User Profile: SpeckChaser

SpeckChaser

Member Since: January 08, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [6] September 30, 2014 at 8:52am

    “Makenzie and Steven Schultz left a $100 tip on a bill of $66.65 Saturday night. They later turned to Facebook to explain the reasoning behind their unusual move.”

    Pray for our country and its inhabitants…we need it.

  • [8] September 29, 2014 at 9:04pm

    People sure do attach the word “amazing” to quite a lot of things.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 29, 2014 at 6:00pm

    The reason you should agree with the global warming premiss is becasue it is true, not because your attempting to win an argument over settled science.

    That is unless you realize that man has pumped more CO2 into the atmosphere in the last several decades than anytime before…and unless you realize that the earth has been cooling during those decades when it should have been warming.

    With the exception of those inconvenient truths, yes the earth is definatly warming…I’m serial…Excelsior!

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] September 28, 2014 at 2:32pm

    The bullets were fired from a semi auto, which every one knows is an assault machine gun anti aircraft weapon, probably bought at a gun show, and probably had a 100 round clip.

    Semi autos only shoot cop killer bullets and can be stopped by nothing, especially bullet proof glass.

    Responses (3) +
  • [17] September 26, 2014 at 10:20pm

    If I made 100 Mill a year I would have quit after 6 or seven months.

  • September 26, 2014 at 11:41am

    Blink said, “after it completely destroys the entire ‘you have to have god for morality’ non-argument?”

    The fact that you believe that video “completly destroyed” anything, especially the opposing argument, is hilarious.

    Your premiss is based of the idea that God’s non-existence is a proven fact.

    It would be like starting with the premiss that the son does not exist. Then saying we know you can have warmth without the son because we have warmth and the son does not exist.

    You can not have it both ways. If there is no higher standard than ourselves, then you have no basis to call anything good or evil.

  • [3] September 25, 2014 at 11:59pm

    Blink

    Opinions are funny things.

    My opinion…yes, you have been at it for many many years. And for many years I have seen you “logic” get debunked to the point where several times I have actually been embarrassed for you.

    Your opinion…due to your superior knowledge and reason you have defeated and thoroughly embarrassed any and all takers who would dare challenge your unwaivering position that God is an imaginary being made up by the stupid to act as a crutch for the weak.

    Like I said opinions are funny things.

  • September 25, 2014 at 11:38pm

    Blink

    I watched your link. And the short version is you can’t have it both ways.

    You can’t say there is no higher authority then turn around and claim something is good or bad. I mean, you could say it, but it would carry no weight.

  • [3] September 25, 2014 at 4:36pm

    “According to KTUL, the children are in protective custody.”

    It is against the law, I think just about everywhere, for firearms to be accessible to minors. That being said, I think people are usually charged if a minor injures an innocent person with the gun…not so much someone attacking them or a family member.

    I remember the story about the kid, 12 years old or so, killing an armed intruder who broke in while he was babysitting his siblings. Been a while, but don’t remember anyone getting charged for him having access.

  • [15] September 25, 2014 at 3:06pm

    The only thing stranger than someone failing to immediatly remove it from the vehicle would be someone excepting a loan of this kind in the first place.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 25, 2014 at 2:08pm

    Secret squirrel / John

    I really like those ideas. Unfortunately, they are probably to sensible for anyone in power to implement.

  • [-1] September 25, 2014 at 12:15pm

    Your no loon. That’s what I’m talking about.

    I am on a phone but the images stay when I turn it sideways. I get the brick with blue line on other stories. Only getting the pistol slide in this one. I even refreshed the page because I thought something got jumbled up.

    I wish they would put a link that would bring you to the desktop version. I hate the mobile versions. I emailed the staff to see if it would be possible. Just about everybody has it…didn’t figure it would be hard to do. That was a while ago and I don’t remember the exact response, other than they didn’t seem too interested.

    It just seems like the bricks are just one more thing to load on an already cluttered website. It is pretty irritating trying to click on a link only to have the site send you elsewhere because the screen jumped when you clicked while something else loaded.

  • September 25, 2014 at 11:05am

    What is the deal with the image of white bricks and a pistol slide in the background of this story?

    It is not making it easier to read…

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 25, 2014 at 8:45am

    Nabuqu

    “took a way a non-existent privilege”

    I wouldn’t think funding for department salaries would qualify as a non-existent privilege.

    “It’s moral evil to try to hold someone else accountable for another person’s actions.”

    Like holding the taxpayers responsible for the action of this officer? That is what I would like to see stopped.

    I read Ezekiel 18 before posting this. I don’t believe it concerns lowering funds for police department salaries that abuse their power.

    An outstanding teachers working in a terrible school districts will deal with negatives associated with those disctricts, despite the fact that they themselves are outstanding.

  • [85] September 25, 2014 at 12:50am

    “the guy who got shot should sue living heck out of that Police Department, as well as the officer personally”

    I support suing the officer personally, but suing the police department is suing the tax payer.

    I would like to see a system that reduces the wages of the police force when incidents like this happens. Maybe the good would root out the bad if it affected their pocketbooks.

    Responses (14) +
  • [9] September 24, 2014 at 12:59pm

    “Though unconstitutional the service does help keep drunks off the road, Now if the officers where to abuse their power…” Alrios

    I bet I willl see nothing more depressing, pathetic, and ignorant today than the above statement,…and it is an oxymoron to boot.

    If officers are doing something that is unconstitutional, then they are already abusing their power.

    Garbage like that gives me little hope for this countries future.

  • [11] September 24, 2014 at 12:01pm

    One of the links on drudge is about a college requiring fraternities to accept women.

    http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/09/22/wesleyan-fraternities-ordered-to-go-coed/

    So yea, I’d say political correctness has went to far

  • September 23, 2014 at 9:20pm

    Ablindmule

    “Did you really ask that question?”

    Yea. I did. I know I did becasue it is clearly posted under my name.

    I more less found it funny how he phrased the statement.

  • [14] September 23, 2014 at 4:04pm

    “Stiefel said that Openly Secular will be deemed a success when atheists are able to be open…without…being treated differently due to their decision to reject a higher power.”

    Wait…What? If God doesn’t exist how can you reject Him?

    Responses (5) +
  • [28] September 23, 2014 at 3:54pm

    East

    They said 600…Not 42,000.

123 To page: Go