Because subsequent to Congress adjourning sine die in March 1861, the republic’s Constitution was suspended; (we know the effect Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas Corpus had on both the North and the South, and Chief Justice Taney’s RIGHTFUL observation that it was in fact, unconstitutional — threatened with jail — probably the same threat made to Roberts in the ACA ‘case’) —- the constitution of 1871 (2nd Organic Acts expanded the 10-sq mi area to include ALL of the conquered, north AND south) created a ‘new birth of “freedom,” just as Lincoln predicted…. Fundamental transformation.
 February 11, 2015 at 1:33pm
attorn – Legal Definition
To turn over or transfer something to another.
To acknowledge a new landlord and agree to become his or her tenant.
The ‘bar’ is a UNION, sanctioning the practice of ‘law’ at bar…. Attorney AT law. Why not Attorney IN law? Words have meaning IN law…. They also have meaning AT law. Law isn’t a ‘statute,’ Regulation, Guideline, (suggestions) — Today it’s under COLOR of law, presumed to be correct unless properly challenged. These Imam’s use the misnomer ‘attorney’ the same way most in the west misinterpret THEIR culture…. Wise up….
 February 11, 2015 at 12:12pm
Let’s let it play out — Truth, FACTS, law and evidence — I suspect the State won’t dig as deep as it should (honest discovery to the sources, co-conspirators) — lest ‘conspiracy theorists’ run wild. Clancey, Breitbart, Kyle and other high profile figures within a short window –The defense doesn’t have to prove he’s insane (or was) The prosecution has to prove he isn’t (wasn’t), if that’s their tactic — not defending the alleged perp — Turtles know a low profile is best. I like turtles.
insanity defense isn't used that often and is successful in only a handful of cases. When a defendant asserts the insanity defense, he is basically stating that he isn't guilty because he wasn't able to understand that what he did was wrong.
The defendant has the burden to prove the insanity defense by clear and convincing evidence. This means that the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence that due to severe mental disease or defect, he couldn't appreciate the nature and quality of his acts. This is a tough standard to meet and it helps assure that the defense isn't abused.
The prosecution doesn't have to show that the defendant was sane at the time of the crime because there is a presumption that the defendant wasn't insane. The defendant doesn't have to be permanently insane. The state of insanity can be temporary. The insanity must be brought about by factors that are beyond the defendant's control. Therefore, voluntary intoxication won't support an insanity defense. An insanity defense is based on evaluations by forensic professionals that the defendant was incapable of distinguishing between (legal) right and wrong or appreciating the nature of his or her actions at the time of the offense. (This is other states’ standards, as well as to a degree, the Federal Standard.) The Texas Standard, however, is more limited. An individual must be so severely mentally ill that he or she did not know that their conduct was wrong.
yup and James Holmes ? his trial is going on also. the truth will never come out
 February 11, 2015 at 7:56am
NBC – Those who recognize the dog and pony show know it’s entertainment (N)o(B)ody(Cares) except those who accept MSM as their ‘truth.’ “Those who don’t read the newspapers are uninformed; those who do are misinformed.” ~Mark Twain – Believe Jefferson opined a similar phrase back in his day, also. If it’s not backed up with truth, FACTS, law and evidence — it never happened.
 February 11, 2015 at 7:38am
Brian’s ‘position’ is similar to that of ‘WH Press Secretary” in that NOTHING spewed is his ‘opinion;’ – MSM propaganda is controlled by those higher up — read the NDAA — the State Dept actually buys time, the executives ‘edit’ and control the content approved by the Central Authority and the pundits run with it – What it really comes down to is the almighty dollar. Character, integrity and truth don’t figger into the equation. The only thing Brian’s ‘guilty’ of is knowingly, willingly and intentionally deceiving the public for kick-backs (they call it a salary – but follow the $…) – Americans love a scary story almost as they do an emotional tear jerker…. it’s human nature.
True ‘democrats’ of yesteryear are the ‘founders,’ (Jeffersonians) and secessionists of the 1850 and 60′s- absent ‘slavery’ – that’s exactly what the ‘teaparty’ stands for — Small central government, State’s and INDIVIDUAL rights, capitalism – the ‘whigs’ were usurped by ‘Lincolns’ republicans .. (today’s democrats). BOTH establishment parties are progressive, big government — and have been for quite some time — and I do believe The People are weary — the Plantation isn’t producing; – ‘unsustainable’ isn’t just an Agenda 21 project. – A country that fails to PRODUCE is doomed to failure.
March 7, 2014 at 8:04pm
er — I believe it was March 27, 1861 — :-) “Sine Die” — Anyone that doesn’t understand, needs to DO THEIR HOMEWORK (Glenn Beck are YOU listening???)
March 7, 2014 at 7:53pm
bogus ‘war’ – no ‘enemy’ — which is exactly what they intended — perpetual ‘state of undeclared war’ allows them to ‘use’ the ‘war powers act’ which CONGRESS granted — they’re all complicit. – which makes them what? — correct — enemies of the Constitution FOR the united States. IMHO -
That would make them domestic enemies, would it not?
March 7, 2014 at 7:43pm
Lucky no play with scuba gear (?) — it’s ‘public’ domain — NO body ‘owns’ it .. ====> yet.
March 6, 2014 at 9:17pm
Yes, I’m SURE Mythbusters would ‘foil’ the propaganda networks’ plans to keep the People skeered — ‘don’t TRY this at home..’ Someplace it has been said that Necessity is the Mother of invention/innovation …. for real Americans, anyway ….
