Actually, it’s not uncommon for a private Christian school that is owned and operated by a local church to require that all their staff members be members of their church. Not only that, but many church-schools allow only church members to enroll their students. As a private organization, they have the right to make the decisions they think are best.
The headline for this article makes it sound more nefarious than it actually is. There is coming a day very soon (and in some instances it is already here) when private institutions will be told who they have to hire, who they CAN’T fire, who they MUST fire, who they have to allow to rent their facilities, who they have to bake cakes for, etc. Yes, the coach has a right to go to the church of his choice. The private school also has the right to have certain requirements for its staff.
Not saying the school is being super wise here…just saying that private institutions are summarily losing their rights to make their own decisions.
July 30, 2013 at 9:54pm
Read II Peter chapter 2 for a show summary…
“…there shall be false teachers among you… (vs 1)
And many shall follow their pernicious ways; (vs 2)
And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: (vs 3)
Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; (vs 14)
…beguiling unstable souls: (vs 14)
…an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; (vs 14)
These are wells without water…(vs 17)
For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh…(vs 18)
While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption.” (vs 19)
July 25, 2013 at 7:51pm
And this is newsworthy because…?
July 24, 2013 at 12:33pm
This guy has just taken photo-bombing to a whole new level!
July 22, 2013 at 8:56pm
Did not watch the video, but obviously from the article and the comments, this woman was likely never disciplined as a child and now is impossible to live with. Selfishness is apparently a way of life with this her (and frankly, it’s a pretty common malady in this generation.)
But for the life of me, I cannot imagine a man who once vowed before God to love, honor, and cherish his bride to actually video tape this incident and post it online for the world to see.
I can understand separation.
I can understand counseling.
I can maybe even understand video-taping an incident for proof to her or a counselor.
But not posting it publicly.
There is no place in marriage for public humiliation, even if deserved. Husbands are to love their wives as Christ loved the church. That’s a pretty tall order, but it means we love our wives not only when they are at their lovable best, but when they are at their unlovable worst.
You should listen. I got something completely different from it from most here.
July 14, 2013 at 8:58pm
This story is perfect timing for our nation.
Many on the left just can’t seem to get it through their heads that to disapprove of President Obama, or to hope for a Zimmerman acquittal has NOTHING to do with race. It’s all about right and wrong. I would vote for Herman Cain over Joe Biden in a heartbeat. And I have no problem at all calling Temar Boggs and his buddy heroes, even if the abductor turns out to be a white man (which is likely), and even if they had pulled him from his car, beat the snot out of him, and sat on him until the police arrived. Some of us don’t see black and white when we look at people, we see right and wrong.
If a white man breaks into a black man’s house, I stand with the black man.
If a black man robs a bank, I stand with law enforcement (no matter their race).
If a white man rapes a black woman, I stand with the black woman (and her husband or father).
If a black man abducts a white child, I stand with the white family.
If a white man abducts a black child, I stand with the black family.
Get it? It’s not that difficult really.
Great job, guys! God bless you for your selfless act.
July 13, 2013 at 2:10am
I guess now they know how conservatives in California feel when state lawmakers have enough of a majority to vote anything they want into law. California has enacted numerous laws in the past few months that are just as offensive to our God-fearing, family-values sensibilities as this Texas law is to these liberals. The difference is, we don’t chain ourselves to the gallery railing or throw feces when we don’t get our way.
Yea the left has loads of class, dont get your way act like azzholes.and the biggest one is in the whitehouse.
July 13, 2013 at 1:56am
You’re right, and it just goes to show how convoluted our society is when a law that sets a time limit on when you can kill your baby is considered a victory. In a sane world, that would NOT be considered a victory. But we aren’t living in a sane world. I totally get (and agree with) your point, but anytime you can claim a little ground from the enemy, that’s a victory…at least a small one.
Thanks for sharing the beautiful story about your daughter. God bless you both!
July 13, 2013 at 1:41am
God bless these lawmakers for their courage. There’s still a long way to go in this fight, but a step was made in the right direction.
College football romer must similar to the rover position just like my slow pitch softball team. I think my college got screwed because we didn't have a rover.
July 3, 2013 at 2:28am
Can’t you just hear the mom getting her kids ready for their outing?
“Where are we going mommy?”
“We’re going to hold up signs with really bad words on them…here you get this one, dear.”
“But why are we doing this, mommy?”
“Because mean people are trying to take away our rights.”
“Our right to do what, mommy?”
“My right to kill my babies.”
(pause) “But, mommy…I’M your baby…”
“Shut up and hold your sign.”
So sad. My heart breaks for these children.
July 3, 2013 at 1:17am
There is NOTHING more vile than having your young daughter hold a poster displaying a slogan with filthy, vulgar language and innuendo.
Isn't that a self defeating arguement, using children to support abortion?????
That is the same idiotic logic as using a shotgun as a prop for gun control. Oh wait, Biden did that.
That would be the same as someone using the Bible to support Global Warming. Oh wait, Obama did that.
You might as well use your religion to support abortion. Oh wait, Pelosi did that.
Well I guess it's just us who are crazy.
Can't you just hear the mom getting her kids ready for their outing?
"Where are we going mommy?"
"We're going to hold up signs with really bad words on them...here you get this one, dear."
"But why are we doing this, mommy?"
"Because mean people are trying to take away our rights."
"Our right to do what, mommy?"
"My right to kill my babies."
(pause) "But, mommy...I'M your baby..."
"Shut up and hold your sign."
So sad. My heart breaks for these children.
May 28, 2013 at 7:05pm
The names of the two victims are Cambodian names. The ages of the two victims mean they lived through the murderous Khmer Rouge regime of the 1970′s, which was characterized by unspeakable brutality, torture, and murder. The story infuriates me no matter WHO the victims were, but the fact that these people survived the genocide in their own country, only to come to American and be slaughtered…that’s shameful! The people who are involved in the decision to repeatedly release repeat-offenders ought to be ashamed of themselves! I sure wish there was some way to hold people accountable for this outrageous flaw in our system.
And one more thing…we’ve GOT to speed up the execution system.
April 1, 2013 at 11:07pm
This man is Cambodian. And it’s a good thing he was living in America when this happened, because guns are illegal in his home country.
BTW, even with guns being illegal, violent crimes are still commonplace. For one thing, criminals don’t really care that guns are illegal. (Duh!) And for another thing, when a person who doesn’t own a gun decides to commit a crime, they simply use whatever they can get their hands on. Popular choices are meat cleavers, acid, and hand grenades.
I’m glad Mr. Heng is now living in a country that affords him the freedom to protect his family. Someone should ask a few Cambodians to testify to Congress about what happens when a country abolishes private ownership rights, revokes all freedoms, provokes class warfare , disarms the populace, and establishes the government as the cradle-to-grave provider.