So, is it "right" to condemn others seeking love? Is it "right" to deny them the same opportunities to express that love? Is it "right" to remove rights simply because someone chooses to love who he or she wishes?
When religions start to say it is wrong for people to seek happiness where they can find it, that religion is no longer a value to society...and will soon disappear...
Socialist - Love isn't based on feeling happy. It's based on right and wrong by God's standards. You atheists have tried to eradicate Christianity since it's beginning and you've failed every time.
Considering there are many people who do not believe in this God, yet still find and feel love, it seems your explaination is not an acceptable universal definition of love...
That doesn't mean that it is love since love isn't based on feelings.
What's it based on then, troll? Chemicals? Do you have a chemical fondness for God?
Yes Git do tell how I can't love my son, according to your definition, because I don't have a god belief.
It makes sense you seek to constrain the definition of love, too make it so small it is hardly attainable. I think it is because you lack true love, you have twisted love into something unattainable-something to feel guilt for. Is this why you seem so angry and hateful?
He's angry and hateful because he believes in God, and as anybody with a cursory knowledge of the Bible knows, God is angry and hateful.
 February 17, 2015 at 11:44am
Absolutely, you got it. Put them in Alaskan wilderness with a compass, single match, pocket knife and a map that shows where a cell phone is 50 miles away. If they make it, they get rescued and they will be better people in the long run. If not, we’ll bears have to eat too right?
 February 15, 2015 at 11:42am
Awwww…. I love charming little stories like this where “the baseball bat of truth and reality” impacts the “empty, vapid skull of Liberalism” with a RESOUNDING “THUD”!!!! Nothing like a big dose of Common Sense right between the eyes of idiots who so richly deserve it!!! Maybe they will now remove their heads from their hind quarters next time they walk into a voting booth!!! What a lovely story Blaze, thank you!!!
 February 15, 2015 at 11:20am
Bass O Matic! “That’s great Bass!!! :)
February 12, 2015 at 2:15pm
Maybe his agenda was telling the truth since we don’t seem to be getting much of that from the mainstream media these day and especially when it comes to what homosexuals actually do. It is not a “lifestyle”. It is a specific set of activities. Gay is not something you are, it is something you do. And bless the poor confused messed up child for having to endure an environment that is basically created and less than optimal because of the deviant self centered “pleasure at whatever cost and what ever I want” …adults. ( I won’t use the word parent as it is inappropriate here). But hey if you have evidence to refute this then please by all means….go ahead.
 February 9, 2015 at 9:33pm
Correction , if he were in the military he would have been “put on point” ….until he was no longer a concern….years ago.
February 3, 2015 at 12:02pm
Good choices I like your selection and I hope the primaries go their way. However, just in case one of these guys does not become the candidate that runs against Hillary, then please hold your nose like I will and vote for the lesser of two evils. Do not sit the election out simply because our first choice didn’t make it to the general election! President “Dog Eater” got reelected in 2012 precisely because too many didn’t vote for Romney. As poor as Romney was, he was light years ahead of the Socialist POS we still have now. Vote your heart in the primaries but your head in the general election. That or give the country “Clinton Cancer” for a decade and the next several generations nightmarish futures. I hope one of our guys, a REAL CONSERVATIVE, wins but a poor choice is at least better than a pure evil one. Thanks for your consideration.
 January 20, 2015 at 8:33pm
You know Chief, it has black lifeless eyes….like a doll’s eyes…… Farewell and adieu all you fair Spanish Ladies…..
 January 18, 2015 at 10:29pm
You obviously didn’t live during the Carter years. I did. Here let me help. Take 6+ years of Obama, compress them in to 4, put them in the horrific late 1970s, and instead of a traitorous evil Dog Eater as President substitute a totally incompetent whimpish idiot. THAT WAS CARTER. The ONLY good thing about Carter was that he gave us Ronald Reagan – ONE OF THOSE “RADICAL REPUBLICANS” THAT YOU DISPARAGE. But that one fact alone does make him a tiny bit better than the spawn of Satan that occupies the White House now. Here is hoping that Obama gives us the next Ronald Reagan because after 8 years of a Socialist monster charge we surely will need one. There that should help. You are quite welcome glad to be of service. TD01
 January 18, 2015 at 2:10pm
If Dr. King came back today he would never stop throwing up! Most seemed to have learned the part about, ” ….judged not by the color of their skin…”. However, too many, AND ESPECIALLY LIBERALS, seemed to have conveniently forgotten the part, “…but the content of their character….”. People should heed Dr. King’s word but they need to be mindful of ALL of his words NOT JUST SOME OF THEM. Judge character…and the world would be a far better place. So for Bill and Hillary….Sharpton…Jackson…OBAMA…Reid…Pelosi…Durbin…Holder…almost the entire IRS…and EPA…and anyone having anything to do with the welfare state…and the mainstream media…and most of academia ….and that is just for starters…. ….need I say more?
