User Profile: SpeakSoftlyAndCarry

Member Since: January 15, 2013

CommentsDisplaying SpeakSoftlyAndCarry's 10 most recent comments.

  • There is absolutely NOTHING in the Gospel of Jesus Christ that would substantiate ANY natural disaster as being God’s judgement on mankind for how we run His planet. The scriptures tell us that God’s punishment for mankind’s rebellion is reserved for a specific for a day of Judgement. People like you do more harm to the cause of the Gospel than you are doing good. By attributing every natural disaster to being a “fire and brimstone” event you reduce the Gospel to sounding like “superstitions” and “wive’s tales” which only further distances non-believers from Christianity. While there may have been many miraculous events during that occurred during yesterday’s storm, this was a just a natural disaster…a Tornado…period!

  • I think both ends of Kerry look identical.

  • This Administration gets more disgusting with each passing day!

  • Contrary to the misleading headline, and liberally bias article by Billy Hallowell, this 18 year old girl is not being charge with having a same-sex relationship. She is being charge with the very real crime of having sex with an underage child. Which is, and should be, a crime. A sexual predator is a sexual predator regardless of gender preferences. Homosexuality has been accepted by the mainstream and now we are seeing their movement towards having the age limits on legal sex removed so they can seduce, control and have sex with children. And the Blaze is turning into a pathetic facsimile of the other third rate liberal Huffington Post wanna-be “news” sites in misrepresenting the facts on behalf of liberal perverts..

  • I agree. It’s starting to seem like The Blaze is hiring Huffington Post wanna-bees. Well I’ve got news for Billy Hallowell, anyone 18 years of age or older that has sex with a a child 16 years or younger IS A SEXUAL PREDATOR! And if you are not mature enough to realize this Billy Hallowell, then perhaps you should leave journalism to the grown-ups!

  • So I guess it would now officially be considered sexual harassment if the Universities told the DOJ and DOE to go #$ !% themselves and stick their Federal funding where the sun don’t shine?

  • You are correct. The passage of this law would be much more insidious than it already appears on the surface. Some people would just lie about not having any fire arms, but if they ever had to use their firearm for protection or were somehow otherwise caught with one then I’m sure the legal and financial repercussions would be staggering. And out most honest citizens, who won’t lie, will be the very first ones to loose their firearms, leaving them at the mercy of criminals, and at the mercy of a government that is proving itself to be becoming more tyrannical with each passing day..

  • It’s just like with the so-called “Dangerous Breed” dog list. Some of the cat-people on the Left have tried to use legislation to ban certain breeds of dogs but couldn’t get public support. So they have worked with the insurance companies and now deny Home Owner’s Insurance policies to anyone who has a large breed dog that scares the cat-people. While a few breeds like Pitt Bulls and Rottweilers have been created for aggression, the list doesn’t stop there. It includes Malamutes, Saint Bernards, Chow Chows, and Huskies. Anyone who has ever spent time around Malamutes and Saint Bernards knows that these are among the most gentle natured, human-loving, animals on the planet. And Chow Chows and Huskey’s only “act” aggressive when a stranger approaches their family or yard. And only get aggressive when someone is doing something that they shouldn’t be doing in the first place. It has been proven time and time again, that homes with dogs that criminals are leery of save the Insurance companies from having to pay out for theft. But despite the facts, if you own one of these breeds,then you can not get home owners insurance from most major underwriters. And just as they are doing with pets, this is how the Left will get their foot in the back door on gun ownership. If this Insurance requirement passes, it won’t be long before they create a “Dangerous Firearms” list and deny Home Owner’s coverage for owning a weapon that’s on the list.

  • I’m sure the Insurance Company Lobbyists have nothing to do with this one (sarcasm). This Jim Crow-ish law is intended to use the financial abilities of the individual to infringe upon who can own a weapon and who can’t. Where is the Left’s outcry for the obvious discrimination against the poor that the passing of this law presents to poor people’s second amendment rights? Don’t low income people who can’t afford to buy $250,000.00 in Gun Insurance still have second amendment rights? Don’t these same people who have to live in some of the most dangerous neighborhoods deserve the same rights to self-protection as the rest of us have? Every Insurance broker in the DC area is probably walking around with enough wood to build a canoe from just thinking about this law getting passed.

  • The Romeike family should have first went to Mexico and then snuck across our border illegally. Then they could have stayed.