User Profile: TAKING OUR GOV. BACK

TAKING OUR GOV. BACK

Member Since: December 20, 2010

CommentsDisplaying TAKING OUR GOV. BACK's 10 most recent comments.

  • 10 Stupid Things Christian Pastors Should Never Do

    December 6, 2012 at 2:02pm

    In reply to Blacktooth.

    Trinitarianism is a different animal than believing in the trinity. Sounds weird but it’s the truth. One involves the teachings of the Gnostic’s and the other does not.

  • The Third Archon,
    Maybe I am wasting my time simply writing this to you, but someone needs too. If you are going to use any text, make sure you have it in context. Exodus 21:7-8 are only part of the story that fits your rant. The purpose in verse 8 is to redeem (by the master of the father, not the father) or to purchase back the girl (daughter, sold by the master not the father) of a willing slave, a slave that is was bonded out of failure to repay a loan. The part of deception is based on a poor master of a willing slave and he will be accounted for later on in the text. This is still practiced in some Jewish circles and is considered to be the mark of a fair or excellent master. Meaning a man who loves and cherishes his slaves as human beings rather than property, so much so that the slaves refuse to leave their master for fear of not being able to provide as well as he did.

    One more challenge, you say there is and never was any proof of the truth. To argue with one so ideologically stiffened would be a waste of time. So I offer a challenge in return, prove God does not exist. But there must be actual proof, not talking points, or bluffs, and don’t use the Bible. Why, because you don’t believe it is true anyway. If it’s not true then it can’t be used as a lever to prove one.

  • Zap,
    That’s when shock collars come into good use or at least a straight jacket.

    Mac,
    The idea that stealing is not an uncivilized crime is lost in this generation, yes, but the fact still remains that it is uncivilized. It’s amazing how some like you think that the threat is the deterrent rather than the crime. And it was a biblical standard set forth by God through Moses, to chop off the hands of a thief, long before Islam came to be. They just seem to be the only ones holding to it, because it is more effective and cheaper than jail time. Why should we have to continue to pay for their mistakes?

  • I would not like it, but if there are other residents there that wish to decorate for their respected holidays then yes it would need to be permitted under the same right of freedom of religion in a common area. The point is that this is not an owner decision, it is a rented building, even the common areas are for those who pay rent. It is their right as they are paying for care taking services, not lifestyle services. To do so would hinder their right of religious freedom. Under most rental laws this would be assessed as right to the tenant(s). If there is conflict over the use of the area, we are democratic in nature, take a vote by those renting the facility. If you don’t like the way it turns out then leave. If it is a cost decision by the owner because they have been flipping the bill, allow the tenants the option to pay for the added decorations and their installation and removal. Simple really

  • But this not your platform it is theirs, they have the right to maintain sanity as they see fit since they pay for the usage. Say what ever you want, that’s your right, not to print it is theirs. You wanna pay for and maintain the blog, then no one will stop you from saying anything including the blaze. Know your rights and the rights of others before you go all “down with the blaze for taking my rights away”. Dummy they are just using their rights. You have the right to say it, go on say it again, no body stopped you from saying it, they just decided you didn’t need to be printed. Their choice after all it is their money and ink (figuratively).

  • But they don’t want to believe in God, remember the DNC.

  • There is one key element you all are missing: we are already giving up control of the military over to NATO powers. Do you remember how uninvolved the President said we were in Libya, or what about when our black hawks went down and we got into trouble for not telling the UN security forces. We are already subject to certain controls. The real reason that SHIELD has so much control is due to the fact that they have come up with and paid for most of the cool weapons that you see in the film. Though definitely a socialistic secrete security force, they have as good capitalistic practice kept the rights to everything they have contributed to building both for financial gain as well as political control. As a primarily private entity they should be contracted in and not just have judicial authority any time they deem necessary.

    But lets all be as real as possible here. The truth of the matter is that all supper heroes have acted on their own behalf for decades without the consorting with meager governments in the ideals of truth, justice and freedom of mankind. The basic conclusion is that we have never had any kind of control of supper heroes of any type especially the Hulk. Shield is just as above the laws that govern this land as are the heroes. The only one (on screen) to do any time for their wayward destruction of private property was Hancock and that was voluntary to improve his image.