User Profile: thenannerpus

thenannerpus

Member Since: June 08, 2011

Comments

123
  • [1] July 29, 2014 at 9:56am

    This could not be further from accurate. It’s either a lack of knowledge, or a sinister slant on facts.

    The goal here is to silence churches, plain and simple.

    More importantly, the Founding Fathers absolutely recognized religious influence on this country. It was the basis of its founding.

    Your statement is so inaccurate, outrageous, and simply incorrect, that it is clear you are just being inflammatory. This is seriously just laughable that you actually give credence to what you’re saying.

  • July 26, 2014 at 12:04am

    Jamescrow-you can have this world and whatever moral victories you think are worthwhile. I live for the next life and follow Jesus. I mean really, a political victory somehow vindicates your soul? You were made for muck more than that.

    DidiM – lol. I love how truth riles up the Godless. But don’t take my word for it, try reading a bible.

  • [5] July 25, 2014 at 10:54am

    Stephencj – sin should make one angry. It causes us to go against our God-ordained purpose to serve Him.

    JamesCrow – who said anything about making it illegal? Making sin illegal is not possible because we are all sinners. It’s what we do. But we can be forigven for it if we acknowledge our sin and confess it to God.

    EgoLacuna – Really? Gay marriage is outlawed in every state that puts it to a vote. Only activist judges change this by ruling against the will of the people. Homosexual behavior accounts for less than 5% of all citizens in this country. It is far from normalized. I mean, really, it’s not even close.

  • [23] July 25, 2014 at 9:31am

    I liked the show. Up until the two-episode gay wedding. I stopped watching then. Likely will not watch again.

    Gay marriage will never be normalized. Fooling oneself into thinking sin is okay will always lead to an internal conflict because we are made in the image of God, and that image will show itself when we try to conform it to Satan’s image.

    Responses (8) +
  • [5] July 23, 2014 at 5:42pm

    OMG BLAZE!!! WARN US OF GRAPHIC IMAGES!!!

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] July 23, 2014 at 9:45am

    omg that’s hilarious

  • [10] July 17, 2014 at 1:18pm

    It’s funny how people will consider this as a possibility, but bring up the person of Jesus and his life, death, and resurrection, and suddenly it’s a religious discussion.

  • [2] July 10, 2014 at 1:24pm

    Ch – um, I’m a conservative, evangelical Christian who puts Christ as the pinnacle and inspiration of all I do. I’m also quite logical and fact-based.

    So, in short, you are wrong.

    Grafton – I WOULD LOVE IT! She needs to chill out and not take herself so seriously *especially* if her husband agreed to listen to the call, which seems to be the case.

  • [116] July 9, 2014 at 5:48pm

    I was thinking the same thing. This is much ado about nothing.

    I now label Dana a Drama Queen and will look at her through that filter. Time will tell.

    Responses (6) +
  • [2] July 9, 2014 at 5:47pm

    Are you suggesting they’re one in the same?

    Black and white are both colors. Must be the same. /sarc

  • July 3, 2014 at 1:41pm

    I understand your theory, but Satan tempt Jesus by offering Him all of this world because it belongs to Satan.

    Of course, God is sovereign, but Biblically speaking, this world belongs to him.

  • July 3, 2014 at 12:44pm

    Notice the eye of horus. She (and other celebrities) use it often. Evil loves to pollute things that are good: take this song for example, or rainbows (God’s promise perverted into Satan’s “born that way” lie), sex (created by God, perverted by Satan).

    This is not God’s domain, it does belong to Satan. If anyone has extreme success in this world, they are paying homage to Satan and no one else.

    vigilantcitizen.com

    Responses (3) +
  • [87] July 2, 2014 at 5:44pm

    Sovereign,
    Burger Corporate sponsored the gay pride parade. This is not limited to one restaurant.

    I’ll explain what this really is: Burger King chose the one place where backlash would be minimal and overall impact would be minor. If they had decided to do this nationwide, they know they would be out of business in 12 months.

    Which begs the question, why even do it in the first place?
    Answer: to say F-you to the mainstream of America (conservatives and/or Christians)

  • [8] July 2, 2014 at 12:46pm

    Haha great point!

    Would the government protest if there was an “In Government We Trust” celebration?

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 1, 2014 at 10:33am

    Jeffrey Dahmer lived and committed his crimes in Milwaukee.

    You’re doing well to make “liberal” and “dumb” synonyms.

  • [20] June 27, 2014 at 11:25am

    Agreed. This is an act of aggression and should be met with a show of force to intimidate any further aggressive action.

  • [2] June 27, 2014 at 11:19am

    If a PRIVATE company must trim fat somehow, they may do so at will.

    If the GOVERNMENT provides this fat, it must trim it immediately.

    Private companies are the gasoline in an engine. Goverment is the toxic, but necessary, exhaust out of the tailpipe.

  • [1] June 26, 2014 at 12:43pm

    Wow. You defy logic. Christian logic too. Are from Westboro Baptist?

    This man’s testimony is beautiful.

  • [1] June 25, 2014 at 4:50pm

    The difference: Rush Limbaugh enouraged Rs to vote for D. Here, Rs encouraged Ds to vote for Rs.

    One is treasonous to its party, the other is political shenanigans.

  • [4] June 25, 2014 at 4:44pm

    LOL…as soon as I saw the pic of the interior, I knew that was gonna be the punchline. I think there have been other stories of the same problem.

    Manual trans is its own security system.

123