TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying showmespfld's 10 most recent comments.

• Dianne Feinstein Battles Ted Cruz in Heated Senate Showdown Over Guns: ‘I’m Not a 6th Grader’

  March 15, 2013 at 1:00pm

  It’s too bad the Ms. Feinstein doesn’t have the vocabulary capacity that I had as a 6th grader because I knew the difference between “implode” and “explode”. Although she tried to be dramatic, to anyone who really listened to what she said, an “imploding” bullet is not as impressive as an “exploding” one. I think it interesting that DHS has/is purchasing 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (enough to fight the Iraq War for 20 years here, in the U.S. and 450 million of these are hollow point rounds) as well as 7000 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearms suitable for personal defense when Ms. Feinstein and crew have decided that such weapons are not suitable for any other citizen to own. Note, it is OK to sell them to drug cartels and illegals however!

• Sen. Feinstein Makes Wild Claim to Push Gun Control at Senate Committee Hearing

  March 9, 2013 at 1:43pm

  It’s only “legal” to hunt humans if you are Homeland Security or the Government. Why else would they need all those hollow point rounds, personal defense weapons (bullpups) and 30 round capacity magazines for? You don’t shoot at targets with hollow points unless they are living targets that you want to stop. Not to mention the MRAP vehicles that have been seen in our fair nation. If we were allowed to actually put some teeth into our border enforcement and deal appropriately with the violence against our citizens and border agents, these vehicles would be appropriate along our border hot spots. However this is not the case and hasn’t been for decades. Sen. Feinstein is either foolish and ignorant or she knows exactly what she is doing in undermining our Constitution. Only one is forgivable but neither should be allowed power. It is up to the people to stand up for what is right.

• Should This Woman Lose Her Job for Flipping Off the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier (And Then Posting a Pic of It)?

  November 20, 2012 at 4:58pm

  In reply to Jadedfate.

  Actually, many companies and places of business DO retain the right to fire their employees based upon things posted on social networking sites. People have been fired from their jobs because of photos of them with friends that “might send the wrong message” if viewed by people who could possibly associate that with the business. I have a family member who recently had to go through their photos online in preparation for entering a teaching program- can’t run the risk of not being hired or being rejected because someone doesn’t like what they see. She was there apparently with her business and as such was representing them. This is not only a vulgar and disrespectful display of gross immaturity, it is not any behavior that reflects well upon LIFE. She should be relieved of the burden of her job and not considered re-hireable.