I get the feeling that their honesty for both is running neck and neck.
April 21, 2015 at 4:22pm
The only problem with the glorious law is that the legislators failed to also mandate that everyone should be happy with the results or be punished further. People are happy if it’s legally required. That’s how it works.Therefore the need is clear for a minimum joy law to apply to everyone, with a grandfather exception for grumpy the cat
 April 19, 2015 at 2:48pm
people keep returning. the ads generate big money. This, the worst site of all for that nonsense, is not likely to change away from it. People keep coming back.
April 19, 2015 at 2:31pm
monkeys have tails. This thing was an ape, not a monkey.
 April 19, 2015 at 11:26am
Nay, but by the devil himself through his surrogates of which you only named one
 April 16, 2015 at 12:49am
So she ends the misery of the beast, provides food for a village, and she’s supposed to be miserable about it? Her explanation is good. What I read in the comments says that when minds are made up, it doesn’t matter to them.
I don't have a problem with hunting, but her explanation is pure nonsense. You think those African villagers were just waiting for someone to come along to kiII the giraffe? Come on...
 April 16, 2015 at 12:38am
Wouldn’t it be great if people who make claims about the motivations of others were honest?
April 16, 2015 at 12:35am
the head of the democrat party says a woman should have the absolute right over her body, even to the point of murdering her unborn baby at the point of delivery if that’s her pleasure. But the attitudes about allowing that same woman to defend herself seem to transfer the rights to those who would harm her. They apparently should have the absolute right over her body, even to the point of killing her just like she can kill her baby. Weird thinking, these individuals have. Play death forward. Then comes along the rational thinkers in this story and the world begins to look right again.
 April 14, 2015 at 5:45am
Never give up!
April 14, 2015 at 5:43am
Straight-Hate pays. It’s dirty money, but that doesn’t bother some people.
 April 14, 2015 at 5:40am
think. Take some time and think. Your question only makes sense when that step is left out.
 April 11, 2015 at 7:47pm
Beating people up for calling you on your uncivilized behavior? consistent.
 April 11, 2015 at 7:42pm
She’s a bullying victim. When people are on equal ground to state opinion, that is good. When one group gets vicious and nasty because they don’t agree but still insist on rights for themselves that they refuse to recognize for others, that’s a tyranny. Mobs will be mobs.
Clinton-Castro ticket might be honest but it would take the standard chicanery. Assuming Anthony Wiener and Erik Holder don’t make a surprise Hillary-derailing run as Wiener-Holder. Castro doesn’t have to run, she just needs PeeWee Herman as his place holder in a Remington Steele sort of way. If they’re going to be deceptive they might as well get colorful
April 11, 2015 at 7:23pm
Low hanging fruit for a self centered dolt: go where previous administrations had the sense not to go and hob nob with “leaders” previous administrations had the decency to avoid, His idea about what constitutes ‘historic’ reminds me of a misguided tween who thinks that being grown up means smoking, having sex with old men, cussing, and behaving badly. That’s not ‘adult’, it’s just stupid.