to RETURN TO HIS MASTER. Many times bondservants and slaves are specifically instructed to obey their earthly masters, that they might honor God. Colossians 3:22, 1Tim 6:1, Titus 2:9 and Ephesians 6:5 etc. That is NEW TESTAMENT.
The South had the Biblical authority to stand on, the moral ground to stand on, good lost and evil (temporarily) won. Was Abraham Lincoln not a tyrant? It is written "live by the sword, die by the sword." Decide for yourselves. God alone is judge. Southern cities eradicated. 620,000+ killed. Churches destroyed...
Does that mean that some, perhaps many did not abuse their position as master and commit great evil? No. Some did and it ought to have been remedied through legislative restrictions and penalties for masters and extended rights for slaves.
We have the perspective we do due to generations of indoctrination from the victors. Read the expression of early American Saints, the Founders and the Apostles on the matter. God's Word is supreme.
 February 8, 2015 at 4:38pm
If you have to have a parent to tell you what’s right and wrong then you’re doing it wrong. See what I did there? If the claim is true that you can be good without God then you could also be good without anyone telling you and if you go through life having someone tell you what’s right or wrong isn’t that equally as silly? I mean why do we need laws that tell us we have to stop at a stop sign if people can be good without being told? That’s why saying a person can be good without God is a bad argument to make because the premise behind it is you can be good without having to be told.
 February 5, 2015 at 9:50pm
@Capt- Peter tells the multitude in Acts 2:38 to repent and be baptized FOR the remission of sins. 1 Peter 3:20-21 tells us there is an antitype that saves us, baptism. True, Paul was commanded to preach the gospel, however, his point is that the importance is not on who does the baptizing but on who gets baptized. In order for one to put on Christ they must do so through baptism (Romans 6).
I think there’s a contradiction in your statement that a person is not saved by baptism but it’s a first step of obedience…. What happens if you’re disobedient? Are you saved if you don’t do as God says? If it is an obedient act then it is necessary for salvation. If it’s merely a symbol just for show as many in the world have diminished it to be then why do it at all? Why stress the importance of a symbol that is really of no use? Either baptism is an act of obedience necessary for one’s salvation or it’s nothing but an act made to appease one’s own conscious and their family members. I think the Bible tells us that it’s more than a show. Acts 22:16 Paul was commanded to do it. It wasn’t a suggestion. The Ethiopian eunuch did it. Cornelius and his household did it as well as Lydia and her household. Don’t take my word for it, look up every passage that has to do with baptism and you’ll see.
 January 28, 2015 at 6:52pm
But simply having faith is not enough James 2:14-26. In order for one to be reborn they must be baptized. It’s an act of faith that puts us into Christ, it buries us with Him so that when we come up out of the watery grave we have been raised from the dead into life. Romans 6:1-11 and 1 Peter 3:21. Simply believing is not enough as was said that demons believe and tremble, yet they are not saved. The command to be baptized was not a manmade command it was instructed by the Lord when He said one must be born again of water and in Mark 16:15-16. Let me be clear though, it’s not the water that saves, it’s the act of obedience that does. If you need further proof then I recommend reading Hebrews 11 and see faith in action.
January 28, 2015 at 4:21pm
One has a right to life and as Christians we are commanded to help those who are in need. Cakes are not needs.
If I say I don’t cater to gay weddings then that means I don’t do gay weddings at all. I think that’s pretty uniform there. Better yet, I’m a photographer. I don’t do risque photos. I do portraits of people fully clothed. I refuse to do boudoir but if someone came up to me saying just because I provide portraits of people I’m forced to do these other kinds shots I’d look at them funny and send them on their way to someone who actually does that kind of stuff. It goes against my conscientious. Same thing if someone came to the photo shoot dressed in “god hates gays” apparel or wore a shirt with Hitler on the front of it, I’d turn them away because those ideas are not something I want to put my name on.
January 28, 2015 at 7:19am
Sorry but that does not compute. It’s like telling someone to make an airplane but you don’t need to know where the materials come from. In order to have an organism evolve you first need a living organism. Abiogenesis is the Achilles heel of the evolutionary world so how do they get around it? By saying it has nothing to do with evolution and call anyone who disagrees an idiot who knows nothing about science. Problem solved, right? Sorry, but call me an idiot all you like, you can’t separate abiogenesis and evolution. Because when the two are put together the whole idea of evolution crumbles.
 January 28, 2015 at 6:52am
So the most popular argument I often read for the gay marriage debate is that a cake baker should make a cake regardless and that making that cake for the ceremony doesn’t mean you’re participating in it, right? Ok then maybe someone can answer me this, why do atheists get angry when a government official says a prayer in a public meeting? The same line of reasoning is that you’re not actually participating in the prayer, I mean a person can stand there with their eyes open and be quiet for a minute can’t they?
The arguments just don’t make sense. You’re not participating if you bake a cake but you are participating if someone says a prayer. Kinda backwards ain’t it? I would think actually doing work would mean you’re participating and helping out that particular cause whereas standing aside and allowing someone else to pray doesn’t exactly mean you condone it.
As for the hospital scenario, it’s like comparing apples to motor oil. A cake is not a right (although the French may disagree jk) nor is it a life and death situation. If a doctor was discriminating against a gay person and refusing them life saving care then I’d be right there with you. However, forcing people to bake cakes for whatever reason is not right nor is it A right.