User Profile: ScarletRose


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • January 28, 2016 at 8:18pm

    You open your Windows options box on the far Left of your bottom tool bar and look around through Windows Accessories for the “Character Map” – choose “Ariel” font and use the side cursor slide bar and NOT mouse on the interior of the characters, to scan down – or that changes your FONT choice.
    You will see both upper and lower case letters with various types of accent marks. among a few hundred other types of characters. I.E. ¢ ® £ ñ ç ♥ ♠ – etcetera…
    Click on one of your choosing and then click “Select”, then “Copy” at the bottom of the pop-up box. Then go to your comment box or text file or e-mail and select the place with your mouse where you want that letter with the accent mark, and right click, choose “paste” – inserting that character into your word.

  • [1] January 20, 2016 at 12:55pm

    When supporting the Constitution is banned by Conservatives, your nation is in trouble.

  • [4] January 20, 2016 at 12:53pm

    I’ve been banned from a lot of Conservative sites, recently, who use a common internet service to moderate their comments threads, apparently banned by being Marked as SPAMMING, by supporters of some GOP CANDIDATES, for citing Constitutional clauses, Vattel’s Laws of the Land, Frederick Douglass, Founding Fathers, when I cite Principles that have a proven track record as the foundation of my political decisions.
    I don’t get ugly or threatening, but I support the Rule of Law and NOT the rule by whim of the more popular politicians or movements of the Day – especially when changing or eliminating portions of our USA Constitution without going through the Constitutional Amendment process of getting the votes to do it.
    People need to be reminded that this kind of Social Sanction against those very Constitutional Principles is what caused our Founding Fathers to decide that King George III meant them HARM and meant them to be slaves.
    We do things by ELECTIONS in this nation, because Rule by tiny Oligarchy against the will of the overwhelming Majority is still Tyranny – and that is why the Masses have the Right to POLITICAL FREE SPEECH — unless they are inciting VIOLENCE and LAWLESSNESS and INSURGENCY and TREASON as methods for STEAM-ROLLING over the MAJORITY OPPOSITION to a minority political movement.
    If they have CORRECTNESS AND RIGHT on their side, the Majority will go with it, AND SHOULD PREVAIL.
    We have the Right to Speak For the Constitution and Survival.

  • [1] January 18, 2016 at 9:28pm

    Cruz showed his Canadian birth certificate in 2013. Why doesn’t he show his American credentials and just make Trump disappear?

    Looks bad since others in tight situations showed all their documents, like John McCain and Donald Trump!
    But not Obama – not Cruz.
    That is a problem Cruz had back in 2012 and 2013, in Texas, which Dallas News tried to help Cruz vet and get aired out – then.
    If he wants Trump off his back, show his paperwork like Donald Trump showed his.
    That would be his smart move and get the DNC off his back, too.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 18, 2016 at 9:18pm

    Cruz supporters making huge mistake for blocking those who are presenting Constitutional clauses, and Vattel quotations from political discussion threads, thinking if they silence the voters online in political discussions, they will make ground in an election.
    Such things backfire.

  • November 2, 2015 at 7:18pm

    And teaching foolishness to children that could cost the lives of the children – but the children aren’t hers, so she wants them dead, anyway. She thinks it’s despicable that their mothers didn’t have the decency to have abortions, anyway.

  • November 2, 2015 at 7:15pm

    What would you say if the occasion for the cops to stop was her death by Hit and Run?
    Because she is in the bloody street of her own neighborhood instead of on those nice lovely sidewalks recessed a yard back away from the curb!!!
    You would be mad at the cops because they weren’t watching out for the black lady who wasn’t safe in her own neighborhood.
    What’s the matter with you? You have a problem with an AGREEMENT about which is the right side of the street for people to be going in which direction?
    How wide a street would you need if each person could be wherever they wanted to be in any lane of their own choosing – and still have a REASONABLE expectation of safety?
    Just a FEW plain Basics, if you please!

  • [1] November 2, 2015 at 7:09pm

    I would. What if the little kids were to become as reckless in the streets as she is, and them be hurt.
    Those were ice sidewalks on both sides of the street. First thing I thought was why run on the street instead of the sidewalks, anyway?

  • November 2, 2015 at 7:03pm

    In our neighborhood, they will stop the kids walking late in the evening, if there has been a rash of vandalism and petty theft in the area. The law is often “not friendly” – but several of them told me, because they stopped my son, once – they are trying to be provocative to see how the kids respond, so they can try to read their character, quickly. but they mean no harm, just are trying to figure out the kids’ natures as they watch for a few months to see if they can figure who might or might not be likely suspects. My son thought he was a target, but the Deputy told me he already knew my son was not the type, but the boys he was visiting with that night were not of the same nature, and he wanted to discourage my son from being out late, so he wouldn’t develop the wrong companions, and also, so if something happened, and someone else saw my son out at the same time, they would NOT jump to the conclusion that he was the one who did something he shouldn’t. It worked. My son stayed home more, and tended to bring his friends home to play video games and watch movies at home, more, and to go out on the street a lot less. If they played outside, they tended to stay in my yard.
    I was sure glad.

