When a man can “proclaim” that a person can chose to be whatever sex they desire.. A man can “proclaim” what ages they can sexually desire. That is what happens when man decides he is God, and he is now making all the rules.
 May 24, 2016 at 12:00pm
All of these actions use to be considered sin, but since religion has been effectively stripped from our laws and society, there is no longer anything considered sin. Everything is subjective, and anything can be explained into existence.
 May 24, 2016 at 11:57am
These people will not come out first asking for access to your children. They will first put forward the position that though they have a sexual urge, they do not act out on it and like other sexual perversions people should be understanding of them and their position. Later they will get professionals who will claim that this is natural and normal and a form of “love” and since they removed parental rights from it’s citizens and passed it to the state, you won’t have a say over what your kid is taught or what they are allowed to do. You always have to start with the camel’s nose in the tent, before you start moving the herd.
May 24, 2016 at 11:10am
In many States, the age of consent has always been 16.
I’m talking about a federal law to make it uniform. They will force all states to adopt 16 via holding federal funds hostage or through judicial activism. Then it will be 15 then 14 etc.
The age of consent in quite a few Western countries is 14. That is pedophilia, plain and simple and the trend for the radical left will be to seek to go lower.
 May 24, 2016 at 10:03am
Time will determine if electing a Lib who makes promises he never intended to keep, was a better decision than electing a real Social and Fiscal Conservative instead.
To bad Cruz couldn't even win with republicans. He wud have gotten raped in the general, would've loved to see it
A lib? What are you 12? He has no political baggage AT ALL. He's not establishment. AT ALL. He's been a private citizen his entire life building and creating things and making money hand over fist. Unlike the wannabes that he trounced (let's face it, it wasn't even close) who were professional politician (well most of them) with baggage galore. While one professes and claims to be a social and fiscal conservative, their actions (and in many cases inactions) proved just the opposite. But many were blinded by the platitudes and "feelings" that these candidates gave them. Fortunately, the people that were tired of the same old stuff different day, sent a message. Loud and clear. To the current GOP that we're not going to take it anymore (cue the twisted singer song) and we'll show them exactly what we do when the keep throwing establishment candidates at us.
Does a conservative cloture vote to fast track TPA, and then vote against the resolution to limit TPP to the original 12 countries? Does a conservative vote for the Corker bill, which handcuffed our congress and enabled our sworn enemy (Iran) with nukes and money?
Does a conservative work on the North American Union Community project in 2005?
Cruz personally attached TPA to spending bill HR2146. What a surprise.
All this stuff is undeniably NWO globalist stuff.
If you do a little research you'll find plenty of other red flags about Cruz.
So what if Cruz called McConnell a liar, or read Green Eggs and Ham on the senate floor.
That doesn't mean that you give him a pass on his left wing votes in the senate.
 May 24, 2016 at 10:01am
I am betting that Rush is not just concerned about the primary, but also what happens after Trump is elected, (if he is elected). Trump is all talk, he tells you exactly what you want to hear. Rush may be worried that if he actually endorsed Trump and Trump did a full 180 back to his prior Liberal positions after being elected, that he would have to share the blame of those who made this ruse possible.
You do not build a large corporation with just talk.The country has built up a lot of momentum going in the wrong direction. Hopefully Trump will start the process of turning things around it that is possible at this point without a civil war. It's either him or Hillary and Bill.
That is my concern. But it is a better risk than Hillary. Congress and the Senate would not be afraid to go after an old white guy holding the office of the presidency, as they would be for a Hillary or Obama.
SGinNC, all the more reason Rush should have endorsed Cruz in the primaries. With Cruz you will get what you see. With Trump, who the hell knows.
 May 18, 2016 at 3:48pm
She was good enough for Trump… Hell if he wasn’t running he would probably still be supporting her.
 May 18, 2016 at 3:41pm
And he could name Janet Reno or Loretta Lynch and fools like you would still defend him. What I want to know is how much of a “Social Conservative” are these Justices? We all know that Trump is for the LGBT agenda and other Liberal Social positions, just where do these Judges stand on those issues?
If he named Reno or Lynch I’d jump off the train faster than you can even imagine.
But I knew he wouldn't do that.
Because I'm smart.
It looks like Glenn has finally caused brain damage to the people who listen to him and take what he says as gospel.
 May 17, 2016 at 11:47am
What difference would that make? They would just say they “believe” they have a certain sexual organ just as they “believe” that they are physically the opposite sex.
what makes the 'p'/v' signage idea work is that it changes bathroom usage from internal to external. it does not matter what you 'believe'... it's what you have. the truly sad thing about this issue is that we are all discussing this while our country heads toward fiscal and cultural ruin.
Desslock are you offering to check everyone's pants to make sure they are all in compliance.
