Fools huh squeaker? Sure hope you have family in the State Dept serving.
So she should willingly turn over ALL e-mails...Simple enough, no court battles, no hiding evidence like the IRS did for Lois Lerner...
Your days are numbered Libbies...
Wrong, It is for conducing official government business. read the law moron.
Spew1...you forget to precede your unhinged post with "muha ha ha".
Try again fool.
Classified intel sent to unsecured servers outside the loop of State Dept official channels is a major screw up no matter what flavor of politician is serving at that time. This latest amateur hour revelation must fill our Allies hearts with horror and our enemies hearts with glee. This incredibly dumb move by Cankles is hundred times more serious than Watergate ever was.......and yet this cretin of a she beast is still walking around free.
Guess the statute of limitations on the blame Bush / Bush equivalence hasn't expired. Regardless of Bush or Clinton or any pol, the lack of transparency is getting old. And there is plenty of that in the current administration. Fool.
[-1] March 1, 2015 at 12:23am
“Chinese testing long range rockets over western United States” Ranks up there with the most delusional things I’ve ever read here. This is why the rational world calls this site the “conspiracy-theory clearing house.”
videos of all the rockets coming in are on you tube,. some news channels,. abc, nbc and other org. news media,. You can also look up other additional info yourself. i don't really care if you do or not or what ya think personally but i know myself when i worked for North American stainless i packaged personally one quarter inch thick steel rolls that weighed in over half a million pounds and they constantly everyday ship those half a million pound rolls of steel out to them and across the sea. every day squirt,. spurt,. jizz spqr1., oh sry about the mis interpretation of your call sign up there
and i guess saying that the enemy is in the United States would just be as crazy to you too wouldn't it ,. sp,.
 March 1, 2015 at 12:22am
Damaged by the Left? She’s damaged by her own words and actions. All the left does is point and laugh.
[-3] March 1, 2015 at 12:18am
I’m simply pointing out the fact that CPAC and the far right crazy fringies it appeals to have had no, and will continue to have no real impact on the political landscape. It’s a bunch of blowhards who equate anger and loudness with relevancy. Just watch…… And I don’t see you waving the “this is my real name and address” flag here either. Wait, you don’t think all these people are really using real names do you? Now that would be funny.
February 28, 2015 at 10:28pm
Heavyweight? In this context it’s actually spelled D E L U S I O N A L.
February 28, 2015 at 12:42pm
No one said anything to that effect. Once again, you clearly demonstrate your total lack of knowledge of the Constitution and the English language.
Our evidence is self evident. Every encounter with Media Matters scum I have ever had, has resulted in me exposing the half truths and outright lies they bathe in. Your data bases are totally corrupt and chock full of a pabulum of lies meant for the consumption of and dissemination by idiots.
The very foundations of your organization is a syrup of propaganda and lies. Your data bases are meant to make the clueless appear knowledgeable and relevant but only succeed in demonstrating your utter idiocy. Think about that the next time you spout some black froth your computer chokes up for you. Your evil is on display and the only people you are fooling are yourselves. So knock yourselves out. You will eventually choke on the very poison you spew. We don’t have to do anything but watch and wait. Happy Spring!
 February 27, 2015 at 8:50pm
You do realize that your word salad does nothing to address my comments?
February 27, 2015 at 6:09pm
And the crazy old coot doesn’t even know when to shut up. What next, the ghost of Gabby Hayes? And these are the people you put up on a stage and give awards to? Some befuddled, old man who’s still living in an earlier decade in his mind?
And your people tought the genius of nancy pelosi harry reid who can't put a simple sentence together. Maybe some of that old earlier decade is what we need to turn this country around
So you want to take away his freedom of speech.
And, this from somebody who chose "spqr" as part of their handle?!?! I'm gonna go out on a limb that you are neither a Roman soldier, a gladiator or a Roman citizen.....
What is it with liberals and age-ism? You just make yourselves sound like bratty little kids who need a spanking. Being old doesn't make you crazy or befuddled. Being a Democrat does.
 February 27, 2015 at 5:26pm
Did you all see Phil Robertson go off on “Beatniks” and “Hippies?” Beatniks? Has anyone told this out of touch old fool that it’s no longer 1962? These are the types that CPAC puts up on stage, out of touch fogies who don’t even know what decade this is.
And lots of reality starts like Robertson, trump, and Palin
February 27, 2015 at 4:35pm
Now we’ve got stuff about his time in El Salvador, not going to El Mozote when he was supposed to. Helping the criminal Elliot Abrams cover up the massacre by Reagan’s fascist/psychotic allies? Looks like he was a GOP propagandist from the word go….
since they will not have to expand their equipment to handle new traffic, yeah, they will now prioritize so that ALL can get the SAME speed and access.
Ever since Netflix agreed to pay extra for higher speeds, they did.
Now the oh-so-clever Government has invalidated that egreement. Whoopie!
Some have tried to claim that "Net Neutrality" has been around since 2010 with the "Open Internet" regulation
( https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf ) - but that's not the same thing at all.
February 27, 2015 at 3:25pm
All this does is legalize the status-quo, preventing big companies from screwing the little guy. Congrats Matt, you’ve proven one again you have no understanding of the core concept you’re on about.
The issue was NIPPING SOMETHING IN THE BUD
not CORRECTING an existing problem, as Matt deliberately and falsely suggests.
The full name of the issue is/was "PRESERVING Net Neutrality."
And that what the president accomphished.