If God isn’t allowed in schools, neither should sexuality be discussed. Other countries aren’t ahead of us in learning because they’re so progressive, we’re falling behind because we are. Stop teaching sexuality and start teaching actual math and science. Get rid of all this progressive brainwashing and we might actually produce some smarter kids.
 June 29, 2015 at 2:09pm
I’ve already had conversations with people who wish to see the “outdated” way of thinking (conservative Christianity) eliminated and they are more than happy to bully people into submission cause they “deserve it.” So we’re in the fight for our livelihoods because others consider religion hatred that must go away by any means necessary.
 June 24, 2015 at 5:15pm
As a Christian I would stand there silent and allow them to have their moment. I don’t agree with their religion, but I understand that in America they have freedom of speech and religion just as much as I do. That is called tolerance my friend, learn it.
 June 24, 2015 at 1:56pm
Who is forcing you to participate? Could you not stand silent for 30 seconds and allow others a moment to pray? You guys claim tolerance but show none.
 June 24, 2015 at 1:52pm
I’m sorry… where was the gun to their heads? I must have missed that. I didn’t see any force to pray. I will say this again, you don’t have to pray! You can stand there silent and respect the wishes of others who want to. Think about what you’re going to do on your free time. Take that time to meditate or something. Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you have a “right” to shut other people up. Besides I thought soldiers were supposed to be tough and thick skinned, not afraid of every little thing like prayers.
Sometimes during prayer my mind wanders to thinking about my wife's backside. So,I am always sure to thank God for my lovely wife...And her hot backside.
You should see the lengths they do to in Afghanistan to respect a non-Christian religion. How is this atheist going to be able to operate in foreign lands, if he can't handle hickory dickory dock?
Correct. Those who do not want to pray do not have to. On the other hand, they are not free to interrupt those who DO think it worthwhile to pray just before risking their lives.
This is the military. They tell you when to shit ... or not ... and which hand to use to wipe with ... or not. If they want you to use toilet paper, they'll issue you some. Or not. They were told to bow their heads and shut up. They were not told what to think or feel. The orders given were, I think, completely within military protocol.
How do these whiney asses handle the Pledge of Allegiance ... which they ARE required to voice?
 June 23, 2015 at 9:36pm
I thought freedom of speech meant freedom of speech not freedom unless it offends others then ban it.
Also, banning objects or references to something that was somehow linked to a killer doesn’t automatically get rid of hatred or stop any problems, it just causes more division. So how is banning the Confederate flag helping anything other than making liberals feel good about themselves that they actually think they did something?
“Unless it offends others then ban it”.
No, you can offend Christians, thats ok. You can offend all the honkies, crackers, and whites. That’s ok. You can offend ethical and moral family values. That’s ok. But don’t you dare say anything about the sexual perverts or thugs, or you’ll find yourself hatted on by extremist progressives.
Freedom of speech for the left, only means freedom for them, not others. When they get offended, they take up arms. When they offend they call it freedom of speech.
Well, we have become a nation of crybabies. Always offended!
The Confederate flag is a part of the history of this country; what does it have to do with the shooting at a church? Absolutely NOTHING. This is all a part of an agenda with progressives, who are trying to undermine anything to do with our Constitutional freedoms, including the freedom of speech and religion. Pretty soon, these rascals will want to ban the United States flag. I say, stand for something honorable, or get out of the way!
The burden of freedom of speech is the freedom of the press.
scarebear83, I agree. Have you ever noticed that when something goes wrong, it's pass a law so it will never happen again. That is BS. Just like the men that escaped prison. Someone on Fox was talking the day they escaped and said, "They will have them caught is a short time, What has it been now 19 or 20 days. He said they have no surviveal skills and they don't know the woods. Then the mayor of New York had the man hole sealed. So I guess we will have to pass a law so this will never happen again, and it could be the Man Hole Law. I wonder how this country has survived as long as it has without all the do gooders that we have today. Down with all liberals.
I am offended by your comment. ;-)
 June 23, 2015 at 5:02pm
Snow, so you’re telling me that because I open up a PRIVATE business that happens to serve the public it means everyone has a right to my labor whether I want to give it to them or not. So tell me how that’s not considered slavery? Regardless of how you view the section you posted (out of context if I might interject) equal protection of the law would still cut both ways. I still have freedom of religion which means it still applies to me as a private business owner. It doesn’t stop because I open a business. I still have a right to refuse participation in something that goes against my morals as do you. I think some need to go back and take Economics and Gov’t because clearly people need a refresher on private and public sectors.
 June 23, 2015 at 4:27pm
Really? You want to go there?
