This would prove as a liability as disbanding the team and cancelling games amounts to punishment for exercising their natural liberty of freedom of expression. The ACLU would likely get involved. Now, this formula would likely change if it weren't for the fact that this is a public school. It's just one more reason I'm opposed to public schools.
@HJ: you're opposed to public schools because these kids are expressing their rights enumerated by the constitution? you hate the constitution?
Christian...You need to understand that people that fight and die for our country, including my entire family MUST be respected!!!!YOU must keep your screwed up opinions to yourself. You will not win. You will perish when the electricity is turned off!
That will never happen as long as people keep paying to go to these games. Schools will never give up anything that generates revenue.
They should end all school sports. School is for learning. Reading writing arithmetic play sports on your own time.
They will be invited to the White House now. The cops acted stupidly when the gun was not put down.
Cancel the rest of the season, fire the coach & superintendent. Where will this abomination of America end?
christian_eagle_patriot, no - the opposition to public schools is not the students utilizing their First Amendment right. Ask any one of them (or the not-to-be-named pro football player) to recite the text of the Amendment right they're exercising, not one of them will be able to.
This is not about the Constitution, it's about disrespect and ignorance - and schools failing (or refusing) to educate students on the nation in which they live, and by whose Constitution their rights are protected.
Every kid on the does have a right to speech, punishing them is just using force to stop idea's you do not like. Even idiots have the right to speak and I am sick of people trying to shut them down.
 September 29, 2016 at 3:51pm
Ooh that’s good. Nice one.
September 29, 2016 at 2:32pm
Yup – its hard to stop once you get going, isn’t it.
 September 27, 2016 at 11:11am
Ten firsts for Obama
1.First president to divide the country intentionally and start us on a path to a race war.
2. first president to ram through nationalized health care that will bankrupt the nation.
3. first president to intentionally reverse our foreign policy objectives in order to help our enemies.
4. First president to publicly say he hates more than half of the American people.
5. First president to intentionally emasculate our military.
6. First president intentionally debase our moral principles and family unit.
7. First president to advocate for late term abortion, early abortion – all kinds of abortion.
8. First president to nationalize certain segments of the private sector.
9. Fist president to be associated with communists, socialists and anarchists and still be elected president.
10. First president to actively try and subvert, reduce, marginalize white America.
This was hard because I could go on for about 20 more.
11. First to demoralize the White House by lighting it up in rainbow colors.
12. First to apologize for almost every conflict we have engaged in.
13. First to spend more time traveling abroad than other U.S. president in history.
14. First to have played more rounds of golf than any other president in history.
15. First to actually Issued More Exec. Action Than Any President in Modern History
Shake.....#6 was done under the JOHNSON ( well named !! ) administration, another DEMOCRAT !!!!
 September 23, 2016 at 11:46am
Better yet, just say what you think and let the chips fall where they may. I don’t care about being politically correct anymore.
September 23, 2016 at 11:20am
Somebody must have thrown cold water on it.
 September 23, 2016 at 10:38am
Looks like the Weiner is in an awkward position.
 September 22, 2016 at 12:51pm
And this think tank estimated that Obama would add how much?
But the Blaze claims it is "Non-partisan" which of course is Washington speak for "Leftist".
So, what you're saying is, "Trump's not as progressive as Obama????" Obama's your yardstick for comparison? Spending is progressive spending, whether it's from a Bush, Obama, or Trump.
What part of progressivism don't Trumpsters understand?
Nuff said. Thanks.
Even the Huff-Po says this group is for special interests! Founded on big tobacco money during Clinton Administration and made up of "same brilliant" folk who worked on Government budgets!! How'd that work out??! Pravda Blaze misquoted the "results" too.....it's $550B not $200B.
I feel like you believe you just made a much better point than you actually did.
The Butcher of Benghazi is promising to out communist Bernie Sanders by giving away everything that is left after Bobo the Wonder Marxist leaves and this stink tank says it will add $250 billion? Really? Is this stink tank based out of a pot shop in Boulder, Colorado? Is there anyone with a room temperature IQ or higher who believes this claptrap?
This think tank must have been awfully bored for the last 8 years. Has Obama ever produced a budget?
They're "a DC-based think tank" which means they are just a pawn of the DNC.
Obama excoriated Bush II for the historic increase in debt - and then he doubled the debt, which none of us thought was possible. He doubled the debt while decreasing military funding big-time.