March 6, 2014 at 9:12pm
Having a ‘birth certificate’ implies consent — ask ANY ‘judge…’ — The Constitution either means what it says, or it doesn’t …. “Go FISH…”
March 6, 2014 at 8:26pm
Robert E Lee referred to his ‘adversaries’ as ‘those people,’ as well — The ‘lie’ then is the same lie being perpetuated today — ‘tea party’ (neo-confederates) believe the same thing — with the exception that it’s ok to ‘own’ another human being (?) –
February 25, 2014 at 5:57pm
The jingle back in the day was “2 all-beef’ (not pink slime) patties ‘SPECIAL’ sauce (think Thousand Island dressing – today – ‘we just don’t know’), lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun”. Clowns are ‘creepy,’ too — Thanks, Ron McDon! — That’s when we didn’t have to question the personnel, ingredients or price — much. Surprised there aren’t YET warning labels posted on doors, windows and pavement — but it’s coming…. just a few more successful ‘suits.’ 9 out of 10 flies also think eating p oo is a good idea,. ;-)
February 25, 2014 at 4:48pm
No disrespect intended, but —- Lincoln ‘did it.’ That ‘new birth of freedom’ he talked about wasn’t HIS idea – it belonged to the Federalists, particularly his mentor, Henry Clay (as opposed to the Jeffersonians) – whereby the Central government (D.C.) was ‘master’ and the States were subordinate – at the barrel of the G un. Primary ’cause’ similar to the Secession from England — TAXES. Have to DESTROY a thing to ‘save’ it – Modus operandi …. “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it seems to rhyme.” ~ Mark Twain Difference today is that there aren’t the geographical ‘territorial’ lines, so much as the ‘Constitutionalist Libertarians’ vs ‘socialists.’ – difficult to tell them apart without the uniforms – but NSA et al are working on that, me thinks. Best be able to whistle Dixie and the Battle Hymn of the Republic with equal enthusiasm … Auld Lang Syne — Tomorrow’s a new day.
February 25, 2014 at 1:18am
“…And if one does what God does enough times, one will become as God is.” Hannibel Lecter Depends on what one’s definition of IS, is – Sane or insane – good or bad — yin/yang pain/pleasure Who ‘decides?’ Those in CONTROL of any given situation – Governments and Corporations do not LIKE for * individuals * to have that power, so they wrest it FROM them — control, you see. MOST choose to avoid conflict and ‘pain.’ Others gravitate toward it – for their own pleasure in seeing others suffer (or to relieve their perception of another’s perception – euthanizing of “animals”)- sometimes even if it ‘hurts/’pleases” no one BUT themselves — Some choose to see ONLY the omnipotent, benevolent, omnisdcient ‘diety,’ while others choose to see His ‘alter ego..’ the deity that PUNISHES the perceived ‘naughtiness.’ In an ideal world, good and evil would be universally understood and accepted — but by the definition of ….. ‘whom?’ “It’s complicated.”
February 24, 2014 at 7:25am
I was led to believe AFTER the Alaskan Valdez (sp) thingy – vessels (all ‘boats hauling ‘hazmat) hadda be duoble-hulled, etc – Even ‘barges’ — I’m guessing a few 55-gal drums of ‘Quaker-State’s’ lids popped off and were tossed overboard … would make for a nice ‘sheen’ and *provoke* the DESIRED response … Bubba Gump still c’ain’t get no shrimpin’ done – an them crawdads got a funny taste, too.
February 24, 2014 at 6:48am
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2662004/posts Glenn Covers this in his ghost-written latest book, Miracles and Massacres — Chapter 10 – Starts on pp 200 – As some of these fascist things unfold (particularly the ACA, ‘g un-control,’ Agenda 21, etc) – we MAY begin to see these types of things where the People just get fed up as they did in the early 20th century — A ‘collective’ satiation point is inevitable. DO NOT forget the term ‘redneck’ originated from the West Virginia Mining Companies versus the Unions. —- Do your OWN research and use your OWN God-given gifts of comprehension and THINK for yourselves .. If you haven’t pist somebody off today — you’re doing it wrong. Here’s a link to the Battle of Blair Mountain, where it is believed the term ‘redneck’ originated — Be a Gooooood story for Glenn to ‘exploit’ — :-) Just tell the stories — t’ain’t no ‘Sedition Act’ violations involved — just EXPOSING covered-up HISTORY. Do not go gently into that good night ….
January 23, 2014 at 1:31pm
The 9th amendment SECURES the right of the People to do as they damn well please, so long as no trespass against the ‘rights’ of the State are alleged to have been violated. — corporations don’t have rights – they have immunities and privileges – which ‘they’ created. Rights belong to human beings, and the courts have held those rights existed long antecedent to the CREATION of the State. – By the State involving itself in things which one already has the RIGHT to do, (to be read license, permit, sanction, condone, grant, etc) it creates the ‘contract’ and therefore CONTROLS it. Get married it you want to. It’s none of the State’s business, just as it’s none of the People’s business what the State does — again — unless and until it infringes UNLAWFULLY on the rights of those who understand who they are! –> Hale v Henkel 201 U.S. 43.
January 23, 2014 at 2:22am
Sounds ‘plausible.’ — Only corporations can have ‘income,’ — Like-kind exchanges for labor is a ‘wash,’ i.e. I will gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today. — One of the principle prerequisites for a lawful CONTRACT is equal VALUE for consideration; — the second is full disclosure. — without these two primary elements — the contract is VOID. — If the value of ‘labor’ exceeds the agreed upon compensation (federal reserve notes or ‘milk and eggs/Doc Baker house calls — intellectual PROPERTY) between two PRIVATE parties, that’s their RIGHT, and so long as no trespass occurs, NONE of the government’s business. — btw — show me the lawful chain of custody of OWNERSHIP … it doesn’t exist. :-) It’s all debt transfer. Read the creature From Jekyll Island. there IS no ‘money,’ — only currency. — Erie RR v Tomkins made this clear. — Can still barter any way we see fit — Buy/Sell = commerce.