User Profile: Heisendude


Member Since: November 01, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [1] August 4, 2015 at 11:51pm

    LAKE, ” No one was calling for war with Iran with ‘No Deal’”.

    The purpose of trying to make a deal with Iran was to try to prevent a war with Iran over its nuclear activities.

  • August 4, 2015 at 11:47pm

    LAKE, a dirty nuke would cause relatively limited damage. How would Iran benefit from such a foolish move? How would Iran benefit from detonating a nuke on the US?

  • August 4, 2015 at 11:37pm

    “In his speech, the Israeli prime minister conceded that the deal ‘does make it harder for Iran to produce one or two nuclear weapons in the short term.’”

    “However, Netanyahu said that it came at a ‘terrible price’ because ‘the deal makes it far easier for Iran to build dozens, even hundreds of nuclear weapons in a little over a decade.’”

    How so Bibi? What facts lead you to your opinion?

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] August 4, 2015 at 11:26pm

    SARGE, “The Iranian leader just the other day said, ‘All Iran needs is one bomb to kill all the Jews because they are all in one place and not scattered around like they once were all over Europe’.”

    Do you have a link to this claim? Thanks.

  • [7] August 4, 2015 at 6:38pm

    It is all a rigged game and the candidates are already chosen (if there actually is going to be another “election”) but it will be entertaining in a watching a slow train wreck kind of way. Each will be trying to out macho the other when it comes to foreign policy while also claiming they are for a smaller, less intrusive government domestically.

    The “winner” will be the smartest moron in the room.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] August 4, 2015 at 6:24pm

    VERITAS, your link helps support my contention that many if not most of these videos and pics and stories are fake. Thanks.

  • August 4, 2015 at 6:23pm

    MONK, VERITAS’ link shows a fake beheading being filmed. These alleged videos of beheadings and other atrocities do not convince me unless I see the actual act not just the before and after pics.

  • August 4, 2015 at 5:58pm

    DIGITAL, your link proves me correct.

  • August 4, 2015 at 5:51pm

    ARGYLE, “The M-16 is an AR-15 with the full auto selector. M-16 is a military designator, while AR-15 is the original manufacturer’s (ArmaLite) model number. It was made in full auto for the military long before the semi-auto civilian models were made.”

    True but the AR-15 built and authorized for civilian use was never full auto capable. AR-15s are basically civilian models of the M16 sans the full auto/three round burst. The weapon used by Cruz is a AR-15 hence not an assault weapon.

  • August 4, 2015 at 5:30pm

    Cannot find a link to the actual video. Anyone have one?

    Responses (4) +
  • [3] August 4, 2015 at 10:57am

    Planned Parenthood and Baby Body Parts Salvage Inc.

    Just another subsidiary of the Military Industrial Complex and its motto: Converting other people’s pain into our power and profits.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 4, 2015 at 10:39am

    JOHN, it is not a machine gun. It was an AR-15 which is semi-auto only.

  • [-2] August 4, 2015 at 10:32am

    SARGE, “Digital: You’re splitting hairs.”

    Digital is not splitting hairs – he is completely wrong. It is bad enough when the gun grabbers do not get facts right but it is even worse when gun rights guys get the facts wrong. Makes us look stupid too.

  • August 4, 2015 at 10:26am

    DIGITAL. “Machine guns are firearms mounted on vehicles. It’s a gun for a machine. Fully automatic does not equal machine gun.”


    Responses (2) +
  • [5] August 4, 2015 at 10:14am

    THOM, “Dr. Maddow went to Oxford, was a Rhodes scholar…”

    The more reason to challenge her “thinking”. As C. S. Lewis noted, one can be “educated” to the point of imbecility. Maddow fits this description perfectly.

  • [3] August 4, 2015 at 10:08am

    WHIPLASH, the reason I point this out is because there is indeed a difference between semi-auto and assault weapons and it is important that we gun rights supporters make this distinction.

    The gun grabbers want to blur this distinction and use the term “assault rifle” to conjure up into the minds of the ignorant public the idea that any civilian can buy and own a “machine gun” especially when there is a mass shooting. The ignorant public then sees nothing wrong with banning “assault weapons” which the grabbers then include semi-autos.

    Words mean things and the libs know how to play the word game very well. We should not play their game.

    Glad to call you brother in this fight though.

  • [33] August 4, 2015 at 9:47am

    “I am a Professor in English at Capital Community College, I teach about diversity and the negative impact of racial profiling…”

    Why is an “English Professor” teaching such nonsense? Is she really a Professor?

    While I think she should have the book thrown at her for lying and making false statements I also argue that when cops lie and make false statements they too should have the book thrown at them as well, maybe even harder.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] August 4, 2015 at 9:26am

    Left this part off: The AR-15 is semi-auto only.

  • [7] August 4, 2015 at 9:25am

    WHIPLASH, “So Madcow DOES know the difference between an assault rifle and a true MG?”

    The AR-15 is not an “assault rifle”. An assault rifle is one with a selector switch that can change it from semi-auto to either full auto or three round bursts.

    Responses (4) +
  • [3] August 4, 2015 at 9:22am

    MIKEIL, “It also takes a step back on the whole respect of guns thing when you’re playing games with one.”

    Perfect point.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love