User Profile: SPIN_MD


Member Since: September 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • May 15, 2016 at 9:03am

    My point exactly. See above.

  • [2] May 15, 2016 at 9:01am

    Whenever a liberal “examines” another liberal, one has to look at it in a different way. First you have to ask yourself, will this information cause the examining liberal to change his mind about the liberal in question or liberal policies in general? Chances are the answer is no. Lying, subterfuge, deception and chicanery are cornerstones of liberal progressive ideology.

    So if the examining liberal knows that lying is mandatory in order to advance the ideology and subsequently lies then the reason he/she is doing this would have to be some reason other than full disclosure or honesty. One of the most common uses of this type thing is to mix facts with fiction, disinformation. That way something sounds true and official and isn’t quite right.

    Another reason this could be occurring is to desensitize the population to facts by information overload to where they just get tired of hearing it. That way they turn a deaf ear when something “new” or more importantly the actual truth comes out. One always has to look at the timing as well.

    The Congressional committee has a few new unsolicited witnesses mysteriously showing up that want to come clean. Now wouldn’t it be better to have something already out in the public domain where any given liberal progressive liar can manipulate the news, propaganda, cycle.

    Deceivers need collusion and other liars. Remember the only one that was with Hitler, an extremely talented deceiver, till the end was Joseph Goebbels his propaganda guy.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 14, 2016 at 8:17am

    Racist? Honestly, I don’t know the guy. I haven’t really ever listened to him beyond a cursory soundbite here and there. Are you calling him a racist because he is a Republican or because he is gay?

    The reason I respond to your post is that I am a Republican and do know a lot of gay men. I am the only straight guy in the room on any given day at work. I also am likely the only Republican in the room on any given day. Gays do tend to herd and group think. I have several gay friends and haven’t a clue as to how they vote. I assume many do as they are told like all little liberal slaves and vote Democrat.

    That being said, I can make this statement. Gays, are almost to a one, horrible misogynists, racists, ageists and segregationists and are incredibly intolerant of most every religion, yes including Islam. (Which is strange because most are A-$$ licking Democrats.) If they are a dinge queen, they may be less racist, but in all honesty I haven’t seen that. See even the term that they use frequently, is very disparaging.
    If you doubt me and know a gay guy, ask him what the definition of “fish” is and why that term is used.

    I digress. So if you are saying he is a racist because he is a Republican, I’d say you are just vomiting forth the spin tripe on which you have gorged from the Democrat trough. If you are saying he is a racist, because he is gay, you may have a valid point.

    Consider this instead if a=b and b=c then a=c. Democrat=gay and gay=racist then, Democrat=racist.

  • [6] May 13, 2016 at 2:25pm

    Bigotry is well tolerated depending on who is being the bigot. Muslims are bigots to the point of beheading Christians, moderate Muslims,and homosexuals, and selling any random female into slavery. Gays are bigots to the point of putting Christians out of business.

    The sign is correct. Christians do not worship a tribal moon god of the Arabian peninsula. Jesus was the Son of the Most High God. Mohammad was just another guy listening to the lies of Satan.

    The persons offended are bigots. Bigots usually have very thin skins.

  • [11] May 13, 2016 at 1:17pm

    I have a lot of problems with Mr. Trump. This is stupid though. Well. like my grandmother used to say, “consider the source.”

    Blacks cannot be put “back” into slavery when they have never been out of it. The Democrats have had them in slavery for decades. Slaves are not allowed to freely think. They cannot be self determining. 98% of blacks vote for Democrats. Yet nothing changes except how much money they get from the government.

    The Democrat policies of government giveaways have decimated the black community even further than it would have been naturally because of genetics. I reference sub-Saharan Africa as the model for that statement. There was a time when blacks were advancing. It was a nominal rate sure but it was progress.

    Then the liberals got involved because they knew blacks were easily manipulated and malleable like a child. The socialist policies AKA as the VRA and CRA allowed these people to vote. The liberals in the Democrat party immediately commandeered the black community as their private property. It has been that way ever since.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] May 13, 2016 at 11:36am

    The left has proven time and again, their concept of children is chattel and nothing more. They can be destroyed at a whim because of inconvenience. They are drones to be indoctrinated and not taught. They are now going to be sexual pawns for anyone that wishes.

