User Profile: sethklinefelter

Member Since: August 27, 2011

CommentsDisplaying sethklinefelter's 10 most recent comments.

  • The owner of the restaurant was on a local radio show when the story first broke and said that anyone could come in and claim that any piece of paper was a church bulletin and they would get the discount. So, if she was not discriminating to begin with, what is the point of the law suit? It seems to me that FFRF is trying to take time and money away from anyone who dares to speak of church or religion in the public sphere. We need to find a clever lawyer that can sue FFRF and others over frivolous lawsuits, especially when they target private individuals.

  • I have watched it and at times it is funny, but it does not show the difference between the right and left. Stuart is honest in his position and for that i respect him (even though i disagree). On the other hand, O’Reilly is horribly inconsistent in his beliefs. He wants government to do some things and not others, but there is no clear line. The best example from the debate is when Stuart cleaned his clock on wealth redistribution. Stuart is right that Social Security is wealth redistribution now. It may not have been intended to be that way originally, but it is now. So in the end we had a debate between some one that was on the left and a some one representing the RINO Republicans (even if he is not a republican, he acted like one).
    We need consistency in our arguments on the right let’s examine our own beliefs then have a real debate.

  • Am i the only one disturbed by this quote:
    “there are going to be bumps in the road because, you know, in a lot of these places, the one organizing principle has been Islam. The one part of society that hasn’t been controlled completely by the government.
    There are strains of extremism, and anti-Americanism, and anti-Western sentiment.”

    Now i somewhat pulled it out of context, but isn’t this the progressive ideology?

  • Clearly, We (The Tea Party) are Winning when they call for help from the 1% (Batman, Bruce Wayne). LOL

  • Until the teachers remove themselves from the unions, they are the unions. The teachers have the power to fight the unions or change them from the inside, but they do not. Therefore the problem is the teachers. When teachers fight (figuratively) against the unions, then I will stand with the teachers. Until then, they are part of the problem.

  • Since the report does not compare teachers with their peers in other countries, doesn’t the statement “work longer hours than their peers in other nations” fall into the category of “such reasoning would get a flunking grade.” I would think that if this representative of teachers was going to grade the report, they could at least do a better job of using logic then the people they are grading.

  • To NHWinter:
    We can not run people out of America simply because they promote despicable, idiotic ideas. Freedom of Speech is far more important than comfort. Just because Soros is promoting an idea that you disagree with, does not mean that we can forsake the rule of law. Additionally, we need this speech and these ideas as a counterpoint to the ideas that we are promoting.
    I feel that the biggest problem that we are facing at this point is not that someone else is talking about something that we disagree with, but that we have not learned from the left about minimum and maximum goals. The TEA party can be painted as extremists while going for compromise because we have not expressed out maximum goals clearly. If we can tell the world our Maximum goals first, then compromise to our minimum goals, there is no way to paint us as extremists.
    Last, never fall into using government to solve your problems. If you do, you are promoting the agenda of the left.

    Thank you,
    Seth Klinefelter