People need to chill out about this sort of stuff. Nobody is getting hurt by the statues of Themis or Moses which dot many court buildings, including the highest one, the Supreme Court. Statues dont cone alive at night and cause havoc like garden gnomes. Nor are 10 commandment plaques attacking people like poltergeist.
June 18, 2013 at 2:21pm
Ever thought of giving top post to someone else?
June 18, 2013 at 12:42pm
How are he and encinom not banned yet?
June 18, 2013 at 12:40pm
These trolls have simply come out of left field today. Which is why we need y’all to pick up the slack and hot that darn report button, please. I don’t even know if this is the blaze, or huffington post anymore.
June 17, 2013 at 5:54pm
Hey blinks tell us how you feel about the 2nd ammendement. Still applicable today?
June 17, 2013 at 2:53pm
What website are all these PC nomenclature wiccans coming from?
June 14, 2013 at 2:42pm
Precisely. If you frame the argument towards nature instead of just nurture, you can easily compare homosexual preference to being born black.
Helpful tip, don’t compare your struggles with what racial minorities went through. You might get knocked out. If I really didn’t like you, I would have withheld that.
Why has ‘sexual preference’ changed to ‘sexual orientation’? Simple question
June 14, 2013 at 1:33pm
June 14, 2013 at 1:27pm
Numerous recent studies, authored by gay scientists, have shown that children of gay parents fare identically to children of straight parents. However, all of these studies have suffered from the fact that the sampled populations were not randomly selected, largely because few gay parents actually exist. So, investigators have used advertising (mostly online and in gay magazines) in order to recruit enough subjects to study. However, such methods tend to sample a more educated population of subjects compared to randomized sampling. Another deficit of such studies is that the parents themselves have reported the outcomes of their parenting results. Needless to say, no gay parent would want to damage the image of gay parenting.
June 14, 2013 at 1:06pm
Really, what’s the point in trying
June 14, 2013 at 12:32pm
They have no fear anymore, do they? Even if they run out of business, tax exempt GE will receive a stimulus of some sort, and launder the money to msnbc, which they own.
My point is, the media as is will never go away. It’s been this way for a hundred years, and shows no sign of changing
June 14, 2013 at 12:27pm
“The latest and most comprehensive study in the matter shows that children with gay parents actually fare better than children with straight parents. ”
The best way to raise a child is to be gay? YOU DON’T SAY
Also can we see this study, since it flips everything we know to be true upside down?
“Other recent studies all show that children fare equally well in either situation.”
I don’t think you can have it both ways….one of these has to be right.
Again, sources please
June 13, 2013 at 4:27pm
When John the Baptist doubted Christ, he simply gave John more evidence. Same with Thomas, an apostle.
Buuuut there comes a point where I can’t respect an atheist anymore after they have continually been told the truth, and keep on cruising for a fight just because they like to boil people’s blood.
Same tired questions, 1500 character limit. Size and scope of answer: enormous. Human labor involved, huge.
June 13, 2013 at 3:48pm
Most scientists do not necessarily see religion and science as always being in conflict. Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund and coauthors studied the responses of scientists at 21 elite U.S. universities, finding that only 15% thought that science and religion were always in conflict. About half expressed some form of religious affiliation.