– Nidal Hasan – Ft Hood Shooter
– Aaron Alexis – Navy Yard shooter
– Seung-Hui Cho – Virginia Tech shooter
– James Holmes – the “Dark Knight”/Colorado shooter
– Amy Bishop, killed her colleagues in Alabama
– James J. Lee – Discovery channel Shooter
– Jared Loughner – Tuscon Shooter
All considered liberal in their ideology. So, again, do you really want to go there?
 June 22, 2015 at 12:24pm
Snow, show me in the constitution where you or anyone else has a right to my labor. Go ahead… I’ll be waiting.
 June 19, 2015 at 4:23pm
You used the racist card. Point is null. Do not pass ‘go’ and do not collect $200.
 June 19, 2015 at 4:15pm
This is the difference between Sharpton and Beck. Regardless of your views you should pray with the families and help the communities to heal, not to destroy and steal. This is love, love for your fellow man in action.
 June 19, 2015 at 5:15am
Here’s the thing, we need to call liberals out when they do that. Just say they can’t argue the facts when they resort to calling people racists or bigots etc. Every time they do that call them out. They need to be exposed for the hateful people they are.
 June 18, 2015 at 1:59pm
Wait, so it’s an endorsement if he’s wearing his uniform, but it’s not an endorsement for a Christian baker to provide for a gay wedding? Does any of this make sense?
A baker isn't a government or church representative with any special authority or government/church granted powers. A sheriff is.
 June 14, 2015 at 4:28pm
Something interesting just clicked. So this morning our youth minister, who was filling in, preached a lesson about God is love. In mid-preaching he focused our minds on what would we tell someone who asks why God would put the tree in the garden… Free will is all part of love. You can’t force people to love you so the choice is given. Gays claim we hate them which in turn they force us through any means necessary to get us to do what they want. That’s not love or tolerance. If you hate someone you’ll do what you can to harm them. Hatred is anti free will, anti love. So if you’re in favor of taking away Christian’s free will you in turn hate us. It’s not love, it’s tyranny and bigotry.
June 12, 2015 at 11:56pm
Keep in mind Jesus is answering two different questions. He answers the first in which He is referencing the destruction of Jerusalem (this generation will not pass away…). Starting at verse 32 is when He starts addressing *that* day which is the Judgment. Verses 29-31 are still part of the first answer. This is symbolic in which the Gospel will go out into all the world. The nation of Israel would no longer be God’s chosen. The text doesn’t say the elect will be gathered to heaven, it just says they’ll be gathered which sounds to me like the spread of the Gospel message and new converts.
June 12, 2015 at 5:33pm
After conducting some research I believe I was off on the rule of the kings. Nero was the 5th who had fallen. Daniel tells us that one horn uproots the other three horns because he is greater than them. This may be in regards to the four that reigned in one year. Galba, Otho, Vitellius and Vespasian- the one whose army successfully took over. So since the other 3 don’t count Vespasian was the sixth who was reigning and Titus was the seventh who only ruled two years. The eighth one would be Domitian who would claim to be god.
 June 12, 2015 at 3:45pm
Jen, the 42 months is not how long Nero reigned but how long his reign of terror was against the Christians. From November of 64 AD till Nero’s suicide in June of 68 AD he persecuted the Christians like no other. If you add it up it’s exactly 42 months. Revelation 17:9-10 states that seven kings would reign, five kings have fallen and one is… Nero was the sixth that was currently in power. It goes on to say that after him the seventh will reign for only a little while. That was Galba who reigned for less than seven months. I hope that will help in further researching the truth.
[-1] June 12, 2015 at 1:45pm
Even John stated in Revelation that he was a fellow companion in the tribulation which meant it was happening at that time.
In fact I think this guy does a good job at breaking down the book of Revelation. It’s so simple and easy to understand. https://vimeo.com/52020025 In fact it begs the question, if John is writing to the seven churches of Asia, why would he write to them about events that wouldn’t happen until however many millenia after they’re dead? It would be like writing to us what would happen in 4,000 AD.
 June 12, 2015 at 1:05pm
Intersexed- basically think hermaphrodites. No, they aren’t transgendered. These are people who were born truly with medical issues in regards to their reproductive organs or their genetic makeup.
 June 12, 2015 at 12:47pm
I don’t think it’s to show conservatives are “nutty” but I think she’s trying hard to convince others she’s black. “Oh, look! I got hate mail! See? I get racists hating on me so I must be black!” I’m no psychiatrist but I can read people fairly well. It seems like she’s trying too hard to convince others even if it means faking hate mail.