User Profile: SpeakSoftlyAndCarry


Member Since: January 15, 2013

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 18, 2014 at 3:05am

    I can’t believe I am agreeing with Al Franken. Must be either Al has had a “Come to Jesus moment” or I’ve backslidden?

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:58am

    Yes I agree. It’s kind of like being a kid from the big city who’s family moves you to a rural Wisconsin town, and your first day at your new school the Wisconsin farm kids with the mama-did soup bowl hair cuts make fun of your $25 salon hair cut. It doesn’t seem right while it’s happening but it is happening!

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:50am

    No, just a yellow streak.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:46am


  • April 17, 2014 at 7:59pm

    I don’t know but I call dibs on all of the Pizza Hut franchises on Kepler-186f either way!

  • April 17, 2014 at 5:03am

    Do you have an intellectual argument to back up your vitriol and emotionally hysteric remarks?

  • April 16, 2014 at 5:25pm


  • April 16, 2014 at 5:24pm

    So he shot a squirrel out of season. Site him for that and any “discharging a weapon in city limits” ordinance he violated and move on. Do NOT confiscate his firearms.

  • April 16, 2014 at 5:20pm

    Stop telling Yankees to move South!!!!! What the hell is wrong with you!!!!!

    Responses (1) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 3:58pm

    A little history and reminder of Patriots Day April 19th

    Responses (15) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 12:37am

    Glenn is the one who played into the Progs hands. He just painted constitutional conservatives as violent revolutionaries. Stop kissing Glenn’s assss and ask where are those 10-15% of “frightening” violent revolutionaries Glenn is talking about. THEY DON”T EXIST!

  • April 16, 2014 at 12:32am

    I agree with you that Glenn is probably afraid of getting blamed by the corrupt administration and leftist media for any nut job that falls out of a tree. Just like they so idiotically blamed Gordon Liddy for the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Columbine shootings. But other than, that I find you to be a total idiot.

  • April 16, 2014 at 12:21am

    The Real Patrick Henry would laugh at you!

  • April 16, 2014 at 12:10am

    Greg, I’m not someone looking for a revolution and no sane person would WANT it to happen. But you are giving Obama and our government way too much credit and our citizens not enough. Our government hasn’t even been able to beat a rag-tag bunch of third world uneducated Taliban after thirteen years of trying with the support of the whole nation. If Obama ever started a fight with the constitutional patriots at least half the military would resign and fight with the patriots just like so many resigned and went to fight for the confederacy in 1861 when Lincoln declared his illegal war on the South.

  • April 15, 2014 at 11:52pm

    KyleD wrote: “Convince your neighbor of the benefits of owning a weapon, don’t go walking down the street with loaded weapons just to make a point to them. Can you blame them for being scared to crap when the same people walking down streets with weapons are on web forums hoping for war?”

    Really Kyle, you ought to lay off the lead paint chips and don’t drink just any ol’ glass of kool-aid someone hands you.

  • April 15, 2014 at 4:52pm

    No sane person would WANT an armed rebellion to take place. But to fool one’s self into believing pacifism will always work or that that pacifism is what God always demands of us is false and ridiculous.
    By the time Lech Walesa came along the Soviet Union was already financially and politically crippled just like Britain was after WWII when Gandhi’s movement freed India. You can bet that if Walesa had tried protesting during Stalin’s or Khrushchev’s rein it would have ended badly for Lech. And if there had not been a WWII India would have remained a British colony for much longer than it did. And as for MLK Jr. protest, they occurred under Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson who were all three friendly to and supporters of the Civil Rights movement. If MLK had tried a protest movement during Woodrow Wilson’s, Herbert Hoover’s or FDR’s tenors it would have ended much differently too. How did pacifism work out for 6 million central European Jews in the 1930s and 40s? How did pacifism work out for 7 million Ukrainians in the early 1930s? Ever wonder what all those greasy spots on the pavement in Tiananmen Square are? They’re whats left of passive, pro-democratic Chinese civilian protestors that the Chinese government ran over with tanks in 1989.

  • April 15, 2014 at 4:13pm

    GoodStuff wrote:
    “The man has officially lost it”
    That’s what I was thinking as I read the article. I still want to know where these 10-15% violent armed insurrectionists chomping for revolution are that Glenn’s talking about? I haven’t seen them. They seem to only exist in Glenn’s mind and that of his new best buddy former N.Y City police officer and PsyID ceo John Cardillo. (Take a look at Cardillo’s website . IMHO not very impressive.) I realize that Glenn has to give “on the record” anti-violence speeches periodically or the Left will blame Glenn for every nut job that falls out of a tree just like they blamed Gordon Liddy for the Oklahoma City Bombing and even Columbine. But IMO Glenn has gone well past being pragmatic on this one and into Bizarrow World. Is this the “Self Destruct Mode” Glenn has talked about he and other alcoholics having? I don’t understand what’s going on in Glenn’s head right now but if he wants his fans to unfriend him and unsubscribe to the Blaze I’m sure plenty will. And the reason they will do it is NOT because they are violent revolutionaries. It will be in part becasue they are insulted and disgusted that Glenn played right into the hands of the Leftist media who want to portray Conservatives and Tea Party folks as violent. And he has done so right here months before one of the most important elections of modern times! Way to go Glenn!

  • April 14, 2014 at 9:26pm

    Armed resistance should always be the last resort. No one with any sense WANTS an armed conflict with the government. But what the heck is Glenn talking about? Where was this violent element of the Right wing? Did any of the civilian protestors fire a shot, strike an officer, vandalize a LE vehicle, or rape a fellow protestor like the OWS crowd did?…Not that I’ve heard of. So why make that comparison Glenn? I did however see a video (that the Blaze provided) of LE tazing unarmed protestors. That was the only violence I have seen connected to this incident. But if one of the Blaze employees actual did some journalistic work for a change and found any video to the contrary then let’s see it. There is a video on the web plainly showing UNARMED citizens with their hands above their heads advancing on ARMED LE officers who were threatening to shoot them. And there are a lot more facts to this case of alleged corruption on behalf of government entities than the Blaze is reporting on. Several Blaze posters have posted links to them. But the Blaze doesn’t care anymore about those facts than the protestors cared about grazing fees and desert tortoises. These protestors were not there to initiate violence, they were there to make sure a heavy handed government didn’t do the same thing to the Bundy family that they did to the Weaver family.

    Responses (4) +
  • April 14, 2014 at 8:56pm

    I’ll bet there was a lot higher percentage of LE wanting to open fire on the civilians than there were civilians wanting to open fire on LE.

  • April 14, 2014 at 5:59pm

    “…It’s not over.”
    Hey Harry, Are you going to step out onto the Capital steps and tell the crowd that on May 16th?

    Responses (15) +
123 To page: Go