User Profile: SpeakSoftlyAndCarry

SpeakSoftlyAndCarry

Member Since: January 15, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [129] March 25, 2015 at 6:08pm

    And there you have it folks, a videoed microcosm of the Congressional Prog’s contempt and disregard for everyone else’s rights and property!

  • [8] March 25, 2015 at 5:56pm

    Yeah it doesn’t appear to have improved his IQ at all.

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] March 25, 2015 at 5:53pm

    “White House press secretary Josh Earnest…claimed that the Obama administration still believes Yemen can serve as a successful model for “counterterrorism.”

    BAWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  • [1] March 25, 2015 at 5:51pm

    I’m sue all the names and address of all those tech-savvy, Radio Shack customer, solder bugs will end up in the DHS data base…if they aren’t already.

  • [3] March 25, 2015 at 12:14pm

    No John, in this context it’s just the number between 667 and 665.

  • [5] March 25, 2015 at 12:12pm

    And how would you expect someone to know if a story is stupid unless they read it…stupid?

  • [9] March 25, 2015 at 11:59am

    Only 666 more days to go as of this moment folks!

    Responses (2) +
  • [-10] March 25, 2015 at 11:54am

    So what’s the homosexual angle to the story? There’s has to be one…otherwise you wouldn’t have posted such an absolutely stupid non-story…right Blaze?

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] March 25, 2015 at 3:24am

    @argyle58
    I stand corrected! ;)

  • [166] March 24, 2015 at 11:04pm

    So now even all but one of the Democrat Senators are “racists”?

    Responses (3) +
  • [174] March 24, 2015 at 10:41pm

    Only 667 more days folks!

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] March 24, 2015 at 10:35pm

    If this story had been posted by Hallowell I would have guessed you were 100% correct. But since it was posted by Darcey I’d give it a 50-50 chance you’re correct.

  • March 24, 2015 at 2:07am

    @getoffmylawncommiies
    Actually it’s perfect proof that you are an idiot!
    If I’m wrong offer proof – not rhetoric. Name the Senate or House Bill, or Executive Order that was threatening the institution of Slavery in the Southern States that prompted them to secede. Come on smart guy what was it?

  • March 24, 2015 at 1:59am

    @Grover_Standpipe
    “The Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863. Were any Southern slaves freed in 1863 because of it?”
    LOL! Yes Grover, Hundreds upon Hundreds of thousands of slaves were freed in 1863 by the Emancipation Proclamation. In all of the Union Occupied areas of the Confederate States they were freed. And in all of the areas which Union troops campaigned in afterwards. And it has been historically recorded that in many cases the slaves who didn’t know what they should do or where they should go started following the Union troops by whom they were often treated very brutality by to discourage them from following. Especially brutally by General Sherman’s troops during their sweep through the South. The only places slaves really weren’t freed by the Emancipation Act was in the northern Union states themselves.

  • March 24, 2015 at 1:32am

    @Texasgranny73
    Yeah I caught that later. I was just having an episode of fatigue-onset phantom dyslexia last night!
    ;)

  • March 24, 2015 at 1:21am

    @getoffmylawncommies
    Okay so you are dumb enough to fall for the old “The South seceded to preserve the institution of slavery” argument that Northern historians and modern liberals use to slander the South and justify an illegal war. And which public school minions believe because they are either too lazy or too apathetic to challenge their agenda driven text books and teachers by doing their own research.
    If what they say is true then from where, and by whom was this threat to Southern slavery coming from? Eighty-seven percent of the entire Nation’s revenues were gained from the South. The Northern politicians weren’t about to cut off their own spending revenues by upsetting their southern apple cart over Slavery. But if you believe the old lie that the South seceded from the Union to preserve the intuition of slavery then give us the Senate or House Bill number, or proposed Executive Order that was threatening to ban slavery in the South prior to secession? Come we’re waiting?
    And by the way genius, there were five Union States (Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky and Missouri) that practiced slavery before and during the Civil War. Kind of puts a crimp in that whole “the Civil War was about ending slavery” BS huh?

  • March 24, 2015 at 12:52am

    @Grover_Standpipe
    …continued…
    and cannot be understood or justified by today’s mores. But IMO thinking that it was compassionate to turn almost 4 million uneducated people, who had never experienced independence, nor had to be self-reliant, out on their own, all at once, with little more than the shirts on their backs, either before, during or after war time is act of a historically ignorant, unintuitive, selfish individual who is more concerned with feeling warm and fuzzy about themselves than they are truly concerned about the hardships experienced by generations of blacks as the result of it having been done to them by the Union.

  • March 24, 2015 at 12:49am

    @Grover_Standpipe
    Okay just one more time only because it’s so fun exposing the foolishness and dishonesty of you Lefties. Sure the actual numbers of slaves increased by 749,488 over a ten year period (ever hear of procreation?). But the actual percentage of the overall population of slaves to the total population of the country decreased from 13.8% in 1850 to 13% in 1860. And NO it absolutely was NOT due to a disproportionate amount of immigration into the North and I can prove it by using just the population numbers of the slave holding states. The total population of the slave holding states in 1850 was 9,613,969 with 3,204,313 being slaves (33.3%). The population of the slave holding states in 1860 was 12,269,134 with 3,953,761 being slaves (32.2%). So when using only the population numbers of the actual slave holding states the percentage decrease (1.1%) is actually greater than when including the non-slave holding states (0.8%). Proof that the opposite of what you stated is the real truth. But that’s what you Liberals always do – ignore the facts and just make up any story that fits your desired narrative regardless of whether there is any truth to it or not. But even after all the facts that have been presented to you I know you will never accept the truth because you simply don’t want to. Liberalism truly is a form of mental illness. Slavery was wrong and a huge mistake but it began long before there was ever a United States of America and …continued..

  • [8] March 23, 2015 at 6:00pm

    “McDonough stressed that the United States solidly advocates for a two-state solution to protect Israel’s security and the sovereignty of the Palestinians.”

    Hell no the United States doesn’t solidly advocate for a two-state solution! Only the Socialist Progs do. The majority of the U.S. public does NOT!

  • [2] March 23, 2015 at 5:53pm

    “White House chief of staff Denis McDonough indicated Monday that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will continue to have a tough time walking back his comments about rejecting a Palestinian state”
    Why the hell should Netanyahu “walk back” on his comments about rejecting a Palestinian state? There is absolutely no sane reason to create a Palestinian State out of Israeli territory. It would be suicide for Israel to do so. It would be as insane as giving Louis Farrakhan the black Muslim state that he and his followers want given to them out of U.S. territory and giving La Raza the Southwestern quarter of the U.S. like they want. Hey McDumbarse is your Boss Obama planning to do that?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love