User Profile: skunkbear


Member Since: November 01, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • July 31, 2014 at 12:15am

    SASQUATCH, “Your posts suggest that you prefer American causalities to occur as long as the enemy doesn’t get hurt.”

    I prefer no innocent getting hurt. Period. My philosophy includes complete adherence to the NAP. If the violator of the NAP is an American then I fully support him/her to be the casualty rather than an innocent regardless of nationality. In Iraq and Afghanistan US amerika is clearly the aggressor. So yes, I do support the Kyles and the Luttrells being the ones who suffer.

    Also, “So you’re totally OK with murdering Jessie Ventura?”

    No, because he had a “pivot point” (Glenn’s best argument) and seems to have walked away from the “live by the sword…” mentality. Although I do question his desire to want to still hang out with those who still desire to live by the sword…

  • [-1] July 31, 2014 at 12:05am

    YELLOWBEARD, “Rose, killing muslims isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    HITLER, “Rose, killing Jews isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    STALIN/MAO/POL POT ETC., “Rose, killing the bourgeoisie isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    GENERAL SHERMAN, “Rose, killing Southerners isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    GENERAL SHERMAN, “Rose, killing Indians isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    TEDDY ROOSEVELT, “Rose, killing Filipinos isn’t murder. They’re animals.”

    Etc, etc, etc…

  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 11:47pm

    SHAQUELILI, “I look forward to the day we can wipe our butts with the scalp hair of dead Palestinian children.”

    I will bite. Are you willing to personally kill and scalp those Palestinian children as well as doing the rest of your post?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] July 30, 2014 at 11:42pm

    EAST, “It proves that coincidences occur and sometimes dead people had their pictures taken at some time shortly prior to their demise.”

    One, how do you know the first picture was taken “shortly prior”? Two, how do you know he was actually “demised”?

    All of this may indeed be true. But I am willing to bet an equally “poignant” photo could also be found from a Palestinian perspective too.

    Manipulating emotions is at the heart of propaganda. I believe nothing from any “authoriah” when it comes to war.

  • [-4] July 30, 2014 at 11:04pm

    Propaganda. Nothing more. It proves nothing.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 11:01pm

    WJS, “Kyle killed enemy soldiers and terrorists”

    Why were these soldiers “enemies”? Please define terrorist?

  • [-1] July 30, 2014 at 10:52pm

    ARCHANGEL,”But if it didn’t happen, why would he be afraid of SEALS? He has never exaggerated or lied about his service…”

    Because seals are just another gang, US america gubment approved. And when has Jesse exaggerated or lied about his service? (Please do not bring up the thoroughly proven fallacy about the “seals v udt” language.) And if exaggerating or lying about one’s service is wrong then one should never step into a VFW…

  • [2] July 30, 2014 at 10:44pm

    MOM, “James you are painfully unaware that perception is reality.”

    Really?! So truth does not matter, only what is believed by the masses?!

  • July 30, 2014 at 10:33pm

    WALTERWHITE, exactly, fully agree.

    And BTW I dig both your name and your avatar! Very interesting combo…

  • [-1] July 30, 2014 at 10:27pm

    MOM, “…Neither winning a lawsuit nor does money buy character. ”

    Neither does murdering innocent people and telling lies buy character. Unless of course one wears a US amerikan gubment approved costume.

  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 10:15pm

    JF, Jesse did not sue “the widow”. He sued Kyle’s estate before Kyle died. And the law against defamation is a legitimate law and it was tried in court. Being a “war hero” does not give one a license to lie. Justice was served here.

  • July 30, 2014 at 10:09pm

    DLV, the Taliban did not attack the US. Who were the “bad guys” in Iraq that attacked the US?

  • [3] July 30, 2014 at 10:05pm

    THE MONK, “‘I’d be looking over my shoulder looking to see who’s coming after me next’

    Next? If it never happened in the first place how can there be a ‘next’?

    Caught you lying Jesse.”

    Using the word “next” does not necessarily mean someone coming after him physically “again” but that Kyle came after him in his book. It means that Jesse is now and forever marked for a reprisal.

    And if it did happen in the first place why did the jury decide for Jesse?

  • [-24] July 30, 2014 at 9:43pm

    ROSE-ELLEN, I agree with your post except I believe his widow did not get rich off of the book because Kyle’s profits went to a veterans charity.

    Either way, as you said Kyle lived by the sword and he died by the sword. So let his widow and children also suffer the same fate he inflicted on truly innocent men’s wives and children.

  • [-2] July 30, 2014 at 9:20pm

    Marcus Luttrell’s response shows only that he is ignorant of the facts of the case and law.

    But hey, he murdered a bunch of “furinners” while wearing a US amerikan gubment approved costume so that means his opinion is more worthy than any facts or laws.

    Responses (4) +
  • July 30, 2014 at 9:09pm

    DONNY, you are correct. DREDGER, prior to 1983 (I think) the basic training was the same for UDT and Seals hence the term Basic Underwater Demolition/Seal (BUD/S).

  • [2] July 30, 2014 at 8:57pm

    GLKGRL, “…eleven Seals testified Kyle hit JV…”

    Simply not true. One, the eleven witness were not all seals. Two, only two women (I think) claimed to have actually seen Kyle hit Jesse, and their testimony was questionable.

    All anyone has now on this case is what the MSM is reporting. And we all know how honest and competent they are. Let alone faux news, and others with their lies and propaganda.

    More info will probably come out eventually on what actually was said and proved in court, much like the Zimmerman trial.

  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 8:47pm

    TANKER, “However, 11 witnesses supported the story of what happened in the bar and for some reason this jury didn’t buy it.”

    I believe this is misleading. Those eleven “witnesses” testimonies were extremely contradictory and unreliable (drunk at the time, not actually there etc.). Indeed only two (I think) testified to have actually seen Kyle hit Jesse. And their credibility was in question.

    This is why the jury awarded Jesse his justice.

  • [2] July 30, 2014 at 8:32pm

    ALICAT, “skunkbear-justified in the suit against Kyle. NOT against the publisher Harper Collins which apparently Ventura is looking at next.”

    The law here can go either way. It is similar to an author writing a fictional account about real people; it is prudent for publishers to get waivers signed by those who are alluded to in the book. It gets tricky for those who are in “the public eye” (government officials and celebraties etc.).

    Jesse’s case against the publisher seems to rest on them not fact checking who Kyle meant by Scruff Face. Maybe they did. So long as no other identifying characteristics about who was Scruff Face was alluded to in the book then the publishers could be off the hook. But if this is the case then Kyle blew it big time for clearly stating that Jesse was Scruff Face. This could put the publishers in jeopardy.

  • [-1] July 30, 2014 at 8:14pm

    FORTHERECORD, “Ventura is a radical atheist who thinks it’s more moral to live as a radical atheist then someone following G-ds eternal commands.”

    What makes Ventura a “radical atheist” and not just a “regular atheist”? What is the moral code of atheists as compared to “god’s eternal commands”?

123 To page: Go