User Profile: TheDHndrsn


Member Since: October 01, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] March 24, 2015 at 3:25pm

    ARTICLE QUOTE: … judging from the video, there product appears to work well.
    Really, Blaze? Your copy editing has dropped to levels of other modern media outlets? I expect more.The appropriate form of the word “there” above is “their”.
    I note also your browser ap continues to gobble every possible byte of memory on my system. Will thus go back to reading and not commenting.
    Keep up the stellar work.

  • May 12, 2014 at 4:58pm

    Well … I guess we now know what that discussion between the Pope and Barry the Bolshevik was really about.

  • May 12, 2014 at 4:45pm

    Absolutely correct. Had one show up at my door at 6:15 AM one day. He arrived to interrogate me about a car filled with pot that I had just crashed on I-10, fleeing the scene to home before the po-lice could arrive to arrest me. That I depend on a wheelchair to get around and do not own a vehicle even remotely close to the one crashed did not stop him from drawing down on my dog. Dogs are the new “unregistered” weapon to these characters. They could care less if the kill a sentient family member. They get off doing it. Agree completely. This guy is bawling only because he was called on his actions.
    Dog bites the cop, shoot the dog. No questions asked. Otherwise, the cops days as a cop should come to an abrupt end.
    For the record, had the ass who showed up at my door at 6:15 AM shot my dog, I would have returned fire. I was armed at the time.

  • [-2] May 8, 2014 at 7:53pm

    Cops are always defensive if you speak with them about reports such as this, They cannot defend it. They know they cannot defend it, and they do it anyhow. Why? Because they can get away with it, If like me you broach this matter with cops you know, you quickly will discover they are no longer your friends.
    As our Federal Government militarizes local CIVIL law enforcement groups with tanks and gear to serve warrants to 80-year olds on Social Security, at tank-point, is it rational to believe Civil law enforcement will NOT hesitate to pull innocent citizens from their homes, at tank-point, as Agenda 21 kicks in come 2015 and forced relocation and reeducation policies go into effect.
    Unless you plan to go out like a sheep and submit to forced relocation and reeducation, take time today to create a defensible perimeter for your home. When they come for you, shoot for their feet. Have at least one fall back area that can stop anything short of a 50 cal for when things escalate. If you have the land and the money, an underground tunnels are a nice touch and can come in handy. I would say build yourself a few IED anti-tank devices, but I would likely be arrested. Powers that be do not appreciate sheep saying things like “go build an IED”.
    Be safe out there. You never know when local civil law enforcement might stumble across an unpaid parking ticket.
    Above all, remember your Solzhenitsyn. Baaaah.

  • [3] May 7, 2014 at 5:31pm

    “We respect the rights of all citizens to peacefully protest and the right to bear arms.”

    TRANSLATION: As long as you bitches understand you answer to us, the police, who can do ANYTHING we wish to you with impunity because we are ABOVE the law.

    Which is why they showed up with every available on-duty squad car. I am surprised they did not bring SWAT and a few tanks. Ever notice that, no matter what, it is the citizen’s fault?

  • [1] May 5, 2014 at 5:48pm

    Budgets? What does funding for NASA have to do with science anymore? It is all in the hands of Allah since NASA was declared a Muslim outreach group shortly after Messiah took office. Allah will save us. Not to worry.

    As for the “Republican” comment. There are no “Republican” forces just as there are no “Democrat” forces. There are only Demublicans. We are a nation of one-party rule. Get with the program for Allah’s sake!

  • [3] May 1, 2014 at 2:22am

    A troubling albeit correct observation.
    What happened to the days of doing something illegal before being arrested? I have seen too many accounts of “The officer for their safety and was forced to shoot Citizen X, the family dog, and the entire Citizen X family.” The PR Officer ALWAYS reports, “This event was justified in the name of officer safety.” Approach police at your own risk for fear of being killed in the name of “officer safety”.
    Yet they give the public crap for not supporting them. Duh.
    I can see it now … “Effective immediately, all traffic offenders will be shot through the back of the head immediately upon stopping while the officer remains behind the door of their vehicle, in the name of officer safety.”
    And so it goes in our Collectivist, Limbic AmeriKa …

  • May 1, 2014 at 1:56am

    Perhaps, but NEVER oppose Obama. Do NOT stand up for the founding principles of this country or in the name of the Constitution. Do NOT make waves. Sit down and shut up. God will take care it.

    By the way, don’t follow or support Glenn Beck either. Just sayin’.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:59am

    Paperboy … right on.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:54am

    There is a time and a place for an uprising. Agreed. The Nevada encounter is not likely it. Far too many similar situations, nation wide.

