I think you have that upside down, see “fortherecord” above.
 March 4, 2015 at 2:41pm
They don’t ‘say’ anything without multiple proven scientific methods that determine the age of such objects. Now go ahead with your link storm to all the things wrong with scientific dating methods (that have debunked many times).
The Earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old. Who do you know that disputes that? Liberal friends who think they can prevent climate change by recycling toilet paper rolls and voting for socialists?
Ken Ham's working on the official rebuttal as we speak.
"And the young earther’s heads explode in 3…2…1…"
Just because they found a few teeth that they 'say' are supposedly that old?
prosecutors many times, had far more evidence then evolutionists and old earthers have and the convictions were later overturned when the real murderer admitted to the crime for which the wrong guy had been convicted.
Young earther here.
Head still intact.
We can agree to disagree on such matters.
Science tells us the moon is receding a few inches each year. Less than a million years ago the Moon would have been so close that the tides would have drowned everyone twice a day.
Scientists are still making discoveries about fire and other things that we see everyday. Just recently, scientists stated that their estimates of world fish populations were low by 95%. In light of this type of information, why would you trust that anything can be accurately dated at 2.8 million years old?
If I may interject here. Per the Bible, the Lord created the universe in 6 days and on the 7th, He rested.. Per Science the current estimate for the universe is about 13.9 billion years. Could it be that each day for the Lord translates in to approximately 2 billion years to humans? Is a “day” based, in human terms, on the revolution of the Earth on its axis or is a “day” to the Lord based on His own measure? Maybe His day is based on the rotation of the universe itself? The real key is not how long a “day” is. It is the basic idea of creation, how it happened…in what order…etc… And if you look at it that way, “see the forest not just the trees”, there really is no general disagreement between Genesis or Science. They are both views of the exact same thing and both are correct. I am amused at the dispute between Biblical followers and Science devotees – you are both right and are arguing about the same thing and you don’t even realize it. It is simply a matter of reference and in seeing the overall system. Take the wider view. When you see it that way, it all makes perfect sense. Just saying. Thank you for your indulgence.
"Geez….didn’t they teach you anything at school. First, the maximum age is 6K. Then, you need to determine if this was pre or post flood. So, now you have a 0 to 4.3K or 4.3K to 6K range. Then, of course, you want to see if you can do DNA testing do determine if there is Nephilim DNA as a cross reference. I’m not sure if Science has been able to tell general Nephilim DNA from the Nephelim DNA directly from one of Lot’s wives post flood. If so, this would be another cross confirmation of time.
Now, don’t you feel foolish!"
Of course what they obviously really teach at school is obviously subterfuge and coverups and never actually addressing the facts of the issues, oh and ridicule.
Can't refute something, just make fun of it, that is obviously the 'scientific' method. LOL
[-1] March 4, 2015 at 2:01pm
Excellent comment. Many thumbs up.
 March 4, 2015 at 1:57pm
It would be evidence if there were any actual data to support his position, in this case he’s guilty of what Palin used to call “making stuff up”.
 February 27, 2015 at 4:43pm
Yeah all couple of dozen of them.
 February 27, 2015 at 4:42pm
A lifelong Democrat.
 February 27, 2015 at 4:37pm
Explode from laughing would be correct.
Only an idiot would believe either of those grifters has any intention of running for office.
[-11] February 25, 2015 at 10:32am
Bark bark bark!
February 25, 2015 at 10:26am
Let me know when you’re planning to storm the castle, I’ll make some popcorn.
Simple: I'm beginning to think you don't have a brain, just a sponge that soaks up all the Liberal pabulum puke!
 February 24, 2015 at 4:45pm
If you expect a thoughtful rebuttal to your intelligent post, you’ve come to the wrong place. The Blaze is the fringe of the fringe, not everyone mind you, every once and awhile there’s an actual cogent discourse but it’s rare.
February 24, 2015 at 2:30pm
Guliani used the EXACT SAME PHRASE, “I want to fundamentally transform” in his campaign speech in running for the city of New York.
February 24, 2015 at 2:26pm
” I have yet to hear one positive word or seen one positive action by his people” Well if you actually cared about facts and listened you would have heard the President, and his people, make many statements about the greatness of this country. But all you really want to hear is the same echo chamber talking heads so its not surprising you’ve become a unthinking sheep.