 January 12, 2015 at 2:21pm
The Prime Minister ‘ s comments have the same aroma and ambiance that you would expect from a Turkish Rodeo…..
What would Harry Potter do? You know I may be wrong but I am betting he would not murder innocent civilians, target Jewish establishments, crash planes in to buildings, stone and enslave women, or strap suicide bombs on his children in order to purge infidelic “Muggles” from the those who are “Magic”. And again I may be wrong but I don’t think Hogwarts was a Madrasas. Just saying. TD01
 January 3, 2015 at 8:00pm
What parents??? There is no plural for there for parents. The parent that you talk about is usually (70+%) a mindless egg filled promiscuous mother that had a liason with a sperm doner that probably came about via drugs and/or alcohol. There usually is no true father involved since a government check paid by taxpayer money makes black fathers, at least in the eyes of the black community, unnecessary. So correction : Parent…and that is being EXTREMELY CHARITABLE. All brought to you since 1964 by the Liberal Democrat welfare state.
 January 3, 2015 at 7:50pm
Yes they were made that way from five decades of broken fatherless families in order to keep massive numbers of fools voting for welfare state creating and supporting Liberal Socialist Democrats. And all done WITH YOUR TAX MONEY YEAR AFTER YEAR.
 January 3, 2015 at 7:46pm
50 years of the welfare state on parade!!! This is the behavior you get when you replace father’s in the family with a government check and repeat for four generations. Take a good look people because this is 50 years of your tax money at work to create dependents in order to keep Democrats in power. TD01
When LBJ introduced his war-on-poverty, and the "Great Society", he's quoted as saying, "I'll have those n|**er$ voting Democratic for the next 200 years". Read the 3 & 4 paragraphs here: http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/2012/10/lyndon-johnson-the-n-word-and-the-concept-of-the-democrat-plantation/ and decide for yourself whose responsible for all this nonsense
 December 27, 2014 at 8:26am
You got it. And I am willing to bet no father in the family either and a mother who was a 3rd or 4th generation welfare recipient. But hey this is all OK since by making this guy and his relatives dependent on taxpayer extorted money for 50+ years he served his purpose well in keeping Liberal Democrats in perpetual power year after year. So yes, another Obama son…and Ted Kennedy son….and Maxine waters son….and Al Sharpton son…and Bill/Hillary Clinton son….and Barney Frank son…and LBJ son and…..well you get the idea.
 December 25, 2014 at 7:23pm
…And suddenly there was with the Angel a Multitude of the Heavenly Host praising God and saying, “Glory to God I’m the highest and on Earth, peace, good will towards men.”……..
 December 23, 2014 at 9:13pm
In theory you are absolutely correct. In practice 50 years of the welfare state have created this amoral culture by creating three generations of dependents all to keep Democrats in power. It will not stop until people stop voting for Democrats or more than likely the country goes bankrupt. These people don’t care that they are vermin as long as someone else enables them by fixing their horrific “lifestyle choices”. And it the US taxpayer forced by Democrats who are that “someone”. In a just world were being a dependent and doing stupid things have consequences then you would be right. In reality as long as fools vote for Liberals these people will never advance because they don’t need to. I know sad isn’t it.
 December 23, 2014 at 10:05am
Hmmmmmm….Deep thought here….RE: The Lesbian commercial….I wonder which one gets to say, “Not tonight dear, I have a headache.” ? I wonder….Oh well I am off to see my family – my 17 daughters all by different mothers, my pet alligator, my toaster oven, a grizzly bear I met in Alaska, and of course my beloved wife who is a 3000 year old mummy I dug up…errr…met rather…while touring Egypt. Hey the definition of family is expanding all the time right? So……….