Shhhhhh! dont let them know or they will switch whatever it is they are doing!
[-4] August 13, 2015 at 2:17pm
A former colleague who was sick of Carson’s hypocrisy came forward, the media did their job and reported on it. They didn’t have to “find” anything.
Still got the hots for the birther angle I see. Trump spend time and treasury on that and came up with nothing, as did everyone else that went down that rabbit hole.
[-16] August 13, 2015 at 2:10pm
A non-issue? Primary medical research that depends on fetal tissue a non-issue? Probably don’t have much use for science in general I’d bet.
Nice try at a spin, but as usual a failure, ie Simply NOT true. The good Doctor clearly stated that the tissue needn't be fetal tissue, so medical research does not justify murdering babies.
In addition to the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act, the Senate had several other opportunities to vote on the issue of fetal tissue donation during the 1990s. Each time, a bipartisan majority indicated support for the practice. In 1992, for instance, most Republicans — including McConnell — voted against a proposal to limit fetal tissue research to samples procured from miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. In 1997, the Senate voted down an amendment to the Udall Parkinson’s Research Act that would have prohibited funding for research on aborted fetal tissue.
You are, indeed, Simple.
You do realize that Dr, Carson is one of the world's leading neurosurgeons, right? I'm sure he probably knows a tiny bit more about science than a patchouli-huffing, pro-abortion hack like yourself.
No, All simple does for a living is to troll these sites and do what his employer in the Whitehouse tells him to say. he is nothing but a dutiful employee
Carson used aborted fetal tissue which beckies are against, but now they call simple-truths an idiot when defending Carson. LOL
It’s a non-issue because this doesn’t have much to do with the Planned Parenthood story. The Planned Parenthood videos are important because:
1) They reveal the reality of abortion. Fetuses are human beings and abortion is wrong.
2) They reveal that Planned Parenthood workers are generally psychopaths.
And 3)They reveal that Planned Parenthood is conducting multiple practices that are unethical and possibly illegal.
This is not an attack on legitimate medical research, this is about an abortion mill trying to profit from the sale of their victims’ corpses.
[-7] August 13, 2015 at 2:06pm
Most, but not all, hayseed hickabillies.
[-17] August 13, 2015 at 2:05pm
Hypocrisy is colorless. Carson is just another run of the mill GOP hypocrite.
No. No he is not run of the mill ST. Dr. Carson is an extraordinary man with a vision to lead American back to greatness.
Is there anything you did 20 years ago, that you would do different now? If Hillary's sins are all in the "past", give this one up.
And your gal Hillary is not a hypocrite? How hypocritical of you.
Well, I will defer to your expertise on hypocrisy, Lord knows you have to indulge in a lot of it.
Sure, the GOP has its share of hypocrites (e.g.. McConnell, Boehner) but they are pikers compared with the Left. The Left have elevated hypocrisy to an shameless art form. I have changed my mind about the death penalty. Does that make me a hypocrite? I think not. Re-examining and re-thinking evidence, facts and faith show objectivity and humility. Dr. Carson knows there is a Higher Power, may you find it soon.
August 13, 2015 at 10:30am
Not who, but what decides whose is more important. The what is the Constitution.
Driving is a privilege not a right. You can lose your privilege to drive if you do not obey the driving laws.
So where is the "right to marry" in the Constitution? I'll bet you can't find it in there.
 August 13, 2015 at 10:24am
Marriage at its heart is a legally binding contract between two people, you can draft up said contract anyway you want, no one is stopping anyone from doing so. Most people don’t want the go through the time, effort or expense of doing that so they get a marriage license which essentially is a ‘standard’ contract.
The states, most, where not largely part of the birth, marriage, death. It is not necessary as the point of the constitutionally provided census performs the basic right of country the citizens. So, get government out of our business.
Marriage is only a contract when issued by the government and signed by those being married. If the marriage is only done on a traditional basis in and by a religion, binding only by God and the parties, the government has no say in the matter. The control issued by a marriage license gives control over to the government and takes it away from God. Divorce, children, ect.
August 13, 2015 at 10:20am
Exercising free speech isn’t the issue here, discrimination based on religious beliefs is not protected by the 1st amendment. Your concept of what the Constitution protects is backwards.
 August 12, 2015 at 10:36pm
Somebody wants to use somebody, you got that part right