User Profile: Sosorryforyou

Sosorryforyou

Member Since: August 03, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [-35] November 21, 2014 at 5:31pm

    Except that the President IS NOT from Africa. He’s an American. Not surprising though that some Blazers will agree with this idiot’s hatred (idiot being the key word here since he’s not very bright to put up such a sign.)

    Responses (20) +
  • [-3] November 21, 2014 at 9:34am

    And lucky for you, you can announce your sexuality without one ounce of backlash coming your way. Not so for homosexuals who want to make the same announcement about their sexuality. Why the double standards?

    Responses (12) +
  • [-3] November 21, 2014 at 9:09am

    Your assertion of how President Obama views illegals is just not true, is it? Here are the President’s words from last night:

    ”Are we a nation that educates the world’s best and brightest in our universities, only to send them home to create businesses in countries that compete against us? Or are we a nation that encourages them to stay and create jobs, businesses, and industries right here in America?”

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] November 20, 2014 at 8:36am

    I’ve never thought of his films as being disturbing and artsy. Working Women, Remains of the Day, Charlie Wilson’s War? Good movies but hardly disturbing and artsy. Maybe there are a few artsy ones I don’t know of, but it’s hard to imagine any of them as disturbing. I’d like to know which ones affected you so.

  • November 19, 2014 at 3:05pm

    Rob Pompolit – according to your qoute “Bottom line. — If a group is against Christmas. Then it is 100% evil then. To profit from it.” Well, quite a few of the “nice” businesses who’s Christmas advertising is rated highly by the AFA are Jewish owned and are thus “profiting” from a holiday they don’t celebrate and believe in. Just to name a few:

    Sears
    Starbucks
    TJ Maxx
    Niemien Marcus
    Nordstroms
    Macys
    Old Navy
    JoAnn Fabrics

    Hope you don’t shop in these “evil” Jewish-owned stores who’s owners have decided Christmas is just too tempting not to make a profit off of.

  • [1] November 19, 2014 at 12:39pm

    SDR – I’m sorry to inform you, but many of the “nice” businesses are Jewish-owned, and therefore their owner’s beliefs do not necessarily line up with your biblical beliefs and/or values, and are just spreading the “Christmas joy” though their advertising for purely financial reasons.

  • [2] November 19, 2014 at 10:22am

    So, a Jewish-owned business should go all-out “Christmas” while seeking “biblical truth”? Funny, more than half of the bible supports their “biblical truth”, not yours. They celebrate Hannaka this time of year. THAT’S their biblical truth.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] November 19, 2014 at 10:16am

    “Happy Holidays” is appropriate because Christmas is not the only “holiday” celebrated during and for this shopping season.

    Responses (1) +
  • [23] November 19, 2014 at 10:05am

    About half of those on the “marginal” and “naughty” list are Jewish-owned businesses. Why would the AFA create such a list publicly denigrating a Jewish-owned business as “naughty”, and thus not worthy of your holiday spending dollars just because their owners worship differently and chose not to promote “Christmas” to the level of “nice”. At some point, Christians need to start being FOR something instead of always being AGAINST something, in this case, AGAINST a business owner’s right to promote their business in the manner they chose without worry of being religiously and publicly persecuted.

    Responses (12) +
  • [12] November 19, 2014 at 9:41am

    The current owner of Victoria Secrets who bought the business in 1982 is Jewish, which is also a religious holiday celebrated during this holiday season. Why would anyone expect him to direct his stores to lavish ads and in-store promoting with mostly Christmas messages? You wouldn’t expect a business owned by Christians to do the same with mostly Hannaka messages. After all, people are shopping at this time of year for both religious holidays. If the only reason they’re on the naughty list is because they celebrate a different religious holiday at this time of year, then this list maker is utterly disrespectful to those whom worship differently.

    Responses (4) +
  • November 18, 2014 at 11:50pm

    I wouldn’t expect anything different from David Frum. He’s a Repub and a Lover of the Bush era. He’s wrong, though. There’s definitely a precedent.

  • November 18, 2014 at 10:37pm

    Extending deportation protections is a huge overreach? Really? Well, if so then two recent republican presidents set it’s precedent.

  • [-5] November 18, 2014 at 5:31pm

    The President is not attempting to grant amnesty.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-4] November 18, 2014 at 5:24pm

    JRook – You’re absolutely correct. It’s the exact same thing I thought when I read that phase. Beck’s putting on the sweet act as of late, but I don’t believe him for one instance that he’s ready with a open and loving heart to truly understand where the President is coming from. In Beck’s world, if the Pres does something that he doesn’t agree with then it must have sinister motives.

  • [-13] November 18, 2014 at 10:37am

    Where is there proof of this young girl’s assertion that her request was denied? The school says her request is still bring considered. This case is being built on flimsy evidence.

  • November 17, 2014 at 4:14pm

    Well, he did, didn’t he? I believe he’s the first to sign an Amnesty bill and the first to lessen deportation requirements.

  • November 17, 2014 at 4:12pm

    What law would they be breaking? What law are they making?

  • [-1] November 17, 2014 at 10:41am

    Yep, in most cases. But then, a few years ago my kid’s public school district made that a priority. (I’m not actually sure about peeling the potatoes, but then, they don’t serve a lot of potato-based dishes!)

  • November 17, 2014 at 10:27am

    Deeb – The First Lady’s idea of healthy lunches includes healthier versions of pizza and Mac n cheese, and many more “favorites”. And, the vast majority of schools in this nation have no problem with bagged lunches from home and what’s in them. And, if your kid has food sensitivity issues, they should bring lunch from home.

  • November 17, 2014 at 10:20am

    RealLib – We have a real juvenile obesity problem in this Country. What’s wrong with using our tax payer money to help change ideas about what kids should eat in order to live a healthy lifestyle? For many kids, they don’t get the right nutritional information at home, so the school should step in and do their part. I just don’t want my taxes going to help an obese child and/or a non-active one shovel more crap in their mouths. They probably get enough of that at home.

123 To page: Go