User Profile: solaveritas

solaveritas

Member Since: September 08, 2010

CommentsDisplaying solaveritas's 10 most recent comments.

  • A developed drug will never see the light of day. “The powers that be” wouldn’t dare allow the masses to remember their broken promises, or be smart enough to throw them out of office.

  • Bill Press says, “What if he were a Muslim shouting Alahu Akbar”? Would you like that?
    Bill is old enough to remember, as are Blaze readers, yet NO ONE has mentioned the rants of Muhammed Ali that went on and on and on while Howard Cosell would be trying to interview Ali after yet another victory in the ring. It was more than giving thanks. It was rude and obnoxious, but no one made the comments about Ali and Islam like Bill Press is making about Tebow and Christianity. Same old double standard.

    Let whoever express their thanks however they want. Tebow is much much less subdued than Ali and does NOT claim that God favors his team in the contests.

  • Most indecent exposure laws require that the exposure be, among other things, “for the pleasure” of the person exposing themselves. Don’t think so here. And, besides, she wasn’t “exposing” until they ORDERED her to get out of the car.

    But, overall, we should say to her “Shame, shame, shame, you should never drive that fast!”

  • They will try anything, everything, just in case we are stupid enough to let them do it.

  • First: For the illegals … the situation is still a whole lot better than living in Mexico.

    Second: Remember forced busing of white students to schools in chocolate neighborhoods? They were bullied as the new LEGAL minority. But, we told them to suck it up and persevere because it was the law, and that’s what Americans do.

  • Everyone, be sure to write ESPN and tell them you can’t respect stupidity and won’t be watching MNF anymore.
    It is stupid to conclude that Hank was comparing B.O. to Hitler. He only coined an “example of opposites” to make a point.
    Football watchers don’t have a lot of Harvard degrees, but they know the difference between unsportsmanlike conduct and too many men on the field!!
    AND “football types” aren’t whining sissies anyway! So, change the MNF logo to PINK, why don’t you!
    Goodbye MNF!!

  • What’s worse? Underwear or running shorts that show more skin?
    What is underwear? What YOU decide underwear is?
    Your law based on opinion is too vague to afford due process and is unconstitutional. You either support our system of laws or you don’t, which is it?

  • No, you don’t have any such right. If its not indecent exposure, you have no such right.

  • I can’t believe the ACLU is against this one. Truth is, we should all be against it.
    If you can walk around in running shorts that show more, why is it criminal to be also wearing sagging jeans?
    Its unconstitutional.
    Government should not be making up their budget with “fashion laws”.
    Those who dress this way already pay by the poor image they portray, and the jobs they don’t get hired for, etc.

  • Guns have always had a practical purpose: protection from animals living closeby.
    Guns in the revolution were given a political purpose: protection from Tyranny.

    The “animals closeby” have changed from animal to human, but they are still there.
    The tyranny has slowly grown back and is a significant threat today.

    So, this book of pics is good to keep the rights alive due to real purposes for it, and to prevent “gun rights” accommodation being limited to “sports usage”.