Hillary will be expensive, even her "poor street girl" outfits cost thousands of dollars.
Who is going to increase spending less, Trump or Clinton???
Instantly, Trumpers jump to the its a lie stance. I don't know the real numbers, but someone explain to me how we are going to provide medical care for everyone, increase border security both in infrastructure and man power, significantly beef up our military, improve the national infrastructure, give six weeks of paid maternity leave all while cutting taxes. I am not saying that some of these ideas are bad, but let's be real about the cost. Your instantaneous dismissiveness of every criticism of Trump is mind numbingly brain dead. Someone please tell me how this is not a deficit issue and give me the real numbers. Now, you can all start calling me a liberal Hillary loving Soros troll, but once again, that is also mind numbingly brain dead and oh so old and tiresome. Don't forget to down vote me and call me a stupid loser.
Probably the same kind of people that said obamacare would produce a budget surplus. I doubt Trump could achieve spending close to Hillary's new infrastructure slush fund, shovel ready my rear.
you said exactly what I was thinking, in a MUCH better way. Thanks
You guys are exactly like Obama supporters. Whenever anybody had a legitimate criticism of him in 2008, it was "Bush this, Bush that." Still is, in fact. And now whenever a legitimate argument is brought up against Trump, it's "Hillary this, Obama that." One person's flaws do not erase the same flaws in somebody else. You nominated a big-government, big-spending, big-mouthed progressive, and the sooner you own up to that fact the better it will be for you.
The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s analysis estimated that Clinton’s plans would increase the U.S. debt by $200 billion over 10 years. In comparison, Trump’s plans are projected to hike the national debt by $5.3 trillion over the same time period.
Liberals can't do math worth a damn.
You know the difference between modern Democrats and the modern GOP? Both parties spend big, but the GOP goes further by slashing revenue too.
Clinton = big deficits
Trump = YUUUUGE deficits
Good work, Trumpers
I only support about 10% of what the federal government does these days. So what's the number if we do what I want?
They were pretty close on Obama. So I don't get your point.
Since you don't know the answer what exactly is your point. Because if you had any grasp of the FACTS you would know that the PRESIDENT was handed an annual deficit run rate of $1.2 trillion (FY 2009, Bush's last FY) by GW Bush. And of course along with it the worst performing economy since the great depression. But low information voters and individuals like you who can't handle facts and the truth, don't want to remember that now do you.
"Liberals can’t do math worth a damn." Really cause they were smart enough to realize that you can't cut taxes and throw a war at the same time. Something GW Bush didn't get. And despite the increased war spending which is the classic GOP way of boosting the economy, Bush tanked the economy and left the PRESIDENT with a $1.2 trillion dollar annual deficit run rate (FY 2009). How's about you do some math homework and realize that it was Reagan who ran up the first $1 trillion deficit and between him, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. they accounted for $10 trillion of the $19 trillion. And a good portion of the remaining $9 trillion was associated with climbing out of the worst economic performance since the great depression.
I make my living in finance. The biggest financial bubble of all is the US Government debt bubble. We will hit a debt brick wall sometime in the next few years. It will be calamitous beyond description. Literally HALF the US population is dependent on the US government in one program or another. 160 million people! And there are only 95 million taxpayers! That's unsustainable!
Plan and prepare accordingly!
The 1930's happened...then Eisenhower gave his speech warning about the military industrial complex.....that .it's all about the flow of money...not sovereignty, not freedom, not the constitution....not God......he was ignored. along came Kennedy who made the mistake of actually believing he was President.. the warnings kept coming, they were ignored.....Obama was elected..people got nervous and started waking up.. and stilllllllllll. people just want someone "else" to "fix it"...
Think tank??? HAHAHAHA Don't you mean UNEMPLOYED and not qualified to do anything?
 September 22, 2016 at 10:25am
This is what justice looks like in Obama’s world.
 September 21, 2016 at 2:50pm
Really – 2 years. What took so long?
 September 21, 2016 at 1:42pm
My wife calls me a little devil – always took it as a compliment.
The need to be a victim for a certain segment of society is clearly overwhelming anything that might be considered good judgement. They desire to be a victim, they want to profit from being a victim and they love the notoriety of being a victim.
Because they know the government will cater to that false sense of victimization-heck, the government is the one that created this monster! And...Jackson and Sharpton are the ones who are benefiting the most from of it.
 September 13, 2016 at 2:39pm
I imagine Bill as being very good at the “slip of a tongue’ stuff. Just saying.
