User Profile: swampy57

Member Since: August 20, 2012

CommentsDisplaying swampy57's 10 most recent comments.

  • I like things simple.

    Don’t make this over complicated by bring up things that do not directly apply. If you want to see how far things have become out of balance, just exchange 2 words in this story. Where it says “white” let it say “black” and where it says ‘black” change it to “white”. Then if the story was ‘black’ family attacked by ‘white’ trash low-lifes, at a gas station on a public road because they were told they were the wrong color in the wrong neighborhood we would have a whole different response, wouldn’t we? You bet there would be. I wouldn’t be surprised if that part of the city got put on lockdown until a DOJ abuse of power made people pay dearly. Then many others would to continue to pay in the future when the incident is repeatedly brought back up as a case of discrimination each time someone’s demands run out of reason or logic. Invoking the incident should be enough reason to give in to their demands when someone just doesn’t get what they want. If that doesn’t work on it’s own, maybe same thing with more volume will.

    Do you see the difference between that likely outcome and what is really happening? This difference is how far we are out of balance. It is a second grade math, subtraction lesson to realize a difference. This difference is how far we are from simple right and wrong.

    I like things simple.

  • So she didn’t answer the question. Couldn’t or wouldn’t? Instead she chose to remind Senator Cruz of the only thing she could, her seniority and more experience. She must really think people are stupid because just one look at her and anyone could see that set of radials has way too much road wear on them for safe driving.

    So she didn’t answer the question. Instead she alluded to her Harvey Milk experience as first hand. Hey girl, I thought that dude was shot with a revolver. Those aren’t on your list of assault weapons so is what you are proposing only phase 1? Your traumatic, life defining issue still wouldn’t be solved so there will be more to do? Besides, I and a lot of others have seen that much and worse. That is why I own; so I don’t end up like any of that. Hey wait girl, don’t you own and conceal carry too? Is that a double standard or do you just have an evil twin?

    So she didn’t answer the question. How could she if her motivation is based in agenda rather than the principles behind our gaurenteed rights? If she was in the right she would be able to answer. Truth and true principles shine for what they are in the light of day. A response that needs to be kept in the dark is one that would be exposed for what it really is in the open light of day.

    So she didn’t answer the question. Hey girl, don’t you know that sometimes no answer IS an answer? This would be one of those times.

    I swear, that woman puts the DF in “WDF?”.

  • Of course she will get the position. She has already paid for it. $35 to 40 miilion is nothing compared to what she will make back in profits once she has the power for her own use.

    http://hillbuzz.org/who-is-funding-the-purchase-of-the-35-million-beachfront-hawaiian-estate-for-barack-and-michelle-obama-to-move-into-come-january-2013-2013

  • General Mattis,

    Your country needs you more than ever. Run for Congress. You began your career fighting Communists. Begin a new one doing the same thing. The only difference would be is that the enemy this country needs help defeating now are not in the ‘foreign’ half as defined in the oath of enlistment.

    I could just picture the day you were no longer under the restraint of having to answer to civilians that couldn’t buy a clue with a credit card but instead were on the same level or station as them. But clearly not the same as them. Think about it. Your country may need you now more than ever.

    I can almost hear your response. ‘Are you saying that I would HAVE TO be around politicians all the time? Boy, how long have you been stupid?’ Or words to that effect.

    Ok, dumb idea. But something-something times, something-something measures and there is a whole lot of something going on.

    Semper Fi

  • She had no choice but to fake it. If she did anything real, it would be different than all of the other things that are fake about this regime. Then people would have something to compare to and they might be able to tell the difference between fake and real.

    Do you see? All fup duck the same makes things equal too.

    DNC, if you have already started looking for 2014 campaign slogans, feel free to use that line.

  • Well they do have an accessory attachment that is a clown head you attach to the muzzle. The bullet will come out the clown’s mouth and it looks like the clown is saying, “Oh”. So that makes people feel all good and they don’t realize BFH theory is about to be applied to them. For our enemies that may be afraid of clowns, not understand clowns because of cultural differences, or perhaps are even clowns themselves I heard they were developing alternatives. I think they are working on teddy bears, friendly lions, and little yellow ducky heads. But it really doesn’t matter because the end result is BFH theory is put in practice.

    The 45 ACP is a much better round than the 9mm for a military weapon. A 9mm will penetrate and do damage but only if it hits something vital. The wound that results from using required ball ammo looks like it was made with a drill. On the other hand, a 45 ACP looks like someone used a pick ax. In CQC, which would you rather have in your hands to fight with?

    As far as capacity, to get the same effect as a single 45 ACP, you have to shoot the target 2 or 3 times with a 9mm. So 7 rounds is the same as 14 – 21 9mm if you are actually shooting to hit and do damage.

    Some people say the 45 ACP is old technology compared to 9mm but in truth, the 45 came out in 1911, hence the pistol model number and the 9mm came out in 1908 for the German Luger. German training even stated to ‘use 2 rounds for each target’.

  • Dogwater,
    You are right about using 6 to 8 round magazines. I could switch out. But then I would need 4 or 5 other people to maintain the same sustained rate of fire while we were each doing that in turn. But if it is against tyrannical government forces it would be a good thing. So wouldn’t it be even a better thing if all 5 or 6 of us had 30 round capacity at our disposal. It would be a force multiplier. Besides that, having 10 30 round magazines each versus having 10 6 round magazines each would also provide for some additional staying power and endurance in a fight.

    Besides, they ALWAYS use those 30 round magazines in the zombie movies.

  • Gov. Cuomo,
    I don’t need 10 bullets to kill a deer. I need the magazines that hold 30 rounds to be prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse. Haven’t you been reading your memo’s from FEMA? Our federal government has been telling us to be prepared for that. If we do what you say, how will we be prepared for that with just grandpa’s old shotgun? Haven’t you seen any of those movies? Those things come at you more than 2 at a time.

    Worse yet, what if some pencil neck little word weasel in the White House (I hope that is not being racist) decides he is a king or royalty or something like that and tries to do some social re-engineering like Pol Pot or the other members of the 20th Century Dictators Club did? They all tried to ‘Fundamentally transform’ things or words to that effect. That would be a lot worse than a zombie apocalypse because a lot of people would not see it coming until it was too late. In the movies you can at least always tell which ones are the zombies.

    In closing Gov. Cuomo, go pound sand. You want to back your words with actions, you go walk around Grand Central station without a protection detail or carrying a weapon for a few days then we can revisit this topic. I think some of the people down there were in those zombie movies. I am so grateful I do not live in your fup duck state where thinking like this is the cause, not the solution, of most of the problems you have. Especially when the solution to failed ideas is more of the same stupid

  • We need more sword control laws in this country! Forget the 2nd Amendment. This time we will do it right. We need to have anything including a pointy stick to be considered an assault weapon. It all needs to be registered, regulated, and transfer taxed because you can put an eye out with even a pointy stick. We need to do this to protect the children. They need to be brainwashed into believing pointy sticks are dangerous things. Remember, people don’t kill people. Pointy sticks kill people. Ok, that doesn’t happen very often but it could. And that is what needs to be regulated; anything that is possible. We need to control every possibility.

    “I am Barack Obama and that is why I am running for President”.

    Ok, seriously on an emotional development level above that of a 12-year old, I hope the employee becomes Employee of the Month and wins free visits to a local gun range.