    Take for example, an AZ rancher on the border who has more problems with Border Patrol, destroying his property, cutting his fences, killing his cattle, and telling him they will shoot his dogs if the dogs come near them while they are illegally trespassing on his ranch, than he does with illegals. The rancher is being represented by the ALCU and suing the Feds. Notable also that Border Patrol is not permitted on much of the BLM land down this way EXCEPT on foot. BUT … hey, they can trash private property sans warrant with impunity.

    To Beck’s credit, there is something to be said for the Gandhi approach. Unfortunately, Beck is alienating a bunch of folks that already know it is better to talk than shoot. We are not idiots, Beck. If you feel compelled to talk down to an informed and aware following, as the Progressives do, well … Beck, you can go suck on it.

    Personally, if there are those who feel the only path left for America is to start shooting, something with which I disagree, I would rather they descend upon Washington and take out the trash rather than throw themselves away in the Nevada countryside. The Feds have way too much room to maneuver with air support. DC the more prudent approach, just sayin’.

  • April 14, 2014 at 3:08pm

    I believe the difference here being that the Bundy family purchased grazing rights for this area, not to dwell also on the consideration they have been grazing cattle on this land longer than anyone posting here has been alive. Of course, once some bureaucrat started worrying about a turtle, it was all over. Doesn’t matter that the turtle is about as endangered as the fruit fly. Man bad. Turtle good. Bureaucrat POWERFUL. wesker, you are a kool aid drinker and an idiot.

  • April 13, 2014 at 6:02pm

    Glenn, by chance do any of these words look familiar to you?

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. …”

    When a man asks that I not support him, I honor that request.

  • March 29, 2014 at 4:29pm

    Let there be no doubt as to the truth this man speaks. I have been in a wheelchair my entire adult life. Taxi cabs avoid the disabled like the plague. My worst taxi experience was a business trip to New York, back in the 90′s, One morning I had to make it 10 blocks from my hotel to the Javits Center. It had snowed about 1″ during the night. I was unable to hail a cab. I wheeled the entire 10 blocks, snow, slush and slop, as multiple dozens of available cabs passed me by. Between the taxi cabs and the 1 foot high curbs sans curb cuts, to this day I avoid travel to New York City. It is a horrible, wretched, smug dung heap of a city. As for taxi cabs, I use them if no other option. I offer one observation, though. What I call the “Taxi cripple effect” seems far more prevelent in the equitable and inclusive Northeast corridor than in the South or Southwest. Just an empirical observation. And one more example of the hypocrisy of Progressivism.

  • March 29, 2014 at 4:24am

    “Self determination”, Alan? Great for Russian-speaking Ukrainians, but completely unacceptable for US citizens. US citizens accordingly need a bunch of messianic, progressive freaks in Washington to command everything for them; what they must buy, right down to their religious beliefs, convictions, and behaviors.

    The utter hypocrisy of these Progressive tyrants is mind boggling at best.

  • March 29, 2014 at 4:09am

    I seriously doubt the government owns and operates printing presses for their printed materials. They have a contract with a privately owned printer. Having printed catalogs and other marketing materials on a large scale at one point in my career, I can tell you that print jobs are not priced based on font. Savings will be recognized by the printer as higher profits, nothing more. The government won’t save *****.

  • March 29, 2014 at 4:04am

    Unfortunately, print jobs aren’t priced based on font. The printer will make higher profit because it uses less ink. The government, the customer that is, won’t save *****.

  • March 20, 2014 at 6:31pm

    They are effectively ignorant of everything else, so why not their religion too? A more uninformed bunch of ignoramuses than the under 30 crowd I have never met.

    Was speaking to a 19-year old the other day, a mother of one with another on the way. I mentioned the missing 777 jetliner. She was unaware of the event, even as it flashed across the cable news story running in the same room. I mentioned Allah Akbar Airlines may plan to use it to nuke New York City. She replied, “What about the world? Won’t we all die?”

    This conversation too place in her home town here in AZ.

    Responses (2) +
  • March 19, 2014 at 5:11pm

    The company I retired from was involved with this research back in the ’90s. We invented and owned the technology to create carbon that could reversibly bind the chemicals in breath to be later analyzed, in this case, by IR laser spectrometry. Was promising stuff. Look how long before that technology became news. Cool.

  • November 3, 2013 at 1:43pm

    Any of you seriously expected to see Obama leave office, ever?

    In reply to the contribution What If Obamacare Was Never About Our Health?

  • October 31, 2013 at 5:03pm

    Photo caption, how they wish it could read: Bad gun. Bad, bad gun.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love