User Profile: SpeakSoftlyAndCarry

SpeakSoftlyAndCarry

Member Since: January 15, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] January 24, 2015 at 3:06pm

    @mohavegreen
    Correct! SO WHAT if the TSA found 2,212 firearms in checked luggage? It’s not like the firearms were going to become animated and commit a “luggage breakout” during mid-flight and then crawl though the airliner’s air vents, from the cargo hold into the passenger area or cockpit area to hi-jack the plane. This is just stupid. This article is nothing more than sensationalized anti-gun propaganda intended to frighten the public into accepting stricter regulations. Which apparently Zach Noble and the Blaze are willing to assist in. So once again I have to ask, “Who’s side are you and your Blaze really on Glenn?”.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] January 24, 2015 at 2:54pm

    @Lunar
    I didn’t know it wasn’t legal anymore to have a firearm in your checked luggage. I know for a fact it used to be legal. And since it is illogical for it to be illegal to carry a firearm in checked luggage when traveling I would imagine there are a lot of older folks who didn’t know this had changed.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 24, 2015 at 9:44am

    @AlexS1
    The only way their behavior can ever make any sense is when one realizes and accepts that Liberalism truly is a form of mental illness.

  • [3] January 24, 2015 at 9:14am

    Sorry Simonne but you’re clinging to the past. It really doesn’t matter anymore if there is a (D) or an (R) in front of these progressive politicians titles. With either the end game will be the same for America. Look at the damage both Bush Presidents did to our country and our liberty. Every bit as much, if not more than the Clintons did. And if there had never been a President George W. Bush then there would have never been a President Barack Obama. These Progs are like a cancer to this country.

  • [8] January 24, 2015 at 9:05am

    @ORPatriot
    You are exactly right. That’s what the “If you’re not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to hide” dolts are too stupid to realize. Give the government that kind of oversight into everyone’s personal spending and it won’t be long before the Leftist demigods are going to want to be using it to manipulate income tax brackets. And to control what groceries we can buy, and will use it as a means to e-force the rationing of energy and water.

  • [14] January 24, 2015 at 8:48am

    “Microsoft founder and computer pioneer Bill Gates says the only form of digital currency that will work is one where the government can see who is making transactions.”

    First Common Core and now this. I’m really starting to not like that guy.

  • [5] January 24, 2015 at 1:05am

    @TomHagen
    Tom I know that is what you and most liberals truly believe. But you’re really just further proving my point. Like most liberals, you are confusing conservative’s moral objections, and discriminating judgments (which are based on conservative social mores) as being fear based affronts. You do this because fear and insecurity are such dominant motivators of the liberal psyche that you assume everyone else is motivated by the same. But nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives tend to be self-confident, self-reliant and believe in voluntary social co-operation and personal responsibility. And we conservatives likewise tend to assume everyone else should share the same motivational traits as we do. We tend to become indignant at those who don’t/won’t. So when conservatives object to the anti-social behaviors, or the immoral practices (as set by our conservative mores) of any individual or given group, it isn’t because we fear them, it’s because we expect better of them and are disgusted when they fail to meet our expectations of personal responsibility. I am sorry that you find your own fear-based prejudices and biasness so contrary to the ideologies you embrace that the cognitive dissonance generated by the hypocrisy of it requires you to project your own negative feelings onto conservatives. But blaming conservatives for the woes of non-conservatives is never going to improve anyone’s lives or fix any of the problems in this country.

  • [57] January 23, 2015 at 8:53pm

    A progressive is a progressive regardless of whether there is a (D) or an (R) in front of their name. Either way the end game will be bad for the middle class.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] January 23, 2015 at 5:14pm

    @TomHagen
    Regardless of how many times I see it, it still never ceases to amaze me just how out of touch with reality, and how emotionally and intellectually dishonest liberals are. You liberals create these pseudo realities in your minds to justify or deny your own fears, biases, bigotries and hatreds. And like VTDave correctly stated, liberals “project your own issues onto others”. It really is sad and pathetic that so many liberals so desperately seem to have this need to trap themselves in these faux mental constructs where conservatives are saddled with liberal’s negative attributes!

  • [1] January 23, 2015 at 4:14pm

    I am very embarrassed that a President of the United States, even Obama, would grant this clown act an interview. And yet O’joko won’t give the leader of America’s strongest ally in the middle east, Netanyahu an audience. DISGUSTING!!!!!

  • [161] January 22, 2015 at 10:51pm

    I’d wager Michael Foster is a flaming liberal. IMO who else but a liberal would automatically assume a black man with a gun is a criminal and over re-act like he did? But maybe not, I guess it’s also possible Foster has “Other issues”.

    Responses (12) +
  • [2] January 21, 2015 at 6:23pm

    The earth goes through warming and cooling cycles and it has nothing to do with human made CO2 emissions. This was happening long before man was here and will be happening long after man is gone. Want to learn more about natural climate change and the Green Agenda Cult? Here is a good place to start. Not just the first page linked but have a look around the rest of the web site too.
    http://www.green-agenda.com/greenland.html

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] January 20, 2015 at 2:44pm

    So now the O’ministration essentially is saying “abort babies to save money”. It’s now a short step to “let the sick and old people die to save money”.

    Responses (1) +
  • [18] January 20, 2015 at 3:07am

    Time for the Liberals to start breaking ranks and distancing themselves from Obama’s failed presidency and administration if they want to win the White House again in 2016.

  • [10] January 20, 2015 at 3:03am

    This is the case with much of the country’s infrastructure. Back right after Obama took office and persuaded Congress to pass his trillion dollar plus stimulus package we were promised that a large portion of that was to be used to rebuild our infrastructure. But I sure haven’t seen much evidence that it ever was.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 19, 2015 at 11:51pm

    @TROONORTH
    Yes, warming and cooling cycles are nothing new. There was a Medieval Period Warming Cycle that lasted 500 years from approx. 800-1300 A.D.. Archeological digs have shown that 1,000 years ago the Vikings were even growing grape vineyards in Greenland. But as the planet entered a cooling cycle, crops in Greenland began to fail and eventually the Vikings had to abandon Greenland. Too bad for the Vikings that they didn’t have SUVs and Coal burning power Plants…the CO2 emissions might could have saved their culture. Anyone who is interested in researching this further can do so on the following link. There is also other very good information about the Global Warming Agenda on other pages of the same site.
    http://www.green-agenda.com/greenland.html

  • [36] January 19, 2015 at 7:14pm

    Well considering they only have about 75 years of accurate global weather records to draw their conclusions from, I’m not impressed. The earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old, so after they have a few hundred thousand years of accurate weather records to compare warming and cooling trends then MAYBE they can draw an actual scientific conclusion.

    Responses (6) +
  • January 19, 2015 at 1:32pm

    When I was reading the article I was thinking “well here’s another one of Billy Hallowell’s stupid much to do about nothing articles, as if the notions of “physical modesty” and “refraining from lust” in a Christian context is some new revelation. But after reading some of these comment posts I’m now convinced that Billy’s article extracted just the response he was hoping for.

  • [12] January 18, 2015 at 3:00pm

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 18, 2015 at 2:54pm

    I’d vote for Hillary before I’d vote for Lindsey Graham because if we’re have to have another Progressive POS in the White House I’d rather it be one who isn’t lying about who and what they are.

123 To page: Go