    I think the reason this is happening now is clear. Since the current president is black, these type things, the homosexual agenda and child molestation is well tolerated in the black community. According to the CDC, in a study they did concluding in 2013, they estimated 7 out of 10 black men participate in homosexual activity on a sustained basis.

    As far as the child molestation issue, since blacks, along with many other ethnic groups, don’t view having sex with children in the same way as do western Europeans, the instance of child “involvement” in sex play that is how it was framed in the piece I read, is “well tolreated” in the black community and has been for decades.

    The current president is simply enforcing black community values on the whole country. He doesn’t see anything wrong with it. It is right as rain to him and every single black person drawing breath in this country.

  • May 13, 2016 at 11:05am

    This is the first baby step by the left, maybe, to eliminate child molestation laws. I call it “the left” because I honestly don’t know who is driving this. I know a lot of liberals that think this is crazyworld but they won’t say anything. because to be on the left you have to give up freedom of thought.

    I know some will call me crazy but would anyone on this forum have thought the SCOTUS would redefine marriage for western culture to include same gender and more probably anything, just 5 years ago. I’m thinking not. It happened though. If someone had said that 10 years ago everyone would have called them crazy as I am sure some of you are doing to me right now.

    Contrary to the narrative of the left, homosexuality is NOT genetic. There is NO proof of that. The few studies done have only shown similarities AFTER THE FACT. The studies done, by the way, were very skewed, biased and completely outside any norm for scientific investigation.

    That being said, homosexuals need access to children. That is why they are so adamant about teaching gender neural ideas in public schools starting with K. There is already a drive underway to redefine pedophilia as a sexual “orientation” instead of a deviancy. Does that sound familiar?

    The gay agenda, which is NOT being driven by any gay I know, has the overturning of every child molestation law in this country as its next objective. The “marriage” issue gives them access now to children in states that wasn’t there before. (cont above)

  • [2] May 13, 2016 at 10:08am

    This is one of the good things about Trump. He is most likely the ONLY Republican presidential candidate that can put the biased media in its place without reprisal. I am definitely not a big Trump fan but he’s growing on me.

    Responses (4) +
  • [2] May 12, 2016 at 11:27pm

    There is no evidence at all that diversity improves anything, let alone something as important as national security. In fact, there is more evidence to the contrary. Facts are always the silver bullet to the liberal. Nothing liberals espouse concerning social engineering are supported by facts. The narrative is the only thing that matters to these people. Well that and an unlimited supply of taxpayer money. Therein lies the rub. When the money runs out. And it will. These “programs” will fold like a defective deck chair.

    The fact of reality is diversity is fictional. It is an irrelevancy of inestimable proportion. That is what these people are incapable of understanding. Intelligence, aptitude, attitude, ability and whether a person is ACTUALLY qualified should be the only things considered when being chosen for any position. That can never be. The statistics do not support that notion.

    Therefore programs such as affirmative action, diversity quotas and gender equality are promoted instead of the obvious logic which would dictate having the best qualified person for any given position regardless of color of ethnicity.

    This country has been suffering from the consequences of fictionally qualified persons in jobs for the past several decades. The real reasons companies relocate overseas is multifaceted. The social engineering of the left is solely responsible for 90% of it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] May 12, 2016 at 10:06pm

    The thing that puzzles me is why is anyone surprised. Blacks look upon Hispanics as interlopers on their stuff. Blacks have felt for some time like they are owed everything. This is the only logical progression of the socialism policies known as the CRA and the VRA. Blacks think the CRA only applies to them…period.

    On the flip side, Hispanics having a completely separate language and subsequently culture, do not like intermingling with anyone else. They abhor diversity.

    Blacks, are actually encouraged and therefore, strive to marry whites. If you don’t believe that google any given black NFL player and look at his wife, chances are pretty high she isn’t black. Interracial marriage was a primary goal, if not THE primary goal, of MLK. He knew that blacks in the future would need Caucasian genes in order to survive. As an aside, statistically every black person in the US, whose ancestors have been here for over a hundred years, has an average of 25% European genes.

    Hispanics, especially those from Central and South America, are of the opinion that the US stole the land of the SW US from Mexico. There are multiple organizations which promote this ideology. So many in these areas specifically, like CA, act as if everyone except them is an interloper on their turf.

