Will they be housed, educated and work in Beck’s Utopia, the one he said he’s building in Independence, USA?
Whatever happened to that African trip Beck said he was going to make, the one to South Africa?
First he ignores issues that credible others speak of for years, then he demeans the message and the messenger, then depending on the way the popular wind blows and upon determining whether he can make a buck on it, he and he alone discovers them through mystical promptings from the Divine, then he ghostwrites a book and hosts a pilgrimage to a gathering to talk and talk and talk.
Beck has portrayed himself as being a Founding Father type, a Moses, a Bonhoffer, a Gandhi, a Schindler. And a super duper church going Christian. I don’t believe or think he is any of those. I will no longer listen, watch or buy anything Beck related nor will I visit this site after I post this. I implore others to deeply consider this post and read and recall other information about Beck and realize you should not listen to him to learn the truth about the world.
Thanks and signing off.
Beck is a monumentally narcissistic man. It's all about him and his grossly overinflated opinion of himself.
@spudwhite ---- You may have a point. Not too far down the road I suspect this site will have about a couple dozen posters left just hangin out chatting with each other. On the other hand, there is a certain morbid fascination in coming here --- sorta like when you slow down and crane your neck to see the bodies being pulled from the wreckage on a highway.
"educated and work in Beck’s Utopia, the one he said he’s building in Independence, USA?"
I remember seeing that special when he was all getty about this new city that he could create. The "buy in" just wasn't there apparently. I haven't heard a damn thing about his dream labs operation going on in 3 different locations.
When he mentioned that I could watch the Blazetv on the internet, and at same time the iPad and look up quotes or the sighted statistics as they were mentioned in real-time -- that idea was very cool.
The technology still isn't here and that is if it was ever really being developed. The idea sounded cool but maybe it was just a cool blaze episode....nothing more. I still can't get the alternate views he mentioned for subscribers.
 May 6, 2015 at 1:35pm
Please consider donating to help his wife and young children through this sad period. There is a gofundme.com
Account with this photo set up for them.
Our little community is so saddened by his passing, he was one of the good guys protecting us from hardened bad guys.
 February 28, 2015 at 6:35pm
Mark Levin is such an intelligent wise man a mensch and a true patriot
Watched his speech in total and he kept himself as subdued as possible the man is full of righteous passion and I’m humbled just listening to him
I hope all conservatives realize that the tyrant in the oval doesn’t worship the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob or of the Fathers Son Jesus the Christ
Muslims worship a false god in allah
It is Muslims who say allah Akbar which most accurately means allah is greater
Greater than the Judeo Christian God
Allah is the pre Islamic regional god that Mohammed’s clan worshipped along with other gods
Never give the dignity to allah that God alone deserves
Christians and Muslims believe in Jesus Christ.
Fun fact - Allah is Arabic for God.
 February 22, 2015 at 7:13pm
Pure Islamic style deception and willing MSM lying
There were 20 Muslims only
Read and view it at
 February 13, 2015 at 11:38am
Too bad the vile perp wasn’t inside with his hands tied and his genitalia nailed to the floor.
 December 16, 2014 at 11:00am
My husband was killed four years ago in a quite similar manner by being hit from the rear, except his car rolled several times and also hit a pole. He, too, died at the scene. His killer, originally sentenced on gross negligence manslaughter to prison for 10 years, mandatory 6 is now is a half-way house minimum security facility getting ready to get out and resume her life. No justice in this life.
Why this protracted delay? Either they are fearful for their lives because they found no evidence of wrongdoing OR the far more likely version, sad to say, that they needed a “talking to” by certain govt powers to “remind” them they need to find the cop guilty of something, if not murder. Either way, riots will ensue.
most likely they are waiting for people to get home to families, and children to get home from school.
 June 24, 2014 at 11:12am
The powers-that-be are demographically changing the country into one they can manage easier.
As far as the tactic of using children to induce Christian guilt, read Camp of the Saints and see how that worked out for European civilization.
June 12, 2014 at 9:50pm
It’s Wag the Dog time at the Obama House. They need to distract, so make up a great story and then bring home “Ol Bowe” and make him a hero– but it might end like the movie, too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjerGldHsD8
[-1] June 6, 2014 at 12:19pm
“the children are innocent”.
But the mother who died deserved it because she was guilty of what, being WHITE?
 May 7, 2014 at 4:50pm
The sign read
(there was some other word below this but the sign was curled on it)
Why the focus on the homosexual part I don’t know, the shrieking guy seemed to hate the whole message. Typical progressive who is intolerant of any belief but their own. No doubt it hit close to home for him as he was passionate as well as violently vulgar in response. He should have been charged with assault.
When will some so-called conservative libertarians ever learn to read/see the UNEDITED version before deciding to commence to eating their own folks so as not to be labeled “racist” which as I recall, not too long ago on Glenn Beck Radio, the three guys were saying was not a label they were even concerned with because it was simply a ploy by the progressives to shut people up.
