User Profile: Arizona Don

Arizona Don

Member Since: September 01, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • August 9, 2016 at 2:34pm

    This is no more and no less then an attempted stop trump. Everyone with any common sense knows at this point the choice is between two people a business man billionaire and a lying, conniving, corrupt, untrustworthy, criminal person who cares nothing about this once great nation and is a complete risk of our national security. No one else has even a remote chance to win.

    However, her husband got into office because of Ross Perot and it appears the plan is to try to get someone to take votes away from Donald Trump to allow hillary to back into the presidency just as bill did

    Both bill and hillary are criminals perhaps worse then Al Capone at the height of his power. I find it totally ignorance to try to get her elected. If she is elected and put into place a liberal supreme court every American will pay a terrible price for this. When these communist progressive come after the guns through the supreme court there will be push back like never before seen in the world.

  • April 17, 2016 at 9:48am

    Somehow declaring martial law nationally would set off a revolt. That may be declared locally but never nationally. The amount of police (or military force) needed for such action on a national scale could not be ignored and would surely start an armed revolt. Corralling 320 plus MILLION armed people would take a tremendous force. Such a force is not available nor willing.

  • [-2] January 23, 2016 at 5:55pm


    Responses (1) +
  • [3] December 20, 2015 at 12:04pm

    These so called democrats can if they want give up their guns. Those of us who know better then what she says will keep ours. Pass a law attempting to either restrict them out of existence or confiscate them will do nothing to improve any problem existing in America today. Therefore we will not comply. It is true when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. BUT there will be millions of new outlaws presently referred to as gun owning law abiding citizens.

    Why democrats wish to punish law abiding citizens for the acts of a few is undeniably ignorant and yet they demand we not punish all muslims for the acts of a few. Who can say double standard? Everything about these regressive, oppressive communists who refer to themselves as democrats is dictatorial in nature.

  • December 19, 2015 at 3:26pm

    The real problem here is the establishment does not like either Trump or Cruz. Consequently, they will do everything they can to take both our of the race. Some also say, like I just read a statement by Bill Bennett he thought a combination of establishment republicans and so called progressive democrats will get rid of Trump by killing him if he continues.

    For once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media, and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened like never before. Continued

  • [1] December 19, 2015 at 3:25pm

    Donald Trump can self-fund. No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business, and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart. It’s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. It’s because most of the other politicians are part of the “good ole boys club.” They talk big, but they won’t change a thing. They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations, and multinational corporations . . . like Big Pharma or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock and barrel by foreigners, like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments that own Hillary with their Clinton Foundation donations.

    These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there’s one man who isn’t beholden to anyone. There’s one man who doesn’t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teachers’ union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the Bar Association to fund his campaign. Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help.

  • December 18, 2015 at 11:10am

    It appears only O’Reilly and Lou Dobbs, on Fox, attempt to be fair when it comes to Donald and Cruz. I suspect it is because the rest support an establishment candidate like Rubio or Bush. It became known in the first debate how it was going to be. All three of the hosts had gotcha questions for Donald. None of them effected Teflon Don. The question is will it effect Cruz? However, it seems the big question is how does Donald Trump appease the establishment to bring the party together after he is the nominee. It seems Cruz, who I would like to see as VP, will not do it.

  • [3] December 1, 2015 at 3:14pm

    This man is beyond description. I know of no words that can possibly explain his not only narcissistic moods but total disrespect for truth and other people. He always considers himself much superior to everyone in the room regardless of skin color or ethnicity. He always demands respect he never affords others because, as a muslim, he does not respect infidels.

    It is easy to predict no future president will every surpass him in one category. There will never be a bigger imbecile as president as barack obama, ever!

  • November 22, 2015 at 11:17am

    I agree with your statement. And with that in mind, consider this. During WWII (actually all wars) not all citizens within a nation supported the governments actions in that war however, nearly all citizens supported the military whether they actually wanted to or not. Therefore the citizens of a nation are the enemy more or less just like the fighters in the military are. If the Allies had fought WWII as we fight the Islamic terrorists we would all be speaking German today and hitler would have ruled the world. But we did not fight the war that way we destroyed the cities and factories where support was garnered and the weapons, used against us, were made. Consequently we won. We cannot win a war on the terrorists without fighting that very same way. Being politically correct will get us killed and our once great nation destroyed. It can not only, only be that way but it WILL be that way unless we learn and get down right mean to those wishing to destroy us completely. Even if they are only the supporters and not the actual murderers.

    If we have learned nothing, from this obama administration, we must learn a pacifist cannot be a (pretend) leader or even remotely successful leader. Right along with it is impossible to lead from behind!

  • [3] November 22, 2015 at 10:41am

    Islam is not a religion it is not even a cult, what it is is an ideology, a dictatorial system of government, disguised as a religion in order to gain acceptance among the population as well as government(s) recognition which allows it to garner privilege it would not otherwise be afforded. It also uses the religion as leverage to keep members in because of the fact it declares they will be killed if they leave the so called religion. It preaches killing of non believers and rewarding the murderers with virgins if they themselves are killed performing these acts. Which, as I see it, displays the fact their profit mohammed was a sexual pervert and so were (are) his followers. It motivates with fear and permeates death not love as religions do. There is no good within Islam. Which in itself demonstrates perversion.

