Nobody would be “standing on their soap box” if gays weren’t trying to force everyone to consider their lifestyle normal by law. You don’t see anyone protesting polygamists, for example, because the vast majority of them recognize that most people won’t accept their lifestyle as normal. They’re fine with that arrangement, and we are too. Of course we think it’s wrong, but they don’t put anyone on the defensive. That’s true tolerance: two groups tolerating each other, not one group forcing the other to change its beliefs.
December 11, 2014 at 5:49pm
Well, if you’d look at a few actual twin studies you’d find that most are funded by gay rights organizations, with an agenda of their own. And they still don’t consistently produce concordance rates over even 50%; if sexuality were determined genetically concordance rates would be expected to be much higher, near 100%.
 December 11, 2014 at 5:46pm
I’ll never understand how liberals think that the more time passes, the more correct they become.
I suppose it is simply that reality supports us in our thinking....
scientam-well, turns out libs have been right EVERY time-women's rights, the evils of slavery, equality for gays-
April 19, 2014 at 8:50am
“matter and energy are constantly created and destroyed… quantum physics has demonstrated this.”
How ironic that you “suggest that arguing from ignorance is another logical fallacy,” because E^2 = (m(c^2))^2 + (pc)^2 is how we model all matter-energy conversions. It shows that you either have matter or you have energy, you don’t create or destroy either. They are two sides of the same coin, you only convert between the two.
In addition, inorganic matter does not turn into organic matter in nature. Nowhere in the world can one find a “primordial organism,” which the secular theory of evolution relies so heavily on, that has been created because lightning struck the right combination of inorganic materials. As has been observed for centuries, not to mention restated in Darwin’s book “Origin of Species,” natura non facit saltus; nature does not make jumps. It seems that Itb was not the one arguing from ignorance in this instance.
April 11, 2014 at 7:26pm
I’m disappointed in the Blaze’s poor editing job on every article. “Full-proof,” really? In what way are you proofing something against “full”? The term is “fool-proof,” meaning you have proofed it against fools, i.e. anybody can get it right. Come on, Blaze, people learn to correct mistakes like these in middle school, they shouldn’t be making them in a job that relies on writing proficiently. Hire some people with a decent knowledge of the English language, for your sake and ours.
Easy, remember the story came from another source (AP) so it might not be a mistake made by The Blaze. Spell checkers do wicked things sometimes and one will observe something they never intended after the 3rd or 4th read.
The internet is about speed to data not accuracy of the data, Remember that.
March 26, 2014 at 10:18am
They don’t have to. They just have to make an artificial intelligence that *appears* to think like a human, so it will be hyped up by the media as the “first artificial intelligence” and accepted by the masses as a bona fide replication of a human in machine form. There are lots of people out there who have trouble holding on to their bountiful stores of money, and this company is going to make a killing off of them.
March 23, 2014 at 10:28pm
This is sick. Since when has the ability to reproduce been optional in marriage? The answer, to the liberals I know are going to jump on this post, is never. A vocal minority wants to convince people that they’re better as people for supporting deviant “rights,” but as I have said elsewhere, simply wanting something really badly doesn’t give you a right to it.
What the hell are you babbling about? There are millions of straight couples who can’t have children of their own, and they are all allowed to get married and raise families. Every day, not just states but churches as well marry couples who are obviously too old to reproduce.
March 23, 2014 at 8:25pm
“everyone who’s tired of hearing the other side talk smack”
So, basically anyone who doesn’t agree with their exact political views. How open-minded and liberal…
March 23, 2014 at 8:22pm
Hilarious how fickle liberals are about their stance on muslims. Half the time, muslims are a misogynistic people who hate women and live to keep women from having the rights they deserve. The other half, they’re an angelic, oppressed minority and saying anything against them is racism, or as the liberals love to call it, “Islamophobia.” Pick a side, libs!
"This won’t convince many, because people want to hear people agree with them."
Hence why Christians will laud this film, because it reinforces their belief that they're persecuted when they're really the persecutors.
"This won’t convince many, because people want to hear people agree with them."
Thank you for summing up the entire reason Christians want to go see this movie.
We don't want to feel the victim mentality, we want to see a story where good triumphs over evil. (Which is, by the way, in most movies, but in this case is specifically Christianity over Atheism.)
March 21, 2014 at 10:03pm
Liberals love to take it one step at a time. Don’t let them take that first step towards spreading disinformation.
Number of parents that will care, and do anything about this....
In the 10's
They try to pervert the word 'Regulated' to mean restrict through legislation. Regulated means 'trained'....a well trained citizen soldiery.....Don't let them fool you with fancy wordplay www.ctwilcox.com
Sadly, their definition of the 2A is correct according to case law.
While not quoting the actual 2nd amendment,it does reflect the current application. The 2nd does not forbid criminals from owning weapons,or the insane,or terrorists or cannon. So it is a more correct telling than a pure regurgitation of the original. Does it mention all men are created equal except the ones we have in chains back home? I support private ownership of weapons btw.
You do understand that this is what Communist Core will look like just a bit farther down the road, right?