Why have unenforceable laws .
 May 12, 2016 at 11:44am
I have a concealed carry permit and I am totally pro 2nd amendment, but I do not agree with this guy or people like him. No, not everyone can open carry a firearm. Felons, people under the age of 18 and several other types of people fall into this category. The police are out to keep the citizens safe and not just looking for a confrontation. Next time just show him your ID or weapons permit and help the police rather than making a situation to make the police look bad.
Well, first, if open carry is legal, then this gentleman is just fine. If someone is uncomfortable being around visible firearms, that's a personal problem they should seek help for. Second, if you do some searching on the Philly PD, you will see that many of their officers have come out against open carry and have stated that permit or not, they will work hard to make your life difficult if you open carry. Now, does that really sound like they are "protecting and serving" the law-abiding citizens? They have made it clear they will harass law-abiding citizens in an effort to discourage people from open carrying.
Here's a thought: how about they actually go out and deal with actual crime rather than persecute law-abiding citizens? And yes, it's pretty easy to see that a 49 yr-old man jogging with a pistol holstered and a go-pro is not a criminal. The criminals seek to avoid scrutiny and will conceal their weapons until they are committing crimes.
RE: "police look bad" - They did this when they broke the supreme law of the land and infringed upon this mans rights protected by the 4th amendment. LEO cannot detain everyone "just to check you out", nor even with "mere hunch".
This actions displayed here is no different than April 1775.
 May 11, 2016 at 1:27pm
Maybe at one time you could have made this claim. But Christians of today have become so non confrontational that now secular groups hold this power over our life that you claim Christians wield. Who is getting folks fired if they do not agree to their group think? Who is attacking and threatening prosecution if another person disagrees with their beliefs? Who is going after businesses, or even States if they do not subscribe to their vision of reality? Who is it that constantly insinuates that Christians and all religions are comparable to Islam in an effort to delegitimatize all religions as a whole? I will give you a clue, it is not the Christians.
 May 11, 2016 at 1:18pm
A dinosaur looks like a dragon. If they didn’t see it in person, they could have easily been digging or finding bones, just as we do today.
May 11, 2016 at 12:56pm
If by activist you mean a Judge who will hold and enforce their same Conservative values, then this is a no brainer. Of course you wouldn’t be whining if a Liberal activist Judge was put on the bench to push their Liberal agenda instead.
 May 6, 2016 at 9:45am
For a guy who claims he is not Republican, but instead lists himself as a member of the Conservative party because according to him Republicans are too Liberal for him, he sure does love the fake Conservative, Progressive Liberal Trump.
 April 29, 2016 at 11:00am
So what was incorrect about this sign? And just what can Target do if they did find out who posted this truthful note? And no man dressed as a woman, you are not female, and even if you get your male parts cut off you will still be a man with no junk. I am sick of the lies and modern day Nazis forcing people to share a fantasy with mentally ill people.
 April 29, 2016 at 10:51am
You call Cruz an Establishment Puppet which could not be further from the truth, while you support the closet Liberal Progressive, the guy who claimed on tape that he was a Democrat because he was more aligned with their agenda.
 April 20, 2016 at 1:19pm
It is obvious why many do not like Cruz and this guy in so many words says so in his post. They hate him because he is a Social Conservative and a Christian. Many in our party are no different from the Democrats when it comes to pushing filth and the Progressive agenda on the American people, including so called Conservative Republicans.
 April 20, 2016 at 11:01am
Hannity is stuck on this Trump has a Majority line. He just can’t wrap his head around the fact that a majority of people did not vote for Trump and the Republican party is set up so that if a person does not get a majority then they run a second round to get to a majority.
 April 20, 2016 at 10:58am
I heard the exchange on the radio and I am really getting sick of Hannity pushing this narrative that voters are being ripped off, because he should know the process or learn the process. I am also just as upset at Cruz for not being frank with those he is trying to reach. Cruz needs to stop beating around the bush and giving half answers. Be straight and be direct and informative when providing answers. People need to realize that they are not voting for a President in the Primary, they are voting for a Candidate to represent the Republican Party. The Party makes the rules in an attempt to find the best candidate and one that represents a majority, not the majority of a minority. He could have also told Hannity that if Trump had gotten the delegates in these States, we would not be hearing all of this crap and outright lies about Cruz stealing or cheating. He could have also brought up the fact that these “winner takes all” States that Trump has won disenfranchise those who voted for other candidates, if we were using their same talking points and standards. Cruz stop talking like a politician, stop talking down to listeners, and while you are at it, stop repeating the same material ad nauseum! You sound like a poster when speaking, rather than a real thinking man.
 April 18, 2016 at 1:35pm
Only to a Chump voter would following the rules, which are equal for all candidates be construed as “cheating”.