User Profile: SingerGuy

SingerGuy

Member Since: September 01, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [4] May 25, 2016 at 6:34pm

    Wash, rinse, SPIN, repeat. A typical day for the spoxpeople.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] May 20, 2016 at 8:36am

    Video clearly shows that his back was turned to her when that happened and she was back on the stage before he turned around. How can he help her when he doesn’t even see it happen?

  • May 15, 2016 at 8:05pm

    Yes, everything on the Interwebs is live as you watch it; no matter how many times you press the replay button.

  • [3] May 9, 2016 at 11:09am

    If they take the files from last year’s yearbook, and then replace the data with this year’s students, and on that page in that exact position last year they had a student named Isis Phillips, then this was a failure to update the field with the current year’s student’s name. In that case you could call it a typo and not be wrong, even if the word ‘typo’ fails to fully communicate what happened. (Disclaimer: I have no idea if this is what happened. I’ve just been in the desktop publishing industry for 30 years and know how these things can happen.)

  • [5] April 16, 2016 at 12:23pm

    It’s more of a “deactivate” than a “delete.” The data is still there, but it’s in limbo. I did that on December 30th and haven’t looked back. It’s surprising how few of my friends have sent me a private email asking why I disappeared.

  • [10] April 8, 2016 at 10:47am

    No, but Pavlov does. ;-)

  • [2] April 4, 2016 at 5:44pm

    I only saw the back end of the horse and I called it Obama. Was I wrong?

  • [54] March 22, 2016 at 7:53am

    You are very correct. My wife and I have been foster parents for five years and have so far adopted four children that were initially placed in our home. We have stipulated that we won’t accept Native American children for this very reason. The Tribes have been known to even undo a legal adoption, so going from foster to adoption is still no guarantee that the Tribes won’t emotionally destroy these children even years down the road.

  • [4] February 17, 2016 at 11:13am

    She’s hoping to win the Litto Lotto!

  • [17] February 10, 2016 at 10:13pm

    @Spqr1: He reacted to getting shot. He did not pull. He was right handed and carried his gun openly on his right hip. His hand went up to his left chest area and came away empty. There was never a gun displayed.

  • [9] February 1, 2016 at 11:29pm

    “This What Is Inside” should read “This Is What Is Inside.” Come on Blaze! Proofread your headlines!

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] January 28, 2016 at 8:51am

    Why do you have to say, “so called?” He has a massive resume of credentials that testify that he *is* a constitutional lawyer. I would bet his resume looks way better than yours in that category. If you’re going to attack him, at least have the courtesy of using verifiable facts. (Calling him a do-do head won’t work either.)

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 27, 2016 at 8:44am

    So Trump is going to duck out of the debate because he doesn’t like one of the moderators? That’s just what we need in the White House; Donald Duck! [/sarcasm]

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] January 8, 2016 at 8:58am

    I expect the City of New York to go after these RATS with a vengence for killing rats without a license or something equally ridiculous.

  • [309] January 4, 2016 at 8:36am

    From the article: “Dwight Hammond, 73, and Steven Hammond, 46, said they lit the fires on federal land in 2001 and 2006 to reduce the growth of invasive plants and protect their property from wildfires.”

    What that carefully crafted sentence does not say is that the valley was filled with wildfires, and their property was in imminent danger of being burned and their winter feed destroyed. They set backfires on their property, along the border with BLM property, to create a firebreak in hopes of saving their ranch. The backfires worked better than they hoped and were even instrumental in bringing the larger fires under control. However, the fires burned across the fence line and onto BLM land, and the BLM is calling those fires “arson” in an attempt to garner public support and win a decades-old battle to drive the Hammonds off of their ranch.

    Successfully battling a wildfire by the use of a back fire is not arson; it is intelligent land management. The Hammond family should have been praised for their quick action, not given excessive prison sentences over it. This whole story is BLM abuse and government media propaganda. This family is being persecuted and prosecuted off of their land.

    I don’t support taking over the building the way they have done, but I agree that something needs to be done to draw attention to this story. I’m not sure how successful they can be with the media not telling their side of the story, as in this article.

    Responses (33) +
  • [12] January 3, 2016 at 11:21pm

    Here is some important back story on what led up to the current situation with the Hammond family. This is another example of BLM overreach trying to shut down all grazing rights and put ranchers out of business.
    https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/723

    Please share this story with everyone you know. The lamestream media is not going to tell the Hammond’s side of the story.

  • December 18, 2015 at 11:24am

    Because this video was produced as part of a 12 days of Christmas video series for Mormon.org. In the context of why it was released and for whom the link is entirely appropriate.

  • December 18, 2015 at 11:23am

    Because this video was produced as part of a 12 days of Christmas video series for Mormon.org. In the context of why it was released and for whom the link is entirely appropriate.

  • [92] December 17, 2015 at 2:11pm

    So many comments that get hung up on the fully produced music video. The point of the whole thing is that someone with the fame and talent to draw massive crowds played in a NY subway and people walked past her with no realization of who she really was, thus ignoring the gift of her free music. So what if in post production we had all the added instruments and vocalists? So what if the hidden camera was moved around as she played this over and over so they could get various camera angels to use for editing? The point was made beautifully, and we get the fully orchestrated music video to enjoy.

    How many of us ignore the wonderful gift of the atonement because we fail to recognize a poor carpenter from an obscure village in Israel is actually the King of Kings, the creator of the world? *THAT* is the point of the video, not whether the sound was improved in post production.

    Responses (2) +
  • [40] November 3, 2015 at 10:02am

    @Raven911: “Or better yet, keep your damned live stock in its pen…”
    So you’re saying that you’ve never lived in cattle country? I suppose you don’t know anything about “open range,” do you? From the article, “the bull had just struck a station wagon along a highway in an open range.” When you drive through an open range you need to be constantly alert for cattle on the roadway. It is a part of normal life in the west, which you apparently know nothing about. I suspect the people in the station wagon don’t know much about it either, or that bull would not have been struck by their vehicle.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love