Well, not to brag, but mine is a pretty deluxo cave...
I hope you can stay warm in your mini skirt and high heels, being the pathetic, unprincipled prostitute that you are.
[-2] November 13, 2015 at 5:05pm
Cruz will be buried in the general election if nominated, Heck I’m sure if he’s nominated he’ll tone himself way down the Blaze crowd will turn against him. So predictable.
November 12, 2015 at 5:21pm
Replace “timidity” with “common sense reality” and I’m with you.
November 12, 2015 at 5:12pm
Fortunately this wackadoodle will never have the opportunity to get anywhere near the WH. I’m sure his next ghost written book is already being written and he’s mapped out his next book signing tour, then there’s the inevitable Fox job in the future.
[-7] November 11, 2015 at 12:01am
Hillary is going to wipe the floor against any of these buffoons, and getting ready to lose the Senate too. The only reason you’ll keep the House is gerrymandering and voter suppression.
Yeah, Reaganomics mostly worked. How come you didn't support it? Oh, that's right, democrat, my bad.
Sorry about your incontinence.
Tell you what. Since I already did this years ago. It is your turn. Go through Jimmy Carters time served. And you will notice a direct correlation between the Democrats plans and unemployment. Or lac of participation in the economy. Do the same with Obamas and the Democrats and you will see the same. But the major difference is how they reported unemployment and getting on welfare and the people available for jobs "vs" jobs available. Where as Obamas administration doesn't report those the same way. So you see a false statement on unemployment. Compared to jobs available. But you will actually see in Obamas world. If we had 125 people available for jobs and only 95 business hiring. To them, that would be 5% unemployment. Because they didn't count the other 25 people.
Clinton benefited directly from what Reagan did. And setting up the atmosphere that allowed for the high tech industry. Clinton balanced the Budget, but pushed the rest onto future debt. If you noticed that by the second term when Clinton's polices was kicking in. You say the economy faltering toward the end of the Presidential term. Hence the 1999 to 2000 High Tech stock drops. And the country slowing down, and the housing bubble getting bigger. And the Dems was warned.
But the fact is. When you take in inflation and the size of government. There is no way Obama and the Democrats have succeeded. The Dems have only disguised the problems they have created.
A Democrats way of reducing spending is to not spend 10 million, but to spend 9.99 million on the next new plan. And fall to tell the people they actually spent another billion in another bill. Meaning they reduced the future debt they wanted to spend. Rather than actually reducing the cost of Gv.
Perfect example is the Un-Affordable Health Care Bill created another bureaucracy and cost. While never getting ride of or merging the other bureaucracies they already had in place. And in which many things are replicated. And many differences in care or services. For perfect example Medicare will pay or allow for things that VA will not. So, how is it take the Gv can say they are giving the care the Vets need.
Billions could have been saved by simply allowing Medicare to the uninsured and/or giving a certain minimum care insurance or for catastrophic care. With a certain dollar amount of coverage. As an example. And that is thinking liberal. But the Obama care was about control. And trying to destroy and consolidate the big Insurance companies for hostel take over by the Gv (in the end). Or Crony business with the Gv to run their programs and politicians making big money in the process. Especially if you notice the major Insurance being setup lie in Regions...just like EPA.
Mussolini did some of that/this with business if you check history.
 November 10, 2015 at 11:42pm
43 million on a natural gas gas station in a country with 0 cars that run on natural gas, just the tip of the iceberg.
November 10, 2015 at 10:46pm
You might want to familiarize yourself with the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution.
 November 10, 2015 at 2:21pm
Seems like most of the whining is right here on the Blaze.
So Harry Reid didn't commit libel because Romney didn't sue him?
You are truly simple...
Not entirely true. This meant, according to the Court, that public officials could only win a defamation suit when the statement that was made was not an honest mistake and was in fact published with the actual intent to harm the public figure. According to the Court, actual malice only occurs when the person making the statement knew the statement was not true at the time he made it, or had reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.
[-2] November 10, 2015 at 2:14pm
No candidate, or President, has ever released their college records.
[-1] November 6, 2015 at 2:25pm
God had nothing to do with fossil fuel, period.
 November 6, 2015 at 2:23pm
He might be a good man but he’s radically unqualified to be the leader of the number one superpower.