User Profile: Shotgun167

Member Since: August 01, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Shotgun167's 10 most recent comments.

  • Only if they can find some pictures of Booga when he was a wee little child, wrap in his loving Mama’s arms.

  • Did anyone catch the other lie:

    a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress

    The had to bribe individual Congressmen in the middle of the night to get it to pass by a single vote. How the *** does that constitute a “strong majority”?

  • Not only that, miamisammy, as someone that is building a real airplane, the spar passes through the wrong place in the ribs. For a single spar, the areodynamic forces on rib portion in front of the spar needs to be approximately equal to that behind the spar. Don’t take care of that, and the rib will impart a wrenching torque around the spar. The have the spar going through the very tip of the balsa wood ribs. BALSA wood. How much torque would BALSA wood withstand.

    But, it’s still a cool video.

  • I saw part of this. I noticed that the protagonist, the character that you were supposed to sympathize with, decided to take a job where she dressed scantily to get large tips. That is, she sold her body to exploit men for money.

    Liberals in America are all about exploiting people.

  • And I still would be for the Blunt Admendment. The bill doesn’t say that the employer gets to stop you from paying for birth control. The employer gets to say that she isn’t going to pay for your birth control. If you can’t see the difference, you’re purposefully being obtuse. My employer doesn’t get to say where I take my paid vacation. They do get to say how much paid vacation they are willing to pay for. If it is to big an issue for me, I get to decide if I want to continue working for them. If you are so upset about not having your employer paying the $30/month that the pill costs, find another job. THAT is how it works in America.

  • Why Did Ron Paul Skip CPAC?

    February 13, 2012 at 1:52pm

    In reply to Nobar.

    He has talked to the radio hosts. They either call him crazy because of some newsletters someone else wrote 20 yrs ago, or they call him crazy because he doesn’t think we can afford to be the world’s police. Talking to them is a waste of time, when he could go straight to the voters and talk to people who actually want to hear what he has to say.

  • Why Did Ron Paul Skip CPAC?

    February 13, 2012 at 12:53pm

    In reply to krod2516.

    Listen to KROD and know that this is what flailing looks like. The neocons can’t stand to have their foreign policy questioned, because that exposes it for the liberalism that it is. The all scream about personal responsibility and individual rights, but throw that away when talking about foreign policy (national responsibility and national rights).

    Woodrow Wilson would be proud of their attempts to force their view on everyone and be rulers of the world.

  • And yet, I see the likes of Rick Santorum winning caucuses with 50% of the vote. The TSA isn’t going anywhere, because the only group that would even think of trying to trim the federal monster, thinks it is “crazy” to try to trim the federal government. This country is lost.

  • Frank Luntz and Sean Hannity are both corporate shills acting like conservatives. If you haven’t drunk the “go team” Republican kool-aid, it is obvious. They are all about reducing the size of the government, except the parts of the government they like. Those parts should be increased. Luntz has his hand picked team of partisans give their views of the debates as a way of skewing public opinion. Why does the MSM feel a need to selectively tell you what they politicians said right after they said it, as if you didn’t just hear it for yourself? It is a way of applying emphasis on what they want you to take away from what was just said. Luntz in particular is a scheming putz that should crawl back under the rock that spit him out. Listen closely to what he says, and more importantly, what he doesn’t say, and you will understand what a sleazeball he is.

  • @ArgumentumAdAbsurdum

    Yes, you should have the right to dump toxic wastes, but you should face criminal charges the first time a teaspoonful of it turns up on my property.

    Your call for an overreaching nanny state is sad and pathetic.