TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Sunspots's 10 most recent comments.

• ‘That’s One of the Dumbest Questions I’ve Ever Heard’: Sen. McCain Responds to a Reporter’s Benghazi Question

  November 14, 2012 at 7:55pm

  I don’t normally agree with squishy pro-amnesty RINO McCain, but good for him! Maybe he took a lesson from Newt on calling out the media. Hope he keeps it up.

• U.N. Declares Contraception a ‘Universal Human Right’ for ‘Women and Adolescents’

  November 14, 2012 at 7:52pm

  So access to family planning and birth control are a human right? Ok, where does this end? If a man has a limp noodle, does access to viagra become a human right? If a woman has a thyroid condition, such as myself, should access to thyroid replacement hormone be a human right and paid for by the taxpayers since an out of whack thyroid can and does affect fertility? What about if someone has a fetish and can’t get in the mood without whatever the object of their fetish, will access and government subsidized access to these objects become a human right? How about toys, will sex toys be included because somewhere some liberal, lesbian feminist believes everyone should have access to a strap on, it is a human right, and government should provide them because not doing so is discrimination against lesbians?

  What next? What else will these socialist idiots claim to be a human right next?

• Obama Promises Immigration Reform After Inauguration: Comprehensive Bill and Pathway to Citizenship

  November 14, 2012 at 7:36pm

  After Reagan’s amnesty we were promised no more and never again. We were also told his amnesty would stop the problem. It failed. If politicians think another amnesty will stem the flow of illegals, they are delusional. GOP needs to understand agreeing to any amnesty will only give more votes to the democrats and cost the GOP votes. Another amnesty will only open the flood gates further and embolden the next wave to be even more demanding that we, the citizens, change our country and bend to their will. Enough!

  If we must allow some of the current illegals to stay for whatever reason, if our government is going to be too squishy to kick them all out, then NO pathway to citizenship! How does it make any sense to even consider rewarding illegal entry with citizenship and voting rights? Give those who must stay a legal residency with no path ever to citizenship,have them learn english, make it so they can’t get any federal assistance for at least 15 years, and if they break any laws then their legal status gets revoked and they get deported. And do away with birthright citizenship anchor babies and birther tourism! Birthright citizenship only for those born to citizens or legal permanent residents, not visa holders and not illegals.

  How can we have immigration reform when we aren’t even enforcing our current laws to know what needs to change? Melt the phone lines, no amnesty, no path to citizenship.

• TheBlaze Live Chat Rewind: Epic Countdown to Donald Trump’s Noon Obama Announcement!

  October 24, 2012 at 12:14pm

  So Trump’s epic announcement is that he will donate $5 million to Obama’s charity of choice if Obama releases his college and passport records by Oct. 31st? Really? While I do appreciate Trump reminding the public that Obama has kept so much about himself secret and is challenging him, Trump is wrong to believe donating to a charity will motivate or inspire Obama. Obama doesn’t care about charity or others, so he’s not going to take the bait unless there is a major outcry from people relentlessly demanding Obama’s records and he sees a drop in poll numbers.

• ‘I’m Not Stopping’: Penn. Woman Faces $600 Daily Fine for Feeding Hungry Children

  August 14, 2012 at 11:25am

  Ok, so she was feeding the kids at her church with no problem, but then when she had her second baby she started feeding the kids at her private home instead of the church to make it easier for herself and the township says she can’t do that without a permit. So move the meal service back to the church! Sounds like this woman, while doing a good deed, wants her neighbors to accomodate her want to stay home with her baby and ignore the additional noise and traffic to her home she is creating by moving the meal service from the church to her home.

  While I agree what this woman is doing is a very nice, charitable thing and she should be applauded for her volunteer work and caring about the kids in a way that their own parents don’t seem to care about them, I also understand her neighbors not being thrilled with her yard being turned into a daily soup kitchen with kids running around and making noise. The kids can still get the free meals, but do it back at the church so the people who bought houses in a private, quiet area can continue the peaceful enjoyment of their homes.

• Exclusive: TheBlaze Interviews the Guy Fired for Berating a Chick-fil-A Employee (Updated with Quotes)

  August 3, 2012 at 6:34pm

  So he’s not sure what he would say to the employee he verbally assaulted and would have to think up the words? Um, how about “I’m sorry. I was wrong to do that to you.” That would be a good start. The fact that those words were not the first to come out of his mouth when asked what he would say to the woman shows me that he is not sorry at all. I also have trouble believing he’s getting as many threats as he claims. And I am not buying into his poor me excuse. So what if he has a wife and four children, he should have thought about them before acting like a jerk. He went there to harrass the staff and have his say while he filmed himself, and he posted the video without a care of how he looked or how ulgy he had been to an innocent woman just trying to earn a living, and now he can’t even say he is sorry and wants us to have sympathy for him because people reacted negatively to his ugly rant and abuse of an innocent person. Typical liberal.

