User Profile: Skyking69

Skyking69

Member Since: November 08, 2012

Comments

  • January 18, 2013 at 1:45pm

    Honeydouchebag13,

    The Second Amendment is a bar against a tyrannical federal government. Supreme Court ruling, Federalist Papers and debate records make this fact, not opinion. All other uses, hunting, target shooting, defense, etc.; they all flow from this fundamental God given right. That is the truth and apparently you and your ilk cannot handle it. Why? Because the “assault weapon,” named that by gun control nuts in the 1980′s when they were looking for an effective marketing scheme to malign them; you can’t handle the fact that US citizens can own them and normal capacity (sometimes called high capacity by gun control nuts again using marketing techniques in an effort to shift the debate) magazines. Get used to it. Congress isn’t going to pass another AWB for a number of reasons. Get used to that. And you’re a loser. Get used to that. The loathing you feel when you look in the mirror can only be solved by your death. Remember, suicide is an option.

    Phil

  • December 25, 2012 at 4:27pm

    LAR5,

    Just because he maybe bought the gun at a gunshow from a non-dealer, or from the truck of a non-dealer parked in a shopping center parking lot, or in an apartment when responding to a Craig’s List advertisement, or stole them from someones home(s) or vehicle(s); he knew he was a convicted felon and the lack of a background check isn’t what kept him from getting the guns. He was breaking laws buying guns, stealing guns and/or possessing guns. Another gun law would have been ignored just like those were. But, even more illustrative…

    How many people did he shoot? How many did he kill? Weren’t there laws against that? What about setting arson fires? Weren’t there laws against that?

    OK, so if we just plug the so called “gun show loophole” that is going to fix what?

    The ******** that push for the so called “gun show loophole” are just looking for an excuse to chip away at peoples rights by increasing costs of purchase. The only thing the “gun show loophole” is going to do is…nothing. It isn’t going to do a thing.

    Phil

  • December 11, 2012 at 9:53am

    Worth repeating – Smart man.

    Responses (57) +
  • December 11, 2012 at 12:02am

    You hijackers ought to get an all expense paid visit to the winner in the story above…

  • November 23, 2012 at 12:56pm

    thegreatcarnac,

    I understand the sentiment, but two points: 1) He was not fired, he retired. 2) I am not sure on what basis he would sue. Many people confuse the 1st Amendment right to free speech in discussions like this. The 1st Amendment prohibits the government from restraining your speech. Your employer can fire you, your spouse can divorce you and your friends can disown you for saying something they view as moronic.

    I personally wish this guy had dug his heels in and told all of them to f&^% off. He wasn’t going to get prosecuted, the only reason it made headlines is because he was a cop and some jackass decided to file a complaint about him making the statement. I would have loved to see him push it as I suspect an arbitrator would have reinstated him had the agency fired him for making an admittedly intemperate, but not even slightly threatening statement.

    Political correctness run amok. Whomever filed the complaint about his statement, I hope they read this – You should grow a pair, put on your big boy/girl panties and stop being so sensitive. And if you don’t like that, you can kiss my a$$.

    Phil

  • November 8, 2012 at 1:29pm

    Jeanniemac,

    Can you please provide a citation for that quote? An urban legends site says it is bogus (http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2008/11/13/bogus-khrushchev-quote-makes-the-rounds-again.htm).

    Thanks,

    Phil