User Profile: Arizona Don

Arizona Don

Member Since: September 01, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • May 20, 2015 at 3:48pm

    Ok sounds like reasonable thinking. She has not done anything of value in the years she has been in the public eye but she knows how to get things done. Of course that makes sense doesn’t it? Now there is progressive (creative) democrat thinking for you! Does that make her lazy or incompetent? Seems to me those qualifications match very evenly barack obama! The only difference between them is she can’t hide her past record. Oh, wait she did hide her thousands of secretary of state emails didn’t she. Ok maybe there is no difference after all.

  • [2] May 13, 2015 at 6:12pm

    Because they will have to be forced back under that rock. Right now they have an advocate in obama and another waiting to get in – hillary! There is two ways to provide that force the easy way is the upcoming election. The other way is not so easy or quick.

  • [2] May 13, 2015 at 6:00pm

    We are all sick of their crap. It is frustrating how ignorant they are. Anyone who can read history can learn why guns are necessary to freedom in any society. Without the ability to provide self protection there is no freedom there is only dependence. In this case total dependence. Lives are involved that makes it total dependence.

    However, the more they persist the more obvious it becomes their intentions are far from honorable. More on the order of hitler and stalin. In every case in history when guns were confiscated it was (said to be) “always for the good of the people.” But it really wasn’t it was for the good of government control of the citizens.

    You’re sick of it and so am I but we cannot stop pointing out the error of their ways. So never give up the fight. Never! Keep on keeping on!

  • [4] May 13, 2015 at 5:42pm

    That is the negative narrative. Positive is guns save lives everyday. Many more then are lost by guns at least of good innocent law abiding people. Without a gun how can a 80 year old 90 lb lady protect herself against a 250 lb 6ft 4 inch 38 year old man intent on robbing her or worse? In fact the gun is the great equalizer that keeps all humans equal. Regardless of size, color, ethnic group or any other thing. It takes the bullies out of control and that goes for tyrannical governments as well. Give up your gun and give up all your freedoms! Maybe even your life!

  • [4] May 13, 2015 at 5:28pm

    I suspect in the House this will get no traction.

    The progressive democrats just cannot give up on controlling the weapon and not the person holding the weapon. Without a person to use it it is actually not going to kill anyone. If the ammo is responsible for mass killings the wood around the lead in a pencil is what causes all misspelled words. Even if they did manage to ban ammo who thinks ammo would be banned? Of course it would not be. Black market. Drugs are banned and are they available? These idiot politicians just don’t get it.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 7, 2015 at 9:16am

    Speech is protected by the first amendment, everyone knows that or should. Some however, seem to think their speech is protected and others speech is not. Some feel offensive speech is not. Some call speech they dislike hate speech in an effort to get around the first amendment right. Nothing could be farther from the truth. It is usually that speech that needs to be defended and therefore the reason for freedom of speech being an integral part of the first amendment. Reasonable people however, do not go around attempting to kill people who say or do things they disagree with. Furthermore, Islam, or more specifically muslims, attempt at least to spread fear throughout the nations where they have a foot hold. So everyone knows offend them and they may attempt at least to kill the offender. Who supports that? They see themselves as not only superior but favored and entitled. Sound familiar? Who else do we know who thinks of their self that way.

    There may however, be repercussions from speech. Again whether right or wrong. In any case attempting to murder those exercising their free speech right is the wrong here not those exercising their right to free speech. Just in case someone does not know it murder IS against the law. I wonder if O’Reilly knows that? Or is he just making excuses for the muslims?

  • April 15, 2015 at 7:44pm

    First term Senators have not worked out well at least in the case of obama. I’m sticking with the guy (governor) with a proven record. Scott Walker. Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and all the rest would make a good VP with the exception of Bush. Do not want any more Bushes. And certainly no more Clinton’s. The Bushes are RINO’s while Clinton is corrupt, crooked and not truthful or trustworthy. She is a compulsive liar much like obama she has proven that. Perhaps that means nothing to progressive democrats but real patriotic Americans it means everything. Those who lie to you will and do steal form you. Obama is an excellent example!

    In the final analysis however, any candidate running now would be better then obama or clinton. Jeb Bush is marginal however. I’m getting just about tired of having to chose from the least of two evils. I therefore suggest if the Republicans wish to win the election DO NOT RUN A BUSH. Yes I was shouting! I refuse to hold my nose and vote again. I will not vote if Bush is the candidate and I have never missed an election since I was 21 years old. In 55 years!!!!!!!

  • [4] April 4, 2015 at 3:50pm

    Actually Greta is right

  • [2] April 4, 2015 at 9:59am

    The idiots who elected the jerk off in the white house not once but twice are just as much to blame for what is certainly going to happen right here in the USA as obama! Before everything is said and done they will have blood on their hands. There should be little doubt in anyone’s mind we are headed for an armed violent conflict. The citizens of this once great nation are running out of patience.

    The progressive democrats, by electing someone so that history could be made, are destroying the United States of America with or without help from Iran’s nuke’s. Many if not most conservatives knew from the beginning obama was out to do exactly what he is doing at this very moment. There should be little doubt destruction is his goal. Only when this is realized do all the things he has done to date begin to make sense.

