User Profile: seeker9


Member Since: October 24, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [20] January 23, 2015 at 3:45pm

    I might be mistaken, but I think at least one of the major carriers used the post office to deliver to a residence over the holidays. I do know I had to pick one package up at the post office because I wasn’t home at time of delivery. Fact is, I was home.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 21, 2015 at 3:13pm

    If you had a disc that was treated, and skimmed it across a pond, would it sink? A phobia is a fear of something, and hydro means water, so the treated metal is afraid of water?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 21, 2015 at 3:03pm

    Mine says restricted content.

  • [1] January 21, 2015 at 12:37am

    First two sentences “Thats simply not true about the inheritance unless they are inheriting billions. If you look at this plan the increase is from 23.5 to 28, this isnt the first time capital gains has been set at this rate.”
    The problem with inheritance tax is the beneficiary has to pay the tax in cash at FMV (fair market value) of inherited property. If you inherit a business or a farm worth a million, you would have to fork over $400,000 or whatever the rate. If you don’t have the cash, you have to sell, most likely at less than FMV. Taxes have already been paid on it any way.

  • [17] January 20, 2015 at 11:21pm

    Define progress. Progress towards what end? Dingy Harry didn’t table numerous bills at his desk? Oh, I get it, he is actually king, and can never, ever be wrong. Never run a business or corporation, but knows exactly how it should be done. Right.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 20, 2015 at 11:12pm

    Check your facts. The richest already pay the biggest portion of the total tax levies.

  • [3] January 20, 2015 at 11:09pm

    Capital gains rates are NOT the same as inheritance tax rates. Check your facts and get a little knowledge.

  • [17] January 20, 2015 at 10:25pm

    Middle class economics = Marxism via the IRS tax code.

    Responses (3) +
  • [7] January 20, 2015 at 10:23pm

    Caught an amazing liberal statement on msnbc yesterday. Jan Schkowsky (D): “We all do better when we all do better.” Guess that sure couldn’t be a lie, but just nonsense. Just amazing insight!

  • [29] January 20, 2015 at 2:32pm

    I,m confused! An increase in newborns is bad for the economy. But, an increase of illegal immigrants is supposed to be good for the economy. WTF!

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] January 16, 2015 at 10:37am

    Love that Louisiana Cajun food!

  • January 8, 2015 at 7:26pm

    And BHO with ACORN did a Sharpton shakedown on banks, they would cry racism if loans were denied to people that could not afford them.

  • [2] January 2, 2015 at 12:22pm

    You win a prize! You are the first ever to call me a knuckle dragging peasant. The prize is some knuckles drug across your face. Enjoy.

  • [156] January 1, 2015 at 9:54pm

    You mean they had severe droughts before global warming? What will the lefties say?

    Responses (3) +
  • [19] December 31, 2014 at 11:52am

    I’m not from Kansas, but “nothing”?

    Responses (4) +
  • December 23, 2014 at 3:13pm

    Well, listen to this:
    It’s comedy from years ago.

  • [1] December 23, 2014 at 7:24am

    BHO response: “It’s the right thing to do.” (sarc)

  • [4] December 22, 2014 at 12:20pm

    PCL still pays a hefty dividend of over 4%. Can’t get that at a bank.

  • [33] December 19, 2014 at 4:20pm

    Hands up, don’t pick! (if it’s a man).

  • [294] December 17, 2014 at 10:34am

    Yup, single isolated incidences are always indicative of deep rooted societal problems of great national import. Got it. (sarc)

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go