"That’s not true. They are a bunch of fanatic nobodies who are against war. They have a big website. .Check it out."
They are not actually 'against war'.
They are only against innocent victims fighting back when 'politically correct' thugs, attack such innocent victims.
Notice they never ever protest when Hamas is firing rockets into Israel, or when they stole billions of dollars the world gave them to build schools and hospitals and instead, used it to build terrorist tunnels from which to kidnap and murder Israeli civilians.
They don't protest obamas illegal wars either.
They're astroturf frauds.
Fortherecord, I will see your notice they never ever protest when Hamas is firing rockets into Israel and raise you a from the top of hospitals or from civilian neighborhoods in hopes of getting Israel to kill "innocent civilians" by launching rockets into area's that Hamas launches rockets from. Of course also nothing is ever said about all the early warnings Israel gives out before they actually attack. I guess I'm not thinking the politically correct way.
 March 1, 2015 at 8:51pm
Same page. Nor I.
 March 1, 2015 at 8:47pm
Nope. Media and the cuckoos left wing protest everything pretty much.
 March 1, 2015 at 7:52pm
We know. Of course we wish them well.
 March 1, 2015 at 7:49pm
I should think all of our conservative hopeful presidential candidates will be there. Ain’t that a kick in the head that liberals are not so liberal when they lose control of a situation? Appears they are racist.
Anti-Semites at the very least .. and yes that includes most liberal Jewish Americans.
You are so right Texasgranny73, the Democrats are acting like spoiled children starting at the very top with Obama. They are an embarrassment to our country by insulting a leader of one of the few friends we have in the Middle East. He is completely correct, if Iran goes nuclear the world will be in extreme danger and we will have Obama to thank for it.
 March 1, 2015 at 7:36pm
Ahh. Freedom of speech for a selective few. Veddy in te rrest ing. Same person wrote the provocative headline for the article? More interesting than Al Sharpton. Selective few.
March 1, 2015 at 7:18pm
You must really be important cause that house stuff provocative.
March 1, 2015 at 7:17pm
What’s up with this? The ***** word has been allowed back on the Blaze?
 March 1, 2015 at 4:56pm
Is this a first time award or is there someone more un evolved?
 March 1, 2015 at 4:54pm
 March 1, 2015 at 4:31pm
At this point I think it’s too early to say best man but your second sentence is straight arrow. Like him.
 March 1, 2015 at 4:23pm
Don’t you worry your pretty little head. You won’t be deciding. We will.
March 1, 2015 at 4:19pm
I don’t think that is what he/she meant at all. Different point of view. I saw let’s not discount the candidates before they are candidates on the ballot to be voted on. Easy peasy.
March 1, 2015 at 4:16pm
Thank you. Perfect. We’re not even near knowing them.
Reagan did not grant amnesty by fiat. He did it with Congress who promised to close the borders. Unlike pen and phony baloney. Jimmy fricking Carter’s government offered long lines at the gas tanks, stand off with whats his face the Ayatolla in Iran with American hostages. Reagan was good for our country. But hey, stay angry.
 March 1, 2015 at 4:00pm
Please explain how you think the president maybe Walker can change abortion.
To quote my response to justangry:
“My point really is that these guys who normally have no problem expanding Federal power, stick their hands in their pockets and shrug on abortion.”
They eviscerate law and the constitution in 1,000 different ways, but when it comes to abortion, suddenly they’re “by the books” guys.
So how about this… Maybe it’s better to find creative ways to solve a problem than to find creative ways to avoid one.
In what circumstance would you put your confidence in a person who says “it can’t be done”? Some people look for every excuse to quit. Others find every reason to try.
 March 1, 2015 at 3:54pm
Yes, that’s right. I like Cruz as well. We will have some good candidates in my opinion discounting a couple like Bush and Christy. Our Texas governor Perry is going to make a comeback; that should be interesting. If our next president of the United States cannot answer questions by Mark Levin I would say he or she is too weak. That old Constitution has me in it’s spell.
 March 1, 2015 at 3:38pm
I disagree. I like him. What he did with the unions is fantabulous.
Ya ever heard a wise man changes his mind; a fool never does?
What I want in the next president is one who will keep this country safe and abide by the Constitution. Of course a conservative.
We’re not even near to knowing what all of them have to say but reading up on his background he is pretty darn impressive.
 March 1, 2015 at 12:44pm
 March 1, 2015 at 12:20pm
All I know about baseball is Brooklyn Dodgers Jackie Robinson Don Drysdale Sal Maglie Roger Craig PeeWee Reese Gino Cimoli Don Newcombe Duke Snider Ransom Jackson Rocky Nelson Carl Erskine Clem Labine Sandy Osman Roy Campanella Carl Furillo Charles Neal. You mean them?