    There is no love loss between blacks and Hispanics. Another aside, the black population has only grown 2% since 1964, when the CRA was passed. The Hispanic population has grown 500%. Look who’s winning.

  • May 12, 2016 at 12:43am

    I have known several women who had abortions in my lifetime. Some decided later in life to hang up the whore shoes, get off their backs and “try” and be a mother. They were all horrible mothers to a one. I don’t know where people think a person which could pay someone to rip her own baby apart could ever be a good mother. That type of mental disorder just doesn’t disappear. I mean that is like schizophrenia just disappearing. It just doesn’t happen.

    This woman’s comment about “loving” her son yet wishing she had killed him doesn’t surprise me. I’ve actually heard this before. I had a friend from college who also had a friend that had multiple abortions and when she was in her mid thirties she decided to have a baby. She didn’t really know who the father was. She thought that it was possibly her last time to actually have a kid so she did.

    Single women have a very hard time rearing a son especially when they really didn’t want the kid to begin with. That plus there was a constant flow of “uncles” which just confused the kid. The boy was a troubled sort. He got in fights a lot. He got into drugs. He screwed around a lot. He knocked up his first “girl” when he was 14. She was in her 30s. She was one of his mother’s whore friends.

    She finally lost her cool and in a moment of rage told him that she wished she had aborted him. He beat her to death. He is now in a prison. The funny thing is if she had killed him, she would have been lauded as a hero. He’s the bad guy though.

  • [1] May 11, 2016 at 6:49pm

    This is part of the hypocrisy of the fashion/modeling/advertising industry. This isn’t very clever advertising per se but it is generating a lot of buzz. In PR there is no such thing as bad press.

    Fashion advertising has been pushing the boundaries of taste for a very long time. Remember the stuff that was called advertising for A&F? Really? I know it was supposed to be high concept advertising but still. It would have been nice to see some of the A&F clothes instead of a bunch of naked models frolicking around.

    What about Victoria’s Secret? Has anyone ever seen any Andrew Christian ads? How about Aussie Bum? Granted all of these companies have a very specific market but they use very racy images in their advertising.

    I just think the ad is in poor taste. I mean what if the girl had a stain? How appealing would that be? Maybe that is where they are headed with this sort of thing. The next thing will be an upshot of a girl in new Calvin Klein panties on the rag. How provocative! How progressive! How forward thinking! How raw and edgy!

    O FYI for all you guys, the term edgy simply means ugly in the real world. Only the fashionistas know what ugly is edgy and what ugly is just plain ugly.

  • [3] May 11, 2016 at 6:45pm

    I have a few questions. Firstly, who are these people? Why are they even “news”? Is anyone really surprised by the abject stupidity of the left?

  • [1] May 11, 2016 at 6:44pm

    That is commonly called either stupidity or mentally disordered. Which ever it is doesn’t make much difference the results are often the same.

  • May 9, 2016 at 2:50pm

    It depends on the fascist. Socialism ALWAYS leads to fascism, eventually. Socialism has NEVER been totally realized in practice. It can’t ever be realized because those, politicians and/or bureaucrats, who put socialism into place never want to let go of the power.

    The goal of socialism is nice in theory. Everyone working together for a common good. Everyone equal. No one as leader. It sounds great but it doesn’t take into consideration the selfish nature of humans. There is no true altruism. Everyone works an angle. Even those which seem to have lofty selfless goals are working an angle.

    I know a few guys that do doctors without borders. While is APPEARS that they are doing this for the good of others, it is ALWAYS used as a marketing tool or a PR tag line. The real sneaky guys are careful to not say anything themselves. They let others “leak” the info. So no there is no real altruism, well not in humans anyway. Socialism, popular today, while being portrayed as altruistic in nature is about POWER, and power only for a few chosen ones, not everyone…period.

    Socialism devolves into communism which eventually gives way to fascism because of power alone is problematic. Don’t get me wrong. Fascism is not the desired system. Fascism can be less horrible if it is more on the lines of nationalism. At least there is an identity which unifies. The problem being in this specific instance is that nationalism and pluralism don’t mix….at all!

  • [2] May 7, 2016 at 1:12am

    The elephant in the room which no one will address is this. The Federal Reserve System was set up to eventually fail. There is no other outcome for the system. Those who set it up knew it would happen. I’m sure many economists are surprised it lasted this long. When the US economy folds, which it will, the global economy will fall like a house of cards.

