Imagine this situation: you are a woman who wants to permanently dispose of your soon-to-be-ex-husband. You have moved out of the family home. With this law, you simply have to accuse your husband of abuse, and the cops will take his guns away. You now have a husband who can’t defend himself. A little creative thinking, and you can permanently get rid of him now. Yay!
Yes and if a woman wants to have revenge for her boyfriend or husband having an affair all she has to do is cry abuse.
 March 26, 2016 at 2:43pm
OK, Disney. You say “We will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law.”
So, let me make sure I get this straight:
* You threaten to take your business out of a state because of a law that allows behavior you disagree with. That is your right, and I’m glad that you have that right.
* The potential law that you disagree with protects people, churches and businesses from being forced to do business that is contrary to their beliefs. That should be their right.
* So, you threaten to do exactly what you complain that the potential law would allow others to do: you will refuse to do business with people that disagree with your beliefs, while demanding that the state not pass a law that would protect the rights of others from being forced to do business with people that disagree with their beliefs.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Disney.
 March 26, 2016 at 2:10pm
There is this wonderful key on your keyboard called Caps Lock. Learn how to use it properly, and people might actually read your full rant *before* dismissing you as a lunatic. Since you clearly can’t think on your own, this simple suggestion might help you integrate with normal society. You can thank me later.
 March 26, 2016 at 1:56pm
“Of course the National Enquirer story is 100% FALSE!!! I only speak to myself, however.”
A spokesperson that doesn’t know the difference between speaking TO herself and speaking FOR herself is overpaid and underqualified.
 February 13, 2016 at 12:16pm
And yet you continue to come here. What does that say about you?
 February 10, 2016 at 8:36pm
The whole concept of super-delegates is a scam. Why should one person get an equal vote with a whole group of voters? It reminds me of a quote from George Orwell’s “Animal Farm”: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”.
February 3, 2016 at 9:56pm
Two arguments I have heard against requiring women to sign up for the draft, and my responses:
* “Not all women want to join the military”: tough luck, not all men want to either, yet we have to sign up for the draft. This argument holds no water.
* “Not all women are physically able to handle it”: again, this is not a valid argument. Not all men are physically capable of handling it either, yet we all still have to register for selective service.
I have yet to hear an argument against this that makes sense.
Women should have to register for selective service. Then, if they ever are drafted, they can follow William Jefferson Clinton to Canada like everyone else.
January 18, 2016 at 10:01am
If this training is going to fix the whole issue for Chipotle, why wait three weeks? The stores are still endangering lives. Shut them all down NOW, do the training, and re-open.
 January 3, 2016 at 1:20pm
What part of the 5th Amendment do these jackasses not understand?
“No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”.
People are placed on the terror watch list and no-fly list without due process, because they are “suspected” of being a danger to the country. They have not been convicted of a crime or been through any “due process”; it is just an alert to the proper authorities that they MAY be a danger to society.
In order to revoke a person’s constitutional rights, they MUST go through the due process of a trial. ANY candidate that says they agree with cancelling a person’s 2nd amendment rights without due process MUST not be elected.
I only let myself get offended by people whose opinions I care about, who then betray the trust I put in them. Sarah Silverman’s whole existence is spent trying to get under peoples’ skin. I do not respect her, therefore I don’t give a rat’s ass about her opinion of Christianity. I only clicked on the article to see how she backed up that tweet. Since she didn’t, I’ll just go on with my life same as before: not caring that Sarah Silverman exists.
 December 5, 2015 at 10:03pm
Shawn’s fascination with white mens’ genitalia, combined with the fact that is is really white himself (contrary to his own claims), I think he’s overcompensating for something. Just because he *is* a big dick doesn’t mean he has one.
On a side not, why is this website replacing his last name with K*** but not the word “dick”?
 November 24, 2015 at 9:58am
The first “university” was in Italy, so everyone going to a university is appropriating Italian culture. It must be stopped. Shut down these institutions immediately.
 November 15, 2015 at 12:08pm
Impugn: “dispute the truth, validity, or honesty of (a statement or motive); call into question.”
So, if my English is good, to impugn something, that something has to be true, valid, or honest. Clinton’s “integrity” is none of those things, so her statement makes no sense.
Exactly, perhaps the Alinsky dictionary has a different definition of "integrity" than Webster's?
 September 23, 2015 at 10:27am
What do you call an atheist church applying for tax-exempt status? A “non-prophet organization”. ;)
 August 18, 2015 at 10:01am
Y’all make it amazingly hard to watch the desired video when you place an auto-play really loud video all the way at the bottom of the page to the right of the comments. That movie trailer is so loud I had to turn down the speakers, and since the player didn’t have a pause option, I had to wait until that trailer was over before I could play the video that is the focus of the page.
This is why I'm forced to use the AdBlock browser extension. I understand websites need advertising in order to generate revenue and stay in business. However, when you start with obnoxious pop-ups, pop-overs, pop-unders, and especially the auto-play ads with audio, then I get fed up and just kill it all. I don't think I'd even be able to visit this site w/o AdBlock Plus. Even Glenn has complained about the number of ads on this site... I'm hoping he'll do something about this soon.
Yeah, you can't look at this web page at work, that is for sure
 May 9, 2015 at 11:14am
So, according to Ms Vanderpool, encouraging everyone to be their own person means to do what everyone else is doing and not share a dissenting opinion? Does this woman think before she opens her mouth?
“You want to encourage everyone to be their own person,” she told the paper, “and for someone to decide it’s OK for those two students to go on a morning show and wear a shirt like that with no repercussions, what is the school saying? That it’s OK?”
In the words of Bugs Bunny, “what a maroon!”
 March 6, 2015 at 2:55pm
Good ol’ linkbait, and we all keep falling for it.
 March 6, 2015 at 2:54pm
I would say more “amazing” than “wonderful”, myself ;)
February 27, 2015 at 2:32pm
She WYFFed it, big time.
 February 5, 2015 at 3:40pm
I like that idea.
If they react differently, they would be hypocritical. But, this is the government we are talking about, and the military is just as “politically correct” as any other branch.