User Profile: smojet

smojet

Member Since: January 09, 2013

Comments

  • [8] October 23, 2014 at 12:46pm

    The tips on how to block ads are helpful, but the point is we shouldn’t HAVE to do all that just to view the site without the barrage of pop-unders and obnoxious ads. I already subscribe to TheBlaze, so I’m a paying supporter! I take it very personally when a pop-under won’t even let me close the ad without “verifying” that I really meant to close it. It’s infuriating and rude. At least they aren’t advertising for those “get rich working at home” schemers anymore.

  • [1] October 5, 2014 at 8:44pm

    I think they did the right thing. If people need more images, they can find them. No obligation to print the savages’ propaganda. At least deal a blow to their morale when they realize we aren’t disseminating their horrors on our front pages anymore. The black page and bold statement will do plenty to wake people up – they aren’t ignoring it or covering up the truth in the least.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] September 10, 2014 at 10:22pm

    W.K. contradicted his own advice: music transcends good and bad, the lyrics don’t matter, but music that tries too hard to be good and sweet can be cloying? Having lyrics stuck in my head definitely effects my mood and tends to push me towards the mood of the music and lyrics I’m rehearsing in my mind. It’s crazy to say it doesn’t matter. How can Mr. Advice be so certain the boyfriend gets joy out of it, rather than magnifying some dark emotions he’s already feeling? If she continues this relationship and they have kids, is it okay to have gory and satanic posters and music playing around them too, because lyrics and images don’t matter? The boyfriend doesn’t sound like he’s in a dateable state of mind right now; he sounds troubled.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 3, 2014 at 9:48pm

    The kingdom belongs to such as these.

  • [1] August 1, 2014 at 11:05pm

    As to the “why”: I never thought to encourage changing my daughter’s doll’s “diapers,” because she’s not even two years old yet and I didn’t think she’d be interested, but she initiated it and wanted all her dolls’ diapers changed. She brought them to the changing pad all, laid them down, and demanded, “Diaper? Diaper? Diaper?” Kids just mimic the stuff that makes up their lives, and for toddlers, that includes a ton of time getting their diapers changed. My 7-year-old niece was fascinated and wanted to help with my daughter’s diapers, and I liked showing her how to do it because that’s how kids learn. If I had a son instead of a daughter, the niece would have gotten exposure to actual, baby male genitalia, not just a plastic reproduction. All great practice for babysitting someday, then being a mother. That’s life!

  • [4] July 30, 2014 at 1:31pm

    I think it’s weird that everybody jumps to comment on whether this should be LEGAL or not. What in the world? Not every controversy comes down to “should there be a law against this” or “is this illegal”! The question is, is this totally abrasive and rude? It is.

    A lot of you commenters are throwing the word “brat” around with alarming ease.

    “If we loved children, we would have a few. If we had them, we would want them as children, and would love the wonder with which they behold the world, and would hope that some of it might open our own eyes a little. We would love their games, and would want to play them once in a while…. We would want children tagging along after us, or if not, then only because we would understand that they had better things to do.”
    - Anthony Esolen

  • [2] July 28, 2014 at 10:22pm

    Just for a mental exercise, imagine demons are real and have wills of their own. Would they respond to scientific testing in a repeatable manner? If you’re going to argue this from a scientific standpoint, I don’t know if that’s a rational expectation.

    Ever read Flatland?

  • [-1] July 28, 2014 at 10:07pm

    You’re really spending a lot of time and energy on this. It really bothers you.

  • [-2] July 22, 2014 at 12:43am

    You seriously want to shoot people – even children – on sight. This lunacy is what makes my liberal-leaning family dismiss conservatives altogether, even though you’re a loud minority. American’s don’t treat people that way.

  • June 24, 2014 at 1:41am

    Can you prove this?

  • [3] June 24, 2014 at 1:34am

    Are you sure nothing has been caught on film? If video evidence were produced, would you change your stance, or say it was faked? If you’ve already made up your mind, you can explain away any evidence. It’s like being a conspiracy theorist: anything contrary to the conspiracy must be part of the conspiracy. Also, if people are correct that they are experiencing the actions of spirits with minds and wills, would those spirits submit to scientific testing and analysis under controlled conditions? Food for thought, Phillipmcd.

  • [3] June 24, 2014 at 1:22am

    It isn’t the cardboard and plastic, it’s the human will that’s at play. Do you think everyone here who is testifying that the board worked is lying or delusional? All of them?

  • [1] June 23, 2014 at 1:35pm

    If it’s benign, why hide the sensors in lamp posts? Has a reporter asked the city or the Art Institute that question?

  • May 20, 2014 at 4:46pm

    This is really sloppy use of the word “mistakes.” Politicians especially like to use it when they do something wrong on purpose and get caught, so it is mired in misuse and implies sin even though that isn’t what it means. Then to make matters worse, Driscoll comes up with a bunch of examples that aren’t sins OR mistakes. Is striking out a mistake? I don’t think so – it’s just failure to hit the ball. Mistakes and failures aren’t the same thing at all. His point was far too muddy to even evaluate. He didn’t define his terms. I don’t think he even knew exactly what he meant.

  • May 18, 2014 at 12:42am

    This story caught my eye because I always used to think our old husky behaved more like a cat than a dog. She was pretty indifferent when we came home — no big, retriever-like greeting. She usually didn’t bother to get up. When we called her, she would come only if it suited her, despite major efforts on my part. She slept curled up on the couch. She was coy — had to be wooed and given her space. I concur with an earlier poster: she was born to run, run, run! Amazing! At age ten, she went sprinting through almost three feet of fresh snow, and the distance between the tracks of her stride was easily eight feet. Fun to see these pics.

  • February 11, 2014 at 11:34am

    I agree – this was the same tradition when I was a kid. It was expected that everyone got a card. There’s value in building community this way, and not letting kids snub each other.

  • February 18, 2013 at 8:44pm

    This article uses pretty inflammatory language for what New York is trying to do, and I by no means trust New York’s government to do anything properly. But having lived in downtown Chicago, it was clear that a majority of the homeless I met on the streets had some form of mental illness, and it didn’t seem like the city was handling the situation well by just leaving them to suffer. If conservatives could actually run a major city for a change, what would we do about this problem? Leave things as they are?

  • January 25, 2013 at 7:05pm

    Agree – snatch her up, Glenn!!

  • January 9, 2013 at 3:17pm

    You people are missing the point. I clearly and obviously did not object to all bad news. It’s that it’s tragic, depressing, AND I gain nothing by reading it. Learning about what’s going on in the world is useful. And I just don’t find other people’s tragedies entertaining.

  • January 9, 2013 at 9:38am

    These types of stories make me want to avoid news sites. They are just tragic and make you feel awful, but serve no purpose other than to warn you about another way you could die from a freak accident. When I signed in to The Blaze TV today, it ran a commercial for The Blaze saying they wanted a dialogue, so here’s my feedback. Unless there’s some use for the information, could we avoid posting stories that just depress?

    Responses (4) +