No mention of killing a baby in the constitution, yet, SCOTUS claims killing a baby can’t be regulated as it interferes with a right…yet, the second amendment is constantly being “regulated”. Hmmm…go ahead an celebrate as yet another baby is torn apart with forceps and has her head crushed and her brains sucked out through a vacuum. Congrats!
 June 21, 2016 at 4:03pm
Looks and sounded like one of the “dreamers” I keep hearing about.Surely he was in a rush to Walmart to purchase diapers and baby food for a local orphanage.
 June 7, 2016 at 5:23pm
@ Oakland, Darwin himself said his theory would collapse if organisms exhibiting irreducible complexity were discovered (complex organisms) because they are not the product of random chance, but the product of design and thought, just like software. What has been discovered is that complex organisms exist at the very basic level of life, in the cellular structures which are filled with millions of pieces of INFORMATION. Information is the result of design, not the result of chance encounter.
As for the fossil record, it clearly shows distinct and abrupt starts and stops, not a gentle progression. The Cambrian Explosion is a great example.
“In China, we are allowed to question Darwin, but not the government. In America, you are allowed to question the government, but not Darwin.” — Paleontologist Paul Chien
 May 19, 2016 at 4:42pm
Gee, another community organizer. What a shock.
 May 17, 2016 at 6:41pm
False. Don Draper of “Mad Men” fame created this ad.
May 4, 2016 at 8:40am
What an interesting turn of events. Like bell-bottom jeans, it seems like the N word will make a comeback and be culturally acceptable.
Larry Wilmore and Barack Obama; my n!66a$, you did it!
 May 3, 2016 at 9:16pm
A savvy reporter would have taken advantage of it, especially with the recent acceptance of the “N” word at the WH.
Savvy reporter: “So, President Obama, seeing that you are a N!&&3r, did that play into your selection of the proposed SCOTUS nominee?”
 May 3, 2016 at 11:11am
She said what she meant and she meant what she said. Just like Obama in 2008 when he said he would shut down the coal industry.
 April 28, 2016 at 8:35am
There’s risk in everything. How come you didn’t post a link to the dozens of outbreaks of contaminated food that does go through the government regulators?
April 26, 2016 at 8:18pm
That isn’t what happened here. They didn’t say no because the customers were gay, they said no because the customers wanted them to make a product that directly violated their conscience. This would be akin to forcing the Jewish printer to print fliers for the upcoming nazi rally or asking a gay artist to make a piece of art promoting Biblical marriage and condemning the perversity of homosexuality.
April 26, 2016 at 8:14pm
No, the Muslims would follow the gay couple home and cut their heads off.
[-1] April 26, 2016 at 8:12pm
Just bake the cake with some special sauce or blow your nose in it.
[-2] April 26, 2016 at 8:10pm
Agreed. Time to start targeting gay-owned businesses and force them to produce products and engage in services that are against their beliefs. Maybe make a gay couple produce art work promoting Biblical marriage and the perversity of homosexual acts.
April 26, 2016 at 8:07pm
Time to target gay-owned businesses and force them to contradict their beliefs. Or, publish the names and addresses of the judge(s) involved in the case.
What would those "beliefs" be, exactly? Being a gay business owner is not a "belief" system. And why publish the addresses of the judges? So they can be targeted by unstable people?
You do realize that a rabid Christian lawyer already tried that trick, and failed in court, right? Turns out the bible themed “Hate Cakes” he ordered were deemed offensive and lesbian baker was able to show she routinely rejected orders of offensive language on cakes. The courts can tell the difference between a wedding cake, symbolizing love, and hate cakes ..
 April 7, 2016 at 1:06am
This has everything to do with “limited government”; in this case, MS is affirming the First Amendment which protects religious liberty. Cuomo believes the religion of LGBT should trump all other religions.
'It's limited government when the government steps in to create new laws and more government'
That's because the homosexuals sue people and eradicate the first amendment religious freedom. Are us religious people not allowed to defend our first amendment rights from the predatory homosexuals?
 April 7, 2016 at 1:04am
So, basically the MS law simply affirms the First Amendment which was fully explained in James Madison’s treatise “On Property” where conscience (among other characteristics) is regarded as property that is protected by the constitution.
[-2] March 31, 2016 at 3:28pm
The fact that you would post these assertions shows that you don’t understand the fundamental meaning and corroboration of the New Testament and the Old Testament. If you really were curious to know the truth behind what you are posting, you could easily find out by using the “google” machine. In the meantime, you are simply displaying your ignorance on the topic in a public place.