Looks like Stu just dogged having to eat Jeffy’s underwear, and our nation dogged having a presidential candidate who’s even more far left then Hillary! At least for now.
 October 28, 2014 at 3:28pm
This must have been way too truthful!
I cant watch it here because the the video now says… “This video is no longer available because the uploader has closed their YouTube account.”
April 2, 2014 at 7:26pm
Insanity! – Pure Insanity! If military brass had any balls they would have gotten rid of the dumb gun free zones at Fort Hood, and todays headline would have instead read…
Shooter opens fires today at Fort Hood and was declared dead shortly thereafter having reviving 400 gunshot wounds from off duty personal returning fire, no service personnel were killed and only two were injured.
This reminds me of the old Liberal joke. The private reports to the general. "Sir the enemy are preparing to attack and our men on the front line don't have any bullets." The politically appointed general replies, "Well, that wasn't my idea."
@ shotgun My thoughts exactly..insanity..we are in an insane nation
Kenny, sounds like you got it all figured out. Maybe you should be in the Military. D-Bag.
February 21, 2014 at 5:40pm
I think people are looking at this the wrong way.
First even if “true” Nugent’s comment was inappropriate because its the kind of language the Left would use; after always being polite and courteous in political debate is what makes us Right.
Thought what is really worth noting is that Jackass comments happen from time to time, I even make them myself if I get too passionate in my debates, however unlike the Left which would try to black list Nugent and then charter buses just so they can throw him under them for such a comment. Abbott instead said they while he thought the comment was wrong, he stands by his invitation to invite Nugent in the first Place, thus showing the true strength of Abbott’s character.
Anyhow I know who I’m voting for to be the next Texas Governor, and it ain’t Wendy Davis.
February 13, 2014 at 8:47am
The conspiracy to prevent the Blaze from being on big cable thickness.
January 15, 2014 at 11:28pm
Get ready for the most Boycotted movie ever!
In fact if they make a movie that is Sandy Hook incarnate it would be fitting to make anyone wanting to buy a ticket pass a background check first; because what kind of sane law abiding citizen would ever want to watch a movie showing children being mass murdered?
September 23, 2013 at 5:57pm
And yet Obama wonders why so many conservatives have reservations about giving more arms to Al-Qaeda rebels in Syria.
August 8, 2013 at 6:11pm
I give them cudos on the excellent graphics they created to convey the stats, my experience is that most people who are anti gun wont/cant ready any article that challenges their per-conceived notion that guns are evil weapons used solely to murder people and shoot at the “Good Guys”.
August 8, 2013 at 2:23pm
CC and HC as the top two! This survey sounds more cooked than the one that said 90% of all NRA members supported universal background checks.
July 25, 2013 at 12:45pm
I agree 100%
I too leaned cursive in elementary and then had zero use for it until an advancement test I took in college ask that I sign my name in cursive. By which time I had completely forgotten how to write in cursive so I just printed my name and then connected all the letters together.
Cursive is useless in our keyboard society, and it is not worth the time it takes to teach it. Scholars might find it helpful to learn so they don’t have to constantly use a smart phone app to translate old journals into print, but otherwise their is little to no benefit in learning how use it anymore.
You cant blame republicans (at least the non RINOs) for wanting to put a gun in the hand of every man, women, and child one month and then accuse republicans of being in charge of a city that has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation less than a year later, unless of course your a biased Hippocratic with an agenda. So for good sakes make up your mind!
July 10, 2013 at 5:48pm
Unlike the Journal News publishing the names of gun owners I believe this app while dumb does deserve freedom of speech rights since it is essentially a blog of people talking about who owns guns rather a gross violation of privacy rights. Who knows I might even make use of the app myself so I can inform any would be burglars just how fast my shotgun can let them know they are not welcome to break into my home.
I would however like to see the app do the logical thing and also include a “Gun Free House” posting option so that people can find a place to go where its guaranteed they will not encounter any guns. I mean if these people truly believe that the key to safety is avoiding guns then I imagine that they would want the option to let everyone know, rapists or otherwise, that they proudly have no guns in their house.
I mean can you imagine how hypocritical it would be for this app to allow someone to post that I have guns in my house, but I cant post that they don’t have guns in their house?
Amen, son...the First Amendment flows both ways (although the lib-prog left only want it to go one direction. Freedom lovers they pretend to be...)
Now THAT is an EXCELLENT idea sir.
I admire people who THINK.
Someone develop an APP that flags gun-free zones and homes.
Let the criminals know where they're safe.
June 30, 2013 at 2:11pm
Can anyone say cruel and unusual punishment
June 17, 2013 at 12:52pm
In the spirit of Bipartisanship Rand Paul promises President Barack Obama he will work with him on new gun control laws. An unknown photographer takes his photo at the time of that statement.
June 4, 2013 at 3:16pm
Just wanted to post the 1010 comment for this story, I think that’s a new record. Anyhow as an Eagle Scout I would be for the BSA allowing gay scout members, but not leads, so long as they made it clear it was for the express purpose of convincing said gay members that they should be heterosexuals.
May 30, 2013 at 8:11pm
All we would need to do is hack the China super internet filter that keeps its citizens from first of all learning the truth about their government, and more important telling the others about it. Once that’s accomplished the US just sits back and then let the millions of Chinese who are suddenly aware of whats going on organize and demand changes and quite possibly hack their own government for a change. The beauty of this is that China would not be able to complain about it as I just don’t see them going to the UN and filing a compliant that their citizens now have free speech courtesy of the USA.
May 28, 2013 at 12:10am
Someone should inform the ACUL that not presenting both sides of a two sided debate is called Indoctrination.