User Profile: SpeakSoftlyAndCarry


Member Since: January 15, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [4] September 20, 2014 at 3:01pm

    ShamROck214 wrote: “But alas big business wanted cheap labor so to hell with security.”
    Yes exactly! The money supporters of the GOP want the cheap labor and the Dems want the future votes of the anchor babies. It’s a win-win situation for both party’s elites and a loose-loose situation for the middle class!

  • [3] September 20, 2014 at 2:54pm

    Sure the Left would have screamed. But Bush should have had the moral fortitude to do the right thing and let them scream!

  • [3] September 20, 2014 at 2:22pm

    You directed a response addressed to skunkbear that was clearly intended towards my comment. So you couldn’t even get something that simple right just like you haven’t gotten anything else right! Pathetic!

  • [6] September 20, 2014 at 2:10pm

    Try putting away politics and have the intellectual integrity to be honest . Bush did bungled national security and continued his Dad’s and the Clinton’s ruining of the U.S. economy with Global Free Trade. Even after 9/11 Bush refused to close the borders, profile likely terrorists, or cancel visas of likely terrorists. Instead he signed into law the most unconstitutional bill this country has seen since WWII and stripped legitimate law abiding citizens of many of their Constitutionally guaranteed rights and liberties. Just because the Obama administration has continued (and added to) Bush’s bad policies doesn’t take away the guilt from Bush too. 9/11 should have been Bush’s wake-up call but instead he continued making his calls from the PC, Progressive, World Globalization playbook. And so has Obama, if that makes you feel any better!

  • [1] September 20, 2014 at 1:52pm

    …via the Syrian Rebels OR the former Egyptian ruling Muslim Brotherhood that is.

  • [4] September 20, 2014 at 1:48pm

    If the Taliban did shoot down that jet with a surface to air missile I’m wondering where they got it? One of the thousands we gave them during the Soviet invasion during the 1980s?…I doubt it. I doubt a 30 year old surface to air missile would still be operable. So where did they get it?…Russia?…maybe, China?…doubtful, from the O’ministration via the Syrian Rebels?…most likely!

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] September 20, 2014 at 1:39pm

    Finally the country appears to be starting to wake-up. If nit-witted George Jr. hadn’t been trying to be so PC after 9/11 we wouldn’t have half the Islamic threats we do now even under this treacherous Muslim sympathizing O’ministration.

    Responses (3) +
  • [138] September 20, 2014 at 10:36am

    The article update states that the threats were from cartels. So I would think that implies Mexican Drug Cartels. I find it more than a little disturbing that a foreign entity can effectively shut-down freedom of speech in the U.S.A.. I think a visit to the Mexican cartels by the United States Marine Corps is now overdue!

    Responses (9) +
  • [5] September 20, 2014 at 10:21am

    What the West calls “Radical Islam” is actually true Islam. These are the true believers and followers of Islam. Osama Bin Laden is to Islam what the Rev. Billy Graham is to Christianity. What the West calls “Moderate Islam” is the equivalent of “luke warm Christians” – they basically believe but don’t stringently obey or follow the dictates of their religion. Trying to negotiate peace or humanitarian issues with the leaders of “Radical Islam” is literally trying to negotiate peace and humanitarian issues with devils. Any agreement you get on their part will not be keep but will only be a temporary ruse to gain an edge for themselves. Only the Christian evangelizing of the “moderates”, persuading them to convert to Christianity, can effectively change the currently Islamic middle eastern cultures. And I don’t hold out much hope that this current Pope could effectively do that.

  • [7] September 19, 2014 at 5:42pm

    Who appointed that peckish old bitty to the bench anyway?…FDR?

  • [4] September 19, 2014 at 5:39pm

    “There is no other higher authorities to appeal to.”
    …not in this life, BUT…

  • [1] September 19, 2014 at 5:33pm

    “So will they wait for a conviction or will they just take the charge and ruin their career?”

    Not a chance. They don’t want to risk being stripped with a switch off the political correctness tree.

  • [28] September 19, 2014 at 5:27pm

    I wonder how many of our resident liberal trolls are getting headaches right now trying to figure out Jack Ma’s “angle”?

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] September 19, 2014 at 4:22pm

    Correction: …1,400 Years…

  • September 19, 2014 at 3:47pm

    Your brand of idiocy is extraordinary even by Liberal standards!

  • [2] September 19, 2014 at 3:39pm

    Don’t be such a rube. Sykes-Picot is now being used as an excuse for nearly 1,400 of Islamic terrorism. I guarantee you 90+% of middle-eastern Muslims had never even heard of Sykes-Picot until this year.

  • September 19, 2014 at 11:05am

    “So if all the leaders of each country are removed, then who controls the united arab kingdom? ”

    …the Beast.

  • [7] September 19, 2014 at 10:25am

    You are absolutely correct antiepa. It is refreshing to see that someone else here see’s the whole picture, doesn’t buy into the false narratives, and actually UNDERSTANDS what is really happening and why!

  • [2] September 19, 2014 at 9:52am

    Intellectually you know as well as I do that the Sykes-Picot Agreement is not to blame for the hatred and violent culture of Islamic middle-easterners. You’re just too loyal of a Beckie to admit it which frankly I find very disturbing. Are you going to let Glenn turn you into an apologist for Islam too?…because that’s basically what he is doing now – blaming the West for Muslim’s hatred toward the west.

  • [7] September 18, 2014 at 11:00pm

    That was the old Glenn. I haven’t seen that guy for many months. The new Glenn I don’t recognize. He seems to have a completely different agenda.

123 To page: Go