A "black" man with "white" speech, speaks out on Bundy's Negro comments:
I am a "black" man raised in a black and white family, though I speak with a "white" tongue. Maybe I can shed a different light on the happenings in Nevada, in light of Bundy's "Negro" comments. I'm glad we have the uncensored video taped interview.
Bundy's key words about the federal government are: we can make a difference right now by taking care of some of these Bureaucracies, and do it in a PEACEFUL WAY.
Bundy's key words about Whites are: their FAMILY structures are worse than Spanish families.
Bundy's key words about Blacks are: Their FAMILY structures are worse than Spanish families, they don't have anything to do, they have less freedom, they aren't happy. We sure don't want the colored people to go back. Are they better off under government subsidy?
Bundy's key words about illegal Spanish are: We sure don't want the Mexican people to go back. We need their family background. So, forgive their illegal entry. They work hard. They're together, they picnic together, they're spending their time together, they're awful nice people.
So, Bundy concludes the two solutions are: 1) the peaceful 'taking care' of bureaucracies and
2) the strengthening of the health of the black and white families through the forgiveness of illegal Spanish families. We NEED them to help repair (by example) the destruction of the FAMILY structure in the Black and White American families.
I ask one question: Have most Americans become PC police - to further destroy America?
Bundy does not speak eloquently, however, in the midst of his battle with the federal government he chooses (while he has the microphone) to compassionately address his concerns for 3 groups in America: the whites, the blacks and the illegal Mexicans. Without a high education, or eloquent speech he spells it out loud and clear to the country he loves. Bundy is not, like some: trying to pit these 3 groups against each other; nor is he trying to overthrow the federal government by force. The American public needs to kindly and peacefully enter into live public debate over all 4 positions Bundy addresses. How else do we peacefully grow back into a more cohesive United States of America, allowing to "all", the freedom to openly believe and express their faith in the God of the Bible; while never denying anyone else's freedom to not believe in the God of the Bible. It's not the color of our skin that matters. It's what we truly "believe and follow" that matters. My Black and White family is not an anomaly in America. (Politically correct is slavery) As one 'Founder' put it: "Give me Liberty or give me Death". As one 'Contemporary' put it: "Freedom Works". As one of God's chosen people put it: "As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." As the One God of the Bible puts it: "If you love me, you will obey my commands." Maybe, by loving God, we can get back to 'honoring
April 25, 2014 at 11:11am
Listen and watch this entire 3 plus minute “interview” of Cliven Bundy in the “rant” and notice what the N.Y. Times omitted and what they highlighted and P.C.’d to the hilt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agXns-W60MI
Listen as he first says he watched the first and last Watts riots and understood the “colored people” were rightly upset with their lot, and he doesn’t want those times of discrimination to return for them or for the Mexican people. Out of compassion, he notes the lifestyle of Nevada city “Negroes” as being bleak and meaningless. Then he says the remarks that really got him into trouble– that they “never learned to pick cotton” — I’ve heard that expression numerous times by rural, usually older people about ANYONE who has not lever done hard manual labor, because cotton picking is certainly that. It’s an expression akin to saying “Gotta a hard roe to hoe” or asking to see your hands (for callouses) when you say how hard you worked. It’s an idiom kind of thing. He went on extolling Mexicans and saying they’re better than White folks but of course the N.Y. Times doesn’t mention it
This man is not anything but a decent, hard-working, honorable Mormon American as far as I can tell, but the Government/MSM vowed to fight him with all their powers and they have, through the Alinsky techniques by calling him a racist. Come on, folks, this is always what the other side does to their “enemies”. Glenn Beck should recognize this, they’ve used it o
April 18, 2014 at 4:49pm
I think Beck has lost many listeners’ trust/respect because he seems focused on selling his many products and preach and say what a prophet/amazing person he is and how God gives him messages all the time. And all his constant talk of his problems and illnesses, and his rapidly changing moods are just too much drama for a manly man. Embarrassing, and off-putting really. That movie, The Master, seemed a little too close to some of Beck’s behavior/routine. He says he doesn’t want “followers” yet seems upset at anyone who doesn’t believe his every word.
This country is sunk, sadly, and an oligarchy is in firm control and we are living The Matrix. We al need to be careful, so maybe Beck is simply trying to be the last minnow eaten by the shark, as regards his stance on the Bundys. I suppose the govt. hates him as much as it does Limbaugh and I don’t blame them for protecting themselves or their families but Beck needs to stop pretending he is fearless and ready to shoot folks at a moment’s notice, then go all Gandhi and sunder to evil.
Also, I doubt if many of us need Beck to tell us we need to have a good relationship with the Lord and should try to be good Christians.
