I think I would have poured some wine down the drain long before it got to that point.
 July 8, 2015 at 2:59pm
There is nothing a commercial farmer can do with excess milk, than throw it away. It can’t be stored and wait in turn until a milk processor just happens to have room in their tanks. It can’t be given away as raw milk because unlike those farmers who specifically produce raw milk, they are not set up to maintain the same sanitation standards and methods. They can’t just turn it in to sour cream and cheese, which require specific cultivated bacteria and enzymes and the right temperatures, handling, and time specific to each product. Large farmers only have the time and facilities to milk and care for their herd, which can be over 1000 head. There is nothing they can do if processors are not accepting milk, just dump it and keep milking the cows until the processors have room, and then limit the number of milk producing cows in following seasons until demand picks up again.
 July 8, 2015 at 2:41pm
They can not give away unprocessed commercial grade milk because it is unsanitary. They milked the cows and stored the milk with the anticipation that it will be pasteurized and homogenized. This means they did not use as strict sanitation methods that a raw milk producer would use. No one should ever drink raw milk from a large operation. You want raw, get it from a smaller more local producer.
July 6, 2015 at 2:04pm
Detroit is a crazy city. I don’t blame him at all for not stopping until he got to a well lit parking lot.
This was not in Detroit, it was in what seems a safe city, a couple hours from Detroit. No 35 mph doesn’t seem as if they are fleeing but this day in age the officer has no clue what is happening in the vehicle ahead of him. He orders a man to stop and the man did not. The officer does have a right to arrest him, however, the justice system will prevail.
I’m unsure why so many negative marks considering conservatives are supposed to support LOCAL police. I fully understand that after hearing the young mans story that he should have been released, but give the officer the benefit of the doubt. If the justice system sees that is was an unnecessary arrest, then let the justice system reprimand the officer…We do not know what the officer was thinking at the time of the arrest nor do we know the complete story. Also we need to understand that the vehicle did match another that was called in. Everyone is jumping to a conclusion without knowing both sides.
Are we conservatives that asks for all of the information to make a good decision or are we conservatives that jump to conclusions because government officials are involved? We do not have the officers statement of reason nor do we have the release from the department. So I ask, why are we automatically taking sides? I am a man, I live in a decent size city (Indy), which has it’s downsides and even cop impersonators every once in a while…but if an officer pulls me over, I stop. I may then fight it in court.
 July 6, 2015 at 1:58pm
If true, Mr. Wallace is right and the officer is wrong. The charges should be dropped. Some police officers have no sense.
 July 6, 2015 at 1:48pm
Marriage. Why is it no one considers marriage? Why are the only choices abortion, single parenthood, or adoption? All of them are bad. Marriage seems to be the only choice that offers the chance of stability and lasting happiness (mind you, I say chance, not guarantee), but it is the last thing considered, if thought of at all.
If this guy was who she was supposed to marry, she would have married him, and then she could tell him all this stuff tonight when they get home instead of writing a letter and thinking about whether or not to mail it, so, obviously, despite all her whining to the contrary, she did the right thing back then.
 July 4, 2015 at 12:32pm
I’m not surprised. Lesbians and Gays by definition are never seen in public together absent political motivations. Bi-sexuals are looked down on as neither gay, nor straight. Transgenders are not homosexual in the conventional sense (think of Bruce Jenner trying to reconcile his still existent attraction to women and trying to decide whether he will be attracted to men in the future) I thought the “Q” meant “questioning”, not *****, seeing as how the term ***** was originally meant an insult to all of the above. If “Q” is for “*****” now, then they are redundant, and anyone in the party who identifies as “*****” will probably be ignored. This movement was divided against itself before it even started. I wonder sometimes how they got as far as they did, but not much. I have a pretty good idea that most of the money behind the movement can be connected to powerful socialists and anti-Americans.
No, Sister. The word Qu33r is well accepted in the LGBTQQ community. It means someone who is a non-conformist even within the LGBTQQ community. The first Q is questioning and the second Q is Qu33r.
You got it spot on SISTER1 - Henry Hay and Matechine society - part of the effort to destroy America from within: - The whole sordid history of the war against America within America:
Communist manifesto states right out that they want to end family and religion as institutions that stand in their way.
On step closer to taking children from families and educate by the state and weathermen underground bomber Bill Ayers already has written the Common Core education that they get.
 July 2, 2015 at 12:21pm
Thank you Captain Killjoy! This is why you don’t get invited to parties and no one likes you.
June 22, 2015 at 10:09pm
It took an official study to determine that good manners and a relaxed attitude improves racial perceptions? Seriously?!
 June 22, 2015 at 11:46am
Actually, this a strategy which, while it raises the hair on the back of my neck, makes sense. We can not afford an increasingly belligerent Russia getting the upper hand or thinking they can get the upper hand in military maneuvering in Europe. They already have an ally in Cuba, and numerous friendly nations in South and Latin America who are quite PO’d with the US. Do we need Russia getting a foothold in Europe, with their established infrastructure and resources? You can bet Russia will happily supply their allies with weapons and supplies, in fact they already do it on a regular basis. We don’t need them supplying our enemies anymore than they already are doing, and we certainly don’t want them in a position to launch a direct attack on our allies or our soil.
USSR-ROOSKIES ALREADY OWN THE GASPIPELINE SUPPYING 100% TO ALL OF EU!!
 June 22, 2015 at 10:35am
Happy Father’s Day, Angel Soft. Proving yourselves to be total a** wipes, one commercial at a time.