Your mind, and your child's mind, is the prize.
Collectivism kills--always has and always will.
Progressive = re-branded Communist
Brainwash the children or plant your own hybrid seeds, that's how you really change a country from within. The Liberals apply all the most effective tactics to take away our freedoms, while Conservatives sit around wondering how it all happened, because they simply will not think so deviously. They need to start thinking more like the opposition, and become real Freedom Fighters, or there will be nothing left to save for the 2016 election.
I will say that they got the KERNAL right. The 2nd is there to restrict governmental over-reach. Nothing about hunting or some other BS it is there to allow us to protect US FROM our government. Let the blue states register their firearms, suckers.
That's how you boil a frog. If you drop him in a pot of hot water he will jump right out. But if you put him in a pan of cold water and slowly heat it up you can boil him.
This is Illinois. IEA is a huge force that props up bad teachers.
One teacher had sex with a student, got her pregnant, and was fired and hired in a neighboring district.
Leave you're kids in Gov. run school & this is what they teach ! WTH
the school should be sue for spreading direct lies as fact. Multiply the amount by the number of years they have been teaching this.
Well I have checked all my weapons and not one has ever been to prison, so that should clear all doubts if they're legal or not. Liberals are trying to brain wash our children, to believe what they want the constitution to say. I bet those two teachers are still in the education system, just another lie to mislead the public. They always cover their bases with throwing accountability out the window.
indoctrinated democrats indoctrinating innocent kids by Lying to them. Just amazing that public teachers can prey on kids, this is no different than a teacher sexually molesting a student.
The communist mind always is going after your kids. In the worship of government, the communist must stand between the individual, God and family.
Welcome to the new communist movement....aka liberal democrat.
Keep in mind, what members of congress approved the budget that funded the communist movement?
THIS MAKES ME MAD. YOU CAN NOT REWRITE AMENDMENTS THE WAY YOU WANT THEM TO BE AND TRY TO TEACH SCHOOL CHILDREN A LIE!! ..
EXACTLY..... You know well how Liberals work!
I imagine Obama singing a variation of Johnny Cash's "One piece at a time", but instead of trying to get a Cadillac, he's dismantling the constitution.
They want the children.
March 21, 2014 at 6:19pm
Blink, what gives them the right to claim federal benefits as a married couple? What are they supposedly being denied protection from? Everyone in the country is as free as everyone else to marry whomever he or she wants to, provided the spouse is of the opposite sex. I’m just as free as you are to use dollar bills with George Washington’s face on them. If I try to give you a dollar bill that has the statue of liberty on it, you don’t have to recognize that as legitimate payment for a good or service. You’re not denying me any rights, but it’s the same situation with gays.
March 21, 2014 at 6:11pm
Wanting something really badly doesn’t give you a right to it.
It would sure be nice if you actually understood that this IS justice being blind and saying that the law must be "blind" to sexual orientation.
blink: Just when will they declare that justice must be blind to crime . How can justice remain ' blind' and still administer justice ? You must have a moral code in order to judge human behavior.
March 20, 2014 at 11:21am
March 20, 2014 at 11:19am
Sooooo… a big dehumidifier with a filter? Wow, that’s, uh… that’s something!
March 17, 2014 at 8:16pm
Now, I’m no authority on this matter, considering I don’t know what ride it was or how prosthetic limbs are attached to the body, but I would assume that they are not attached as firmly as real limbs. That being said, it would be much more tragic for a vet to be flung off a roller coaster because his legs detached than it would be for his daughter to have to ride alone.
March 17, 2014 at 8:13pm
Let’s see, switch lunch boxes, or go to the news station? Which is easier? Hm, this is a tough one… After many hours of deep pondering, I have found a solution! Switch the freaking lunch box and move on. If he likes my little pony so much, he can watch it on his own time, but he’s going to grow up to be an effeminate wimp who relies on other people for his protection. If you want to take such a gaudy lunch box, that’s on you, you can’t just expect people to tolerate it. In much the same way, I could only walk through Times Square wearing a “God hates ****” shirt without getting beat up if I could physically defend myself. Unpopular opinions sometimes require force to express them, and no artificial system of authority can effectively change this fact.
While Chinese and Russian children are taught math, reading and science, the soon to be gulag workers of Amerika are taught how to be effeminate.
first off i am sure that it was not there first choice to go to the press. and how in the wide world of Equestria is liking a show make you a wimp? last i checked we have Bronies in Spec ops and also bikers and i dont think they are normally associated with wimps? did you ever think that maybe just maybe its a good show? have you watched a episode?
Walk how is liking a show being taught to be effeminate? as i have stated before i am 23 i do everything you would expect a guy like me to do you know shoot, hunt/fish, have a job, do competitive sports at my collage i am attending, top of my class i also compete in power lifting and have trained proficiently in 4 different martial arts. so please tell me how i am effeminate. if you saw me on the street you would never know i was a Brony unless i told you or was wearing one of my MLP shirts.
March 17, 2014 at 7:42pm
Led by “elders”? Sounds much more like a cult than a church.