User Profile: TeresaJ

TeresaJ

Member Since: June 27, 2012

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 19, 2014 at 2:44pm

    Also agreed.

  • April 18, 2014 at 3:01pm

    If anybody has ever wanted to know why I am against Obamacore, this is why. “Voluntary” standards are only the first step.

    To boil a frog, turn the heat up slowly.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:57pm

    American government was only founded on “equality” in the sense that all men are born equally classed, and all must be treated the same by government, given the same punishments or concessions as any other man or woman.

    There is nothing that says or indicates the government has any right or business trying to “equalize” people out of their economic class.

    Respect for authority or rules? We were built on a Revolution. We have a Constitution that says government may not overstep its authority. Is Obama writing this himself?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 14, 2014 at 2:49pm

    I remember my younger sister’s reaction when I told her we had no microwave.

  • April 14, 2014 at 12:34pm

    I have the same comment for same-sex marriage.

  • April 14, 2014 at 12:19pm

    What is your freedom worth? A bowl of ice cream.

  • April 14, 2014 at 12:17pm

    No one should have to live in fear of being targeted by the government for their political beliefs either, but I’ve yet to see Obama lift a finger.

    It’s a little late to try to make yourself look good.

  • April 12, 2014 at 8:58am

    He’d invent any kakamainy story to get votes.

  • April 11, 2014 at 10:47pm

    :(

  • April 11, 2014 at 5:03pm

    No, I won’t. I will be “rebelling” against how you somehow think it is your “right” to reach into my family’s pocketbook to pay for your contraception. The murder of children, well that is on a different plane of argument altogether, but suffice it to say, you won’t be using my family’s money to murder your children.

    In addition, women already have equal pay. Don’t believe something to be true just because it comes out of Obama’s mouth. Do your own research, and be productive, or stop pretending you have anything to contribute, please.

  • April 11, 2014 at 4:29pm

    their fathers*

  • April 11, 2014 at 4:27pm

    You really know nothing about America or the founding fathers, or “subjugation of women,” or the rise of Hitler in Germany. The only dividing I have seen is Obama trying to divide just about everyone from white male conservatives, which, ironically, are the DESCENDANTS of those who FOUNDED this nation.

    Not that it makes them the know all that be all, but I’d think that white Christian males, who more closely resemble the founders than anyone else, being unrepentant and unabashed descendants of the culture, might just understand their motives a little better than group of self described “minorities.” (Calling yourself a minority, isn’t that automatically taking yourself out of the “norm?” )

    Obviously, there are several flaws in my line of reasoning. “White Christian males” will not inherit the thoughts of there fathers anymore than anyone else, but my point is, marginalizing them and calling them “anti-American” is pretty dumb. I mean, in case you had not noticed, the founders were… you guessed it, white Christian males.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 11, 2014 at 4:06pm

    Married to my only husband in 2000. Still married and still will be married till death do us part.

    The crux of all of America’s problems are the lack of moral values. Selfishness, lying, murder… bad, and make for bad marriages. Kindness, patience, putting others before yourself… good, and make for good marriages and disciplined children, which in turn makes for a safe and functional society. It really is that simple.

  • April 11, 2014 at 11:55am

    Big Mama is a term of endearment to some.

  • April 11, 2014 at 11:52am

    Being hurt, I understand. Calling in the national guard, I do not. Maybe she needed this experience to grow up a little.

    As for the kid, it does seem like this receipt “messaging” is happening a lot. I’d offer, however, that the same culture that is fostering rude children is the one fostering over-reactive “adults.”

  • April 10, 2014 at 4:35pm

    I don’t want to see any bloodshed or violence either, put I cannot be so blind as to put faith in donations or ballot box. If there is one thing this administration has proven, it is that they will put their hands in your cookie jar while simultaneously telling you to your face they are not doing anything. Do not believe that elections are fair, and that monies involved are not corrupt, or even not from sources outside the U.S.

    The reaction from the people here are due to one thing: They recognize the federal government is out of control, and this has been the one tangible example they can have any control over. The IRS scandal, little they can do about. Drones, Fast and Furious and Benghazi, nothing. Impeach Obama and Holder, nothing. This… it’s a fight they can actually approach. It wouldn’t be happening if the government had not lost the respect of We The People.

  • April 10, 2014 at 3:59pm

    I worry about my daughter… but I more worry for whether my son will find a wife who has interest in something besides herself. It’s not really the men who are unmarriageable, although the young men will catch up eventually if they keep accepting the feminist march as basis of reality.

  • April 9, 2014 at 5:54pm

    I don’t follow Catholicism, but I have a lot of respect for nuns. God bless you for your service, Miss Baker.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 7, 2014 at 5:24pm

    @LibertyIsMyMiddleName

    Really?

    Liberal argument for homosexual marriage: Love (an emotion)
    Conservative argument: Biological function (facts)

    Liberal argument for transgenders: how they feel (emotion)
    Conservative argument: biological gender (facts)

    Liberal argument for abortion: “it’s my body, I should choose if I want to be a mother” (emotion)
    Conservative argument: human, growing life (facts)

    Liberal argument for Obamacare: “everyone should have access to insurance, it’s a right (emotion)
    Conservative argument: we can’t afford it (facts)

    Liberal argument for illegal aliens: don’t separate them from their families (emotion)
    Conservative argument: They need to come in legally so our system is not overwhelmed (facts)

    Liberal argument on voter I.D.: “You can’t create hardships for people!” (emotion)
    Conservative argument: We need to preserve the integrity of elections (facts)

  • April 6, 2014 at 6:54pm

    @ Blink

    To answer your first question, read here: http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=122

    To answer your second, slavery in the Bible and slavery in Colonial times were two different things. Slavery was most often a means for providing for the poor, as in an early form of welfare, and slaves had rights. Often, they were people who sold themselves into slavery because they couldn’t afford to feed themselves. Sometimes, they were sold by their fathers as children, for the same reasons. A male slave was set free every seven years. Women were sold to be wives, but they still did have rights.

    Many Americans, particularly young people, who have never truly been taught the Bible (even many of those who have grown up in church) don’t understand because they do not know the culture of the people they are studying.

123 To page: Go