    The whole thing was set up like mutual assured destruction during the cold war. The premise being no one would want war because there was no way to win it. Well, the geniuses that set up the Fed and subsequently set up the nonsense of the global economy had the same idea. The idea being no one would have the nerve to call the debt because the house of cards would fall.

    The US is 6% of the world’s population and consumes 50% of the goods. If there is no one to consume the goods , those producing said goods, like China, will either have to look elsewhere or cut back on production. There is no elsewhere unless the producers are willing to take far less than they have been getting.

    Therein lies the rub. Anywhere else on Earth, populations having been living with far far less than even the poorest homeless US citizen. They will most assuredly be willing to get less for the same output. That coupled with the ever growing contempt for the US pretty much guarantees a very rocky road ahead for the US.

    The DC politicians have been playing chicken with the debt to buy votes from the non-productive, especially the Democrats.

  • [1] April 23, 2016 at 10:08pm

    Who are these people? I haven’t heard of any of these people. I don’t listen to rap. I listen to real music. As far as BLM, well, are they staging a strike in GA for all the blacks killed by a family member yesterday? Those people confuse me even more than the average liberal or any of their given sycophants.

    They don’t seem to care about the fact they are perceived as idiots. Those that don’t know they don’t know are very dangerous people. It is the only logical outcome of these people having been lied to for decades about pretty much everything.

  • April 22, 2016 at 1:12pm

    I did not judge. Jesus warned against judging others. Jesus did, however, command His followers to be observant. The truth is slowly emerging. I don’t know how he died. There are rumors of a drug overdose. I personally have never known a true devout follower of Jesus die from a drug overdose. That is very antithetical to the teachings of Christ.

    I am unaware of Prince’s religious affiliations or beliefs. I was just being observant as to his behavior and his music which was anything but Christian in nature. I cannot know the man’s heart. Only God knows the true intentions of his heart. I just cannot rationalize his behavior with scripture no matter how open-minded I try and view it.

    There are many people calling themselves Christians which are not. These people calling themselves Christians are doomed to the fires of Hell. Jesus prophesied this before His crucifixion. That is the truth.

  • [-4] April 21, 2016 at 5:47pm

    As a christian I am always sad when someone, that by all indications, appears to have died outside of salvation.

    That being said, it really does bother me when someone like this dies and the secular world just goes on and on and on. In full disclosure, I never particularly cared for the guy’s music. It wasn’t particularly bad, but it wasn’t particularly good either.

    He is just another performer who died relatively young. He didn’t radically change music. He didn’t pioneer anything in music. His “work” won’t be remembered centuries from now. I mean the guy wasn’t Beethoven or Bach. He was a somewhat mediocre talent that had a pretty good commercial hook and image that made him some money.

    I do feel sorry for his family. It is always sad to lose someone this unexpectedly.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] April 21, 2016 at 5:36pm

    I might point you to the Bible where it says many will come and protest about how they not only claimed Jesus as savior but did many good deeds in His name. Jesus sends them to hell. He says even thought they knew Him, He didn’t know them. The Bible says even demons know Jesus and tremble.

    One cannot be an actual Christian, i.e. saved, and willfully sin on a consistent basis. That is called unrepentant sin. The Bible clearly states that unrepentant sinners will NOT go to heaven. They can call themselves whatever they like.

    The concept of faith alone is not in actuality Biblical. Faith is where the Christian life starts…not ends. Jesus said if you love Him, you would keep His commandments. Not because you “have” to but because you want to. If one is truly saved, one doesn’t want to commit willful sin.

    Will one sin? Yes, we are in the corrupt flesh. Do we have to sin? No. As a child of God through the precious blood of the risen savior, Jesus, we can chose to walk in the Spirit and not the flesh.

    Can a homosexual be saved? Yes. Will said person have feelings for the same gender still? Possibly. This is where it gets tricky. Is the attraction or the action the sin when it comes to homosexuality?

    Jesus said if one looks in a lustful way at a woman, a man has already committed adultery or fornication with her in his heart. Fornication and adultery are sexual sins where gender is irrelevant. It is the action that matters.

    Responses (7) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love