• Polygamous ‘Sister Wives’ Family Continues Utah Legal Battle Despite Promise Not to be Prosecuted

  July 25, 2012 at 11:55am

  Is it really polygamy if there is no legal marriage? As far as I can tell, this guy has one legal wife and three mistresses who his wife knows about and welcomes into their home. If their marriages are “spiritual” only, if they are married in their hearts but not in the eyes of the law, then who cares if he calls them wives, mistresses, turnips or whatever. He’s not a polygamist, he’s an adulterer.

  Granted, UT law says it is illegal to call someone you are not legally married to a wife, and even goes so far as to make it illegal to live together out of wed lock, but like many laws in many states they don’t enforce those laws unless there is other criminal activity. It seems to me the Browns made issue for themselves by going public and thumbing their noses at the law in order to gain fame and fourtune, now they are complaining about attention they brought on themselves with their choices and trying to keep the issue alive when the state has pretty much said they will leave them alone.

• Offensive? Navy SEAL Training Includes Shooting at Targets Shaped Like Muslim Woman

  June 30, 2012 at 11:17am

  Why is the media being given access to SEAL training sites? I think that is the bigger question. I don’t want our enemy to know what kind of training our guys go through. Sick of this PC nonsense, make everyone feel good, open our doors and reveal our secrets to all trend that is happening. What the military does for training should be kept behind closed doors so we always keep the enemy wondering what we can do, so when we do have to strike it is that much more scary for the bad guys because they foolishly underestimated what our guys can do.

  I have no problem with targets being realistic pictures of what the enemy may look like. If CAIR doesn’t like it, they can kiss my rear. What are they going to do about it? Throw another one of their hissy fits? Whatever! I say keep shooting the targets that look like the enemy so our guys are prepared for anything and everything that may come at them. If the enemy doesn’t like it or some leftist wimp thinks it is mean, oh well, boo hoo.

• ‘Raping Their Innocence’: Parents Outraged After School Principal Allegedly Teaches 5th Graders About Oral & Anal Sex

  June 15, 2012 at 12:56am

  When did sex ed become a “how to” class? When I was in school sex ed consisted of one day in health class covering what to expect when going through puberty (most of us already knew this, but there were a couple kids without parents who talked to them), basic anatomy with proper names, that male and female parts fit together and that is how a baby is made, and if you didn’t want a baby then it was up to you to not have sex or use birth control. We also learned that condoms prevent the spread of diseases and some diseases kill, and that no one should touch you if you don’t want them to and no means no. That was it. No “how to” on techniques or positions or anything else, no props or graphic pictures or practicing on a banana, and no discussion of oral sex…and somehow, as we got older and became sexually active, we all managed to figure out what to do just fine without some adult giving us step-by-step instructions. In fact, figuring it out was part of the fun! Why do liberals believe teaching such graphic details on how to do things to such young kids is acceptable? What is their goal other than to freak out kids or desensitize them to sexual activity so much that they believe casual sex is healthy and normal and become sexual even younger than they already are doing? I’m so glad I do not have kids in public school and that my niece is being home schooled.

• Drag Queens & Dancers Party Through Tel Aviv for Annual Gay Pride Parade

  June 8, 2012 at 11:13am

  I keep waiting for there to be a straight pride parade. And a straigt pride flag. When do we get a parade and a flag to identify our sexuality so we can pretend others should stop what they are doing and give a flying hoot about what we do in our bedrooms?

  Dammit! I want a flag!

  Speaking of flags. The other day I was in the grocery store and there was a mom with an adorable little girl, about four years old, wearing a t-shirt with a rainbow on it. Most people would think “hey, cute kid” and move on, but no, some guy in his mid-20′s, who has grown up being indoctrinated into believing sexuality is all that makes up a person’s identity and nothing else matters, has the nerve to say to the mother that it is good she is teaching her daughter about diversity and gay rights. The mother looked confused and I had to say something, so I looked at the guy and informed him that sometimes a rainbow is just a rainbow and little girls like rainbows and glitter and sparkly things just because they are pretty, not because they have an agenda, and he needed to back off. He didn’t like that. I think I hurt his little feelings by not embracing his statement. Oh well.