User Profile: Strasser

Strasser

Member Since: November 09, 2012

Comments

123
  • April 17, 2014 at 9:35pm

    Filthy Harry is right, what happened the WAS an act of domestic terrorism. But it was the BLM who were the terrorists, backed by their granddaddy moneyman Harry, who is clearly using the power of his corruption-protected Senate seat to use the power of the federal government against the people of his own state. There could be no better demonstration of why the 17th Amendment was a disaster and why the states need the original Constitutional plan for state-legislature-appointed senators to provide some recourse against this kind of rogue bully.

  • February 20, 2014 at 3:33pm

    Actually that is a variety of cholla, but not a jumping cactus based on my understanding of the beast (I’m 20 years an Arizonan). The name “jumping cactus” refers to a variety also known ironically as the “Teddy Bear Cholla”. But painful nonetheless.

    Responses (1) +
  • December 6, 2013 at 1:57am

    That seems to be standard operating procedure these days. Do you suppose the search warrant included seizure of guns and ammunition in addition to spray paint? Yes, ******* media, these must be truly vile and horrid rednecks if they have nearly half a box of shotgun shells strewn about the house!

  • December 1, 2013 at 10:54pm

    I think it’s time for American women to stop living in this little fantasy world where “fat is beautiful” and thin or athletic women are to be hated and ridiculed. This mentality is used as an excuse by too many to completely let themselves go and have all the excuses they need to rationalize it. Face the reality, repent the sins of sloth and gluttony, and stop hating those who achieve what you have not. Simple Christian principles. Same goes for men with massive beer guts!

    Responses (1) +
  • November 21, 2013 at 1:59pm

    Texas-Freedom, the answer may be very simple–Reid and the C0mmies may simply have decided that, one way or another, they will never lose control of the senate again. That could happen in many ways, some more subtle, some downright violent.

  • November 9, 2013 at 10:33am

    Cruz Missile, I know what you mean–it’s nice to think the President should help set the moral compass for America. But Founding principles and the Constitution seem pretty clear–the government has no business forcing marriage laws on the states.

  • [1] November 6, 2013 at 2:24pm

    this debacle was very much the fault of the Virginia Libertarian Party and those who voted for Sarvis. The Dems did what they always do to win–they cheated, they stacked the deck, they bullied with big money. What did the Libertarian Party do? They ran a candidate who was backed by an Obama bundler and whose record placed him far to the progressive side of Cuccinelli, any why? Arrogance? Incompetence? Blind ambition? Deliberate sabotage?

    And what of all those who voted for Sarvis? Even the most rudimentary vetting of the candidates and application of intellectual honesty would have shown their “candidate” was a fraud, and that Cuccinelli would have been a better choice. Again, arrogance? Ignorance? Blind obedience to anyone with an “L” after his name???

    To the narrow-minded demagogues equating questioning the wisdom of a third party to supporting the “establishment” GOP, congrats on honing your Alinskyite skills, but they are ignorant and misplaced. The argument here is whether to establish a third party or to fight to take the GOP back from the Progressives. Cuccinelli represented a huge primary victory toward that end, and voting for him yesterday would have had the GOP RINO’s p**ing in their little pink panties.

    Instead today they are laughing at you and at all of us. NICE job.

  • November 4, 2013 at 1:22pm

    from 6 to 3 Republican to 5 to 4 Democrat. Yet the Libertarian Party authored proud articles in the wake of those election disasters bragging about how much of the vote they won.
    What exactly did the people of America or Arizona win thanks to rigid ideology taking priority over common sense? I am a conservative libertarian who hates the “establishment GOP” with passion, but I see nothing but harm coming from the arrogance and intolerance of the Libertarian Party in these cases. They seem to be too proud and too stubborn to stand down in close elections for the good of the nation–even when the Republican candidate is a small government Constitutionalist.
    In Virginia the Libertarian Party–and those who vote for their candidate based only on party affiliation–should be looking at the reality: that a solid conservative who would likely do a lot of good for the state and for the cause of small government is on the verge of losing to a corrupt progressive statist because their candidate, who is not even a libertarian, is siphoning votes from Cuccinelli. What good will their pride and ambition have done for the people of Virginia should that outcome become reality tomorrow afternoon?