Oh, whatever happened to Beck’s bizarre plan to build a self-contained city? He never talks of it any longer, does he? Maybe even he doesn’t believe all his grandiose ramblings.
I think you nailed it. The recent comments about the "domestic terrorists" (heavy sarcasm here) simply caused those of us who listen to and respect beck's opinion to re-examine his behavior.
He used to be just ADD and it was OK cuz he was on the right track(s)....But something else has changed (money/ambition?) and it doesnt pass the smell test.
Here's a remedy to Beck-itis.
April 14, 2014 at 2:55pm
The federal govt. shouldn’t own any land except what’s under the white house — the national parks/forest/wilderness, too. Other than that, private property should be the rule — open the land to the citizens for purchase like in the old days.
According to Article 1, Section 8, clause 17. They can't even have forests or parks. The purposes for which the FEDS may acquire land are very specific.
"erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings"
The Making of America, p 458.
"Mr Gerry contended that this power might be made use of to enslave any particular State by buying up its territory, and that the strongholds proposed would be a means of awing the State into an undue obedience to the Genl. Government--
Mr. King thought himself the provision unnecessary, the power being already involved: but would move to insert after the word "purchased" the words "by the consent of the Legislature of the State" This would certainly make the power safe.
Mr. Govr Morris 2ded. the motion, which was agreed to nem: con: as was then the residue of the clause as amended."
April 14, 2014 at 2:31pm
I stand with Cliven Bundy, this is about States Rights. I’m not LDS, but Catholic btw for those that think this is the Mormons vs. everyone else. So-called public/federal land will be what the Chinese want when they present the USA with a demand for payment, and the USA shouldn’t have any except for the existing national parks/forests/wilderness, all other lands should be held by the People privately.
My only experience with the BLM was back in the 1980s when in Utah. The BLM had cleared with bulldozers and a chain between them a large area of cedars several weeks before and allowed anyone with a firewood permit (which we had) to gather it for firewood. We did and we stopped mid-way and cited and fined for cutting down “live” trees. We were right next to a pile of dead cedars that had been obviously cut some weeks ago by the BLM and were cutting them into manageable pieces and packing them into our pickup. We were flabbergasted and were told that since some of the firewood had “green” leaves we were guilty of killing them. Such is the logic of the government.
March 20, 2014 at 3:11am
Reports said zero calls had been made from any passenger phone in the plane at any time — odd, so they must have been disabled quite early on.
In any case I stand by my belief that the pilot was working with military pilot hijackers and this plane will be used for a seriously horrific scenario if they are able to get away with it. The Islamic jihad idea may be at work here, or that might have been an enticement to the pilot but the true aim may be different, such as a false flag. I had already read about the oxygen element, it’s the overall formulation of a reason that has been missing from the news. This is a cold-blooded bunch and it’s about 100% probable that the majority of the passengers are deceased and the plane is being re-painted and retrofitted with improvements and laden with a bomb, perhaps a tactical nuke to EMP over a major city such as D.C. to destroy it and take down the grid nationwide.
March 19, 2014 at 2:54am
Perhaps the two men with stolen passports were special forces military pilots of some sort and the plane’s pilot was in on the hijack and had trained for it on his home simulator. The 20 Freescale Semiconductor Experts were placed in the front 1st class section more than likely and cell phones were rendered inoperative by some means, maybe electronic jamming. The F.S. Experts along with the military men and the captain were fitted with oxygen masks, then the plane ascended quickly to an elevation and duration to kill the remaining passengers. Then the plane did tactical flying and landed in Diego Garcia to be retrofitted into a deadly stealth weapon for an unknown but nefarious purpose.
Cell phones only work if they are in range of a cell phone tower signal. At the point where the plane was at last radio contact, they would have been too far away from shore, and too high up, for any signal.
According to this article-http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/world/asia/questions-over-absence-of-cellphone-calls-from-missing-passengers.html?_r=0
"...death could come within minutes if someone were the equivalent of outdoors at 45,000 feet. But without information on the speed of depressurization, it is hard to predict the medical consequences"
"A table used by pilots for “time of useful consciousness” without an oxygen supplement at various altitudes shows only nine to 15 seconds at 45,000 feet, compared with five to 10 minutes at 22,000 feet."
If the cockpit and the cabin are on separate air/pressure systems, then oxygen masks weren't even necessary. The hijackers enter the cockpit (this pilot and co-pilot have invited passengers into the cockpit before), the plane then ascends to 50,000 feet, and the cabin is depressurized long enough to knock out/kill the passengers. (Once they were unconscious it would have been easy to take their cell phones and tie them up while allowing them to live-such as perhaps the Freescale employees).
The plane then descends to the very low altitude required to fly below radar etc, which the pilot/hijackers knew would be close enough to the ground for cell phones to work. Not a huge leap of reason.