User Profile: Shoot2Stop

Shoot2Stop

Member Since: July 14, 2012

Comments

123
  • [9] August 29, 2015 at 11:20pm

    Good gravy!

    Why doesn’t our government just give up? Put up a sign saying “Terrorists Welcome – Come Kill Us”

    We need someone like Trump but maybe even a stronger SOB.

    .

  • [23] August 22, 2015 at 9:31am

    Thank you men. You done good.

    .

    Responses (1) +
  • August 20, 2015 at 4:54pm

    “One man’s religion is another man’s belly laugh.” -Robert Heinlein

    Every superstition on this planet generates within me chuckles. Some rise to a great belly laugh. This is one.

    .

  • August 14, 2015 at 4:23pm

    All government related email should be automatically archived real-time to a bullet-proof array deep in Cheyenne Mt. The same with the body-cam video/audio that all elected and appointed cretins should be forced to wear 24/7.

    When questions come up a rotating select committee of vetted and cleared regular citizens will review the data and pass on the pertinent stuff to a special Grand Jury.

    When you can’t trust, or instantly fire, your employees – extraordinary measures must be taken.

    .

  • [67] August 10, 2015 at 2:38pm

    Had the Nazi gassing of the Jews been on Movie Tone theater news in the forties the entire world would have demanded we storm in and wipe them out. The world sure has changed since the days of my father. :-(

    .

    Responses (4) +
  • [6] August 8, 2015 at 4:14pm

    Yep. GOA ‘Gun Owners of America’ ( http://www.gunowners.org ) I’ve been a life member of both for decades. Both have a purpose and both, in my opinion, do good for us gun owners.

    .

  • [60] August 6, 2015 at 4:03am

    Yep! Enforcing E-Verify ( http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify ) is by far the easiest, cheapest, simplest, and most logical answer. But, of course, neither side of the political isle wants to give anything but lip service to illegal entry into our country.

    Every U.S. employer has Internet access. Thirty seconds online would verify the status of any prospective employee. Hire someone that fails E-Verify: First offence $10K fine. Second time $100K. Third time loose your business, go to jail, and forfeit your assets.

    Seems the polling places could use this same E-Verify system on election day too.

    What am I missing here? I know the liberals want voters, but why in heck are the conservative politicians not demanding E-Verify enforcement?

    .

    Responses (3) +
  • [25] August 3, 2015 at 5:36pm

    And screwy Louie has nothing to say about the black on black murders. Nor does he say anything about the black on white murders, which are at least an order of magnitude greater than white on black.

    .

  • July 31, 2015 at 11:44am

    First, I make Attila the Hun look liberal. Now, the quantum foam, and other scientific theories, may eventually be proven wrong but at least there’s ‘some’ testable evidence for their existence, not the several thousand year old yammering from a bunch of ignorant goat herders.

    .

  • [-3] July 31, 2015 at 9:21am

    It seems he’s done about as good of job as your guy, on the other end of the spectrum.
    .

  • July 31, 2015 at 9:13am

    Terrifying? Good gravy! Only if you’re a ten year old. The dark ages called and wants their superstitions back.
    .

    Responses (3) +
  • [20] July 31, 2015 at 7:25am

    And as it has happened each time we’re water restricted, our water rates have gone up. Many of the water districts raise their rates when they aren’t selling enough water. And, of course, after the drought the rates never go back down. :-(

    .

    Responses (1) +
  • [20] July 29, 2015 at 1:48pm

    Good gravy – What an idiot.

    .

  • [9] July 24, 2015 at 6:09am

    Note to Ms. Zarrell: There was already maximum gun control in that theater. The only one who appeared to have a gun was the criminal. Rachel my dear, if you haven’t noticed, criminals don’t abide by the law – that’s kind’a the definition of ‘criminal’. Might I ask, how would you suggest we get the criminals to comply with your proposed new gun control laws?

    .

  • [33] July 24, 2015 at 5:45am

    I go nowhere unarmed. A concealed firearm is what I call my life ‘assurance’ policy.

    As one of the relatively few licensed California CCW holders I abide by the law and renew my permit every 24-months, as required by state law. This I’ve done now for many decades. But if for some reason all California CCWs were repealed this would not change my daily ready condition one iota. After all, my life, and the lives of my loved ones, are worth infinitely more than any law.

    Now that every state in the union has at least some form of CCW there’s no excuse for YOU, the unarmed Blaze readers, not to get a permit, training, and carry everywhere and all the time. Once you’re armed I suggest even more training than is required by your state. Participating in IDPA ‘International Defensive Pistol Association’ events are great fun and training. You meet some of the best people at the range. ( http://www.idpa.com )

    .

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] July 24, 2015 at 4:59am

    Helpful hint: If you’re ever involved in the lifting of a car, and there are few to do the job, open the door on the side to be lifted and lift from the outstretched open door. Depending on the weight of the car the longer lever-arm can enable just one or two people to lift a vehicle clear of a victim.

    .

  • [1] July 12, 2015 at 6:04pm

    Yes, I understand that but – How in the heck do you sell beautiful garb by making those who sport it look like they hate what they are doing? To me it reeks of wine snobs. I suspect if someone started showing happy and smiling ladies parading their wares they’d start a trend, and sell a heck of a lot more merchandise.

    .

  • [6] July 12, 2015 at 5:37pm

    Bang – Bang, “Stop – Stop” Most witnesses, when interviewed after the fact , will swear they heard you say Stop – Stop BEFORE they heard the Bang – Bang. Anyone presenting a weapon, in a threatening manner, around this old man will not be able to contradict that reverse order.

    .

  • [8] July 12, 2015 at 5:16pm

    Great story, and wonderful results for that young girl and her struggling family, but I just have to ask… Why, in all things beautiful, do all these very attractive models have to strut the ramp with such a sour look on their face? There’s nothing more attractive than a good looking young lady, sporting a nice outfit, and a light-up-the-room smile on their face. They even walk like they’re about to spit in your eye. I just don’t get it. I assume the designer wants all eyes on the cloth, and the model is supposed to be just a mannequin, but if I was a buyer, or seller, I’d want the lady to light up the dress and the room. After all, you never see a TV commercial, selling anything, with the presenters looking like they hate their jobs.

    .

    Responses (1) +
  • [136] July 10, 2015 at 7:36am

    Good gravy! Parking the plane away from the ramp for a few cartridges? Is there no commonsense anymore?

    .

    Responses (10) +
123
Restoring Love