User Profile: Scarybones

Scarybones

Member Since: March 20, 2011

Comments

123
  • June 27, 2016 at 4:30pm

    Yeah, I mean if you look at before Europe came and kind of messed s**t up over here … we were doing alright and living in balance with the world,” Martinez said.

    I have done decades of extensive archaeological studies in the region and he could not be more incorrect. The Spanish messed things up upon their arrival but centuries before any known contact large Mayan and Aztec cities failed and were abandoned. The prevailing wisdom is that they pushed the jungles too far back and essentially over extended their civilizations until they depleted their resources thus forcing them to move. Many great civilizations through history failed because of overpopulation coupled with climate shifts or short term anomalies which they were unable to technologically override. Europeans Introduced diseases that decimated the populations which, of course, has no relation to some perceived climate change. Prior to contact, and all by their lonesomes, they were screwing up their environments just fine. Today we override local shifts in climate either with technology, i.e. Greenhouses, wells and irrigation and the like, or with global trade. I have the feeling that it will take thirty years for them to admit that they were wrong. In the meantime, carry on.

  • [3] June 27, 2016 at 11:40am

    “Now, what we’ve been doing is looking at the data, and we know that police somehow manage to de-escalate, disarm and not kill white people every day,” he said.

    Therein lies the problem. The underlying assumptions associated with this statement are staggering. If a person, no matter their color, complies with the law, follows any commands by a police officer if given and then sort it all out later if there is a disagreement, then any given situation will de-escalate. If, on the other hand, a person acts like a thug, is defiant, etc… then the situation will escalate quickly. The assumption this guy makes is that the police are acting and reacting based upon race and not upon the actions of the individuals they are dealing with. Maybe, just maybe, the reason that whites have fewer problems overall (if this is even statistically correct) is that they come from homes with two parents. And maybe, just maybe, the reason that blacks on average have more problems is that they don’t grow up in two-parent households at the same percentages as other races. The correlation between personal responsibility, good behavior and problems with police seems pretty clear. But of course it is easier to just blame Whitey

  • [10] June 22, 2016 at 2:38pm

    Go to recess, turn out the lights and leave them there. This is basically a self-imposed time out and we should let them take it.

  • [5] May 8, 2016 at 1:42pm

    Clearly these dangerous cartoons are so evil that they have spawned a whole generation of western terrorists who can’t wait to get out there and stab people. Wait, what? That didn’t happen to the generations of kids who grew up with these cartoons? Hmmmm. Time for a little introspection there Sparky.

  • [13] May 4, 2016 at 9:56pm

    ” Wallace said. “But I think at least the initial impulse was if you put him on, you get ratings and we’re in the news business.” They are in “business” alright. Unfortunately helping create the news does not a good journalist make. For once I would love to see real debates that are not limited to sound bites and campaign slogans. We are all losers when the media is most concerned about ratings.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] May 4, 2016 at 4:04pm

    noun
    1. A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.

    2. Hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

    Where in all of this is there any mention of majorities? These women clearly, as demonstrated by their actions, hate whites and attempted to hurt them based solely upon the basis of race. They are the very definition of racist. Took me all of 30 seconds to look up the definition. You should try it sometime.

  • [3] April 26, 2016 at 3:34pm

    So wait, the State and the University are racist against Blacks and that is why she was fired for being White? Got it. Not really. How this woman ever had a job as a professor is beyond me.

  • [4] March 29, 2016 at 11:54pm

    So if he can’t have dreads because they are from her culture (I assume that this means Africa as a whole which is dumb in and of itself since Africa is very diverse) then why is she wearing pants and a t-shirt? These are clearly things developed in white, European based cultures. How dare she culturally appropriate these things. She should only wear what she considers to be her native, African dress. Oh, and by the way, I have traveled extensively in Africa and spoken to numerous others who have done the same and any American who goes there and claims that they are African/American will be laughed at if not outright shunned. Real Africans consider blacks from America to be no more “African” than they do my lily white behind.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] March 28, 2016 at 12:43pm

    Don’t you find it nice that not every story is about death and destruction? A little levity balances out the day.

  • [1] March 10, 2016 at 2:04pm

    So who is to say that she doesn’t fall into the 20% that didn’t find a job? Whether the 80% number should have been lower or not does not change the fact that she could easily fall on the wrong side of the line. Her grades are not the only factor in securing a job. Her personality and attitude alone may very well be the reason that no one wants her on board.

  • [2] February 16, 2016 at 9:06pm

    Nobody is denying Obama’s right and duty to nominate a new Justice. The Senate has the right to deny said Justice. The Democrats denied Bork based solely on partisan politics. The Republicans can equally deny Obama his pick. How hard is that to understand?

  • [9] February 12, 2016 at 1:36pm

    Just as I predicted days ago. She inflates what happened to her and then when the video is released proving such she insists, against all evidence, that her initial claims are true. Always playing victim and never taking responsibility for her outstanding actions. The police followed standard procedure that is set in place to protect everyone. What she was feeling and what she feels now are irrelevant to the situation. They acted appropriately and her defenders are acting with the same level of denial.

  • [30] January 31, 2016 at 11:31am

    Republicans fought hard to stop segregation. The Democrats fought to keep it. Thankfully the Republicans won. Apparently the Democrats haven’t given up and, despite their spin, are fighting hard to reinstate it. If you claim to want equal opportunity then you can’t grant any group special snowflake status. The key words here are “equal opportunity.” Notice how I didn’t say “equal success” or “guaranteed success?”

  • [3] January 28, 2016 at 11:00pm

    That would be entirely illegal so, no, it won’t do the trick.

  • [3] December 28, 2015 at 1:55am

    “Are you prepared to show me a white self that love has unmasked?” Why should I show you anything? Why should I give you the time of day? You aren’t ENTITLED to any part of me so quit acting the self riteous ass and get a real job. The only one fixated on race is you.

  • [4] August 15, 2015 at 3:38pm

    This is a war against humanity. Wake up people! These pigs should be shown no quarter. They should be annihilated with extreme prejudice.

  • [4] July 3, 2015 at 10:06pm

    “ICE issued a detainer for Sanchez in March, requesting to be notified if he was going to be released. The detainer was not honored”. Sounds like a major lawsuit coming to the Sheriff’s dept. At least ICE was trying to do the right thing but, had they succeeded originally this guy wouldn’t have been in the country. Not surprised that this happened in San Fran. It’s what you get with sanctuary cities.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 28, 2015 at 11:19am

    This is a function of the lack of awareness by the store associate, and sadly by the typical American. Now, had the associate been asked to make a cake depicting Kim Kardashians posterior they probably could have done it from memory.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] June 27, 2015 at 4:10am

    Kingofprydain you state that When you operate a business, you must serve everyone. So, if I come to, let’s just say, your plumbing company and let you know that I need the pipes in my house replaced. You are booked solid but I don’t care. I want you to do the job. Are you telling me that you have no right to refuse me your services? How does this not make all business owners slaves to any and every jackass that comes through the door?

  • [2] February 21, 2015 at 5:56pm

    She is perfection. Keep her in place, let her keep spouting off and then, close to election time, expose all of the shenanigans that she and her ilk perpetrate on a daily basis. She is the perfect poster child for the left and a gift that keeps on giving for conservatives.

123