 February 24, 2015 at 12:59pm
There really isn’t much information to go on. Anonymous health professionals coming forward to report an “emerging health crisis” and “alarming trend” sound scary, but without names, numbers, and socioeconomic data, it means nothing. Why are pregnant mothers, or women generally, becoming addicted to marijuana? Are there other drugs (OTC and recreational drugs) in their systems? How is this connected to legalization? Correlation or causation (the article suggests causation in that they are addicted because marijuana is legal, which is stupid to the ‘nth degree) Are there more marijuana addicts over all? Where are they getting their fix?
I’m not meaning to suggest marijuana is harmless, but let cooler heads prevail and find the roots of addiction before putting in to law a knee jerk reaction.
Of course, on the other hand, Colorado did bring it on themselves and they are going to have to sort it out.
 February 23, 2015 at 3:59pm
Something to be considered. Every woman involved in a porn shoot or film is someone’s daughter. Whether she is there voluntarily, or coerced. Every woman involved in prostitution is also someone’s daughter, again, voluntarily or otherwise. Would you want your daughter involved in the porn and sex industry? If you are a sane and loving parent, then the answer is no. So why is it acceptable for other people’s daughters? If it’s bad for own daughter, you can be assured it’s just as bad for other parent’s daughters.
[-1] February 13, 2015 at 5:59pm
In a legal document like that, they are referring to trained drivers are they not, especially of the variety that will literally drive while you sleep in the berth?
Christian or not, it is both unwise false to list JESUS as a co-driver, particularly since there are many men named “Jesus” in the US. Be clear and precise in your documentation or expect to reprimanded if not fired.
If you wish to express faith, do so; but do it in a way and at a time that does not leave doubts about your sanity and honesty.
 February 6, 2015 at 9:54am
Despicable. How insane and abusive can a parent get? Completely unjustified.
1. Stranger danger is a myth. A child is far more likely to be attacked or kidnapped by family (as this demonstrates, although typically it’s done by the non-custodial parent). Strangers very rarely victimize children they don’t know. Parents, significant others, and even priests and teachers all have a greater reputation for exploiting children than do strangers.
2. Nothing justifies outright trauma to a child. It doesn’t matter whether this six year old was being disobedient toward his mother or ignored her guidance concerning strangers. On a related note, I don’t think schools are justified in simulating active shooter drills during instructional hours for the same reasons. The risk and damage of trauma is greater than the actual risk of danger.
3. His ability to speak to strangers may save his life or the lives of others. Too many kids are helpless and infantalized and have no idea how to relate to other people or ask for help. They simply give up or commit suicide when the going gets too rough. Too many people have heard “stranger danger” all their childhood and grew up with the habit of not speaking to new neighbors and keeping their eyes averted. Entire neighborhoods are full of people who distrust and despise each other as potential enemies instead of friends and a support network.
 February 5, 2015 at 3:29pm
Excuse me, Mr. Obama?! Get off your own high horse. We are not dealing with the crimes and issues of half a millenia ago, or even a century ago. We’re talking about TODAY! The horrors being done right NOW, and it’s not the Christians! Stop your moral Twister game and do your job!
 February 4, 2015 at 11:34am
We don’t do cable or satellite TV in my house. If we are going to sit down and watch something, it better be available in BR or DVD or available online because we won’t justify spending money on cable, not when most of it is distortion and filth broken up only by commercials. If it’s worth our money to see it, we’ll pay for the program specifically.
 January 31, 2015 at 5:01am
Is there a large group of Muslims who regularly attend American rodeo? Is this in demand in Texas? I don’t live in Texas, but somehow I doubt either situation is true and that that move is glaringly out of context. It would seem more appropriate to have an Imam offer an invocation at a town hall meeting or soccer game in Detroit, where there are lots of Muslims. But over a rodeo with an audience that primarily consists of Christians, that’s not inclusive. That’s ignorant and marginalizing, and about as appropriate for that venue as singing another nation’s national anthem.
So, you admittedly don't know what you are talking about, yet you feel perfectly comfortably calling to exclude a segment of the population. Classy!
No, it is not in demand in Texas. Texas is probably the very worst place to try this kind of stupid stunt. I assume CAIR pressured the Ft. Worth Stock Show to have one of their guys do the prayer.
Rodeo Outreach Program? I assume muslims invented the rodeo much like they invented spaceflight and toilet paper.
 January 11, 2015 at 9:52pm
Not sure his attendance there, or anywhere else in public is called for. He can’t go anywhere without a small army of security and entourage members. He would only be in the way. There is nothing he can say, without contradicting everything he has said about Islam being a peaceful religion and how the “future doesn’t belong to blah blah blah people who disrespect Islam blah blah”. He’s in a corner, and for once is doing what he should do when it comes to issues not specifically outlined in his job description, which is to keep quiet about it. He should lay low. While I doubt it is his fault directly for the terrorism in France, he has done no significant and lasting thing to combat and condemn global terrorism and jihad.
 December 7, 2014 at 6:14pm
So either Jackie was lying, or she was so drunk out of her mind, that she can’t keep names, dates, and locations straight, or she’s mentally disabled.
sister : Guess what ? The Left has now come up with a new excuse for lies : the ' victims' suffer trauma so that makes them change their story ! ( a new defense : Blame the guy you claim did whatever to you for ALSO making you confused with your allegations and facts ?! ONLY A LEFTY RADICAL, SKILLED IN ' LUCIFERIAN ' LIES could come up with this one ! Can just hear the Devil : " Hey, I didn't tell Eve to eat that apple . She's lying . And she put a spell on me and, it confused me. I told her not to eat the apple before I told her to eat the apple ! None of this is my fault . She put a spell on me ! " ) Oh, brother.