User Profile: SerikFox

Member Since: October 08, 2011

CommentsDisplaying SerikFox's 10 most recent comments.

  • Why the hell do those calls always have tons of static on them; need to upgrade your equipment police?

  • I agree that it is no ones call to make as to whether someone deserves to live or die, however when you unjustly and intentionally take the right of life from others, you lose it yourself. Everyone has equal rights, and therefore your rights end where another’s begin. When you make it your goal to take the rights of others away, it is only justice that you lose them as well. Personally I don’t care particularly how these people die so long as it is fast and efficient. It is our job to carry out justice, however it is also our job to make sure that we are not cruel in our justice; I don’t particularly care if people like these bombers are in pain when they die, I don’t see a need to make it comfortable for those who don’t deserve it, but the intent should be simply to kill them as efficiently as possible, without any unnecessary cruelty. That would be cruel and unusual – to make an execution anything more than it has to be; we can be better than these people, but if we take the same road as them in killing as they do then we are not. We must do our duty to justice, and nothing more. I personally believe that they will receive any due punishment after they die, not before.

  • First off you’re totally discounting several factors involved in the stress on their bodies. Second, if God created everything, didn’t he create science too? So why not give praise to God that they were able to lift it? If God created nature, then why can’t he use nature for his miracles? Look at all sides of a scenario before making a statement please.

  • “like”

  • Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha that’s hysterical!

  • Kill them. They have lost their right to live.

  • Poor shark (not sarcastic; I’m not saying I wouldn’t happily eat shark, but I just feel bad for it dying like this when it wasn’t meant to). Peta is a joke though. Been all over their website just to see what kind of BS they had up; they genuinely don’t know anything about animals. My personal favorite is when they described cows as “intelligent, sweet, and compassionate”. Bull ******* ****. 1 out of maybe 50 is nice. I work on a ranch; I’m around cows every day and I can say for certain, they are not sweet, nice, or intelligent. They will punt each others babies if they get in the way of their food, they will push ones they don’t like out even if it’s bad weather, and they really don’t care if another cow gets hurt. Some of them do, but as a whole they don’t. You’ll get a couple here or there that like attention a lot and tend to be much nicer and more caring, but at the very least 95% of them would not care if you or another cow keeled over and died on the spot. Some of them would even cheer it if they could. Intelligent is not a word I would use either. Some of them are very smart; but only some (still more common than “sweet” cows”). Most of them make bricks seem intellectual. (I do rather like cows personally, but I’m not deluded to think that they’re what they’re not. You want a sweet and caring animal you get a dog or certain types of goats and some horses. Not a cow; there’s a reason the word cow doubles as an insult.)

  • A) That is literally called an entrenching tool and although it’s technically a spade, “shovel” is not an improper word to use, just uncommon. B) In what way was “Navy Members” inaccurate?

  • It’s not us, it’s the Californian’s who’ve moved here. People actually from CO are usually all pro-gun, especially where I live. Even my (sad to admit this) very liberal siblings are somewhat pro-gun.

  • I must be a bigger nerd than any of the people who were outraged by what he said, because there actually essentially is a jedi mind meld, although it was extremely dangerous. It was used by Jorus C’Baoth during Outbound Flight.