    Islam’s profit, mohammad, makes hitler, stalin and mao look like choir boys. Islam is totally evil. Therefore, mohammad is the profit of evil. During WWII we found it necessary to fight everyone within the nations attacking us because they, the citizens, supported those fighting. Just as we the civilians of the USA supported our military.


  • [3] November 22, 2015 at 10:41am


    If those members within Islam (so called moderate muslims) do not stand against the radical Islamic terrorists can we not assume they support radical Islam? We do know they use the mosques to gather monetary support for the terrorists and they are also used as recruiting places. And spread propaganda there. We also know the mosques preach shari ah law. We should also know it is shari ah law that will (must) destroy both our Constitutional Republic and our constitution itself. If it is to dominate America and that is the goal of this Jehad.

    Members of the Islamic faith claim it to be a religion of peace and yet they do nothing to curtail the blood thirsty murderers within the so called religion. The terrorists who function under the name of Islam. The very people who have beheaded Christians throughout the middle east declare themselves as followers of Islam and act under the name of Islam. Anyone not against them are against those who are against them. There is no neutrality possible here. Its one way or the other. If they are not for doing away with the violence then they support the violence being perpetrated upon the world everywhere. Consequently, eliminating violence may include them as well. If the Qur’an preaches killing non believers and it does how can it truthfully be called a religion of peace by anyone? Including obama?

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] November 13, 2015 at 6:01pm

    So if the numbers are correct and I don’t know how they can be. 39.2 million paid at a cost of 93.7 makes a net loss of 54.5 Billion. And that does not include costs of incarceration of the criminals and there seems to be many of them as well as many hidden costs to the American taxpayer. Consequently, I will trust Donald Trumps numbers on this one.

  • [5] October 31, 2015 at 1:35pm

    Well, yea but that is what the regressive, oppressive, repulsive communists disguised as democrats like. So that makes her HIP, cool or whatever the current glad tiding is.

    Just listen to the cheers. Just like obama’s when he promised FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION. Isn’t it great?

  • October 31, 2015 at 12:18am

    Yes it is a lot like occupy wall street except it is a little more violent. same supporters.

  • October 31, 2015 at 12:14am

    Facts are never racist

  • [1] October 26, 2015 at 2:53pm

    Women have been given, by the almighty, the “privilege” of generating life. A gift that morally is to be between a man and a women through a great intimate love or passion of two humans, namely a male and female. A gift that should never be taken lightly. The real life fact of today however, is it is. In some circles pregnancy is even abhorred. Without morality and fundamental appreciation for life itself abortion will continue. Without morality humanity itself my cease to exist. A human is the only animal on earth that does not protect its offspring with its own life if threatened or otherwise the need arises.

    Abortion is murder no matter what anyone says. It is the taking of a life or if you will a potential life. There is no difference between killing a late term baby then allowing it to be born and killing it after birth. Or for that matter killing the mother or father.

    The question is what difference is there between killing a baby in the womb then gassing shooting or otherwise killing an adult? Both are taking a life both should be abhorred by every human being on earth.

    In the final analysis however, abortion is murder nothing more nothing less. And that act is an act against God.

    Abortion is unquestionably Americas holocaust!

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] September 27, 2015 at 2:53pm

    I totally agree with your perception here. The media has for some years now at the very least attempted to control elections. They have failed in congress and the conservatives or I should say Republicans (not all of which it seems are conservative) have won. The fact they have accomplished zero of what they promised (which now-a-days seems to be the status quo) does not take away from the point here. Leaders (that is a stretch of the definition) like McConnell and resigning Boehner have contributed to the problem not eliminated it.

    The presidential elections on the other hand they certainly have controlled because of ignorance of Republicans not because of the tenacity of Republicans or the intelligence of the progressive democrats. That ignorance is displayed weekly if not daily. Nearly everywhere!

    What Donald Trump has done, whether the old line Republicans want to admit it or not, is at least to a degree taken some of their control back. I admit at times not gracefully but he has succeeded in controlling much of the conversation as well as much of the topics of this election cylce. That, by the way, is a good thing no matter what anyone says or thinks about Donald!

  • [5] September 4, 2015 at 5:23pm

    So the police are trying to determine why the 11 year old kid have access to the gun. At the age of nine I had two guns a 12 gage shotgun, (given to me by my grandfather) which I still have to this day, and a 22 rifle. Got my first deer at the age of 9. I always had access. They were my guns!

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] September 1, 2015 at 2:03pm

    I hope they win millions if not billions. There will never be criminal charges brought against them so civil will have to do. The real answer for these sanctuary cities and states is jail time for those responsible. Including obama!!!!!!!!!!!

  • [1] August 18, 2015 at 5:09pm

    O’Reilly is right again. I have not agreed with him this much in the last 18 years. How much did it matter if obama explained hope and change or his fundamental transformation or for that matter what “yes we can” meant. We can what? Details don’t seem to be important actually if obama had explained hillary would probably be president. Then to top it off the reason after 238 years we were going to need a “civilian federal police force” as well equipped, funded and trained as the US military. Similar I suspect to the infamous brown shirts of Germany of the 1930′s. Does anyone wonder why he has purchased over a billion rounds of ammunition? I wonder if it is for the civilian police force? That was not explained either!

    The difference between obama/hillary and trump he has done things (what he said he would do). Neither obama or hillary have ever done anything (unless you can count screw ups as accomplishments). I suspect progressive democrats do otherwise they could not get anyone qualified to run for president.

123 To page: Go