SOVEREIGN, "...and the current isn’t swift…"
And that is the crucial issue. The current should ALWAYS be considered too swift rather than not "too bad"...
And how is he to know that the roadway isn't washed out under all of the water. His rig could drop into a hole deeper that it is.
Yep, I to stuck having to go through a huge puddle in the winter with icebergettes and I keep the clutch I and the engine revved high and rolled through it letting the clutch off every little while to give some forward momentum and it was up to the middle of the grill in a Toyota truck, until a semi decided not to wait until I got out and moved in from the opposite side and sent a wave up to my windshield.
Cursing like a sailor at his stupidity I did make it out, left the truck for the day, in the parking garage at work, drove it home just fine. We also had a crapload of road salt mixed with the water and I drove that truck for another five years. I have to say my knees were shaking when I got out of the truck though, that's what we call challenge driving or oh crap, oh crap, oh crap driving. It was a forced entry but I found out just how far under water you can go and keep driving. I love a good scientifically done experiment. lol
 October 5, 2015 at 12:58pm
Wow. Talk about your circular reasoning!
 October 5, 2015 at 12:41pm
If heterosexuals would stop giving birth to homosexuals the problem would be solved.
Actually, I've read that the fact that it's so much easier to be "out" in our culture now might lead to a decline in the homosexual population if there is anything at all to the argument for genetic causes. The author, a homosexual man who's never wanted children, theorizes that there aren't enough homosexuals who wish to go through the process of procuring biological children to make up for the number who will not be having them while maintaining a 'double life'.
It's a lifestyle choice. The left uses the "born that crap" to justify their immoral lifestyle.
Nobody is born homosexual. That is a myth perpetuated by the victim mentality.
I'm still waiting for someone like you to prove it by choosing to be gay yourself.
You discovered the "gay gene?" Quick, tell the scientific world because they have failed thus far.
The concept of a "gay gene" is overly simplistic. There is no gay gene like there is no tall gene or blonde gene. But all scientific research done on the subject shows a clear genetic and biological link to sexual orientation. Do some research, it's a pretty interesting subject.
To those who say being gay is a choice and homosexuals cannot reproduce and that that then is somehow "evil" then is it not also equally "evil" for those heterosexuals who choose not to get married and not have kids?
@dude - Only if one was claiming the failure to have children is the "evil" part. No one is doing that, but many believe we should set aside the cornerstone of society and the relationship that has been proven over and over to be the best to have and raise children in for special recognition. Now a gay couple can do as they please and have been able to for quite awhile, but now decided they should get "married" as well. Since they can't actually have children they then adopt and GUARANTEE that the child will either be motherless or fatherless. Now that is wrong.
Studies show that children raised by gay parents fare equally well or even better than children raised by straight parents. Having children is not a requirement of marriage. The best scenario for a child is two quality parents. Stop focusing on what is between their legs, and focus on the quality of them as parents.
If heterosexuals would stop giving birth to children who choose to be gay, the problem would be solved.
HairyLiar, "Studies show that children raised by gay parents fare equally well or even better than children raised by straight parents" is another lie and those studies have been debunked and shown bias. Most of the people conducting such studies are homosexuals themselves and only study the child in the current environment, not the adult who grew up in the toxic environment. Many children now who grew up in such homes reject and regret growing up without a father or a mother and have given testimony to the fact of social stigmas resulting from it. You already know all this. It has been addressed repeatedly. Quit pretending it doesnt exist because you dont like it and at least be intellectually honest. Honestly, do you live by the mantra 'lie big enough and often enough and people will believe'?
Google "gay parent studies" if you want to educate yourself on the topic. But feel free to keep spouting off ignorance and acting like it's true.
HENRI, gay marriage and gay adoption are two different subjects.
I argue that gays getting married does not "set aside the cornerstone of society" i.e. heterosexual marriage.
Scripture answers your question best.
Luke 28-29~~And there were following Him a great multitude of the people, and of women who were mourning and lamenting Him. But Jesus turning to them said, "Daughters of Jerusalem, stop weeping for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your children. For behold, the days are coming when they will say, 'Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bore, and the breasts that never nursed.'
There is no genetic gay gene because DNA is more like a recipe than a blueprint.
You can reverse-engineer blueprints, but not DNA.
Evangenitals trying to discuss science is a riot.
 October 3, 2015 at 12:19pm
Marriage is a private issue between two people.
 October 3, 2015 at 12:18pm
What’s next? A “shocking” video you will have to “see to believe” about some trivial nonsense.
October 2, 2015 at 11:06am
Hanegraaff and Rosenberg! Dissss-missed!
 October 2, 2015 at 10:54am
Extinct? I saw Bigfoot riding a woollly mammoth just last week.