  • November 2, 2015 at 6:51pm

    Her EXAMPLE in the community could cause small children, imitating her foolishness – after all, she is a college dean – could cause them to be at risk to be hit by a speeding vehicle.

  • November 2, 2015 at 6:40pm

    Unreal stupid to say that the drivers are ALL “only her neighbors” and “they can just go around her”.
    First of all, They won’t ALL ALWAYS be “JUST HER NEIGHBORS”.
    I live in a remote area and JUST a neighborhood of family and old people, no stores or anything. And we still get a rash of a few reckless drivers from time to time. And once, one of them ran over a girl on a bike and dragged her several yards UNDER the truck WITH the Bicycle, before he could get it stopped. They had the dickens of a time getting that pickup jacked up so they could get her out – off the hot pipes against her body.
    And it was an accident. Nothing malicious, just did not think anyone else would be on the street at all. Just thought he had free reign, and it was broad daylight. It happened SUDDENLY. He didn’t have any warning, any more than the girl did.
    She is a college dean – supposedly trustworthy to be a role-model. Are there any five yr olds in the neighborhood to watch her rule the streets? I noticed sidewalks on both sides of the street.

    She earns NO RESPECT from me for what she is clearly TRYING to teach the children of that neighborhood.
    I find her UNFIT to have in the neighborhood for her IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIONS towards other people’s children.

  • [1] November 1, 2015 at 5:48pm

    I don’t believe that data AT ALL! QUITE THE REVERSE!
    I see TONS more people speaking out about the UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY of the COURTS, the FACT THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ordering the clerks to give out UNCONSTITUTIONAL Licenses on the orders of an UNCONSTITUTIONAL PARTISAN OLIGARCHY.
    Proof – you still cannot get this thing passed by a Super Majority of American Citizens in an Amendment in proper Constitutional Procedures.
    Ain’t going to happen.
    This isn’t even a LEGITIMATE “LAW OF THE LAND”. It is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL Court ruling without Legislative, TRUE REPRESENTATIONAL Blessing.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] November 1, 2015 at 5:40pm

    IF it is NOT their Values and they didn’t come to ASSIMILATE to the Nation, then Expel them.

    The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
    Emmerich de Vattel
    BOOK 1, CHAPTER 19
    Of Our Native Country, and Several Things That Relate to It
    § 233. Except such as affect the common safety of mankind.
    But this very reason shows, that, although the justice of each nation ought in general to be confined to the punishment of crimes committed in its own territories, we ought to except from this rule those villains, who, by the nature and habitual frequency of their crimes, violate all public security, and declare themselves the enemies of the human race. Poisoners, assassins, and incendiaries by profession, may be exterminated wherever they are seized; for they attack and injure all nations by trampling under foot the foundations of their common safety. Thus, pirates are sent to the gibbet by the first into whose hands they fall. If the sovereign of the country where crimes of that nature have been committed, reclaims the perpetrators of them, in order to bring them to punishment, they ought to be surrendered to him, as being the person who is principally interested in punishing them in an exemplary manner. And as it is proper to have criminals regularly convicted by a trial in due form of law, this is a second reason for delivering up malefactors of that class to where … have been committed.

  • [2] October 29, 2015 at 12:36am

    I agree – Iceland – May 2012
    They should all be in ONE TRIAL in an open air venue for TREASON, with scaffolding being built about 50 ft from the defense table – area surrounded by Jumbo Trons – half to view the news feed videos of them bragging about their acts of Treason and half to show the world the trial. No Federal Public Servants managing the Trial or operating as Instruments of the Court.

  • October 24, 2015 at 1:13am

    I started to try, but what I would say to you on that issue would be erased by the mods anyway.

    You walk a mile in the shoes of the human beings THAT GOD created for a High Calling on their lives, whose mothers walk them into a Planned Parenthood clinic, and walk out without them. Then get back to us about “CHOICE”.
    It’ll be interesting watching you ‘splain your opinion on that to Jesus.

  • October 24, 2015 at 1:09am

    IS that supposed to be a COMFORT to anyone other than Odrama Queen?

  • October 24, 2015 at 1:08am

    NO!. Paul Ryan is NOT a “CHANCE”. He is a MAJOR BLOW to the HULL of the ship while it is centered in the largest OCEAN – DAYS, MONTHS DECADES from any other means of flotation or transport.
    AND HE JOYS over his opportunity to SINK THE SHIP!

  • [1] October 24, 2015 at 1:03am

    Cutting your own throat to spite your own face is usually NOT the Best you can do.
    It certainly isn’t ADEQUATE at this time.
    The final blow to the destruction of the ship you are in and the only ship in sight, in the midst of the Atlantic Ocean in the midst of a Perfect Storm that includes a Category 15 Hurricane – among other things, is NOT the BEST of ANYTHING.

    But you enjoy yourself with it while it continues to exist while being flushed to the bottom of the Abyss – which you should remember, HAS NO BOTTOM.

  • October 24, 2015 at 12:58am

    A Vote for Paul Ryan is a WELL-DESERVED VOTE for the Death of the GOP.

    It’s so over!

  • October 23, 2015 at 11:34pm

    Let Paul Ryan’s Harvest find him quickly and with great ironic simplicity.
    Matthew 25:31-46

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love