*After I destroy America and ISIS destroys Israel.
July 6, 2015 at 3:38pm
endless examples? really? do you have a partial list?
and how is “caring” and “loving” defined in your examples?
And being raised in a Christian household automatically means “caring” and “loving?” that’s another surprise to me!
even your anecdotal, unprovable example is falling apart.
 July 6, 2015 at 3:34pm
I would agree with you except that “admitting her sin” was an anonymous post on redditt. That does not sound like someone taking responsibility. She’s actually hiding from it. Hopefully it’s the first step of many that she takes in owning her choice.
 July 6, 2015 at 1:34pm
The letter should’ve been signed Beaker because all I heard was “me, me, me, me, me, me!”
 July 6, 2015 at 12:38pm
It has been demonstrated that sexual preference/identity issues are directly related to the damage their sexual identity sustained as a child/adolescent. Having these “urges” is proof positive of the person having sustained abuse in some form, directly targeting their masculinity/femininity. The person may be unaware of the abuse, compounding the difficulty in determining its source. Which many people then conclude, “I was just born this way.” I am convinced this is false.
July 6, 2015 at 9:51am
Harmeless to Civilizations:
Don’t flatter yourself that you and your life are that important that God’s plans revolve around them.
 July 2, 2015 at 11:26am
IMHO, best candidate I’ve seen in a long while. Not perfect, no. But appears to not be an establishment puppet and is conservative on important issues to me (abortion, unions, big government)
 July 2, 2015 at 11:24am
Hmm…I live in WI, and most of what you say isn’t even true.
So what you are actually writing here is called libel.
 July 2, 2015 at 9:51am
Wrong on both counts.
1. The Judicial branch does not create law, the Legislative branch does. However this ruling (and Obamacare) actually created new law. Illegal ruling and the people are within their Constitutional right to defy it at all costs.
2. The government will use 501(c)3 status as leverage to force churches to perform the ceremonies. This tyrannical government was not stopped by laws before, why would something like forcing churches to perform the ceremonies “or else” stop them either?
I am sorry if I come across as arrogant. I’m quite a compassionate person. I am sure you would get upset with someone that denies the earth is round. And rightfully so. I get upset when sin is called “acceptable” or even “good.” I won’t stand for it. Calling sin “sin” is acting in truth, with integrity, and with kindness.
 July 1, 2015 at 4:52pm
Hm, so God’s way, 1 man and 1 woman, is more logical and simpler…
 July 1, 2015 at 3:24pm
“marriage was taking place before the birth of Christ”
And I again refer you to self-evident design, which is echoed throughout history, that the intended purpose is one man and one woman. To go against this requires a level of violation of natural and logical law. Hence the APA’s labeling homosexuality a mental disorder. They were right. It absolutely is. As is all sin.
 July 1, 2015 at 3:19pm
A druggy can argue doing drugs is his pursuit of happiness.
 July 1, 2015 at 3:16pm
Yes he does. And he has the right to be a hypocrite.
 July 1, 2015 at 1:43pm
The Blaze should really not be showing such offensive photos. I panicked when I saw the top of the General Lee because I’m pretty sure I’m going to jail now.
I hope you rot there, for even looking at it! Shame...
The Blaze and their subversive staff will be hunted down by the regime and their corporate whores!
 July 1, 2015 at 12:31pm
no, the corollary is not about religion, it’s about God’s intentional design. God creates with a purpose. The design of man and woman is self-evident, which is why marriage appears in all cultures. To go against it is a violation of, once again, self-evident purpose. So while I reference Christianity, I am more specifically referring to God and God incarnate (Jesus). If He invented marriage (which He did), then mankind cannot alter it, through religion or law.
You can rightfully argue that Kings of the Old Testament violate this sacred covenant, which they did. That doesn’t make God’s design null and void. If we call it sin, then we’re all on equal footing, and that messy area of sin is where God operates best, by offering us grace. If we refuse to call it sin, then we are a law unto ourselves and are not beholden to any power. Which is what we are seeing with those that refuse to see the issue as sin. Love truly is greater than hate, and homosexual acts (not the person, the acts themselves) are “detestable” to God, and are a self- and others-hating action of contempt.
 July 1, 2015 at 12:24pm
nothing predates Adam and Eve.
 July 1, 2015 at 12:21pm
Boy, the “f” for facebook is almost like the mark of the beast, sans compulsory use.