There’s risk in everything. How come you didn’t post a link to the dozens of outbreaks of contaminated food that does go through the government regulators?
April 26, 2016 at 8:18pm
That isn’t what happened here. They didn’t say no because the customers were gay, they said no because the customers wanted them to make a product that directly violated their conscience. This would be akin to forcing the Jewish printer to print fliers for the upcoming nazi rally or asking a gay artist to make a piece of art promoting Biblical marriage and condemning the perversity of homosexuality.
April 26, 2016 at 8:14pm
No, the Muslims would follow the gay couple home and cut their heads off.
[-1] April 26, 2016 at 8:12pm
Just bake the cake with some special sauce or blow your nose in it.
[-2] April 26, 2016 at 8:10pm
Agreed. Time to start targeting gay-owned businesses and force them to produce products and engage in services that are against their beliefs. Maybe make a gay couple produce art work promoting Biblical marriage and the perversity of homosexual acts.
April 26, 2016 at 8:07pm
Time to target gay-owned businesses and force them to contradict their beliefs. Or, publish the names and addresses of the judge(s) involved in the case.
What would those "beliefs" be, exactly? Being a gay business owner is not a "belief" system. And why publish the addresses of the judges? So they can be targeted by unstable people?
You do realize that a rabid Christian lawyer already tried that trick, and failed in court, right? Turns out the bible themed “Hate Cakes” he ordered were deemed offensive and lesbian baker was able to show she routinely rejected orders of offensive language on cakes. The courts can tell the difference between a wedding cake, symbolizing love, and hate cakes ..
 April 7, 2016 at 1:06am
This has everything to do with “limited government”; in this case, MS is affirming the First Amendment which protects religious liberty. Cuomo believes the religion of LGBT should trump all other religions.
'It's limited government when the government steps in to create new laws and more government'
That's because the homosexuals sue people and eradicate the first amendment religious freedom. Are us religious people not allowed to defend our first amendment rights from the predatory homosexuals?
 April 7, 2016 at 1:04am
So, basically the MS law simply affirms the First Amendment which was fully explained in James Madison’s treatise “On Property” where conscience (among other characteristics) is regarded as property that is protected by the constitution.
[-2] March 31, 2016 at 3:28pm
The fact that you would post these assertions shows that you don’t understand the fundamental meaning and corroboration of the New Testament and the Old Testament. If you really were curious to know the truth behind what you are posting, you could easily find out by using the “google” machine. In the meantime, you are simply displaying your ignorance on the topic in a public place.
Why doesn’t that law apply to all races, “discrimination”, race should have zero to do with adoption, only the “character” of the care takers matters.
She was raised by wolves, I think.
 March 20, 2016 at 8:10pm
Soto. Hmm…just another “dreamer”.
 March 17, 2016 at 3:53pm
The FBI Hostage Rescue Team…
What hostages were they rescuing again?
 March 10, 2016 at 9:02pm
It’s the “Knockout Game” in reverse.
 November 8, 2015 at 11:44pm
Here’s an idea. Leave. Take your “talent” and money to a different school that also believes white people are a scourge. They don’t feel welcome on campus – I don’t feel welcome in the hood so I don’t go to the hood.
Yes she's right but, as a potential leader amongst the choices she wouldn't be in my first round pick.
Founders, a blind squirrel finds the occasional nut. Carly changed parties to run against a seated Democrat. She is about as Republican as Hillary. She is a California Liberal just like old Nancy " you have to pass it to find out what is in it ". DO THE RESEARCH.
 August 8, 2015 at 11:55am
So you prefer it when journalists lob softball questions at people who are running for the most powerful position in the world? Isn’t this what irritates us about the relationship between the mainstream press and the Obama admin?
Fox just joined the msm with their lame stream questions. Those were not hard questions they were setups, gotta type questions. Why not ask Trump about his plans to get the economy going? Far from fair and balanced. It grieves me to say this because I have watched Fox from the beginning, but I will not watch them anymore.
 August 8, 2015 at 11:52am
Shouldn’t this apply to Megan Kelly as well? Seems to me like it’s okay when Trump hammers someone but as soon as someone challenges him then that person is now pure evil.
Kind of a double standard.
 August 7, 2015 at 12:26pm
I disagree. I’m vehemently anti-abortion and I completely agree with Scott Walker. But Megan Kelly asked a tough question. Isn’t this what we want? Isn’t this why we claim to be more intellectually curious than the slobbering love-affair the press has with Obama? Everyone here complains about the mainstream press carrying the water for the Democrats and not doing their duty as the watchdog. I’m glad tough questions were asked last night. I certainly want everyone to be vetted properly If we are going to win in 2016 our candidates will be asked this question several times.
Yeah, I don't understand why there are so many crybabies on here. Have they never been involved in an election? That must be it because any grownup should know these questions must be asked because we need our candidates clear on positions rather than being blindsided and fumbling when the democrats begin their attack.
"Megan Kelly asked a tough question"
Yes, ask a tough question, by all means....However Megan and Fox, had an agenda, a plan, a coordinated attack on Trump. that was their objective.