User Profile: Tankboy2adfwd


Member Since: February 16, 2011


  • [2] December 10, 2014 at 1:14pm

    Hold my beer. Hey y’all, watch this!

  • [5] November 15, 2014 at 1:42pm

    Lost his finger playing poker? Never stay in with a hand THAT bad.

  • [2] November 6, 2014 at 1:37pm

    Its obvious to me that the girls rant was staged by the “artist” filming street preachers. Note how she glances directly at the camera during her performance. Enough said.

  • April 10, 2014 at 11:25pm

    Though I hate her politically, I can’t laugh at this or find any joy in it. It’s just not right to throw anything at an old woman.

    Responses (2) +
  • March 31, 2014 at 12:01pm

    They already changed Easter vacation to spring break. Now in most districts, it is nowhere near holy week or Easter. Let them change this now and you will soon see “winter break” begin on New year’s day or sometime in February to save on heating costs in the coldest month. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.

  • July 16, 2013 at 2:28am

    Let me get this straight. She had a restraining order out on him, then went to HIS house without police. She would have been advised to do so under such a no contact order. She did not think he was home. Who opened the door? Did she unlawfully enter HIS house? If he answered the door, she should have left right then. Too many questions I need answered, but on it’s face this does not sound like a justified use of a weapon. All things considered, I believe 20 years is too much unless the charge was attempted murder and was proven in court.

  • July 14, 2013 at 11:12pm


    Responses (1) +
  • June 1, 2013 at 5:34pm

    The driver needs to grow a pair. Rule number 1… When maneuvering around a tornado, drive like you are in a combat zone.

  • May 23, 2013 at 1:13pm

    Confusion? Just read “The Real America”.

  • May 23, 2013 at 1:08pm

    Clearly, a reader of at least one of Glenn Beck’s books.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 19, 2013 at 7:19pm

    She choked. Looks like she was nervous and doubted herself. She screwed up a word and went totally blank. Too bad the stands did not pick up the song sooner. Our national anthem should not be a solo act, anyway. One should lead the song, but the lone voice should be joined by all with nearly equal volume.

    Responses (4) +
  • February 16, 2013 at 9:35am

    The police admit to a lack of evidence to pin the shooting on ANYONE at this point. They likely will not know any more unless they arrest a guy carrying a gun that can be tied to the crime using ballistic forensics, or if someone comes forward who has knowledge of the shooting. It seems to me that when asked if there is evidence to link it to a cartel, the obvious answer is NO. Nobody said it was definitely not a cartel. Given what is known, it is equally possible to be some random 99 percentard shooting into the “all-suites corporate hotel”. The possibilities are too numerous to tie it to any one group or individual without evidence.

  • February 16, 2013 at 9:10am

    You misunderstand the answer. The question asked was IF THERE WAS ANY EVIDENCE to suggest involvement of Mexican drug cartels. The police did not rule out the possibility of a cartel being involved with their answer. They only stated that there was no EVIDENCE found to make that connection. It is BECAUSE they don’t know who did it, that they cannot link it to a cartel this early in the investigation. Let’s be fair and not stuff words into peoples mouths here.

  • February 16, 2013 at 8:59am

    The question was very specific. Did they find evidence of….. The answer was NO. If the question had been, “Is there a possibility of drug cartel involvement?”, perhaps the answer would have been different.

  • February 9, 2013 at 1:09am

    Proofreading is a lost art.

  • February 9, 2013 at 12:09am

    When you shoot an intruder in your home or an assailant aggressing elsewhere, it is self defense. If the same guy is running away life a scared little dog (retreating), by all means keep him in your sight picture but DO NOT FIRE. That is not self defense, but shooting a guy because you’re pissed. Get the plate and call 911. I hope the law goes easy on him, but he made a poor choice. Even in the wild west, it was bad form to shoot a guy in the back.

  • January 30, 2013 at 10:25pm


    Responses (1) +
  • December 27, 2012 at 9:11pm

    Halfway down the trail to Hell,
    In a shady meadow green
    Are the Souls of all dead troopers camped,
    Near a good old-time canteen.
    And this eternal resting place
    Is known as Fiddlers’ Green.
    Marching past, straight through to Hell
    The Infantry are seen.
    Accompanied by the Engineers,
    Artillery and Marines,
    For none but the shades of Cavalrymen
    Dismount at Fiddlers’ Green.
    Though some go curving down the trail
    To seek a warmer scene.
    No trooper ever gets to Hell
    Ere he’s emptied his canteen.
    And so rides back to drink again
    With friends at Fiddlers’ Green.
    And so when man and horse go down
    Beneath a saber keen,
    Or in a roaring charge of fierce melee
    You stop a bullet clean,
    And the hostiles come to get your scalp,
    Just empty your canteen,
    And put your pistol to your head
    And go to Fiddlers’ Green.

    Responses (4) +
  • [4] December 24, 2012 at 9:24pm

    I’ve seen far too many suicides and suicide attempts overseas. Almost all that I had known about involved problems with a relationship. Do any of you have any idea what it feels like to be 7000 miles from home and unable to do anything when things start to fall apart there? When you are a take charge kind of guy, the loss of control over your own life can be too much to bear. Take it from someone who has sat a while with an M-16 under his chin until a mental image of his children crying after being told daddy was never coming home pulled him from that horrible pit of depression. Let’s just tone down the conspiracy BS a bit and show this warrior the respect he is due. Question with boldness. Do not question with ignorance and paranoia.

  • December 20, 2012 at 8:53pm

    Having the police investigate the comments was the right thing to do. They were very vague, could have meant anything, and sounded ominous to at least one parent. When it was found to be a misunderstanding on the part of the alarmed parties, it should have ended right there. Suspension is utterly ridiculous. It seems to me that the school administration is determined to make a big issue out of a non issue. Maybe they feel embarrassed that they raised alarms and are trying to save face? Maybe the administration got themselves so worked up over the comments that they don’t believe the perspective of the police that no wrongdoing was done? At any rate, it boils down to the administration acting stupidly. Can someone say infringement on free speech?

    Responses (1) +