User Profile: Thornyrose13


Member Since: July 02, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [1] March 10, 2015 at 10:54pm

    If they are preaching to her, she should talk to human resources about hostile work environment, at least after making it clear to her co-workers that she does not wish to discuss religion at work. But how ironic that a man who believes in proselytizing is upset that someone would try to convert a christian. It all boils down to how much she likes her job and her pay.

  • March 4, 2015 at 1:08pm

    Does this place provide other services besides abortions? I would at least like to know the full story here.

  • March 4, 2015 at 1:07pm

    yet the bible does state that no sin is greater than another, except blaspheming the Holy Spirit. even THINKING about committing a sin equals the deed. So she is correct about people judging her.

  • [2] March 4, 2015 at 12:58pm

    Sounds like gelding some of the “stallions” young would discourage this sort of violence. This kind of misogyny needs to be dealt with in terms that make it clear that the men who believe they have the right to act like animals will be treated like the beasts they are.

  • [5] March 2, 2015 at 5:10pm

    where are the charges of perjury? each and everyone of those people need to be fired, and criminally prosecuted. I hope the people of the town wake up and do some housecleaning of their own.

  • February 27, 2015 at 11:07pm

    very true. he handled the disease with class, accepting the consequences of his years of smoking, while holding himself up as a warning and example.

  • February 27, 2015 at 11:05pm

    play the bagpipes maybe. but it would be awkward if they play Amazing Grace, given Mr. Nimoy was jewish. unless he happened to like the song and asked for it to be played.

  • [1] February 27, 2015 at 11:03pm

    not this time. I saw him in a Skype telecast in August, and while he looked good then, he did state he could not walk across a room without becoming extremely short of breath. This unfortunately isn’t a hoax.

  • [7] February 27, 2015 at 10:55pm

    I am proud to see my congressman’s name in the list.

  • December 19, 2014 at 11:45am

    Legally, the dog should be put down. Morally, it is reprehensible. As long as there is someone capable and willing to tend to this animal, and give it a loving and safe home for its remaining years, I cannot understand why someone would want their companion and friend killed just because they died. Anyone that heartless towards a simple animal is someone I would not trust with a human life.

  • [1] December 19, 2014 at 11:38am

    I think an easy way to let the studios and theater chains know how we feel is simple. I would recommend that on January 3, the first Saturday in the new year, everyone find something to do other than going to the movies. Rent Team America and watch it at home, find some other entertainment, but do NOT buy a ticket, popcorn, soda, etc for that one day. It is time to make them more afraid of their consumers than a little toad and his hacker crew.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] October 19, 2014 at 10:03pm

    When the Fire Department is there, civilians “assisting” can make the job harder. The firefighters have the training and equipment and the protocols to do the most good. If they have to divert resources to rescue would be rescuers, or slow down because bystanders are getting in the way, their job is made much harder. At the same time, i know many instances where volunteers/bystanders have been put to use in ways to allow the firefighters to do their job, namely saving lives and property.

    Responses (2) +
  • [209] October 9, 2014 at 1:47pm

    This woman’ s plan is not bravery. It is not cowardice. It is a rational choice of an individual faced with a future that offers pain, physical and mental debilitation, and financial ruin. In a land that recognizes the rights of individuals, the ability to make such choices should be respected, even if one disagrees with the choice.

    In reply to the contribution There Is Nothing Brave About Suicide

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] August 26, 2014 at 10:54am

    A real example for all. So I expect it will get little coverage outside of the Blaze. More heroism and less being passive victims is what our country needs.

  • [5] August 25, 2014 at 6:10pm

    Let him get out of his chauffeur driven limo and visit some of the areas involved. Let him spend some time with a police officer’s family, one who is still on the street, and a family who has lost someone in the line of duty. Let him look at how many crimes are committed, black on black, white on white, black on white, and white on black, and see where the real problems lie. Let him learn about the US as it is today, not in the 1970s, as he seems to think it is. At least the British have an appropriate word for him. Git.

  • [2] August 16, 2014 at 5:31pm

    a) I am an atheist. b) I think this lawsuit was frivolous and counter productive. c) A simple solution that should satisfy both parties is simple. Make Bibles, Qurans, Books of Mormon, or other religious texts available from the front desk. When checking in, people can simply request the boo, and leave it in the room when they leave.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 30, 2014 at 11:54am

    I don’t care who was lying about the incident. Upon Kyle’s death, Ventura could have taken the high road and dropped the suit. The fact that he did not speaks more for his character than did all of the witnesses. I admire Ventura for his past accomplishments, but he is tarnishing those achievements with his current actions. No winners here, as Ventura will find out in the long run.

  • [5] July 30, 2014 at 11:42am

    His point is valid. His choice of examples, not so well thought out. But I at least understand why he chose those examples. They are about as heinous acts as can be committed, and evoke a stronger reaction than say, using assault or even murder as examples. The Bible says that the thought of the sin is the same as committing the sin. How is that any different than what Dawkins is saying?

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] July 27, 2014 at 6:59am

    If the material tested is dated to within a fe thousand years, then it’s contamination. If the dinosaur was in fact only a few thousand years old, then we could expect a bit more than microscopic amounts of “soft material”. After all, we can retrieve dna from other animals that have died over 10,000 years old. Scientific method demands we carry out the tests, but it’s far too soon to claim that this is proof of creationism or young dinosaurs. Much more likely it will be external contamination or fraud that will be the cause.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] July 25, 2014 at 9:10pm

    my first question, what is the possibility of some sort of external contamination? Did the professor take that into account when handling the material? What tests were the “soft tissues” put to? Since the bones are organic, they can be carbon dated. UNLESS they are as old as scientists hold dinosaurs to be, in which case the testing will reveal nothing. His claim the bones are only a few thousand years old are thus easily provable. If he failed to do so and claimed the “soft tissue” is proof humans and dinosaurs coexisted, then yes, his religion is getting in the way of his scientific responsibilities.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love