  • November 4, 2013 at 1:21pm

    My two cents:

    Tomorrow’s gubernatorial election in Virginia is threatening to be a perfect demonstration of the disaster of having a 3rd party in an election. Currently just a few points separate the two main candidates–Terry McAuliffe, a vile, long-time leftist operative, and Ken Cuccinelli, a solid conservative with strong “Tea Party” beliefs and record as Virginia’s Attorney General–in spite of McAuliffe outspending Cuccinelli 10 to 1 and having the backing of all the national-level left-wing heavy hitters.
    And then there’s Robert Sarvis. Running as a Libertarian, Sarvis has anything but a libertarian record–by all accounts he is more a big-spending, big-government progressive than a libertarian–which has led many to conclude that he is in the race only as a spoiler to guarantee Cuccinelli will lose to McAuliffe. And indeed that appears to be what’s about to happen: latest polls show Sarvis has about 9% of the projected vote–likely more than enough to turn a Cuccinelli win into a McAuliffe theft.
    Should this come to pass, it will be far from the first time the presence of a Libertarian Party candidate will have helped propel a leftist progressive into power. In Arizona’s 2012 elections, two of that state’s 9 U.S. House seats were turned over from very promising conservative Republican candidates to extremely liberal Democrats thanks to the presence of Libertarian candidates in those districts, tipping the state’s House representation from 6 to 3 Rep

    Responses (1) +
  • October 1, 2013 at 3:10pm

    So they don’t have money to keep the monuments “open”, but they have the money to print up signs and put up barriers to make it clear tht they have no money? Another case of deliberate stupidity by this moronic government.

  • September 25, 2013 at 6:28pm

    Cruz left a lot of opportunity untouched in his skirmishes with Durbin, but still made a fool of the old commie. Reid showed himself to be the hateful, rat-faced gangster that we all know he is.

  • September 19, 2013 at 2:53pm

    Amazing…women hate it sooooooo much when men think with their genitals–why are they so proud that they vote with theirs???

  • September 13, 2013 at 12:21pm

    The gummint will never allow any degree of control over the border until they are forced into submission by the states, because as SlyOldDog points out, the Reps want the cheap labor, the Dems want the votes–and the CIA and Pentagon want the billions in drug profits they share with the cartels. Our government is beyond out of control, and the lives of millions of Americans–let alone illegal Mexicans–mean NOTHING to them.

  • September 13, 2013 at 12:09pm

    No, they are not racist, and it’s an idiotic waste of time for all these control freaks and liberals to keep harrassing everyone who uses a word they’ve decided they don’t like to hear. If the New Jersey Generals were renamed the Redskins, I can see where it would be offensive, but the Redskins football team use the name proudly and native Americans should be proud to be thought of so highly. Why does anyone need to be so painfully sensitive about their skin color? And why do these same groups and individuals go after teams with names like “Iroquois” and “Cherokees”? Are their own names so offensive to them, or are the complainers enemy tribes? Grow up and grow a skin for God’s sake, and it doesn’t matter what color.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 10, 2013 at 4:20pm

    Don’t be so happy for the US to no longer be the world’s superpower–because along with losing that status, we’re also losing our status as the world’s beacon of freedom and democracy. As we descend into insignificance at the world’s negotiating tables, so we descend into a police state within our own borders. We need to rid ourselves of the cancer of Obama/Boehner/Reid and their progressive regime, and restore ourselves to freedom and our best place in the world–a powerful but peaceful nation that leads not with the strength of its military, but with the strength of its principles.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 4, 2013 at 3:11pm

    I’m crying my eyes out over this tragic “suicide”. I’m sure they did everything humanly possible to resuscitate this fine specimen of humanity.

  • September 4, 2013 at 3:05pm

    Wow…what a maroon! Someone drop this self-identified woman into Denver’s gang district with nothing but a ball-point pen and her brilliant command of Colorado state law to protect her.

  • September 4, 2013 at 2:52pm

    So…no US interests in the war and the Arab nations will pay for it? So how does this not make us Hessians doing the Arabs’ dirty work? I like how these Progressive warmongers think having someone else pay for it somehow solves the moral issue.

  • September 3, 2013 at 4:04pm

    Amen Drudge! “Democrat” and “Republican” mean NOTHING any more! You are either a Constitutional conservative / libertarian or you are a Progressive/authoritarian/statist! Priebus, Boehner, Cantor, Graham, and McCain have been charging full speed ahead into full-blown statism for 5 years now, dragging the rest of the Republican party with them. They are screaming out for tens of millions of voters to wash their hands of them and run from them as fast as they can.

    I believe we can still take back the GOP, but several things have to happen:

    1) The real conservatives in the party need to aggressively work to dump Boehner as Speaker and install someone with a few principles.

    2) We need to bombard our conservative reps and senators with emails and phone calls of support, and bombard the statist RINO’s with angry demands that they sit down and shut up. Post these also on their facebook pages so that hundreds or thousands of others will read your comments and might be moved to similar action.

    3) We need to stop all support of the GOP and instead give directly to candidates who share our belief in the Constitution–and not just in our own district! Imagine if 10,000,000 people across the country donated to a good primary challenger to Boehner in the 2014 elections–or to good conservative challengers across the country!

  • August 20, 2013 at 3:54pm

    As soon as we make this fight about impeaching Obama, WE LOSE. That battle can’t be won, and in any cae it is a diversion from the real problem: that we have an out of control system that no longer gives a cr** about the Constitution or the people. THAT’s the problem we need to focus on.

123