User Profile: SpeckChaser


Member Since: January 08, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [8] October 22, 2016 at 8:05pm

    More Hannity bashing…yawn.

    Responses (1) +
  • [29] October 22, 2016 at 8:02pm

    “Orlando police have said the arrest was lawful.”

    You can be lawfully arrested for possession of donut sugar?

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] October 21, 2016 at 10:40am


    So media matter and think progress have debunked the video? Sure…

    The truth is not only do you not care that democrats are committing mass voter fraud and have been for the last 50 years, but you support it.

  • [8] October 20, 2016 at 8:35pm


    I could have worded that better…

    I was referring to climate change being man man, which used to be called global warming, until they realized it wasn’t warming.

  • [26] October 20, 2016 at 6:13pm

    “Murphy “actually believes in science and the effects of climate change,” the president added,”

    He must have meant to say Murphy believes in computer models and the effects of climate change.

    There is no data to support climate change. Only computer predictions.

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] October 20, 2016 at 5:16pm


    I realize that your statement is only speculative.

    I realize that many in the republican establishment are actively working against trump.

    I realize people like Glenn Beck are actively working to make sure trump is not elected

    Did you have a point?

  • [11] October 20, 2016 at 4:31pm

    What a coincidence.

    Seems like just last night I was watching this presidential debate type thing. The guy kept saying our leaders are very stupid, or something like that.

    Now there telling us this guy got hacked because he fell for a phishing scheme.

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] October 20, 2016 at 4:06pm

    Probably not. The elite always seem to get along well behind closed doors. Only in the public do they prefer to be seen as enemies.

    Responses (5) +
  • [18] October 20, 2016 at 4:02pm

    The correct question would be, if there is clear, undeniable evidence that voter fraud took place on a scale large enough to alter the election, should a candidate from either party be able to challenge it?

    In light of the Project Veritas video proving democrats are actively committing mass voter fraud, spanning a course of 50 years, it is no wonder why the democrats oppose every single action aimed at creating fair and honest elections.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] October 20, 2016 at 1:57pm


    Yea, can you imagine what slender would say if leaked emails proved GH Bush knowingly and carelessly lied about WMD’s

    Do you think blaming those responsible for the leak would excuse the content of the emails, as democrats appearently do now?

    By the way, due to Wikileaks, we now know that Clinton has paid over 6 million dollars to online trolls to give a false sense of online support for her candidacy.

    The idea of Paid trolls has long been laughed at by those on the left. They called people who made those types of claim, “fringe” and “extreme.” Except that it has now been proven to be true.

    So that could explain why people like slender knowingly trying to pass provable lies as truth. A paycheck my be depending on it.

  • [31] October 20, 2016 at 12:54pm


    “Yeah, voter fraud, that’s the ticket.”

    The cat is out of the bag and the time has expired for your lies.

    Hillary Clinton called members of the White House staff the N-word, called hispanics lazy, refuses to pay women the same salaries of men who do the same jobs.

    We have the democrat party on film detailing how they have committed mass voter fraud spanning the course of 50 years.

    We now know they oppose voter ID laws because they are actively organizing illegal immigrants to voter in the election.

    It’s no longer arguable.

  • [121] October 19, 2016 at 10:43pm

    How about some truth rhetoric…

    The truth is under hillarys proposal, one second before a baby is to be born, you could take scissors, jam it into a baby’s skull, open them up and create a hole, then take a vacuum and suck out the brain matter and it would be legal.

    That is not scare rhetoric…simply the truth.

    Responses (10) +
  • [4] October 19, 2016 at 1:55pm


    I could give reasons, like his support for the vets, but you would likely claim you don’t trust him to follow through on his promises.

    So I’ll give you what I believe to be a fitting analogy.

    If you had a illness that was terminal if left untreated, and the doctor told you, “you have four options. First, you could accept no treatment (voting for Hillary). Choosing that option will guarantee your death. Option 2, do treatment A, which may still kill you, but it’s your best shot (trump)

    Then you have option B, and C. Johnson or whatever the other guys name is. You can choose option b or c, but neither have a chance of success, and you will still die.

    Which option do you choose.

  • [4] October 19, 2016 at 8:01am

    The “heavily edited video” excuse is the go to response when a video, regardless of who who films or edits it, exposes action on the left, to which there is no reasonable excuse or explanation.

    Same old song and dance.

  • [1] October 19, 2016 at 2:25am


    Again, and I don’t mean this as an insult, but you are very uninformed.

    Because of recent email leaks, we now know Hillary Clinton referred to African Americans as “losers, hispanics as “lazy”, and doesn’t pay women what she pays men. Not that the last one was a secret.

    As far as the video, it isn’t debatable. The democrat party on film in their own words detailing how they coordinate wide scale, mass voter fraud that has spanned the course of 50 years.

    Are you okay with that?

  • [15] October 19, 2016 at 1:53am

    Thank you blaze for reporting on this video.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] October 19, 2016 at 1:46am


    As far as I have seen, the only video of trumps “grab her p****” video is a little more than 2 min long. It looks like you didn’t need the full, unedited video to come to the correct conclusion…that trump was wrong.

    Why do you have two separate standards when casting judgement on edited videos?

    Why are you so defensive about the democrat video that shows widespread, mass voter fraud spanning the course of 50 years?

  • [10] October 19, 2016 at 12:00am

    Wow. The silence on the Project Veritas video is astonishing.

    Remember when Beck used to say the truth has no agenda? Is that not a thing anymore? Seriously?

    A Ground breaking story of organized mass voter fraud by the Democratic Party over the course of 50 years that is ignored on theblaze. That is a story pre-trump beck would have ran non stop.

    Now that his agenda guides his “truth,” he doesn’t seem interested. Sure, he will claim with certainty that every single person, millions he has never met, are unquestionably not Christian.

    But when it comes to covering one of the biggest political bombshells of our day, where is he? Absent…

    Responses (6) +
  • [20] October 18, 2016 at 8:43pm


    I’m not sure what Bill Clinton settling with Paula jones for $800,000 or how he and Hillary both lost their license to practice law has to do with this story, but I will take your word that it is important.

    But how did you conclude multiple people on tape admitting to wide scale, massive voter fraud spanning the course of 50 years can be discarded?

  • [11] October 18, 2016 at 5:51pm

    Does anyone here remember hearing beck say “the truth has no agenda?”

    Is that not a thing anymore. When did that change?

    Becks agenda is Trump losing the election. Is his agenda the reason he is ignoring arguably the biggest story of the week?

    The Project Veritas video proves wide scale voter fraud by the democrats. Not one mention from beck? Really.

    I wish someone at the blaze would ask beck the the “truth” started having an agenda.

    Responses (4) +
123 To page: Go