Her mind is mostly gone and her heart is two sizes too small.
 September 8, 2016 at 10:41am
I think this was set up with her knowing the questions before it was given so she could spin her side of the story and tell the lowly populace that there is nothing to it. This didn’t do anything thing to hurt her, in fact it helped her.
 August 26, 2016 at 5:44pm
What I can’t wrap my mind around are the animal rights and vegan activists who are pro-abortion. Go figure.
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." George Orwell
Does seem a bit hypocritical.
She mentions "women who are strong" in her piece........what exactly is that? Seems as though women always have to say they are strong........what does this mean???
These people are just an echo chamber of thought because they have no original thoughts of their own. Right, left it is all the same. I can never figure out how anyone can agree with all talking points of a party but some do. Let me help u out: Vegans and animals rights folks want less animals on earth because the cause global warming with their gas. They also want less people on the earth because of their carbon footprints. they echo many other tenets of the left: ows, and the rest. Hello, hello, hello. Echo chamber.
some times...well ....hand sign's seem to be the best response..................ammo up
But against the death penally for murderers.
'You’re a disgrace to the woman race!' the professor purportedly yelled'
The only good (hateful) commie...is a dead commie.
my teacher legitimately gave me an assignment about elephants taking over the world What evidence does Siebert provide to support the claim there is such a thing as an "elephant culture"? In making this claim is Siebert guilty of anthropomorphism? That is, does he ascribe to animals the thoughts and emotions that only humans have? Or is he guilty of the opposite mistake, the error of anthropocentrism--treating human beings as the standard by which all other species should be measured? Is it possible that these "mistakes" are really not mistakes at, especially because we Homo sapiens are in fact animals, too? Would you agree that understanding other minds--human or otherwise--requires us to start with what we know about our own mental processes? Can we even prove that our fellow human beings have thoughts and emotions like our own?
A godless belief system is an open door to the devil for influence in all areas of our lives. Otherwise why would someone advocate so hard for a baby turtle and not care about a human baby in the womb? Who wanted the word 'God' stripped from their political platform and all their by-laws...the Democrats. Who advocates for abortion....the Democrats. The Democrats are the group of the godless.
My daughter started college last week and we talked in advance about what to expect from the liberal professors. I got a text message yesterday from her, and this is what happened in her English class:
The prof. spent the entire class talking about sexual assault and said the reason it is so prevalent is because Snow White didn't give consent before she was woken up. Little boys watch the movie and think this is ok. (If you need a refresher, in the Disney movie Prince Charming found Snow White in the woods after she ate the poisoned apple. He gave her a kiss and woke her up.)
So basically, Walt Disney has created a rape culture among boys because Prince Charming sexually assaulted Snow White.
And I'm paying for this. It may be time to write another letter to my state representative.
“'You’re a disgrace to the woman race!” the professor at the University of Missouri purportedly yelled.”
And this so-called professor thinks of being female as a RACE? I've heard of the “human race”, or the “human species”, but not one composed entirely of one gender! That's not a race or a species!
And to think! They're letting her TEACH -- or better said, INDOCTRINATE!
So this professor of some social science I presume accuses her of offending the whole race of women. Please don't let your children in her class or on this university, they will come out stupider than they started, yet be more convinced they are right.
Or professors who think that the female gender is a race.
Thank goodness there are still some good universities out there, at least in Texas and Utah.
This is “their” demonstration of the Dementia of the Left . . . .
“You’re a disgrace to the woman race!” the professor at the University of Missouri purportedly yelled at Barklage.”
The “professor”, evidently a shining star of the Left, should have been looking in a mirror and yelling at themself.
Also, for a learned(?) “professor” . . . . women are not a Race, they are a gender, of which the Moronic Left has now given us more than fifty "options", which, in the old days, used to be two :)
Liberals hate it when their agendas are undermined.
A professor that screams "....disgrace to the woman race ! "
This is a product of the US department of education. Time to end it.
Pathetic, ignorant and stupid is no way to run a university.
Most universities today are the madrasas of progressive, liberal thought indoctrinating young naive minds with lies and deception packaged to look like truth.
They are, by design, anti-human.
or their wearing a PETA shirt
"You're a disgrace to the woman race!”
This Professor put the tard in Libt@rd!
 August 26, 2016 at 5:38pm
“Dolly Parton Weighs in on the Election”. – Nice one.