User Profile: Sparhawk


Member Since: November 13, 2010


  • February 27, 2015 at 2:32pm

    She WYFFed it, big time.

  • [3] February 5, 2015 at 3:40pm

    I like that idea.
    If they react differently, they would be hypocritical. But, this is the government we are talking about, and the military is just as “politically correct” as any other branch.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] February 5, 2015 at 3:32pm

    “Flag; stripes and stars on: The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be fifty stars, white in a blue field.”

    OK, all well and good. The US flag will be alternating red and white stripes with white stars on a blue field. Got it. Fine. Great.

    But just because the US flag needs those things doesn’t exclude other flags from using portions of that definition. The flag of Puerto Rico fits that definition: alternating red and white stripes, and a white star on a blue field. That doesn’t make it the U.S. flag.

    Having stars on a blue field with other elements does not mean this is an altered U.S. flag. Australia’s flag has red and white stripes and white (6-point) stars on a blue field. Maybe we should take their flags down because US citizens are offended.

    Taking something that only meets part of the definition (white stars on a blue field) and thinking it is an altered American flag means your thinking is altered.

    It is not an “American flag with rainbow stripes instead of the standard red and white stripes.” Because it doesn’t have “thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white”, it is, by definition, not an American flag.

    Last time I checked, we still had the freedom to fly whatever flag we wanted, without giving a rat’s ass if our neighbors were offended. On a military base this may be different, but this flag is not an American flag. Get over yourself.

  • [-12] December 30, 2014 at 6:01pm

    And yet you commented. Like to see yourself in print?

  • [8] November 10, 2014 at 8:47pm

    “Beginning Monday, every proposed suspension of black, Hispanic or American Indian students that doesn’t involve violent behavior will be reviewed by Johnson or someone else on her team.” If they are going to that extreme, then it should be “every proposed suspension”, not “every proposed suspension of ” (insert races/ethnicities here). ALL suspensions should be reviewed if any are reviewed.

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] November 7, 2014 at 6:30pm

    Shouldn’t the person who thought the batteries were guns, and complained about an image on someone’s iPad, be the one suspended for “disrupting the class”? It was THEIR complaint, not the student’s possession of the batteries, that caused the disruption.

  • [5] November 7, 2014 at 6:28pm

    What do you expect from people that mistake foam ear plugs for rubber bullets?

  • [4] October 16, 2014 at 11:14am

    This is entertaining. Politicians craft a law that specifically targets religious beliefs, then get pissy when churches talk about it. These churches are only getting political because the politicians are attacking their beliefs. If churches are not allowed to respond when politicians attack religious positions, then freedom of religion and freedom of speech no longer mean anything in this country.

    Responses (1) +
  • [29] October 9, 2014 at 10:18pm

    A 70% “failure to cure” rate is a 30% survival rate. If I had a 3 in 10 chance of surviving something this devastating, I’d fight until I couldn’t fight anymore.

    In reply to Jim S's comment on the contribution There Is Nothing Brave About Suicide

  • [4] September 4, 2014 at 12:44am

    Gee, Glenn, thanks for the defeatist attitude. Now we can all stay home, let the Democraps win by default, and your prophecy will come true. Self-fulfilling prophecy, wonderful. /END SARCASM

  • [2] August 19, 2014 at 5:57pm

    “I felt like I did a good job of holding my composure throughout the night, and you have a lapse of judgment and slip up…”. Notice how it is “I” when he’s bragging, but “you” when he does something people call him on? This cocky SOB is unwilling to take responsibility for his own stupid actions, separating them from the “I”. Yet another jock that is incapable of being a team player, passing off his failures to someone else.

  • [10] August 2, 2014 at 1:18am

    You say it doesn’t influence your readership, and yet you read it. You realize that means that his headline worked on you, right? So if his “articles are about the stupidest ones to read on this site”, what does this say about you?

    Responses (6) +
  • July 15, 2014 at 10:05pm

    So you are comparing a company that you cancelled (complaining about their treatment during the cancellation call) to a company you have never tried to cancel? Gee, that sounds like a fair comparison.

  • July 15, 2014 at 9:42pm

    Turnabout is fair play. Maybe “AOL product manager, Ryan Block” needs to be reminded of the name “Vincent Ferrari”. Google it. Karma’s a b—-.

  • July 8, 2014 at 10:21pm

    Bob & Doug McKenzie are at it again. Strange Brew, anyone?

  • [17] June 19, 2014 at 8:21pm

    With voter fraud he should lose his voting rights for 20 years. But then again, he will just steal someone else’s ID and vote anyway.

  • [10] June 10, 2014 at 5:13pm

    So “how do you solve a problem like Maria?” hss now been answered. Alert the Von Trapps!

  • [1] May 21, 2014 at 8:30pm

    Complaining about trigger warnings then putting a trigger warning on the audio (“warning: very strong language”). Classic irony!

  • April 10, 2014 at 12:18pm

    For some men, that’s the same thing as talking in their brain.

  • March 29, 2014 at 12:00pm

    Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. On second thought, do.

Restoring Love