    The economy is artificially propped up. The actual employment rate is hidden from the population. The debt and inflation will surly be the thing that causes the nations collapse. It will come before obama’s second term is over.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] April 2, 2015 at 3:38pm

    Looks like this marine blows obama’s excuse for releasing 5 high ranking terrorists doesn’t it? What happened to no man left behind now obama?

  • [1] April 2, 2015 at 11:46am

    You have hit the problem exactly. People who have authority and are not or cannot be held responsible for their actions. Of course that is not the way it is supposed to be. According to the law “no one is above it.” However, it has “evolved” to this point where only the surfs or peons are forced to obey the law and the elites all see themselves above it. We have witnessed this in the past but never to the extent that is happening right now. This whole administration is corrupt and it seems no one can do anything about it. My point here is it goes way beyond this judge. You see if the leadership is corrupt it seems to spread like wildfire. Another current example is hillary clinton.

    A good example is holder was held in contempt of congress. What ever happened to him because of it? Nothing, absolutely nothing. Same is true with this judge. This judge did have the authority to issue a temporary order to collect this man’s firearms however, a year seems like an unreasonable amount of time. I do not think he has the right to suspend his constitutional right to purchase firearms without due process. A judges order is not due process, it is only a process in preparation for a trial.

    In the final analysis judges like presidents, and some law enforcement (not all), have always illegally usurped power.

  • [4] March 29, 2015 at 3:05pm

    This is exactly what Netanyahu warned us about in his speech to congress. However, stopping a vindictive president is difficult to do. Kerry is marching to obama’s tune. As I said before, fasten your seat belts a very rough time is coming for everyone regardless of party.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] March 28, 2015 at 12:52pm

    Rep. Gohmert is correct.

    President after president in the past has tried to make a name for themselves by starting or expanding give away programs many, who were intended to be on the receiving end of those give away programs cheered wildly. No one seemed to think then as now that someday most will not pay anymore. What happens then. Furthermore, under the current administration most if not all of the agencies have increased their power and jurisdiction. If some restrictions are not applied and soon the nation will collapse under the weight of it own corruption.

    Many of the government agencies were begun with exceptional intentions and expectations. During the current administration they have “evolved” (with the help, or perhaps the blessing, of the administration) to become extensions of the executive branches authority performing unlawful acts above their intended duties or responsibilities. They must be stopped. Those agencies that should be eliminated or reduced in size include but are not limited to the IRS, EPA, ATFE, DOJ, HEW, DHS, DOE, and several others. Some only need to be monitored very closely for corruption they include but may not be limited to the CIA and FBI, USDA and USDI. It is impossible to get America back on track without at least modifying all these agencies.

  • [2] March 22, 2015 at 1:10pm

    Hard to think of a reason to get a tattoo let alone get one in the mouth. Not the brightest candle on the cake I take it!

    Responses (1) +
  • February 25, 2015 at 6:32pm

    Insanity should never be allowed to be a defense in a murder trial. The person murdered is just as dead as they would be if murdered by a sane person.

  • February 13, 2015 at 1:04am

    Ok, they watch pone on the computer while at work. Why? I can tell you why. I worked for the government (as a pilot but I got to witness those who were other workers). I have said for 20 years now the government would work at least twice as efficiently with 60% less employees. To many have nothing to do. It has always been that way in certain agencies, but not all. It, I suspect, has gotten worse in recent years (if that is possible). Hiring needs to be frozen for about 20 years and it would get better. However, certain agencies need to be eliminated altogether. Lets start with the IRS and EPA!

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] February 10, 2015 at 4:02pm

    I have a question for all you Aussies down there. Here in Arizona, USA we carry concealed under our second amendment to our constitution. And just about everybody does. Anyway here’s the question.

    What do you think would have happened if that was to happen here? Or better yet let me make it multiple choice. If someone in Arizona pulls a gun and runs down a freeway, to car jack cars, pointing it at people who do you think witnesses will call. A. The police B. The Morgue C. The fire department?

    Times up – The answer is B The Morgue with directions to be prepared to pick up two.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 28, 2015 at 3:26pm

    Islam is not a religion it is not even a cult, what it is is an ideology and dictatorial system of government disguised as a religion in order to gain acceptance and government recognition along with privilege it would not otherwise be able to garner. However, it does come closest to being a cult but its dominating features, like sharia law, takes it out of the realm of any kind of religion.

    It cannot be if it preaches killing of non believers (which it does) and rewarding the murderers with virgins. It motivates with fear and permeates death not love as religions do. There is no good within Islam.

  • January 24, 2015 at 12:25pm

    The only good bet Charles made here is the amount he put on Walker. Neither Bush or Rubio have a chance. Of course it is never good to bet on Black Jack (twenty-one) only a fool bucks the odds of the house. Poker is the only honest bet in a casino!

  • January 10, 2015 at 11:39pm

    I have nothing against Alaskans I have a lot of relatives there. What a stretch Arizona to Alaska. I love them both (but Alaska has a lot more flying bugs).

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love